Prediction, prognosis, and professionalism in perioperative medicine

Prediction, prognosis, and professionalism in perioperative medicine

Guidelines provide a framework to take better care of our patients. They are published by different professional groups and are based on all the research done for us by hardworking colleagues. Compiling a guideline is an enormous amount of work and is generally done with the utmost care. However, re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of anaesthesia : BJA 2024-01, Vol.132 (1), p.13-14
Hauptverfasser: van Lier, Felix, Hoeks, Sanne, Pearse, Rupert M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 14
container_issue 1
container_start_page 13
container_title British journal of anaesthesia : BJA
container_volume 132
creator van Lier, Felix
Hoeks, Sanne
Pearse, Rupert M
description Guidelines provide a framework to take better care of our patients. They are published by different professional groups and are based on all the research done for us by hardworking colleagues. Compiling a guideline is an enormous amount of work and is generally done with the utmost care. However, recommendations often require a subjective interpretation of published research, where personal and academic interests can influence the outcome. We discuss two recently published guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular assessment that led to different conclusions on some important areas of patient care.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.bja.2023.10.021
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2891758297</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2891758297</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-66a59fbe6c58f9ae7d3a128f618251cef8e92637e576fa6e5ea0ad6a3d96a7463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwAWxQliya4LFrO14i3lIlWMDacpMxcpRHsVMk_h5HLWxmNI97NXMIuQRaAAV50xSbxhaMMp7qgjI4InNYKcilUnBM5pRSlVMNbEbOYmwoBcW0OCUzrrRSWog5uX8LWPtq9EO_zLZh-OyH6OMys309lQ5jTCPb-thlvs-2GPyQgh39N2bdJPU9npMTZ9uIF4e8IB-PD-93z_n69enl7nadV0zwMZfSCu02KCtROm1R1dwCK52Ekgmo0JWomeQKhZLOShRoqa2l5bWWVq0kX5DrvW-67GuHcTSdjxW2re1x2EXDSg1KlEyrtAr71SoMMQZ0Zht8Z8OPAWomeKYxCZ6Z4E2tBC9prg72u0167V_xR4v_AgSMbCQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2891758297</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prediction, prognosis, and professionalism in perioperative medicine</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>van Lier, Felix ; Hoeks, Sanne ; Pearse, Rupert M</creator><creatorcontrib>van Lier, Felix ; Hoeks, Sanne ; Pearse, Rupert M</creatorcontrib><description>Guidelines provide a framework to take better care of our patients. They are published by different professional groups and are based on all the research done for us by hardworking colleagues. Compiling a guideline is an enormous amount of work and is generally done with the utmost care. However, recommendations often require a subjective interpretation of published research, where personal and academic interests can influence the outcome. We discuss two recently published guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular assessment that led to different conclusions on some important areas of patient care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0912</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6771</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.10.021</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37977955</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><ispartof>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA, 2024-01, Vol.132 (1), p.13-14</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023 British Journal of Anaesthesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-66a59fbe6c58f9ae7d3a128f618251cef8e92637e576fa6e5ea0ad6a3d96a7463</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8271-619X ; 0000-0003-4022-9574 ; 0000-0002-4373-5934</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37977955$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>van Lier, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoeks, Sanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearse, Rupert M</creatorcontrib><title>Prediction, prognosis, and professionalism in perioperative medicine</title><title>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</title><addtitle>Br J Anaesth</addtitle><description>Guidelines provide a framework to take better care of our patients. They are published by different professional groups and are based on all the research done for us by hardworking colleagues. Compiling a guideline is an enormous amount of work and is generally done with the utmost care. However, recommendations often require a subjective interpretation of published research, where personal and academic interests can influence the outcome. We discuss two recently published guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular assessment that led to different conclusions on some important areas of patient care.</description><issn>0007-0912</issn><issn>1471-6771</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwAWxQliya4LFrO14i3lIlWMDacpMxcpRHsVMk_h5HLWxmNI97NXMIuQRaAAV50xSbxhaMMp7qgjI4InNYKcilUnBM5pRSlVMNbEbOYmwoBcW0OCUzrrRSWog5uX8LWPtq9EO_zLZh-OyH6OMys309lQ5jTCPb-thlvs-2GPyQgh39N2bdJPU9npMTZ9uIF4e8IB-PD-93z_n69enl7nadV0zwMZfSCu02KCtROm1R1dwCK52Ekgmo0JWomeQKhZLOShRoqa2l5bWWVq0kX5DrvW-67GuHcTSdjxW2re1x2EXDSg1KlEyrtAr71SoMMQZ0Zht8Z8OPAWomeKYxCZ6Z4E2tBC9prg72u0167V_xR4v_AgSMbCQ</recordid><startdate>202401</startdate><enddate>202401</enddate><creator>van Lier, Felix</creator><creator>Hoeks, Sanne</creator><creator>Pearse, Rupert M</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8271-619X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4022-9574</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4373-5934</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202401</creationdate><title>Prediction, prognosis, and professionalism in perioperative medicine</title><author>van Lier, Felix ; Hoeks, Sanne ; Pearse, Rupert M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-66a59fbe6c58f9ae7d3a128f618251cef8e92637e576fa6e5ea0ad6a3d96a7463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van Lier, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoeks, Sanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearse, Rupert M</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van Lier, Felix</au><au>Hoeks, Sanne</au><au>Pearse, Rupert M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prediction, prognosis, and professionalism in perioperative medicine</atitle><jtitle>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Anaesth</addtitle><date>2024-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>132</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>13</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>13-14</pages><issn>0007-0912</issn><eissn>1471-6771</eissn><abstract>Guidelines provide a framework to take better care of our patients. They are published by different professional groups and are based on all the research done for us by hardworking colleagues. Compiling a guideline is an enormous amount of work and is generally done with the utmost care. However, recommendations often require a subjective interpretation of published research, where personal and academic interests can influence the outcome. We discuss two recently published guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular assessment that led to different conclusions on some important areas of patient care.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>37977955</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bja.2023.10.021</doi><tpages>2</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8271-619X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4022-9574</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4373-5934</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-0912
ispartof British journal of anaesthesia : BJA, 2024-01, Vol.132 (1), p.13-14
issn 0007-0912
1471-6771
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2891758297
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Prediction, prognosis, and professionalism in perioperative medicine
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T19%3A58%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prediction,%20prognosis,%20and%20professionalism%20in%20perioperative%20medicine&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20anaesthesia%20:%20BJA&rft.au=van%20Lier,%20Felix&rft.date=2024-01&rft.volume=132&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=13&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=13-14&rft.issn=0007-0912&rft.eissn=1471-6771&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bja.2023.10.021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2891758297%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2891758297&rft_id=info:pmid/37977955&rfr_iscdi=true