Well‐controlled disease activity with drug treatment will not improve the frailty status of RA patients to robust state: A multicenter observational study (T‐FLAG)
Objectives To investigate a plateau in treatment enhancement for improving the frailty status of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Methods A total of 345 RA patients who were not robust in 2021 were assigned to the improved (“robust 2022,” n = 51) and non‐improved (“pre‐frailty/frailty 2022,” n = ...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of rheumatic diseases 2024-01, Vol.27 (1), p.e14946-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | e14946 |
container_title | International journal of rheumatic diseases |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Ohashi, Yoshifumi Takahashi, Nobunori Sobue, Yasumori Suzuki, Mochihito Sato, Ryo Maeda, Masataka Terabe, Kenya Asai, Shuji Imagama, Shiro |
description | Objectives
To investigate a plateau in treatment enhancement for improving the frailty status of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.
Methods
A total of 345 RA patients who were not robust in 2021 were assigned to the improved (“robust 2022,” n = 51) and non‐improved (“pre‐frailty/frailty 2022,” n = 294) groups. Factors associated with “robust 2022” were examined by logistic regression analysis. Patients were assigned to the stable (Follow‐up mean DAS28‐ESR in 2020 and 2021 |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1756-185X.14946 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2891755756</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2891755756</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3386-8e1f834b106176cc75c69c0861d22d127fd85d9802d60a1ff9ea8b7120ef85f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkbFuFDEQhi0EIiFQ0yGXobjE3r31eulWEQlIJ4HQSdBZXntMjLzrw_Yeuo5H4BEoeQ4ehSdhLheuxY2tmW9-ef6fkOecXXA8l7xtxILL5tMFX3ZL8YCcHisPj-8lPyFPcv7CmOC1aB-Tk7rtsNWwU_LrI4Tw5_sPE6eSYghgqfUZdAaqTfFbX3b0my-31Kb5My0JdBlhKlgLgU6xUD9uUtwCLbdAXdI-4EAuusyZRkc_9HSji8eJTEukKQ5zLnd9eEX73z_HORRvsA2JxiFD2iIdJx2Qme2Onq_xb9er_ublU_LI6ZDh2f19RtbXr9dXbxardzdvr_rVwtS1FAsJ3Ml6OXDctRXGtI0RnWFScFtVllets7KxnWSVFUxz5zrQcmh5xcDJxtVn5Pwgi1t9nSEXNfps0CM9QZyzqmSHrjboHqKXB9SkmHMCpzbJjzrtFGdqn47a-6_2Wai7dHDixb34PIxgj_y_OBBoDgDaC7v_6an-_eog_BdINJ_j</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2891755756</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Well‐controlled disease activity with drug treatment will not improve the frailty status of RA patients to robust state: A multicenter observational study (T‐FLAG)</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Ohashi, Yoshifumi ; Takahashi, Nobunori ; Sobue, Yasumori ; Suzuki, Mochihito ; Sato, Ryo ; Maeda, Masataka ; Terabe, Kenya ; Asai, Shuji ; Imagama, Shiro</creator><creatorcontrib>Ohashi, Yoshifumi ; Takahashi, Nobunori ; Sobue, Yasumori ; Suzuki, Mochihito ; Sato, Ryo ; Maeda, Masataka ; Terabe, Kenya ; Asai, Shuji ; Imagama, Shiro</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
To investigate a plateau in treatment enhancement for improving the frailty status of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.
Methods
A total of 345 RA patients who were not robust in 2021 were assigned to the improved (“robust 2022,” n = 51) and non‐improved (“pre‐frailty/frailty 2022,” n = 294) groups. Factors associated with “robust 2022” were examined by logistic regression analysis. Patients were assigned to the stable (Follow‐up mean DAS28‐ESR in 2020 and 2021 < 3.2, n = 225) and unstable (≥3.2, n = 120) groups, which were further divided into the non‐improved (stable: n = 180, unstable: n = 114) and improved (stable: n = 45, unstable: n = 6) groups. Factors influencing Japanese Cardiovascular Health Study (J‐CHS) score were examined by multiple regression analysis. Changes over 2 years were compared between the non‐improved and improved groups of the stable group.
Results
The associated factor of “robust 2022” was the follow‐up meanDAS28‐ESR in 2020 and 2021 < 3.2 (i.e., stable state) (OR: 4.01). Follow‐up mean DAS28‐ESR in 2020 and 2021 was associated with J‐CHS score (T = 2.536, p = .013) only in the unstable group. In the stable group, HAQ‐DI was lower (2020: 0.32 vs. 0.16; 2021: 0.32 vs. 0.17; 2022: 0.32 vs. 0.21), and the proportion of J‐CHS: Q4 (weakness) was lower (2020: 48.4 vs. 17.8%; 2021: 55.0 vs. 29.2%; 2022: 50.4 vs. 0%), in the improved group than in the non‐improved group, whereas both groups maintained clinical and functional remission over 2 years.
Conclusions
Drug treatment to maintain well‐controlled disease activity alone is insufficient for improving patients' frailty status after achieving treat‐to‐target goals, suggesting the need for multifaceted approaches.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1756-1841</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-185X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1756-185X.14946</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37975650</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>frailty ; general physical activity ; rheumatoid arthritis ; robust ; target to treat ; treatment enhancement</subject><ispartof>International journal of rheumatic diseases, 2024-01, Vol.27 (1), p.e14946-n/a</ispartof><rights>2023 Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3386-8e1f834b106176cc75c69c0861d22d127fd85d9802d60a1ff9ea8b7120ef85f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6937-3567 ; 0000-0002-7521-6928 ; 0000-0001-6469-1312 ; 0000-0002-4030-8793 ; 0000-0002-8936-4278</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1756-185X.14946$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1756-185X.14946$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37975650$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ohashi, Yoshifumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Nobunori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sobue, Yasumori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Mochihito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Ryo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maeda, Masataka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terabe, Kenya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asai, Shuji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imagama, Shiro</creatorcontrib><title>Well‐controlled disease activity with drug treatment will not improve the frailty status of RA patients to robust state: A multicenter observational study (T‐FLAG)</title><title>International journal of rheumatic diseases</title><addtitle>Int J Rheum Dis</addtitle><description>Objectives
To investigate a plateau in treatment enhancement for improving the frailty status of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.
Methods
A total of 345 RA patients who were not robust in 2021 were assigned to the improved (“robust 2022,” n = 51) and non‐improved (“pre‐frailty/frailty 2022,” n = 294) groups. Factors associated with “robust 2022” were examined by logistic regression analysis. Patients were assigned to the stable (Follow‐up mean DAS28‐ESR in 2020 and 2021 < 3.2, n = 225) and unstable (≥3.2, n = 120) groups, which were further divided into the non‐improved (stable: n = 180, unstable: n = 114) and improved (stable: n = 45, unstable: n = 6) groups. Factors influencing Japanese Cardiovascular Health Study (J‐CHS) score were examined by multiple regression analysis. Changes over 2 years were compared between the non‐improved and improved groups of the stable group.
Results
The associated factor of “robust 2022” was the follow‐up meanDAS28‐ESR in 2020 and 2021 < 3.2 (i.e., stable state) (OR: 4.01). Follow‐up mean DAS28‐ESR in 2020 and 2021 was associated with J‐CHS score (T = 2.536, p = .013) only in the unstable group. In the stable group, HAQ‐DI was lower (2020: 0.32 vs. 0.16; 2021: 0.32 vs. 0.17; 2022: 0.32 vs. 0.21), and the proportion of J‐CHS: Q4 (weakness) was lower (2020: 48.4 vs. 17.8%; 2021: 55.0 vs. 29.2%; 2022: 50.4 vs. 0%), in the improved group than in the non‐improved group, whereas both groups maintained clinical and functional remission over 2 years.
Conclusions
Drug treatment to maintain well‐controlled disease activity alone is insufficient for improving patients' frailty status after achieving treat‐to‐target goals, suggesting the need for multifaceted approaches.</description><subject>frailty</subject><subject>general physical activity</subject><subject>rheumatoid arthritis</subject><subject>robust</subject><subject>target to treat</subject><subject>treatment enhancement</subject><issn>1756-1841</issn><issn>1756-185X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkbFuFDEQhi0EIiFQ0yGXobjE3r31eulWEQlIJ4HQSdBZXntMjLzrw_Yeuo5H4BEoeQ4ehSdhLheuxY2tmW9-ef6fkOecXXA8l7xtxILL5tMFX3ZL8YCcHisPj-8lPyFPcv7CmOC1aB-Tk7rtsNWwU_LrI4Tw5_sPE6eSYghgqfUZdAaqTfFbX3b0my-31Kb5My0JdBlhKlgLgU6xUD9uUtwCLbdAXdI-4EAuusyZRkc_9HSji8eJTEukKQ5zLnd9eEX73z_HORRvsA2JxiFD2iIdJx2Qme2Onq_xb9er_ublU_LI6ZDh2f19RtbXr9dXbxardzdvr_rVwtS1FAsJ3Ml6OXDctRXGtI0RnWFScFtVllets7KxnWSVFUxz5zrQcmh5xcDJxtVn5Pwgi1t9nSEXNfps0CM9QZyzqmSHrjboHqKXB9SkmHMCpzbJjzrtFGdqn47a-6_2Wai7dHDixb34PIxgj_y_OBBoDgDaC7v_6an-_eog_BdINJ_j</recordid><startdate>202401</startdate><enddate>202401</enddate><creator>Ohashi, Yoshifumi</creator><creator>Takahashi, Nobunori</creator><creator>Sobue, Yasumori</creator><creator>Suzuki, Mochihito</creator><creator>Sato, Ryo</creator><creator>Maeda, Masataka</creator><creator>Terabe, Kenya</creator><creator>Asai, Shuji</creator><creator>Imagama, Shiro</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6937-3567</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7521-6928</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6469-1312</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4030-8793</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8936-4278</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202401</creationdate><title>Well‐controlled disease activity with drug treatment will not improve the frailty status of RA patients to robust state: A multicenter observational study (T‐FLAG)</title><author>Ohashi, Yoshifumi ; Takahashi, Nobunori ; Sobue, Yasumori ; Suzuki, Mochihito ; Sato, Ryo ; Maeda, Masataka ; Terabe, Kenya ; Asai, Shuji ; Imagama, Shiro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3386-8e1f834b106176cc75c69c0861d22d127fd85d9802d60a1ff9ea8b7120ef85f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>frailty</topic><topic>general physical activity</topic><topic>rheumatoid arthritis</topic><topic>robust</topic><topic>target to treat</topic><topic>treatment enhancement</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ohashi, Yoshifumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Nobunori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sobue, Yasumori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Mochihito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Ryo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maeda, Masataka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terabe, Kenya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asai, Shuji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imagama, Shiro</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of rheumatic diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ohashi, Yoshifumi</au><au>Takahashi, Nobunori</au><au>Sobue, Yasumori</au><au>Suzuki, Mochihito</au><au>Sato, Ryo</au><au>Maeda, Masataka</au><au>Terabe, Kenya</au><au>Asai, Shuji</au><au>Imagama, Shiro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Well‐controlled disease activity with drug treatment will not improve the frailty status of RA patients to robust state: A multicenter observational study (T‐FLAG)</atitle><jtitle>International journal of rheumatic diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Rheum Dis</addtitle><date>2024-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e14946</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e14946-n/a</pages><issn>1756-1841</issn><eissn>1756-185X</eissn><abstract>Objectives
To investigate a plateau in treatment enhancement for improving the frailty status of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.
Methods
A total of 345 RA patients who were not robust in 2021 were assigned to the improved (“robust 2022,” n = 51) and non‐improved (“pre‐frailty/frailty 2022,” n = 294) groups. Factors associated with “robust 2022” were examined by logistic regression analysis. Patients were assigned to the stable (Follow‐up mean DAS28‐ESR in 2020 and 2021 < 3.2, n = 225) and unstable (≥3.2, n = 120) groups, which were further divided into the non‐improved (stable: n = 180, unstable: n = 114) and improved (stable: n = 45, unstable: n = 6) groups. Factors influencing Japanese Cardiovascular Health Study (J‐CHS) score were examined by multiple regression analysis. Changes over 2 years were compared between the non‐improved and improved groups of the stable group.
Results
The associated factor of “robust 2022” was the follow‐up meanDAS28‐ESR in 2020 and 2021 < 3.2 (i.e., stable state) (OR: 4.01). Follow‐up mean DAS28‐ESR in 2020 and 2021 was associated with J‐CHS score (T = 2.536, p = .013) only in the unstable group. In the stable group, HAQ‐DI was lower (2020: 0.32 vs. 0.16; 2021: 0.32 vs. 0.17; 2022: 0.32 vs. 0.21), and the proportion of J‐CHS: Q4 (weakness) was lower (2020: 48.4 vs. 17.8%; 2021: 55.0 vs. 29.2%; 2022: 50.4 vs. 0%), in the improved group than in the non‐improved group, whereas both groups maintained clinical and functional remission over 2 years.
Conclusions
Drug treatment to maintain well‐controlled disease activity alone is insufficient for improving patients' frailty status after achieving treat‐to‐target goals, suggesting the need for multifaceted approaches.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>37975650</pmid><doi>10.1111/1756-185X.14946</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6937-3567</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7521-6928</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6469-1312</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4030-8793</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8936-4278</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1756-1841 |
ispartof | International journal of rheumatic diseases, 2024-01, Vol.27 (1), p.e14946-n/a |
issn | 1756-1841 1756-185X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2891755756 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | frailty general physical activity rheumatoid arthritis robust target to treat treatment enhancement |
title | Well‐controlled disease activity with drug treatment will not improve the frailty status of RA patients to robust state: A multicenter observational study (T‐FLAG) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T14%3A28%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Well%E2%80%90controlled%20disease%20activity%20with%20drug%20treatment%20will%20not%20improve%20the%20frailty%20status%20of%20RA%20patients%20to%20robust%20state:%20A%C2%A0multicenter%20observational%20study%20(T%E2%80%90FLAG)&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20rheumatic%20diseases&rft.au=Ohashi,%20Yoshifumi&rft.date=2024-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e14946&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e14946-n/a&rft.issn=1756-1841&rft.eissn=1756-185X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1756-185X.14946&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2891755756%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2891755756&rft_id=info:pmid/37975650&rfr_iscdi=true |