Evaluation of a COVID‐19 fundamental nursing care guideline versus usual care: The COVID‐NURSE cluster randomized controlled trial

Aim To evaluate the impact of usual care plus a fundamental nursing care guideline compared to usual care only for patients in hospital with COVID‐19 on patient experience, care quality, functional ability, treatment outcomes, nurses' moral distress, patient health‐related quality of life and c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of advanced nursing 2024-05, Vol.80 (5), p.2137-2152
Hauptverfasser: Richards, David A., Bollen, Jess, Jones, Ben, Melendez‐Torres, G. J., Hulme, Claire, Cockcroft, Emma, Cook, Heather, Cooper, Joanne, Creanor, Siobhan, Cruickshank, Susanne, Dawe, Phoebe, Doris, Faye, Iles‐Smith, Heather, Kent, Merryn, Logan, Pip, O'Connell, Abby, Onysk, Jakub, Owens, Rosie, Quinn, Lynne, Rafferty, Anne Marie, Romanczuk, Lidia, Russell, Anne Marie, Shepherd, Maggie, Singh, Sally J., Sugg, Holly V. R., Coon, Jo Thompson, Tooze, Susannah, Warren, Fiona C., Whale, Bethany, Wootton, Stephen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2152
container_issue 5
container_start_page 2137
container_title Journal of advanced nursing
container_volume 80
creator Richards, David A.
Bollen, Jess
Jones, Ben
Melendez‐Torres, G. J.
Hulme, Claire
Cockcroft, Emma
Cook, Heather
Cooper, Joanne
Creanor, Siobhan
Cruickshank, Susanne
Dawe, Phoebe
Doris, Faye
Iles‐Smith, Heather
Kent, Merryn
Logan, Pip
O'Connell, Abby
Onysk, Jakub
Owens, Rosie
Quinn, Lynne
Rafferty, Anne Marie
Romanczuk, Lidia
Russell, Anne Marie
Shepherd, Maggie
Singh, Sally J.
Sugg, Holly V. R.
Coon, Jo Thompson
Tooze, Susannah
Warren, Fiona C.
Whale, Bethany
Wootton, Stephen
description Aim To evaluate the impact of usual care plus a fundamental nursing care guideline compared to usual care only for patients in hospital with COVID‐19 on patient experience, care quality, functional ability, treatment outcomes, nurses' moral distress, patient health‐related quality of life and cost‐effectiveness. Design Parallel two‐arm, cluster‐level randomized controlled trial. Methods Between 18th January and 20th December 2021, we recruited (i) adults aged 18 years and over with COVID‐19, excluding those invasively ventilated, admitted for at least three days or nights in UK Hospital Trusts; (ii) nurses caring for them. We randomly assigned hospitals to use a fundamental nursing care guideline and usual care or usual care only. Our patient‐reported co‐primary outcomes were the Relational Aspects of Care Questionnaire and four scales from the Quality from the Patient Perspective Questionnaire. We undertook intention‐to‐treat analyses. Results We randomized 15 clusters and recruited 581 patient and 418 nurse participants. Primary outcome data were available for 570–572 (98.1%–98.5%) patient participants in 14 clusters. We found no evidence of between‐group differences on any patient, nurse or economic outcomes. We found between‐group differences over time, in favour of the intervention, for three of our five co‐primary outcomes, and a significant interaction on one primary patient outcome for ethnicity (white British vs. other) and allocated group in favour of the intervention for the ‘other’ ethnicity subgroup. Conclusion We did not detect an overall difference in patient experience for a fundamental nursing care guideline compared to usual care. We have indications the guideline may have aided sustaining good practice over time and had a more positive impact on non‐white British patients' experience of care. Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care We cannot recommend the wholescale implementation of our guideline into routine nursing practice. Further intervention development, feasibility, pilot and evaluation studies are required. Impact Fundamental nursing care drives patient experience but is severely impacted in pandemics. Our guideline was not superior to usual care, albeit it may sustain good practice and have a positive impact on non‐white British patients' experience of care. Reporting Method CONSORT and CONSERVE. Patient or Public Contribution Patients with experience of hospitalization with COVID‐19 were involved in guideline devel
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jan.15959
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2892269097</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3039634671</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3489-5eacfb0a8da1bff9a91f004c39599269c2594394204fa9a702bcfbe3f0a81fa33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kbtuVDEQhi0EIptAwQsgSzSkOIlv52K6aFkgKEokSGitWR87eOVjB_s4KFRU1DwjT4LDhhRIuBlL882nGf0IPaPkgNZ3uIFwQFvZygdoQXnXNqwTw0O0IJzIhgnCdtBuzhtCKGeMPUY7vJdD14p-gX6srsEXmF0MOFoMeHn26fj1r-8_qcS2hBEmE2bwOJSUXbjEGpLBl8WNxrtg8LVJuWRccqnMbe8VPv9s7iWnFx8-rrD2Jc8m4QRhjJP7ZkasY5hT9L5-5-TAP0GPLPhsnt7VPXTxZnW-fNecnL09Xh6dNJqLQTatAW3XBIYR6NpaCZJaQoTm9XbJOqlZKwWXghFhQUJP2Lryhts6Qi1wvodebr1XKX4pJs9qclkb7yGYWLJig2TVQ2Rf0Rf_oJtYUqjbKU647Ljoelqp_S2lU8w5Gauukpsg3ShK1G04qoaj_oRT2ed3xrKezHhP_k2jAodb4Kvz5ub_JvX-6HSr_A1CX5rH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3039634671</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of a COVID‐19 fundamental nursing care guideline versus usual care: The COVID‐NURSE cluster randomized controlled trial</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Richards, David A. ; Bollen, Jess ; Jones, Ben ; Melendez‐Torres, G. J. ; Hulme, Claire ; Cockcroft, Emma ; Cook, Heather ; Cooper, Joanne ; Creanor, Siobhan ; Cruickshank, Susanne ; Dawe, Phoebe ; Doris, Faye ; Iles‐Smith, Heather ; Kent, Merryn ; Logan, Pip ; O'Connell, Abby ; Onysk, Jakub ; Owens, Rosie ; Quinn, Lynne ; Rafferty, Anne Marie ; Romanczuk, Lidia ; Russell, Anne Marie ; Shepherd, Maggie ; Singh, Sally J. ; Sugg, Holly V. R. ; Coon, Jo Thompson ; Tooze, Susannah ; Warren, Fiona C. ; Whale, Bethany ; Wootton, Stephen</creator><creatorcontrib>Richards, David A. ; Bollen, Jess ; Jones, Ben ; Melendez‐Torres, G. J. ; Hulme, Claire ; Cockcroft, Emma ; Cook, Heather ; Cooper, Joanne ; Creanor, Siobhan ; Cruickshank, Susanne ; Dawe, Phoebe ; Doris, Faye ; Iles‐Smith, Heather ; Kent, Merryn ; Logan, Pip ; O'Connell, Abby ; Onysk, Jakub ; Owens, Rosie ; Quinn, Lynne ; Rafferty, Anne Marie ; Romanczuk, Lidia ; Russell, Anne Marie ; Shepherd, Maggie ; Singh, Sally J. ; Sugg, Holly V. R. ; Coon, Jo Thompson ; Tooze, Susannah ; Warren, Fiona C. ; Whale, Bethany ; Wootton, Stephen</creatorcontrib><description>Aim To evaluate the impact of usual care plus a fundamental nursing care guideline compared to usual care only for patients in hospital with COVID‐19 on patient experience, care quality, functional ability, treatment outcomes, nurses' moral distress, patient health‐related quality of life and cost‐effectiveness. Design Parallel two‐arm, cluster‐level randomized controlled trial. Methods Between 18th January and 20th December 2021, we recruited (i) adults aged 18 years and over with COVID‐19, excluding those invasively ventilated, admitted for at least three days or nights in UK Hospital Trusts; (ii) nurses caring for them. We randomly assigned hospitals to use a fundamental nursing care guideline and usual care or usual care only. Our patient‐reported co‐primary outcomes were the Relational Aspects of Care Questionnaire and four scales from the Quality from the Patient Perspective Questionnaire. We undertook intention‐to‐treat analyses. Results We randomized 15 clusters and recruited 581 patient and 418 nurse participants. Primary outcome data were available for 570–572 (98.1%–98.5%) patient participants in 14 clusters. We found no evidence of between‐group differences on any patient, nurse or economic outcomes. We found between‐group differences over time, in favour of the intervention, for three of our five co‐primary outcomes, and a significant interaction on one primary patient outcome for ethnicity (white British vs. other) and allocated group in favour of the intervention for the ‘other’ ethnicity subgroup. Conclusion We did not detect an overall difference in patient experience for a fundamental nursing care guideline compared to usual care. We have indications the guideline may have aided sustaining good practice over time and had a more positive impact on non‐white British patients' experience of care. Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care We cannot recommend the wholescale implementation of our guideline into routine nursing practice. Further intervention development, feasibility, pilot and evaluation studies are required. Impact Fundamental nursing care drives patient experience but is severely impacted in pandemics. Our guideline was not superior to usual care, albeit it may sustain good practice and have a positive impact on non‐white British patients' experience of care. Reporting Method CONSORT and CONSERVE. Patient or Public Contribution Patients with experience of hospitalization with COVID‐19 were involved in guideline development and writing, trial management and interpretation of findings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0309-2402</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2648</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jan.15959</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37986547</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Clinical outcomes ; Clinical trials ; cluster randomized controlled trial ; Cost analysis ; COVID-19 ; Ethnicity ; Feasibility ; fundamental nursing care ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Intervention ; Nurses ; Nursing ; Nursing Care ; Pandemics ; patient experience ; Patients ; Professional practice ; Psychological distress ; Quality of care ; Quality of Life ; Questionnaires ; SARS‐COV‐2 ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Treatment Outcome ; Trusts</subject><ispartof>Journal of advanced nursing, 2024-05, Vol.80 (5), p.2137-2152</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. Journal of Advanced Nursing published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3489-5eacfb0a8da1bff9a91f004c39599269c2594394204fa9a702bcfbe3f0a81fa33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0468-3537 ; 0000-0002-8821-5027</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjan.15959$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjan.15959$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,30976,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37986547$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Richards, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bollen, Jess</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melendez‐Torres, G. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hulme, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cockcroft, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Creanor, Siobhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cruickshank, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawe, Phoebe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doris, Faye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iles‐Smith, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kent, Merryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Logan, Pip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connell, Abby</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onysk, Jakub</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owens, Rosie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quinn, Lynne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rafferty, Anne Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romanczuk, Lidia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russell, Anne Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shepherd, Maggie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Sally J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugg, Holly V. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coon, Jo Thompson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tooze, Susannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warren, Fiona C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whale, Bethany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wootton, Stephen</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of a COVID‐19 fundamental nursing care guideline versus usual care: The COVID‐NURSE cluster randomized controlled trial</title><title>Journal of advanced nursing</title><addtitle>J Adv Nurs</addtitle><description>Aim To evaluate the impact of usual care plus a fundamental nursing care guideline compared to usual care only for patients in hospital with COVID‐19 on patient experience, care quality, functional ability, treatment outcomes, nurses' moral distress, patient health‐related quality of life and cost‐effectiveness. Design Parallel two‐arm, cluster‐level randomized controlled trial. Methods Between 18th January and 20th December 2021, we recruited (i) adults aged 18 years and over with COVID‐19, excluding those invasively ventilated, admitted for at least three days or nights in UK Hospital Trusts; (ii) nurses caring for them. We randomly assigned hospitals to use a fundamental nursing care guideline and usual care or usual care only. Our patient‐reported co‐primary outcomes were the Relational Aspects of Care Questionnaire and four scales from the Quality from the Patient Perspective Questionnaire. We undertook intention‐to‐treat analyses. Results We randomized 15 clusters and recruited 581 patient and 418 nurse participants. Primary outcome data were available for 570–572 (98.1%–98.5%) patient participants in 14 clusters. We found no evidence of between‐group differences on any patient, nurse or economic outcomes. We found between‐group differences over time, in favour of the intervention, for three of our five co‐primary outcomes, and a significant interaction on one primary patient outcome for ethnicity (white British vs. other) and allocated group in favour of the intervention for the ‘other’ ethnicity subgroup. Conclusion We did not detect an overall difference in patient experience for a fundamental nursing care guideline compared to usual care. We have indications the guideline may have aided sustaining good practice over time and had a more positive impact on non‐white British patients' experience of care. Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care We cannot recommend the wholescale implementation of our guideline into routine nursing practice. Further intervention development, feasibility, pilot and evaluation studies are required. Impact Fundamental nursing care drives patient experience but is severely impacted in pandemics. Our guideline was not superior to usual care, albeit it may sustain good practice and have a positive impact on non‐white British patients' experience of care. Reporting Method CONSORT and CONSERVE. Patient or Public Contribution Patients with experience of hospitalization with COVID‐19 were involved in guideline development and writing, trial management and interpretation of findings.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>cluster randomized controlled trial</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Feasibility</subject><subject>fundamental nursing care</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing Care</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>patient experience</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Professional practice</subject><subject>Psychological distress</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>SARS‐COV‐2</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Trusts</subject><issn>0309-2402</issn><issn>1365-2648</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kbtuVDEQhi0EIptAwQsgSzSkOIlv52K6aFkgKEokSGitWR87eOVjB_s4KFRU1DwjT4LDhhRIuBlL882nGf0IPaPkgNZ3uIFwQFvZygdoQXnXNqwTw0O0IJzIhgnCdtBuzhtCKGeMPUY7vJdD14p-gX6srsEXmF0MOFoMeHn26fj1r-8_qcS2hBEmE2bwOJSUXbjEGpLBl8WNxrtg8LVJuWRccqnMbe8VPv9s7iWnFx8-rrD2Jc8m4QRhjJP7ZkasY5hT9L5-5-TAP0GPLPhsnt7VPXTxZnW-fNecnL09Xh6dNJqLQTatAW3XBIYR6NpaCZJaQoTm9XbJOqlZKwWXghFhQUJP2Lryhts6Qi1wvodebr1XKX4pJs9qclkb7yGYWLJig2TVQ2Rf0Rf_oJtYUqjbKU647Ljoelqp_S2lU8w5Gauukpsg3ShK1G04qoaj_oRT2ed3xrKezHhP_k2jAodb4Kvz5ub_JvX-6HSr_A1CX5rH</recordid><startdate>202405</startdate><enddate>202405</enddate><creator>Richards, David A.</creator><creator>Bollen, Jess</creator><creator>Jones, Ben</creator><creator>Melendez‐Torres, G. J.</creator><creator>Hulme, Claire</creator><creator>Cockcroft, Emma</creator><creator>Cook, Heather</creator><creator>Cooper, Joanne</creator><creator>Creanor, Siobhan</creator><creator>Cruickshank, Susanne</creator><creator>Dawe, Phoebe</creator><creator>Doris, Faye</creator><creator>Iles‐Smith, Heather</creator><creator>Kent, Merryn</creator><creator>Logan, Pip</creator><creator>O'Connell, Abby</creator><creator>Onysk, Jakub</creator><creator>Owens, Rosie</creator><creator>Quinn, Lynne</creator><creator>Rafferty, Anne Marie</creator><creator>Romanczuk, Lidia</creator><creator>Russell, Anne Marie</creator><creator>Shepherd, Maggie</creator><creator>Singh, Sally J.</creator><creator>Sugg, Holly V. R.</creator><creator>Coon, Jo Thompson</creator><creator>Tooze, Susannah</creator><creator>Warren, Fiona C.</creator><creator>Whale, Bethany</creator><creator>Wootton, Stephen</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0468-3537</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8821-5027</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202405</creationdate><title>Evaluation of a COVID‐19 fundamental nursing care guideline versus usual care: The COVID‐NURSE cluster randomized controlled trial</title><author>Richards, David A. ; Bollen, Jess ; Jones, Ben ; Melendez‐Torres, G. J. ; Hulme, Claire ; Cockcroft, Emma ; Cook, Heather ; Cooper, Joanne ; Creanor, Siobhan ; Cruickshank, Susanne ; Dawe, Phoebe ; Doris, Faye ; Iles‐Smith, Heather ; Kent, Merryn ; Logan, Pip ; O'Connell, Abby ; Onysk, Jakub ; Owens, Rosie ; Quinn, Lynne ; Rafferty, Anne Marie ; Romanczuk, Lidia ; Russell, Anne Marie ; Shepherd, Maggie ; Singh, Sally J. ; Sugg, Holly V. R. ; Coon, Jo Thompson ; Tooze, Susannah ; Warren, Fiona C. ; Whale, Bethany ; Wootton, Stephen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3489-5eacfb0a8da1bff9a91f004c39599269c2594394204fa9a702bcfbe3f0a81fa33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>cluster randomized controlled trial</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Feasibility</topic><topic>fundamental nursing care</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing Care</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>patient experience</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Professional practice</topic><topic>Psychological distress</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>SARS‐COV‐2</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Trusts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Richards, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bollen, Jess</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melendez‐Torres, G. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hulme, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cockcroft, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Creanor, Siobhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cruickshank, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawe, Phoebe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doris, Faye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iles‐Smith, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kent, Merryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Logan, Pip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connell, Abby</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onysk, Jakub</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owens, Rosie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quinn, Lynne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rafferty, Anne Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romanczuk, Lidia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russell, Anne Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shepherd, Maggie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Sally J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugg, Holly V. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coon, Jo Thompson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tooze, Susannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warren, Fiona C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whale, Bethany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wootton, Stephen</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of advanced nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Richards, David A.</au><au>Bollen, Jess</au><au>Jones, Ben</au><au>Melendez‐Torres, G. J.</au><au>Hulme, Claire</au><au>Cockcroft, Emma</au><au>Cook, Heather</au><au>Cooper, Joanne</au><au>Creanor, Siobhan</au><au>Cruickshank, Susanne</au><au>Dawe, Phoebe</au><au>Doris, Faye</au><au>Iles‐Smith, Heather</au><au>Kent, Merryn</au><au>Logan, Pip</au><au>O'Connell, Abby</au><au>Onysk, Jakub</au><au>Owens, Rosie</au><au>Quinn, Lynne</au><au>Rafferty, Anne Marie</au><au>Romanczuk, Lidia</au><au>Russell, Anne Marie</au><au>Shepherd, Maggie</au><au>Singh, Sally J.</au><au>Sugg, Holly V. R.</au><au>Coon, Jo Thompson</au><au>Tooze, Susannah</au><au>Warren, Fiona C.</au><au>Whale, Bethany</au><au>Wootton, Stephen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of a COVID‐19 fundamental nursing care guideline versus usual care: The COVID‐NURSE cluster randomized controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of advanced nursing</jtitle><addtitle>J Adv Nurs</addtitle><date>2024-05</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2137</spage><epage>2152</epage><pages>2137-2152</pages><issn>0309-2402</issn><eissn>1365-2648</eissn><abstract>Aim To evaluate the impact of usual care plus a fundamental nursing care guideline compared to usual care only for patients in hospital with COVID‐19 on patient experience, care quality, functional ability, treatment outcomes, nurses' moral distress, patient health‐related quality of life and cost‐effectiveness. Design Parallel two‐arm, cluster‐level randomized controlled trial. Methods Between 18th January and 20th December 2021, we recruited (i) adults aged 18 years and over with COVID‐19, excluding those invasively ventilated, admitted for at least three days or nights in UK Hospital Trusts; (ii) nurses caring for them. We randomly assigned hospitals to use a fundamental nursing care guideline and usual care or usual care only. Our patient‐reported co‐primary outcomes were the Relational Aspects of Care Questionnaire and four scales from the Quality from the Patient Perspective Questionnaire. We undertook intention‐to‐treat analyses. Results We randomized 15 clusters and recruited 581 patient and 418 nurse participants. Primary outcome data were available for 570–572 (98.1%–98.5%) patient participants in 14 clusters. We found no evidence of between‐group differences on any patient, nurse or economic outcomes. We found between‐group differences over time, in favour of the intervention, for three of our five co‐primary outcomes, and a significant interaction on one primary patient outcome for ethnicity (white British vs. other) and allocated group in favour of the intervention for the ‘other’ ethnicity subgroup. Conclusion We did not detect an overall difference in patient experience for a fundamental nursing care guideline compared to usual care. We have indications the guideline may have aided sustaining good practice over time and had a more positive impact on non‐white British patients' experience of care. Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care We cannot recommend the wholescale implementation of our guideline into routine nursing practice. Further intervention development, feasibility, pilot and evaluation studies are required. Impact Fundamental nursing care drives patient experience but is severely impacted in pandemics. Our guideline was not superior to usual care, albeit it may sustain good practice and have a positive impact on non‐white British patients' experience of care. Reporting Method CONSORT and CONSERVE. Patient or Public Contribution Patients with experience of hospitalization with COVID‐19 were involved in guideline development and writing, trial management and interpretation of findings.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>37986547</pmid><doi>10.1111/jan.15959</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0468-3537</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8821-5027</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0309-2402
ispartof Journal of advanced nursing, 2024-05, Vol.80 (5), p.2137-2152
issn 0309-2402
1365-2648
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2892269097
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Clinical outcomes
Clinical trials
cluster randomized controlled trial
Cost analysis
COVID-19
Ethnicity
Feasibility
fundamental nursing care
Hospitalization
Humans
Intervention
Nurses
Nursing
Nursing Care
Pandemics
patient experience
Patients
Professional practice
Psychological distress
Quality of care
Quality of Life
Questionnaires
SARS‐COV‐2
Surveys and Questionnaires
Treatment Outcome
Trusts
title Evaluation of a COVID‐19 fundamental nursing care guideline versus usual care: The COVID‐NURSE cluster randomized controlled trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T18%3A59%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20a%20COVID%E2%80%9019%20fundamental%20nursing%20care%20guideline%20versus%20usual%20care:%20The%20COVID%E2%80%90NURSE%20cluster%20randomized%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20advanced%20nursing&rft.au=Richards,%20David%20A.&rft.date=2024-05&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2137&rft.epage=2152&rft.pages=2137-2152&rft.issn=0309-2402&rft.eissn=1365-2648&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jan.15959&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3039634671%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3039634671&rft_id=info:pmid/37986547&rfr_iscdi=true