Complete Transesophageal Assessment of the Aortic Valve Using the Continuity Equation in Equivocal Cases of Aortic Stenosis

BACKGROUNDThe continuity equation (CE) used for evaluating aortic stenosis (AS) is based on values obtained from transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) with the assumption that the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) has a circular shape. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) may be used for accura...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Israel Medical Association journal 2023-11, Vol.25 (11), p.747-751
Hauptverfasser: Moady, Gassan, Serhan, Moanis, Atar, Shaul, Shturman, Alexander
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 751
container_issue 11
container_start_page 747
container_title The Israel Medical Association journal
container_volume 25
creator Moady, Gassan
Serhan, Moanis
Atar, Shaul
Shturman, Alexander
description BACKGROUNDThe continuity equation (CE) used for evaluating aortic stenosis (AS) is based on values obtained from transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) with the assumption that the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) has a circular shape. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) may be used for accurate measurement of the LVOT cross-sectional area (CSA). Previous studies have focused on fusion from TEE for LVOT-CSA measurement and TTE for velocity time integrals (VTI) calculations.OBJECTIVESTo assess aortic valve area (AVA) using parameters obtained exclusively from TEE as an alternative approach.METHODSThirty patients with equivocal AS based on TTE were evaluated using TEE for further assessment.RESULTSThe mean pressure gradient across the aortic valve (AV) was 38 ± 5.9 and 37.9 ± 7.6 mmHg in TTE and TEE, respectively, P = 0.42. LVOT-CSA was larger in TEE (3.6 ± 0.3 vs. 3.4 ± 0.3 cm2, P = 0.049). VTI over the AVA was similar (98.54 ± 22.8 and 99.52 ± 24.52 cm in TTE and TEE, respectively, P = 0.608), while VTI across the LVOT was higher when measured by TTE (24.06 ± 5.8 vs. 22.03 ± 4.3 cm, P < 0.009). Using the CE, AVA was 0.82 ± 0.3 vs. 0.83 ± 0.17 cm2 in TEE vs. TTE, respectively, P = 0.608. Definitive grading was achieved in all patients (26 patients defined with severe AS and 4 with moderate).CONCLUSIONSIn equivocal cases of AS, full assessment using TEE may be a reliable modality for decision making.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2892011941</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2892011941</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p188t-b83b2bf1f9a7ff135ed69e912144bfd47e67078407541c2492c9aae4cc4e42e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzLtOwzAUBuAMIFEK7-CRJZLt2Ik9RlG5SJUYaFkrxz1ujRI7zXEqIV6eFDr9l-G7yRZMljJnVKm77B7xi1IuJdWL7KeJ_dBBArIZTUDAOBzNAUxHapwX9hASiY6kI5A6jslb8mm6M5At-nD4u5sYkg-TT99kdZpM8jEQHy7dn6OdpcbM0gW5Ah8JQkSPD9mtMx3C4zWX2fZ5tWle8_X7y1tTr_OBKZXyVhUtbx1z2lTOsULCvtSgGWdCtG4vKigrWilBKymY5UJzq40BYa0AwaEsltnTvzuM8TQBpl3v0ULXmQBxwh1XmlPGtGDFL5ZrXGM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2892011941</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Complete Transesophageal Assessment of the Aortic Valve Using the Continuity Equation in Equivocal Cases of Aortic Stenosis</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Moady, Gassan ; Serhan, Moanis ; Atar, Shaul ; Shturman, Alexander</creator><creatorcontrib>Moady, Gassan ; Serhan, Moanis ; Atar, Shaul ; Shturman, Alexander</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUNDThe continuity equation (CE) used for evaluating aortic stenosis (AS) is based on values obtained from transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) with the assumption that the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) has a circular shape. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) may be used for accurate measurement of the LVOT cross-sectional area (CSA). Previous studies have focused on fusion from TEE for LVOT-CSA measurement and TTE for velocity time integrals (VTI) calculations.OBJECTIVESTo assess aortic valve area (AVA) using parameters obtained exclusively from TEE as an alternative approach.METHODSThirty patients with equivocal AS based on TTE were evaluated using TEE for further assessment.RESULTSThe mean pressure gradient across the aortic valve (AV) was 38 ± 5.9 and 37.9 ± 7.6 mmHg in TTE and TEE, respectively, P = 0.42. LVOT-CSA was larger in TEE (3.6 ± 0.3 vs. 3.4 ± 0.3 cm2, P = 0.049). VTI over the AVA was similar (98.54 ± 22.8 and 99.52 ± 24.52 cm in TTE and TEE, respectively, P = 0.608), while VTI across the LVOT was higher when measured by TTE (24.06 ± 5.8 vs. 22.03 ± 4.3 cm, P &lt; 0.009). Using the CE, AVA was 0.82 ± 0.3 vs. 0.83 ± 0.17 cm2 in TEE vs. TTE, respectively, P = 0.608. Definitive grading was achieved in all patients (26 patients defined with severe AS and 4 with moderate).CONCLUSIONSIn equivocal cases of AS, full assessment using TEE may be a reliable modality for decision making.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1565-1088</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The Israel Medical Association journal, 2023-11, Vol.25 (11), p.747-751</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moady, Gassan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serhan, Moanis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atar, Shaul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shturman, Alexander</creatorcontrib><title>Complete Transesophageal Assessment of the Aortic Valve Using the Continuity Equation in Equivocal Cases of Aortic Stenosis</title><title>The Israel Medical Association journal</title><description>BACKGROUNDThe continuity equation (CE) used for evaluating aortic stenosis (AS) is based on values obtained from transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) with the assumption that the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) has a circular shape. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) may be used for accurate measurement of the LVOT cross-sectional area (CSA). Previous studies have focused on fusion from TEE for LVOT-CSA measurement and TTE for velocity time integrals (VTI) calculations.OBJECTIVESTo assess aortic valve area (AVA) using parameters obtained exclusively from TEE as an alternative approach.METHODSThirty patients with equivocal AS based on TTE were evaluated using TEE for further assessment.RESULTSThe mean pressure gradient across the aortic valve (AV) was 38 ± 5.9 and 37.9 ± 7.6 mmHg in TTE and TEE, respectively, P = 0.42. LVOT-CSA was larger in TEE (3.6 ± 0.3 vs. 3.4 ± 0.3 cm2, P = 0.049). VTI over the AVA was similar (98.54 ± 22.8 and 99.52 ± 24.52 cm in TTE and TEE, respectively, P = 0.608), while VTI across the LVOT was higher when measured by TTE (24.06 ± 5.8 vs. 22.03 ± 4.3 cm, P &lt; 0.009). Using the CE, AVA was 0.82 ± 0.3 vs. 0.83 ± 0.17 cm2 in TEE vs. TTE, respectively, P = 0.608. Definitive grading was achieved in all patients (26 patients defined with severe AS and 4 with moderate).CONCLUSIONSIn equivocal cases of AS, full assessment using TEE may be a reliable modality for decision making.</description><issn>1565-1088</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotzLtOwzAUBuAMIFEK7-CRJZLt2Ik9RlG5SJUYaFkrxz1ujRI7zXEqIV6eFDr9l-G7yRZMljJnVKm77B7xi1IuJdWL7KeJ_dBBArIZTUDAOBzNAUxHapwX9hASiY6kI5A6jslb8mm6M5At-nD4u5sYkg-TT99kdZpM8jEQHy7dn6OdpcbM0gW5Ah8JQkSPD9mtMx3C4zWX2fZ5tWle8_X7y1tTr_OBKZXyVhUtbx1z2lTOsULCvtSgGWdCtG4vKigrWilBKymY5UJzq40BYa0AwaEsltnTvzuM8TQBpl3v0ULXmQBxwh1XmlPGtGDFL5ZrXGM</recordid><startdate>20231101</startdate><enddate>20231101</enddate><creator>Moady, Gassan</creator><creator>Serhan, Moanis</creator><creator>Atar, Shaul</creator><creator>Shturman, Alexander</creator><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231101</creationdate><title>Complete Transesophageal Assessment of the Aortic Valve Using the Continuity Equation in Equivocal Cases of Aortic Stenosis</title><author>Moady, Gassan ; Serhan, Moanis ; Atar, Shaul ; Shturman, Alexander</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p188t-b83b2bf1f9a7ff135ed69e912144bfd47e67078407541c2492c9aae4cc4e42e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moady, Gassan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serhan, Moanis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atar, Shaul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shturman, Alexander</creatorcontrib><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Israel Medical Association journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moady, Gassan</au><au>Serhan, Moanis</au><au>Atar, Shaul</au><au>Shturman, Alexander</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Complete Transesophageal Assessment of the Aortic Valve Using the Continuity Equation in Equivocal Cases of Aortic Stenosis</atitle><jtitle>The Israel Medical Association journal</jtitle><date>2023-11-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>747</spage><epage>751</epage><pages>747-751</pages><issn>1565-1088</issn><abstract>BACKGROUNDThe continuity equation (CE) used for evaluating aortic stenosis (AS) is based on values obtained from transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) with the assumption that the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) has a circular shape. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) may be used for accurate measurement of the LVOT cross-sectional area (CSA). Previous studies have focused on fusion from TEE for LVOT-CSA measurement and TTE for velocity time integrals (VTI) calculations.OBJECTIVESTo assess aortic valve area (AVA) using parameters obtained exclusively from TEE as an alternative approach.METHODSThirty patients with equivocal AS based on TTE were evaluated using TEE for further assessment.RESULTSThe mean pressure gradient across the aortic valve (AV) was 38 ± 5.9 and 37.9 ± 7.6 mmHg in TTE and TEE, respectively, P = 0.42. LVOT-CSA was larger in TEE (3.6 ± 0.3 vs. 3.4 ± 0.3 cm2, P = 0.049). VTI over the AVA was similar (98.54 ± 22.8 and 99.52 ± 24.52 cm in TTE and TEE, respectively, P = 0.608), while VTI across the LVOT was higher when measured by TTE (24.06 ± 5.8 vs. 22.03 ± 4.3 cm, P &lt; 0.009). Using the CE, AVA was 0.82 ± 0.3 vs. 0.83 ± 0.17 cm2 in TEE vs. TTE, respectively, P = 0.608. Definitive grading was achieved in all patients (26 patients defined with severe AS and 4 with moderate).CONCLUSIONSIn equivocal cases of AS, full assessment using TEE may be a reliable modality for decision making.</abstract><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1565-1088
ispartof The Israel Medical Association journal, 2023-11, Vol.25 (11), p.747-751
issn 1565-1088
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2892011941
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Complete Transesophageal Assessment of the Aortic Valve Using the Continuity Equation in Equivocal Cases of Aortic Stenosis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T21%3A59%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Complete%20Transesophageal%20Assessment%20of%20the%20Aortic%20Valve%20Using%20the%20Continuity%20Equation%20in%20Equivocal%20Cases%20of%20Aortic%20Stenosis&rft.jtitle=The%20Israel%20Medical%20Association%20journal&rft.au=Moady,%20Gassan&rft.date=2023-11-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=747&rft.epage=751&rft.pages=747-751&rft.issn=1565-1088&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2892011941%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2892011941&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true