Return to work after hospitalization for sepsis: a nationwide, registry-based cohort study
Background Sepsis survivors commonly experience functional impairment, which may limit return to work. We investigated return to work (RTW) of patients hospitalized with sepsis and the associations with patient and clinical characteristics. Methods Working-age patients (18-60 years) admitted to a No...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Critical care (London, England) England), 2023-11, Vol.27 (1), p.1-443, Article 443 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 443 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Critical care (London, England) |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Skei, Nina Vibeche Moe, Karoline Nilsen, Tom Ivar Lund Aasdahl, Lene Prescott, Hallie C Damås, Jan Kristian Gustad, Lise Tuset |
description | Background Sepsis survivors commonly experience functional impairment, which may limit return to work. We investigated return to work (RTW) of patients hospitalized with sepsis and the associations with patient and clinical characteristics. Methods Working-age patients (18-60 years) admitted to a Norwegian hospital with sepsis between 2010 and 2021 were identified using the Norwegian Patient Registry and linked to sick-leave data from the Norwegian National Social Security System Registry. The main outcome was proportion of RTW in patients hospitalized with sepsis at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after discharge. Secondary outcomes were time trends in age-standardized proportions of RTW and probability of sustainable RTW (31 days of consecutive work). The time trends were calculated for each admission year, reported as percentage change with 95% confidence interval (CI). Time-to-event analysis, including crude and adjusted hazard risk (HRs), was used to explore the association between sustainable RTW, characteristics and subgroups of sepsis patients (intensive care unit (ICU) vs. non-ICU and COVID-19 vs. non-COVID-19). Results Among 35.839 hospitalizations for sepsis among patients aged 18-60 years, 12.260 (34.2%) were working prior to hospitalization and included in this study. The mean age was 43.7 years. At 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-discharge, overall estimates showed that 58.6%, 67.5%, and 63.4%, respectively, were working. The time trends in age-standardized RTW for ICU and non-ICU sepsis patients remained stable over the study period, except the 2-year age-standardized RTW for non-ICU patients that declined by 1.51% (95% CI - 2.22 to - 0.79) per year, from 70.01% (95% CI 67.21 to 74.80) in 2010 to 57.04% (95% CI 53.81-60.28) in 2019. Characteristics associated with sustainable RTW were younger age, fewer comorbidities, and fewer acute organ dysfunctions. The probability of sustainable RTW was lower in ICU patients compared to non-ICU patients (HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.52-0.61) and higher in patients with COVID-19-related sepsis than in sepsis patients (HR 1.31; 95% CI 1.15-1.49). Conclusion Absence of improvement in RTW proportions over time and the low probability of sustainable RTW in sepsis patients need attention, and further research to enhance outcomes for sepsis patients is required. Keywords: Sepsis, RTW, ICU, COVID-19 |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s13054-023-04737-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2890754966</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A773019175</galeid><sourcerecordid>A773019175</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-565972a9e85de17e3fbcd49d7f5ca871715757289e0992f21ae8e901b53ab66b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkU1LAzEQhhdRsFb_gKeAFw9uTTabzcZbEb-gIIhevITs7qRN3W5qkqXUX2_aCn4gc5jh5XmHGd4kOSV4REhZXHpCMctTnNEU55zylO8lA0KLPC0ZZfs_5sPkyPs5xoSXBR0kr08QetehYNHKujekdACHZtYvTVCt-VDB2A5p65CHpTf-CinUbcWVaeACOZgaH9w6rZSHBtV2Zl1APvTN-jg50Kr1cPLVh8nL7c3z9X06ebx7uB5P0jonIqSsYIJnSkDJGiAcqK7qJhcN16xWJSecMM54VgrAQmQ6IwpKEJhUjKqqKCo6TM53e5fOvvfgg1wYX0Pbqg5s72W0Ys5yURQRPfuDzm38Pl63pSImRPlNTVUL0nTaBqfqzVI55pxiIghnkRr9Q8VqYGFq24E2Uf9lyHaG2lnvHWi5dGah3FoSLDcpyl2KMqYotylKTj8BjJGOTw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2890075998</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Return to work after hospitalization for sepsis: a nationwide, registry-based cohort study</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><creator>Skei, Nina Vibeche ; Moe, Karoline ; Nilsen, Tom Ivar Lund ; Aasdahl, Lene ; Prescott, Hallie C ; Damås, Jan Kristian ; Gustad, Lise Tuset</creator><creatorcontrib>Skei, Nina Vibeche ; Moe, Karoline ; Nilsen, Tom Ivar Lund ; Aasdahl, Lene ; Prescott, Hallie C ; Damås, Jan Kristian ; Gustad, Lise Tuset</creatorcontrib><description>Background Sepsis survivors commonly experience functional impairment, which may limit return to work. We investigated return to work (RTW) of patients hospitalized with sepsis and the associations with patient and clinical characteristics. Methods Working-age patients (18-60 years) admitted to a Norwegian hospital with sepsis between 2010 and 2021 were identified using the Norwegian Patient Registry and linked to sick-leave data from the Norwegian National Social Security System Registry. The main outcome was proportion of RTW in patients hospitalized with sepsis at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after discharge. Secondary outcomes were time trends in age-standardized proportions of RTW and probability of sustainable RTW (31 days of consecutive work). The time trends were calculated for each admission year, reported as percentage change with 95% confidence interval (CI). Time-to-event analysis, including crude and adjusted hazard risk (HRs), was used to explore the association between sustainable RTW, characteristics and subgroups of sepsis patients (intensive care unit (ICU) vs. non-ICU and COVID-19 vs. non-COVID-19). Results Among 35.839 hospitalizations for sepsis among patients aged 18-60 years, 12.260 (34.2%) were working prior to hospitalization and included in this study. The mean age was 43.7 years. At 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-discharge, overall estimates showed that 58.6%, 67.5%, and 63.4%, respectively, were working. The time trends in age-standardized RTW for ICU and non-ICU sepsis patients remained stable over the study period, except the 2-year age-standardized RTW for non-ICU patients that declined by 1.51% (95% CI - 2.22 to - 0.79) per year, from 70.01% (95% CI 67.21 to 74.80) in 2010 to 57.04% (95% CI 53.81-60.28) in 2019. Characteristics associated with sustainable RTW were younger age, fewer comorbidities, and fewer acute organ dysfunctions. The probability of sustainable RTW was lower in ICU patients compared to non-ICU patients (HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.52-0.61) and higher in patients with COVID-19-related sepsis than in sepsis patients (HR 1.31; 95% CI 1.15-1.49). Conclusion Absence of improvement in RTW proportions over time and the low probability of sustainable RTW in sepsis patients need attention, and further research to enhance outcomes for sepsis patients is required. Keywords: Sepsis, RTW, ICU, COVID-19</description><identifier>ISSN: 1364-8535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1364-8535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1366-609X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-609X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s13054-023-04737-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Codes ; Comorbidity ; Computer software industry ; COVID-19 ; Critical care ; Disability pensions ; Hospital patients ; Hospitalization ; Hospitals ; Illnesses ; Infection ; Infections ; Intensive care ; Medical research ; Medicine, Experimental ; Patients ; Self employment ; Sepsis ; Trends ; Ventilators</subject><ispartof>Critical care (London, England), 2023-11, Vol.27 (1), p.1-443, Article 443</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-565972a9e85de17e3fbcd49d7f5ca871715757289e0992f21ae8e901b53ab66b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-565972a9e85de17e3fbcd49d7f5ca871715757289e0992f21ae8e901b53ab66b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4268-671X ; 0000-0003-2709-3991 ; 0000-0002-6931-007X ; 0000-0003-4276-1345 ; 0000-0001-8251-3544 ; 0000-0002-8442-6724</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Skei, Nina Vibeche</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moe, Karoline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nilsen, Tom Ivar Lund</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aasdahl, Lene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prescott, Hallie C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damås, Jan Kristian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gustad, Lise Tuset</creatorcontrib><title>Return to work after hospitalization for sepsis: a nationwide, registry-based cohort study</title><title>Critical care (London, England)</title><description>Background Sepsis survivors commonly experience functional impairment, which may limit return to work. We investigated return to work (RTW) of patients hospitalized with sepsis and the associations with patient and clinical characteristics. Methods Working-age patients (18-60 years) admitted to a Norwegian hospital with sepsis between 2010 and 2021 were identified using the Norwegian Patient Registry and linked to sick-leave data from the Norwegian National Social Security System Registry. The main outcome was proportion of RTW in patients hospitalized with sepsis at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after discharge. Secondary outcomes were time trends in age-standardized proportions of RTW and probability of sustainable RTW (31 days of consecutive work). The time trends were calculated for each admission year, reported as percentage change with 95% confidence interval (CI). Time-to-event analysis, including crude and adjusted hazard risk (HRs), was used to explore the association between sustainable RTW, characteristics and subgroups of sepsis patients (intensive care unit (ICU) vs. non-ICU and COVID-19 vs. non-COVID-19). Results Among 35.839 hospitalizations for sepsis among patients aged 18-60 years, 12.260 (34.2%) were working prior to hospitalization and included in this study. The mean age was 43.7 years. At 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-discharge, overall estimates showed that 58.6%, 67.5%, and 63.4%, respectively, were working. The time trends in age-standardized RTW for ICU and non-ICU sepsis patients remained stable over the study period, except the 2-year age-standardized RTW for non-ICU patients that declined by 1.51% (95% CI - 2.22 to - 0.79) per year, from 70.01% (95% CI 67.21 to 74.80) in 2010 to 57.04% (95% CI 53.81-60.28) in 2019. Characteristics associated with sustainable RTW were younger age, fewer comorbidities, and fewer acute organ dysfunctions. The probability of sustainable RTW was lower in ICU patients compared to non-ICU patients (HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.52-0.61) and higher in patients with COVID-19-related sepsis than in sepsis patients (HR 1.31; 95% CI 1.15-1.49). Conclusion Absence of improvement in RTW proportions over time and the low probability of sustainable RTW in sepsis patients need attention, and further research to enhance outcomes for sepsis patients is required. Keywords: Sepsis, RTW, ICU, COVID-19</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Codes</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Computer software industry</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Critical care</subject><subject>Disability pensions</subject><subject>Hospital patients</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Illnesses</subject><subject>Infection</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Self employment</subject><subject>Sepsis</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Ventilators</subject><issn>1364-8535</issn><issn>1364-8535</issn><issn>1366-609X</issn><issn>1466-609X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptkU1LAzEQhhdRsFb_gKeAFw9uTTabzcZbEb-gIIhevITs7qRN3W5qkqXUX2_aCn4gc5jh5XmHGd4kOSV4REhZXHpCMctTnNEU55zylO8lA0KLPC0ZZfs_5sPkyPs5xoSXBR0kr08QetehYNHKujekdACHZtYvTVCt-VDB2A5p65CHpTf-CinUbcWVaeACOZgaH9w6rZSHBtV2Zl1APvTN-jg50Kr1cPLVh8nL7c3z9X06ebx7uB5P0jonIqSsYIJnSkDJGiAcqK7qJhcN16xWJSecMM54VgrAQmQ6IwpKEJhUjKqqKCo6TM53e5fOvvfgg1wYX0Pbqg5s72W0Ys5yURQRPfuDzm38Pl63pSImRPlNTVUL0nTaBqfqzVI55pxiIghnkRr9Q8VqYGFq24E2Uf9lyHaG2lnvHWi5dGah3FoSLDcpyl2KMqYotylKTj8BjJGOTw</recordid><startdate>20231115</startdate><enddate>20231115</enddate><creator>Skei, Nina Vibeche</creator><creator>Moe, Karoline</creator><creator>Nilsen, Tom Ivar Lund</creator><creator>Aasdahl, Lene</creator><creator>Prescott, Hallie C</creator><creator>Damås, Jan Kristian</creator><creator>Gustad, Lise Tuset</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4268-671X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2709-3991</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6931-007X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4276-1345</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8251-3544</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8442-6724</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231115</creationdate><title>Return to work after hospitalization for sepsis: a nationwide, registry-based cohort study</title><author>Skei, Nina Vibeche ; Moe, Karoline ; Nilsen, Tom Ivar Lund ; Aasdahl, Lene ; Prescott, Hallie C ; Damås, Jan Kristian ; Gustad, Lise Tuset</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-565972a9e85de17e3fbcd49d7f5ca871715757289e0992f21ae8e901b53ab66b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Codes</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Computer software industry</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Critical care</topic><topic>Disability pensions</topic><topic>Hospital patients</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Illnesses</topic><topic>Infection</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Self employment</topic><topic>Sepsis</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Ventilators</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Skei, Nina Vibeche</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moe, Karoline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nilsen, Tom Ivar Lund</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aasdahl, Lene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prescott, Hallie C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damås, Jan Kristian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gustad, Lise Tuset</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Critical care (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Skei, Nina Vibeche</au><au>Moe, Karoline</au><au>Nilsen, Tom Ivar Lund</au><au>Aasdahl, Lene</au><au>Prescott, Hallie C</au><au>Damås, Jan Kristian</au><au>Gustad, Lise Tuset</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Return to work after hospitalization for sepsis: a nationwide, registry-based cohort study</atitle><jtitle>Critical care (London, England)</jtitle><date>2023-11-15</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>443</epage><pages>1-443</pages><artnum>443</artnum><issn>1364-8535</issn><eissn>1364-8535</eissn><eissn>1366-609X</eissn><eissn>1466-609X</eissn><abstract>Background Sepsis survivors commonly experience functional impairment, which may limit return to work. We investigated return to work (RTW) of patients hospitalized with sepsis and the associations with patient and clinical characteristics. Methods Working-age patients (18-60 years) admitted to a Norwegian hospital with sepsis between 2010 and 2021 were identified using the Norwegian Patient Registry and linked to sick-leave data from the Norwegian National Social Security System Registry. The main outcome was proportion of RTW in patients hospitalized with sepsis at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after discharge. Secondary outcomes were time trends in age-standardized proportions of RTW and probability of sustainable RTW (31 days of consecutive work). The time trends were calculated for each admission year, reported as percentage change with 95% confidence interval (CI). Time-to-event analysis, including crude and adjusted hazard risk (HRs), was used to explore the association between sustainable RTW, characteristics and subgroups of sepsis patients (intensive care unit (ICU) vs. non-ICU and COVID-19 vs. non-COVID-19). Results Among 35.839 hospitalizations for sepsis among patients aged 18-60 years, 12.260 (34.2%) were working prior to hospitalization and included in this study. The mean age was 43.7 years. At 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-discharge, overall estimates showed that 58.6%, 67.5%, and 63.4%, respectively, were working. The time trends in age-standardized RTW for ICU and non-ICU sepsis patients remained stable over the study period, except the 2-year age-standardized RTW for non-ICU patients that declined by 1.51% (95% CI - 2.22 to - 0.79) per year, from 70.01% (95% CI 67.21 to 74.80) in 2010 to 57.04% (95% CI 53.81-60.28) in 2019. Characteristics associated with sustainable RTW were younger age, fewer comorbidities, and fewer acute organ dysfunctions. The probability of sustainable RTW was lower in ICU patients compared to non-ICU patients (HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.52-0.61) and higher in patients with COVID-19-related sepsis than in sepsis patients (HR 1.31; 95% CI 1.15-1.49). Conclusion Absence of improvement in RTW proportions over time and the low probability of sustainable RTW in sepsis patients need attention, and further research to enhance outcomes for sepsis patients is required. Keywords: Sepsis, RTW, ICU, COVID-19</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><doi>10.1186/s13054-023-04737-7</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4268-671X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2709-3991</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6931-007X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4276-1345</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8251-3544</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8442-6724</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1364-8535 |
ispartof | Critical care (London, England), 2023-11, Vol.27 (1), p.1-443, Article 443 |
issn | 1364-8535 1364-8535 1366-609X 1466-609X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2890754966 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; SpringerLink Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Springer Nature OA Free Journals |
subjects | Analysis Codes Comorbidity Computer software industry COVID-19 Critical care Disability pensions Hospital patients Hospitalization Hospitals Illnesses Infection Infections Intensive care Medical research Medicine, Experimental Patients Self employment Sepsis Trends Ventilators |
title | Return to work after hospitalization for sepsis: a nationwide, registry-based cohort study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T09%3A07%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Return%20to%20work%20after%20hospitalization%20for%20sepsis:%20a%20nationwide,%20registry-based%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=Critical%20care%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Skei,%20Nina%20Vibeche&rft.date=2023-11-15&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=443&rft.pages=1-443&rft.artnum=443&rft.issn=1364-8535&rft.eissn=1364-8535&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s13054-023-04737-7&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA773019175%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2890075998&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A773019175&rfr_iscdi=true |