The effects of insect repellent on initial Dipteran colonization of decomposing pig remains

Numerous factors influence insect colonization and development on decomposing remains and can influence postmortem interval (PMI) estimations when insects are used in investigations of suspicious deaths. This study aimed to determine whether insect repellent influences insect colonization of decompo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of medical entomology 2024-05, Vol.61 (3), p.530-534
Hauptverfasser: Torres, Cecilia G., Pollock, Darren A., Mitchell, Zachary A., Cradock, Kenwyn R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 534
container_issue 3
container_start_page 530
container_title Journal of medical entomology
container_volume 61
creator Torres, Cecilia G.
Pollock, Darren A.
Mitchell, Zachary A.
Cradock, Kenwyn R.
description Numerous factors influence insect colonization and development on decomposing remains and can influence postmortem interval (PMI) estimations when insects are used in investigations of suspicious deaths. This study aimed to determine whether insect repellent influences insect colonization of decomposing remains. Pig feet were divided into 4 groups: a control not sprayed with repellent, 40% DEET repellent, 98% DEET repellent, and lemon eucalyptus repellent. The feet were placed in containers, and insect visitation was observed over the course of 3 days, then insects were collected at the end of the third day. This was repeated twice a month from April through November 2022. The analysis focused on the order Diptera. Pairwise comparison determined that there was a significant delay in visitation time for remains with 98% DEET compared to remains with no repellent and 40% DEET. There were significantly fewer adult Diptera collected and more remains with no larvae or eggs present among remains treated with 98% DEET. It was concluded that low concentrations of DEET and lemon eucalyptus repellent did not delay colonization, but that high concentrations of DEET delayed visitation, reduced the number of adult flies collected from the remains, and reduced the likelihood of collecting eggs or larvae from the remains. This contributes to the understanding of factors that can influence insect colonization and development that allow for more accurate PMI estimations by suggesting that insect repellent does not need to be accounted for in PMI estimation, but a high concentration of DEET can deter insects in the short term.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jme/tjad148
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2890758352</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jme/tjad148</oup_id><sourcerecordid>3113460780</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b377t-3eed42b18cb725d2760b24daa6f43473419225ac0ea686e3f5b16a01d74a15503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkLtLxEAQhxdRvPNR2UtAEEXi7TO7KeV8woHNWVmETTI590h2YzYp9K93j5wWFlrNMPPNx_BD6ITga4JTNls3MOvXuiRc7aApSZmKaUrVLppiTGlMhRITdOD9GmOsCE_30YTJNJGCsCl6Xb5BBFUFRe8jV0XG-tBGHbRQ12D7yNkwM73RdXRr2h46baPC1c6aT92bsA1HJRSuaZ03dhW1ZhWuGx1ER2iv0rWH4209RC_3d8v5Y7x4fnia3yzinEnZxwyg5DQnqsglFSWVCc4pL7VOKs64ZJyklApdYNCJSoBVIieJxqSUXBMhMDtEF6O37dz7AL7PGuOL8L-24AafUZViKRQTNKBnv9C1GzobvssYIYwnWKqN8Gqkis5530GVtZ1pdPeREZxtMs9C5tk280Cfbp1D3kD5w36HHIDzEXBD-4_pcgRz45yFP9kveLaYgQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3113460780</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effects of insect repellent on initial Dipteran colonization of decomposing pig remains</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Torres, Cecilia G. ; Pollock, Darren A. ; Mitchell, Zachary A. ; Cradock, Kenwyn R.</creator><contributor>Byrd, Jason</contributor><creatorcontrib>Torres, Cecilia G. ; Pollock, Darren A. ; Mitchell, Zachary A. ; Cradock, Kenwyn R. ; Byrd, Jason</creatorcontrib><description>Numerous factors influence insect colonization and development on decomposing remains and can influence postmortem interval (PMI) estimations when insects are used in investigations of suspicious deaths. This study aimed to determine whether insect repellent influences insect colonization of decomposing remains. Pig feet were divided into 4 groups: a control not sprayed with repellent, 40% DEET repellent, 98% DEET repellent, and lemon eucalyptus repellent. The feet were placed in containers, and insect visitation was observed over the course of 3 days, then insects were collected at the end of the third day. This was repeated twice a month from April through November 2022. The analysis focused on the order Diptera. Pairwise comparison determined that there was a significant delay in visitation time for remains with 98% DEET compared to remains with no repellent and 40% DEET. There were significantly fewer adult Diptera collected and more remains with no larvae or eggs present among remains treated with 98% DEET. It was concluded that low concentrations of DEET and lemon eucalyptus repellent did not delay colonization, but that high concentrations of DEET delayed visitation, reduced the number of adult flies collected from the remains, and reduced the likelihood of collecting eggs or larvae from the remains. This contributes to the understanding of factors that can influence insect colonization and development that allow for more accurate PMI estimations by suggesting that insect repellent does not need to be accounted for in PMI estimation, but a high concentration of DEET can deter insects in the short term.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2585</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1938-2928</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-2928</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jme/tjad148</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37967513</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Entomological Society of America</publisher><subject>Animals ; Cadaver ; Colonization ; Decomposition ; DEET ; DEET - pharmacology ; Diptera ; Diptera - drug effects ; Diptera - growth &amp; development ; Eggs ; Eucalyptus ; Eucalyptus - chemistry ; Forensic Entomology ; Influence ; Insect Repellents - pharmacology ; Insects ; Larvae ; Low concentrations ; PMI estimation ; SPECIAL COLLECTION: METHODOLOGY, INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY, AND APPLICATIONS OF FORENSIC, MEDICAL, AND VETERINARY ENTOMOLOGY ; Swine</subject><ispartof>Journal of medical entomology, 2024-05, Vol.61 (3), p.530-534</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com. 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b377t-3eed42b18cb725d2760b24daa6f43473419225ac0ea686e3f5b16a01d74a15503</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5328-6538</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1584,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37967513$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Byrd, Jason</contributor><creatorcontrib>Torres, Cecilia G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollock, Darren A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Zachary A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cradock, Kenwyn R.</creatorcontrib><title>The effects of insect repellent on initial Dipteran colonization of decomposing pig remains</title><title>Journal of medical entomology</title><addtitle>J Med Entomol</addtitle><description>Numerous factors influence insect colonization and development on decomposing remains and can influence postmortem interval (PMI) estimations when insects are used in investigations of suspicious deaths. This study aimed to determine whether insect repellent influences insect colonization of decomposing remains. Pig feet were divided into 4 groups: a control not sprayed with repellent, 40% DEET repellent, 98% DEET repellent, and lemon eucalyptus repellent. The feet were placed in containers, and insect visitation was observed over the course of 3 days, then insects were collected at the end of the third day. This was repeated twice a month from April through November 2022. The analysis focused on the order Diptera. Pairwise comparison determined that there was a significant delay in visitation time for remains with 98% DEET compared to remains with no repellent and 40% DEET. There were significantly fewer adult Diptera collected and more remains with no larvae or eggs present among remains treated with 98% DEET. It was concluded that low concentrations of DEET and lemon eucalyptus repellent did not delay colonization, but that high concentrations of DEET delayed visitation, reduced the number of adult flies collected from the remains, and reduced the likelihood of collecting eggs or larvae from the remains. This contributes to the understanding of factors that can influence insect colonization and development that allow for more accurate PMI estimations by suggesting that insect repellent does not need to be accounted for in PMI estimation, but a high concentration of DEET can deter insects in the short term.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cadaver</subject><subject>Colonization</subject><subject>Decomposition</subject><subject>DEET</subject><subject>DEET - pharmacology</subject><subject>Diptera</subject><subject>Diptera - drug effects</subject><subject>Diptera - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Eucalyptus</subject><subject>Eucalyptus - chemistry</subject><subject>Forensic Entomology</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Insect Repellents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Larvae</subject><subject>Low concentrations</subject><subject>PMI estimation</subject><subject>SPECIAL COLLECTION: METHODOLOGY, INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY, AND APPLICATIONS OF FORENSIC, MEDICAL, AND VETERINARY ENTOMOLOGY</subject><subject>Swine</subject><issn>0022-2585</issn><issn>1938-2928</issn><issn>1938-2928</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkLtLxEAQhxdRvPNR2UtAEEXi7TO7KeV8woHNWVmETTI590h2YzYp9K93j5wWFlrNMPPNx_BD6ITga4JTNls3MOvXuiRc7aApSZmKaUrVLppiTGlMhRITdOD9GmOsCE_30YTJNJGCsCl6Xb5BBFUFRe8jV0XG-tBGHbRQ12D7yNkwM73RdXRr2h46baPC1c6aT92bsA1HJRSuaZ03dhW1ZhWuGx1ER2iv0rWH4209RC_3d8v5Y7x4fnia3yzinEnZxwyg5DQnqsglFSWVCc4pL7VOKs64ZJyklApdYNCJSoBVIieJxqSUXBMhMDtEF6O37dz7AL7PGuOL8L-24AafUZViKRQTNKBnv9C1GzobvssYIYwnWKqN8Gqkis5530GVtZ1pdPeREZxtMs9C5tk280Cfbp1D3kD5w36HHIDzEXBD-4_pcgRz45yFP9kveLaYgQ</recordid><startdate>20240513</startdate><enddate>20240513</enddate><creator>Torres, Cecilia G.</creator><creator>Pollock, Darren A.</creator><creator>Mitchell, Zachary A.</creator><creator>Cradock, Kenwyn R.</creator><general>Entomological Society of America</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5328-6538</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240513</creationdate><title>The effects of insect repellent on initial Dipteran colonization of decomposing pig remains</title><author>Torres, Cecilia G. ; Pollock, Darren A. ; Mitchell, Zachary A. ; Cradock, Kenwyn R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b377t-3eed42b18cb725d2760b24daa6f43473419225ac0ea686e3f5b16a01d74a15503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cadaver</topic><topic>Colonization</topic><topic>Decomposition</topic><topic>DEET</topic><topic>DEET - pharmacology</topic><topic>Diptera</topic><topic>Diptera - drug effects</topic><topic>Diptera - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Eucalyptus</topic><topic>Eucalyptus - chemistry</topic><topic>Forensic Entomology</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Insect Repellents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Larvae</topic><topic>Low concentrations</topic><topic>PMI estimation</topic><topic>SPECIAL COLLECTION: METHODOLOGY, INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY, AND APPLICATIONS OF FORENSIC, MEDICAL, AND VETERINARY ENTOMOLOGY</topic><topic>Swine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Torres, Cecilia G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollock, Darren A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Zachary A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cradock, Kenwyn R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of medical entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Torres, Cecilia G.</au><au>Pollock, Darren A.</au><au>Mitchell, Zachary A.</au><au>Cradock, Kenwyn R.</au><au>Byrd, Jason</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effects of insect repellent on initial Dipteran colonization of decomposing pig remains</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medical entomology</jtitle><addtitle>J Med Entomol</addtitle><date>2024-05-13</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>530</spage><epage>534</epage><pages>530-534</pages><issn>0022-2585</issn><issn>1938-2928</issn><eissn>1938-2928</eissn><abstract>Numerous factors influence insect colonization and development on decomposing remains and can influence postmortem interval (PMI) estimations when insects are used in investigations of suspicious deaths. This study aimed to determine whether insect repellent influences insect colonization of decomposing remains. Pig feet were divided into 4 groups: a control not sprayed with repellent, 40% DEET repellent, 98% DEET repellent, and lemon eucalyptus repellent. The feet were placed in containers, and insect visitation was observed over the course of 3 days, then insects were collected at the end of the third day. This was repeated twice a month from April through November 2022. The analysis focused on the order Diptera. Pairwise comparison determined that there was a significant delay in visitation time for remains with 98% DEET compared to remains with no repellent and 40% DEET. There were significantly fewer adult Diptera collected and more remains with no larvae or eggs present among remains treated with 98% DEET. It was concluded that low concentrations of DEET and lemon eucalyptus repellent did not delay colonization, but that high concentrations of DEET delayed visitation, reduced the number of adult flies collected from the remains, and reduced the likelihood of collecting eggs or larvae from the remains. This contributes to the understanding of factors that can influence insect colonization and development that allow for more accurate PMI estimations by suggesting that insect repellent does not need to be accounted for in PMI estimation, but a high concentration of DEET can deter insects in the short term.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Entomological Society of America</pub><pmid>37967513</pmid><doi>10.1093/jme/tjad148</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5328-6538</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-2585
ispartof Journal of medical entomology, 2024-05, Vol.61 (3), p.530-534
issn 0022-2585
1938-2928
1938-2928
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2890758352
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Animals
Cadaver
Colonization
Decomposition
DEET
DEET - pharmacology
Diptera
Diptera - drug effects
Diptera - growth & development
Eggs
Eucalyptus
Eucalyptus - chemistry
Forensic Entomology
Influence
Insect Repellents - pharmacology
Insects
Larvae
Low concentrations
PMI estimation
SPECIAL COLLECTION: METHODOLOGY, INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY, AND APPLICATIONS OF FORENSIC, MEDICAL, AND VETERINARY ENTOMOLOGY
Swine
title The effects of insect repellent on initial Dipteran colonization of decomposing pig remains
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T12%3A22%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effects%20of%20insect%20repellent%20on%20initial%20Dipteran%20colonization%20of%20decomposing%20pig%20remains&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medical%20entomology&rft.au=Torres,%20Cecilia%20G.&rft.date=2024-05-13&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=530&rft.epage=534&rft.pages=530-534&rft.issn=0022-2585&rft.eissn=1938-2928&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jme/tjad148&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3113460780%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3113460780&rft_id=info:pmid/37967513&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jme/tjad148&rfr_iscdi=true