Why Not This Case? Differences Between Resident and Attending Operative Cases at Teaching Hospitals

Previous studies have focused on outcomes pertaining to resident operative autonomy, but there has been little academic work examining the types of patients and cases where autonomy is afforded. We sought to describe the differences between surgical patient populations in teaching cases where reside...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of surgical research 2024-03, Vol.295, p.19-27
Hauptverfasser: Tsui, Grace O., Kunac, Anastasia, Oliver, Joseph B., Mehra, Shyamin, Anjaria, Devashish J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 27
container_issue
container_start_page 19
container_title The Journal of surgical research
container_volume 295
creator Tsui, Grace O.
Kunac, Anastasia
Oliver, Joseph B.
Mehra, Shyamin
Anjaria, Devashish J.
description Previous studies have focused on outcomes pertaining to resident operative autonomy, but there has been little academic work examining the types of patients and cases where autonomy is afforded. We sought to describe the differences between surgical patient populations in teaching cases where residents are and are not afforded autonomy. We examined all general and vascular operations at Veterans Affairs teaching hospitals from 2004 to 2019 using Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Level of resident supervision is prospectively recorded by the operating room nurse at the time of surgery: attending primary (AP): the attending performs the case with or without a resident; attending resident (AR): the resident performs the case with the attending scrubbed; resident primary (RP): resident operating with supervising attending not scrubbed. Resident (R) cases refer to AR + RP. Patient demographics, comorbidities, level of supervision, and top cases within each group were evaluated. A total of 618,578 cases were analyzed; 154,217 (24.9%) were AP, 425,933 (68.9%) AR, and 38,428 (6.2%) RP. Using work relative value unit as a surrogate for complexity, RP was the least complex compared to AP and AR (10.4/14.4/14.8, P 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jss.2023.09.063
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2891752606</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022480423005036</els_id><sourcerecordid>2891752606</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-b7874b5a5e9651023effa6f24a789969357013eefdf91fe2afed50a68f060633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRtFZ_gBfZo5fE_UiyWTyI1k8oFqTgcdkms3ZLm9SdreK_N7Hq0dMwzDsPvA8hJ5ylnPHifJEuEFPBhEyZTlkhd8iAM50nZaHkLhkwJkSSlSw7IIeIC9btWsl9ciCVViKTakCql_knfWojnc490pFFuKQ33jkI0FSA9BriB0BDnwF9DU2ktqnpVYzQ1L55pZM1BBv9O3y_IrUdCGw1728PLa59tEs8InuuG3D8M4dkenc7HT0k48n94-hqnFSS5TGZqVJls9zmoIucd6XAOVs4kVlVal1omSvGJYCrneYOhHVQ58wWpWNF110OydkWuw7t2wYwmpXHCpZL20C7QSNKzVUu-uyQ8G20Ci1iAGfWwa9s-DScmV6tWZhOrenVGqbNFn_6g9_MVlD_ffy67AIX2wB0Hd89BIOV7y3WPkAVTd36f_BfemOJaA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2891752606</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why Not This Case? Differences Between Resident and Attending Operative Cases at Teaching Hospitals</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Tsui, Grace O. ; Kunac, Anastasia ; Oliver, Joseph B. ; Mehra, Shyamin ; Anjaria, Devashish J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tsui, Grace O. ; Kunac, Anastasia ; Oliver, Joseph B. ; Mehra, Shyamin ; Anjaria, Devashish J.</creatorcontrib><description>Previous studies have focused on outcomes pertaining to resident operative autonomy, but there has been little academic work examining the types of patients and cases where autonomy is afforded. We sought to describe the differences between surgical patient populations in teaching cases where residents are and are not afforded autonomy. We examined all general and vascular operations at Veterans Affairs teaching hospitals from 2004 to 2019 using Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Level of resident supervision is prospectively recorded by the operating room nurse at the time of surgery: attending primary (AP): the attending performs the case with or without a resident; attending resident (AR): the resident performs the case with the attending scrubbed; resident primary (RP): resident operating with supervising attending not scrubbed. Resident (R) cases refer to AR + RP. Patient demographics, comorbidities, level of supervision, and top cases within each group were evaluated. A total of 618,578 cases were analyzed; 154,217 (24.9%) were AP, 425,933 (68.9%) AR, and 38,428 (6.2%) RP. Using work relative value unit as a surrogate for complexity, RP was the least complex compared to AP and AR (10.4/14.4/14.8, P &lt; 0.001). RP also had a lower proportion of American Society of Anesthesiologists 3 and 4 + 5 patients (P &lt; 0.001), were younger (P &lt; 0.001), and generally had lower comorbidities. The most common RP cases made up a higher proportion of all RP cases than they did for AP/AR and demonstrated several core competencies (hernia, cholecystectomy, appendectomy, amputation). R cases, however, were generally sicker than AP cases. In the small proportion of cases where residents were afforded autonomy, we found they were more focused on the core general surgery cases on lower risk patients. This selection bias likely demonstrates appropriate attending judgment in affording autonomy. However, this cohort consisted of many “sicker” patients and those factors alone should not disqualify resident involvement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4804</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1095-8673</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8673</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.09.063</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37972437</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Appendectomy ; Clinical Competence ; General Surgery - education ; Humans ; Internship and Residency ; Operative autonomy ; Resident ; Specialties, Surgical - education ; Surgical education ; VASQIP</subject><ispartof>The Journal of surgical research, 2024-03, Vol.295, p.19-27</ispartof><rights>2023</rights><rights>Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-b7874b5a5e9651023effa6f24a789969357013eefdf91fe2afed50a68f060633</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4759-884X ; 0000-0003-3143-4779</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2023.09.063$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37972437$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tsui, Grace O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunac, Anastasia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliver, Joseph B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehra, Shyamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anjaria, Devashish J.</creatorcontrib><title>Why Not This Case? Differences Between Resident and Attending Operative Cases at Teaching Hospitals</title><title>The Journal of surgical research</title><addtitle>J Surg Res</addtitle><description>Previous studies have focused on outcomes pertaining to resident operative autonomy, but there has been little academic work examining the types of patients and cases where autonomy is afforded. We sought to describe the differences between surgical patient populations in teaching cases where residents are and are not afforded autonomy. We examined all general and vascular operations at Veterans Affairs teaching hospitals from 2004 to 2019 using Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Level of resident supervision is prospectively recorded by the operating room nurse at the time of surgery: attending primary (AP): the attending performs the case with or without a resident; attending resident (AR): the resident performs the case with the attending scrubbed; resident primary (RP): resident operating with supervising attending not scrubbed. Resident (R) cases refer to AR + RP. Patient demographics, comorbidities, level of supervision, and top cases within each group were evaluated. A total of 618,578 cases were analyzed; 154,217 (24.9%) were AP, 425,933 (68.9%) AR, and 38,428 (6.2%) RP. Using work relative value unit as a surrogate for complexity, RP was the least complex compared to AP and AR (10.4/14.4/14.8, P &lt; 0.001). RP also had a lower proportion of American Society of Anesthesiologists 3 and 4 + 5 patients (P &lt; 0.001), were younger (P &lt; 0.001), and generally had lower comorbidities. The most common RP cases made up a higher proportion of all RP cases than they did for AP/AR and demonstrated several core competencies (hernia, cholecystectomy, appendectomy, amputation). R cases, however, were generally sicker than AP cases. In the small proportion of cases where residents were afforded autonomy, we found they were more focused on the core general surgery cases on lower risk patients. This selection bias likely demonstrates appropriate attending judgment in affording autonomy. However, this cohort consisted of many “sicker” patients and those factors alone should not disqualify resident involvement.</description><subject>Appendectomy</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>General Surgery - education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internship and Residency</subject><subject>Operative autonomy</subject><subject>Resident</subject><subject>Specialties, Surgical - education</subject><subject>Surgical education</subject><subject>VASQIP</subject><issn>0022-4804</issn><issn>1095-8673</issn><issn>1095-8673</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRtFZ_gBfZo5fE_UiyWTyI1k8oFqTgcdkms3ZLm9SdreK_N7Hq0dMwzDsPvA8hJ5ylnPHifJEuEFPBhEyZTlkhd8iAM50nZaHkLhkwJkSSlSw7IIeIC9btWsl9ciCVViKTakCql_knfWojnc490pFFuKQ33jkI0FSA9BriB0BDnwF9DU2ktqnpVYzQ1L55pZM1BBv9O3y_IrUdCGw1728PLa59tEs8InuuG3D8M4dkenc7HT0k48n94-hqnFSS5TGZqVJls9zmoIucd6XAOVs4kVlVal1omSvGJYCrneYOhHVQ58wWpWNF110OydkWuw7t2wYwmpXHCpZL20C7QSNKzVUu-uyQ8G20Ci1iAGfWwa9s-DScmV6tWZhOrenVGqbNFn_6g9_MVlD_ffy67AIX2wB0Hd89BIOV7y3WPkAVTd36f_BfemOJaA</recordid><startdate>202403</startdate><enddate>202403</enddate><creator>Tsui, Grace O.</creator><creator>Kunac, Anastasia</creator><creator>Oliver, Joseph B.</creator><creator>Mehra, Shyamin</creator><creator>Anjaria, Devashish J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4759-884X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3143-4779</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202403</creationdate><title>Why Not This Case? Differences Between Resident and Attending Operative Cases at Teaching Hospitals</title><author>Tsui, Grace O. ; Kunac, Anastasia ; Oliver, Joseph B. ; Mehra, Shyamin ; Anjaria, Devashish J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-b7874b5a5e9651023effa6f24a789969357013eefdf91fe2afed50a68f060633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Appendectomy</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>General Surgery - education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internship and Residency</topic><topic>Operative autonomy</topic><topic>Resident</topic><topic>Specialties, Surgical - education</topic><topic>Surgical education</topic><topic>VASQIP</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tsui, Grace O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunac, Anastasia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliver, Joseph B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehra, Shyamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anjaria, Devashish J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of surgical research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tsui, Grace O.</au><au>Kunac, Anastasia</au><au>Oliver, Joseph B.</au><au>Mehra, Shyamin</au><au>Anjaria, Devashish J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why Not This Case? Differences Between Resident and Attending Operative Cases at Teaching Hospitals</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of surgical research</jtitle><addtitle>J Surg Res</addtitle><date>2024-03</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>295</volume><spage>19</spage><epage>27</epage><pages>19-27</pages><issn>0022-4804</issn><issn>1095-8673</issn><eissn>1095-8673</eissn><abstract>Previous studies have focused on outcomes pertaining to resident operative autonomy, but there has been little academic work examining the types of patients and cases where autonomy is afforded. We sought to describe the differences between surgical patient populations in teaching cases where residents are and are not afforded autonomy. We examined all general and vascular operations at Veterans Affairs teaching hospitals from 2004 to 2019 using Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Level of resident supervision is prospectively recorded by the operating room nurse at the time of surgery: attending primary (AP): the attending performs the case with or without a resident; attending resident (AR): the resident performs the case with the attending scrubbed; resident primary (RP): resident operating with supervising attending not scrubbed. Resident (R) cases refer to AR + RP. Patient demographics, comorbidities, level of supervision, and top cases within each group were evaluated. A total of 618,578 cases were analyzed; 154,217 (24.9%) were AP, 425,933 (68.9%) AR, and 38,428 (6.2%) RP. Using work relative value unit as a surrogate for complexity, RP was the least complex compared to AP and AR (10.4/14.4/14.8, P &lt; 0.001). RP also had a lower proportion of American Society of Anesthesiologists 3 and 4 + 5 patients (P &lt; 0.001), were younger (P &lt; 0.001), and generally had lower comorbidities. The most common RP cases made up a higher proportion of all RP cases than they did for AP/AR and demonstrated several core competencies (hernia, cholecystectomy, appendectomy, amputation). R cases, however, were generally sicker than AP cases. In the small proportion of cases where residents were afforded autonomy, we found they were more focused on the core general surgery cases on lower risk patients. This selection bias likely demonstrates appropriate attending judgment in affording autonomy. However, this cohort consisted of many “sicker” patients and those factors alone should not disqualify resident involvement.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>37972437</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jss.2023.09.063</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4759-884X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3143-4779</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-4804
ispartof The Journal of surgical research, 2024-03, Vol.295, p.19-27
issn 0022-4804
1095-8673
1095-8673
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2891752606
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Appendectomy
Clinical Competence
General Surgery - education
Humans
Internship and Residency
Operative autonomy
Resident
Specialties, Surgical - education
Surgical education
VASQIP
title Why Not This Case? Differences Between Resident and Attending Operative Cases at Teaching Hospitals
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T14%3A07%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20Not%20This%20Case?%20Differences%20Between%20Resident%20and%20Attending%20Operative%20Cases%20at%20Teaching%20Hospitals&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20surgical%20research&rft.au=Tsui,%20Grace%20O.&rft.date=2024-03&rft.volume=295&rft.spage=19&rft.epage=27&rft.pages=19-27&rft.issn=0022-4804&rft.eissn=1095-8673&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jss.2023.09.063&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2891752606%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2891752606&rft_id=info:pmid/37972437&rft_els_id=S0022480423005036&rfr_iscdi=true