The effects of insect repellent on initial Dipteran colonization of decomposing pig remains
Numerous factors influence insect colonization and development on decomposing remains and can influence postmortem interval (PMI) estimations when insects are used in investigations of suspicious deaths. This study aimed to determine whether insect repellent influences insect colonization of decompo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of medical entomology 2024-05, Vol.61 (3), p.530-534 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 534 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 530 |
container_title | Journal of medical entomology |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | Torres, Cecilia G. Pollock, Darren A. Mitchell, Zachary A. Cradock, Kenwyn R. |
description | Numerous factors influence insect colonization and development on decomposing remains and can influence postmortem interval (PMI) estimations when insects are used in investigations of suspicious deaths. This study aimed to determine whether insect repellent influences insect colonization of decomposing remains. Pig feet were divided into 4 groups: a control not sprayed with repellent, 40% DEET repellent, 98% DEET repellent, and lemon eucalyptus repellent. The feet were placed in containers, and insect visitation was observed over the course of 3 days, then insects were collected at the end of the third day. This was repeated twice a month from April through November 2022. The analysis focused on the order Diptera. Pairwise comparison determined that there was a significant delay in visitation time for remains with 98% DEET compared to remains with no repellent and 40% DEET. There were significantly fewer adult Diptera collected and more remains with no larvae or eggs present among remains treated with 98% DEET. It was concluded that low concentrations of DEET and lemon eucalyptus repellent did not delay colonization, but that high concentrations of DEET delayed visitation, reduced the number of adult flies collected from the remains, and reduced the likelihood of collecting eggs or larvae from the remains. This contributes to the understanding of factors that can influence insect colonization and development that allow for more accurate PMI estimations by suggesting that insect repellent does not need to be accounted for in PMI estimation, but a high concentration of DEET can deter insects in the short term. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jme/tjad148 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2890758352</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jme/tjad148</oup_id><sourcerecordid>3113460780</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b377t-3eed42b18cb725d2760b24daa6f43473419225ac0ea686e3f5b16a01d74a15503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkLtLxEAQhxdRvPNR2UtAEEXi7TO7KeV8woHNWVmETTI590h2YzYp9K93j5wWFlrNMPPNx_BD6ITga4JTNls3MOvXuiRc7aApSZmKaUrVLppiTGlMhRITdOD9GmOsCE_30YTJNJGCsCl6Xb5BBFUFRe8jV0XG-tBGHbRQ12D7yNkwM73RdXRr2h46baPC1c6aT92bsA1HJRSuaZ03dhW1ZhWuGx1ER2iv0rWH4209RC_3d8v5Y7x4fnia3yzinEnZxwyg5DQnqsglFSWVCc4pL7VOKs64ZJyklApdYNCJSoBVIieJxqSUXBMhMDtEF6O37dz7AL7PGuOL8L-24AafUZViKRQTNKBnv9C1GzobvssYIYwnWKqN8Gqkis5530GVtZ1pdPeREZxtMs9C5tk280Cfbp1D3kD5w36HHIDzEXBD-4_pcgRz45yFP9kveLaYgQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3113460780</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effects of insect repellent on initial Dipteran colonization of decomposing pig remains</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Torres, Cecilia G. ; Pollock, Darren A. ; Mitchell, Zachary A. ; Cradock, Kenwyn R.</creator><contributor>Byrd, Jason</contributor><creatorcontrib>Torres, Cecilia G. ; Pollock, Darren A. ; Mitchell, Zachary A. ; Cradock, Kenwyn R. ; Byrd, Jason</creatorcontrib><description>Numerous factors influence insect colonization and development on decomposing remains and can influence postmortem interval (PMI) estimations when insects are used in investigations of suspicious deaths. This study aimed to determine whether insect repellent influences insect colonization of decomposing remains. Pig feet were divided into 4 groups: a control not sprayed with repellent, 40% DEET repellent, 98% DEET repellent, and lemon eucalyptus repellent. The feet were placed in containers, and insect visitation was observed over the course of 3 days, then insects were collected at the end of the third day. This was repeated twice a month from April through November 2022. The analysis focused on the order Diptera. Pairwise comparison determined that there was a significant delay in visitation time for remains with 98% DEET compared to remains with no repellent and 40% DEET. There were significantly fewer adult Diptera collected and more remains with no larvae or eggs present among remains treated with 98% DEET. It was concluded that low concentrations of DEET and lemon eucalyptus repellent did not delay colonization, but that high concentrations of DEET delayed visitation, reduced the number of adult flies collected from the remains, and reduced the likelihood of collecting eggs or larvae from the remains. This contributes to the understanding of factors that can influence insect colonization and development that allow for more accurate PMI estimations by suggesting that insect repellent does not need to be accounted for in PMI estimation, but a high concentration of DEET can deter insects in the short term.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2585</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1938-2928</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-2928</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jme/tjad148</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37967513</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Entomological Society of America</publisher><subject>Animals ; Cadaver ; Colonization ; Decomposition ; DEET ; DEET - pharmacology ; Diptera ; Diptera - drug effects ; Diptera - growth & development ; Eggs ; Eucalyptus ; Eucalyptus - chemistry ; Forensic Entomology ; Influence ; Insect Repellents - pharmacology ; Insects ; Larvae ; Low concentrations ; PMI estimation ; SPECIAL COLLECTION: METHODOLOGY, INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY, AND APPLICATIONS OF FORENSIC, MEDICAL, AND VETERINARY ENTOMOLOGY ; Swine</subject><ispartof>Journal of medical entomology, 2024-05, Vol.61 (3), p.530-534</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com. 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b377t-3eed42b18cb725d2760b24daa6f43473419225ac0ea686e3f5b16a01d74a15503</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5328-6538</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1584,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37967513$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Byrd, Jason</contributor><creatorcontrib>Torres, Cecilia G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollock, Darren A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Zachary A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cradock, Kenwyn R.</creatorcontrib><title>The effects of insect repellent on initial Dipteran colonization of decomposing pig remains</title><title>Journal of medical entomology</title><addtitle>J Med Entomol</addtitle><description>Numerous factors influence insect colonization and development on decomposing remains and can influence postmortem interval (PMI) estimations when insects are used in investigations of suspicious deaths. This study aimed to determine whether insect repellent influences insect colonization of decomposing remains. Pig feet were divided into 4 groups: a control not sprayed with repellent, 40% DEET repellent, 98% DEET repellent, and lemon eucalyptus repellent. The feet were placed in containers, and insect visitation was observed over the course of 3 days, then insects were collected at the end of the third day. This was repeated twice a month from April through November 2022. The analysis focused on the order Diptera. Pairwise comparison determined that there was a significant delay in visitation time for remains with 98% DEET compared to remains with no repellent and 40% DEET. There were significantly fewer adult Diptera collected and more remains with no larvae or eggs present among remains treated with 98% DEET. It was concluded that low concentrations of DEET and lemon eucalyptus repellent did not delay colonization, but that high concentrations of DEET delayed visitation, reduced the number of adult flies collected from the remains, and reduced the likelihood of collecting eggs or larvae from the remains. This contributes to the understanding of factors that can influence insect colonization and development that allow for more accurate PMI estimations by suggesting that insect repellent does not need to be accounted for in PMI estimation, but a high concentration of DEET can deter insects in the short term.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cadaver</subject><subject>Colonization</subject><subject>Decomposition</subject><subject>DEET</subject><subject>DEET - pharmacology</subject><subject>Diptera</subject><subject>Diptera - drug effects</subject><subject>Diptera - growth & development</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Eucalyptus</subject><subject>Eucalyptus - chemistry</subject><subject>Forensic Entomology</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Insect Repellents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Larvae</subject><subject>Low concentrations</subject><subject>PMI estimation</subject><subject>SPECIAL COLLECTION: METHODOLOGY, INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY, AND APPLICATIONS OF FORENSIC, MEDICAL, AND VETERINARY ENTOMOLOGY</subject><subject>Swine</subject><issn>0022-2585</issn><issn>1938-2928</issn><issn>1938-2928</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkLtLxEAQhxdRvPNR2UtAEEXi7TO7KeV8woHNWVmETTI590h2YzYp9K93j5wWFlrNMPPNx_BD6ITga4JTNls3MOvXuiRc7aApSZmKaUrVLppiTGlMhRITdOD9GmOsCE_30YTJNJGCsCl6Xb5BBFUFRe8jV0XG-tBGHbRQ12D7yNkwM73RdXRr2h46baPC1c6aT92bsA1HJRSuaZ03dhW1ZhWuGx1ER2iv0rWH4209RC_3d8v5Y7x4fnia3yzinEnZxwyg5DQnqsglFSWVCc4pL7VOKs64ZJyklApdYNCJSoBVIieJxqSUXBMhMDtEF6O37dz7AL7PGuOL8L-24AafUZViKRQTNKBnv9C1GzobvssYIYwnWKqN8Gqkis5530GVtZ1pdPeREZxtMs9C5tk280Cfbp1D3kD5w36HHIDzEXBD-4_pcgRz45yFP9kveLaYgQ</recordid><startdate>20240513</startdate><enddate>20240513</enddate><creator>Torres, Cecilia G.</creator><creator>Pollock, Darren A.</creator><creator>Mitchell, Zachary A.</creator><creator>Cradock, Kenwyn R.</creator><general>Entomological Society of America</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5328-6538</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240513</creationdate><title>The effects of insect repellent on initial Dipteran colonization of decomposing pig remains</title><author>Torres, Cecilia G. ; Pollock, Darren A. ; Mitchell, Zachary A. ; Cradock, Kenwyn R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b377t-3eed42b18cb725d2760b24daa6f43473419225ac0ea686e3f5b16a01d74a15503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cadaver</topic><topic>Colonization</topic><topic>Decomposition</topic><topic>DEET</topic><topic>DEET - pharmacology</topic><topic>Diptera</topic><topic>Diptera - drug effects</topic><topic>Diptera - growth & development</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Eucalyptus</topic><topic>Eucalyptus - chemistry</topic><topic>Forensic Entomology</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Insect Repellents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Larvae</topic><topic>Low concentrations</topic><topic>PMI estimation</topic><topic>SPECIAL COLLECTION: METHODOLOGY, INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY, AND APPLICATIONS OF FORENSIC, MEDICAL, AND VETERINARY ENTOMOLOGY</topic><topic>Swine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Torres, Cecilia G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollock, Darren A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Zachary A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cradock, Kenwyn R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of medical entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Torres, Cecilia G.</au><au>Pollock, Darren A.</au><au>Mitchell, Zachary A.</au><au>Cradock, Kenwyn R.</au><au>Byrd, Jason</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effects of insect repellent on initial Dipteran colonization of decomposing pig remains</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medical entomology</jtitle><addtitle>J Med Entomol</addtitle><date>2024-05-13</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>530</spage><epage>534</epage><pages>530-534</pages><issn>0022-2585</issn><issn>1938-2928</issn><eissn>1938-2928</eissn><abstract>Numerous factors influence insect colonization and development on decomposing remains and can influence postmortem interval (PMI) estimations when insects are used in investigations of suspicious deaths. This study aimed to determine whether insect repellent influences insect colonization of decomposing remains. Pig feet were divided into 4 groups: a control not sprayed with repellent, 40% DEET repellent, 98% DEET repellent, and lemon eucalyptus repellent. The feet were placed in containers, and insect visitation was observed over the course of 3 days, then insects were collected at the end of the third day. This was repeated twice a month from April through November 2022. The analysis focused on the order Diptera. Pairwise comparison determined that there was a significant delay in visitation time for remains with 98% DEET compared to remains with no repellent and 40% DEET. There were significantly fewer adult Diptera collected and more remains with no larvae or eggs present among remains treated with 98% DEET. It was concluded that low concentrations of DEET and lemon eucalyptus repellent did not delay colonization, but that high concentrations of DEET delayed visitation, reduced the number of adult flies collected from the remains, and reduced the likelihood of collecting eggs or larvae from the remains. This contributes to the understanding of factors that can influence insect colonization and development that allow for more accurate PMI estimations by suggesting that insect repellent does not need to be accounted for in PMI estimation, but a high concentration of DEET can deter insects in the short term.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Entomological Society of America</pub><pmid>37967513</pmid><doi>10.1093/jme/tjad148</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5328-6538</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-2585 |
ispartof | Journal of medical entomology, 2024-05, Vol.61 (3), p.530-534 |
issn | 0022-2585 1938-2928 1938-2928 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2890758352 |
source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Animals Cadaver Colonization Decomposition DEET DEET - pharmacology Diptera Diptera - drug effects Diptera - growth & development Eggs Eucalyptus Eucalyptus - chemistry Forensic Entomology Influence Insect Repellents - pharmacology Insects Larvae Low concentrations PMI estimation SPECIAL COLLECTION: METHODOLOGY, INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY, AND APPLICATIONS OF FORENSIC, MEDICAL, AND VETERINARY ENTOMOLOGY Swine |
title | The effects of insect repellent on initial Dipteran colonization of decomposing pig remains |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T12%3A22%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effects%20of%20insect%20repellent%20on%20initial%20Dipteran%20colonization%20of%20decomposing%20pig%20remains&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medical%20entomology&rft.au=Torres,%20Cecilia%20G.&rft.date=2024-05-13&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=530&rft.epage=534&rft.pages=530-534&rft.issn=0022-2585&rft.eissn=1938-2928&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jme/tjad148&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3113460780%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3113460780&rft_id=info:pmid/37967513&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jme/tjad148&rfr_iscdi=true |