“It really puts me in a bind”, professionalism dilemmas reported by Chinese residents
Residents play a pivotal role in the healthcare system. However, few tools have systematically revealed the dilemmas and challenges faced by residents. This study aimed to develop a checklist for professionalism dilemmas based on a behavior-based professionalism framework and to examine the range an...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice 2023-08, Vol.28 (3), p.939-966 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 966 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 939 |
| container_title | Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice |
| container_volume | 28 |
| creator | Song, Xinzhi Jiang, Nan Ding, Ning Li, Honghe Xin, Chunyu Qu, Ruoyi Wen, Deliang |
| description | Residents play a pivotal role in the healthcare system. However, few tools have systematically revealed the dilemmas and challenges faced by residents. This study aimed to develop a checklist for professionalism dilemmas based on a behavior-based professionalism framework and to examine the range and proportion of professionalism dilemmas heard of, witnessed, or experienced by Chinese residents. Mixed methods were used, comprising qualitative (document analysis and focus group interviews) and quantitative (a small-scale questionnaire survey) data. Document analysis summarized professionalism dilemma items from previous publications. For focus group interviews, we used narrative inquiry to explore and make sense of residents’ experiences and perceptions of professionalism dilemmas. A small-scale questionnaire survey was conducted during each focus group to investigate the proportion of professionalism dilemma items that residents reported to have heard of, witnessed, or experienced. Through document analysis and focus group interviews, we developed a checklist of professionalism dilemmas based on a behavior-based professionalism framework. The checklist included 58 items over four domains, with 10 sub-domains (compassion, respect, communication, collaboration, integrity, duty, pursuit of excellence, fair stewardship of health care resources, patient confidentiality, and informed consent). We also sought a preliminarily subjective impression by exploring the proportion of residents who have heard of, witnessed, and experienced each of the professionalism dilemma items and residents’ perspectives when faced with professionalism dilemmas. Residents inevitably encounter or experience a diverse range of professionalism dilemmas. This checklist of professionalism dilemmas that was developed could prove to be a significant reference for targeted professionalism education, both for the resident as well as for faculty. It can also act as a helpful tool for improving hospital management guidelines and patient education. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10459-022-10198-4 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2890043017</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1385172</ericid><sourcerecordid>2839648406</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-c4224070663d8a640998db96b0658c6e167339f9add1d0349a86193888e4c2873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkb1uFTEQhS1ERELgBZBAlmgoWBj_rNcu0VWAoEg0UFBZ3vVccLQ_F89ucbs8SPJyeRIcNgSJIqKxLZ9vzox9GHsm4I0AaN6SAF27CqSsBAhnK_2AHYm6UZUwTfOwnJWVlXbOHLLHROcAoIS1j9ihMrWrhdVH7Nv1xeXpzDOGvt_z3TITH5CnkQfepjFeX1y95rs8bZEoTWPoEw08ph6HIVCp2k15xsjbPd_8SCMSljtKEceZnrCDbegJn97ux-zr-5Mvm4_V2ecPp5t3Z1WnFcxllVJDA8aoaIPR4JyNrTMtmNp2BstTlHJbF2IUEZR2wRrhlLUWdSdto47Zq9W3jPlzQZr9kKjDvg8jTgt5aR1AaSX-A20M1NqCFgV9-Q96Pi25fMCNoXJGWw2mUHKlujwRZdz6XU5DyHsvwN9k5NeMfMnI_87I61L04tZ6aQeMdyV_QinA8xXAnLo7-eRTibMWjSy6WnUq2vgd89_Z7mn7C67SpN0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2839648406</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>“It really puts me in a bind”, professionalism dilemmas reported by Chinese residents</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Song, Xinzhi ; Jiang, Nan ; Ding, Ning ; Li, Honghe ; Xin, Chunyu ; Qu, Ruoyi ; Wen, Deliang</creator><creatorcontrib>Song, Xinzhi ; Jiang, Nan ; Ding, Ning ; Li, Honghe ; Xin, Chunyu ; Qu, Ruoyi ; Wen, Deliang</creatorcontrib><description>Residents play a pivotal role in the healthcare system. However, few tools have systematically revealed the dilemmas and challenges faced by residents. This study aimed to develop a checklist for professionalism dilemmas based on a behavior-based professionalism framework and to examine the range and proportion of professionalism dilemmas heard of, witnessed, or experienced by Chinese residents. Mixed methods were used, comprising qualitative (document analysis and focus group interviews) and quantitative (a small-scale questionnaire survey) data. Document analysis summarized professionalism dilemma items from previous publications. For focus group interviews, we used narrative inquiry to explore and make sense of residents’ experiences and perceptions of professionalism dilemmas. A small-scale questionnaire survey was conducted during each focus group to investigate the proportion of professionalism dilemma items that residents reported to have heard of, witnessed, or experienced. Through document analysis and focus group interviews, we developed a checklist of professionalism dilemmas based on a behavior-based professionalism framework. The checklist included 58 items over four domains, with 10 sub-domains (compassion, respect, communication, collaboration, integrity, duty, pursuit of excellence, fair stewardship of health care resources, patient confidentiality, and informed consent). We also sought a preliminarily subjective impression by exploring the proportion of residents who have heard of, witnessed, and experienced each of the professionalism dilemma items and residents’ perspectives when faced with professionalism dilemmas. Residents inevitably encounter or experience a diverse range of professionalism dilemmas. This checklist of professionalism dilemmas that was developed could prove to be a significant reference for targeted professionalism education, both for the resident as well as for faculty. It can also act as a helpful tool for improving hospital management guidelines and patient education.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1382-4996</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1677</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10459-022-10198-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36595184</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Accreditation ; Behavior ; Check Lists ; Decision Making ; Education ; Focus groups ; Foreign Countries ; Health care policy ; Health insurance ; Health Services ; Hospitals ; Identity formation ; Insurance coverage ; Interviews ; Medical Education ; Medical Students ; Patient Education ; Physicians ; Professional identity ; Professionalism ; Questionnaires ; Student Attitudes ; Student Experience</subject><ispartof>Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice, 2023-08, Vol.28 (3), p.939-966</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-c4224070663d8a640998db96b0658c6e167339f9add1d0349a86193888e4c2873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-c4224070663d8a640998db96b0658c6e167339f9add1d0349a86193888e4c2873</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10459-022-10198-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10459-022-10198-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1385172$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36595184$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Song, Xinzhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Nan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Ning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Honghe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xin, Chunyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qu, Ruoyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Deliang</creatorcontrib><title>“It really puts me in a bind”, professionalism dilemmas reported by Chinese residents</title><title>Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice</title><addtitle>Adv in Health Sci Educ</addtitle><addtitle>Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract</addtitle><description>Residents play a pivotal role in the healthcare system. However, few tools have systematically revealed the dilemmas and challenges faced by residents. This study aimed to develop a checklist for professionalism dilemmas based on a behavior-based professionalism framework and to examine the range and proportion of professionalism dilemmas heard of, witnessed, or experienced by Chinese residents. Mixed methods were used, comprising qualitative (document analysis and focus group interviews) and quantitative (a small-scale questionnaire survey) data. Document analysis summarized professionalism dilemma items from previous publications. For focus group interviews, we used narrative inquiry to explore and make sense of residents’ experiences and perceptions of professionalism dilemmas. A small-scale questionnaire survey was conducted during each focus group to investigate the proportion of professionalism dilemma items that residents reported to have heard of, witnessed, or experienced. Through document analysis and focus group interviews, we developed a checklist of professionalism dilemmas based on a behavior-based professionalism framework. The checklist included 58 items over four domains, with 10 sub-domains (compassion, respect, communication, collaboration, integrity, duty, pursuit of excellence, fair stewardship of health care resources, patient confidentiality, and informed consent). We also sought a preliminarily subjective impression by exploring the proportion of residents who have heard of, witnessed, and experienced each of the professionalism dilemma items and residents’ perspectives when faced with professionalism dilemmas. Residents inevitably encounter or experience a diverse range of professionalism dilemmas. This checklist of professionalism dilemmas that was developed could prove to be a significant reference for targeted professionalism education, both for the resident as well as for faculty. It can also act as a helpful tool for improving hospital management guidelines and patient education.</description><subject>Accreditation</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Check Lists</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Focus groups</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Health insurance</subject><subject>Health Services</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Identity formation</subject><subject>Insurance coverage</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Medical Education</subject><subject>Medical Students</subject><subject>Patient Education</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Professional identity</subject><subject>Professionalism</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Student Experience</subject><issn>1382-4996</issn><issn>1573-1677</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkb1uFTEQhS1ERELgBZBAlmgoWBj_rNcu0VWAoEg0UFBZ3vVccLQ_F89ucbs8SPJyeRIcNgSJIqKxLZ9vzox9GHsm4I0AaN6SAF27CqSsBAhnK_2AHYm6UZUwTfOwnJWVlXbOHLLHROcAoIS1j9ihMrWrhdVH7Nv1xeXpzDOGvt_z3TITH5CnkQfepjFeX1y95rs8bZEoTWPoEw08ph6HIVCp2k15xsjbPd_8SCMSljtKEceZnrCDbegJn97ux-zr-5Mvm4_V2ecPp5t3Z1WnFcxllVJDA8aoaIPR4JyNrTMtmNp2BstTlHJbF2IUEZR2wRrhlLUWdSdto47Zq9W3jPlzQZr9kKjDvg8jTgt5aR1AaSX-A20M1NqCFgV9-Q96Pi25fMCNoXJGWw2mUHKlujwRZdz6XU5DyHsvwN9k5NeMfMnI_87I61L04tZ6aQeMdyV_QinA8xXAnLo7-eRTibMWjSy6WnUq2vgd89_Z7mn7C67SpN0</recordid><startdate>20230801</startdate><enddate>20230801</enddate><creator>Song, Xinzhi</creator><creator>Jiang, Nan</creator><creator>Ding, Ning</creator><creator>Li, Honghe</creator><creator>Xin, Chunyu</creator><creator>Qu, Ruoyi</creator><creator>Wen, Deliang</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230801</creationdate><title>“It really puts me in a bind”, professionalism dilemmas reported by Chinese residents</title><author>Song, Xinzhi ; Jiang, Nan ; Ding, Ning ; Li, Honghe ; Xin, Chunyu ; Qu, Ruoyi ; Wen, Deliang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-c4224070663d8a640998db96b0658c6e167339f9add1d0349a86193888e4c2873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Accreditation</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Check Lists</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Focus groups</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Health insurance</topic><topic>Health Services</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Identity formation</topic><topic>Insurance coverage</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Medical Education</topic><topic>Medical Students</topic><topic>Patient Education</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Professional identity</topic><topic>Professionalism</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Student Experience</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Song, Xinzhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Nan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Ning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Honghe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xin, Chunyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qu, Ruoyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Deliang</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Song, Xinzhi</au><au>Jiang, Nan</au><au>Ding, Ning</au><au>Li, Honghe</au><au>Xin, Chunyu</au><au>Qu, Ruoyi</au><au>Wen, Deliang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1385172</ericid><atitle>“It really puts me in a bind”, professionalism dilemmas reported by Chinese residents</atitle><jtitle>Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice</jtitle><stitle>Adv in Health Sci Educ</stitle><addtitle>Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract</addtitle><date>2023-08-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>939</spage><epage>966</epage><pages>939-966</pages><issn>1382-4996</issn><eissn>1573-1677</eissn><abstract>Residents play a pivotal role in the healthcare system. However, few tools have systematically revealed the dilemmas and challenges faced by residents. This study aimed to develop a checklist for professionalism dilemmas based on a behavior-based professionalism framework and to examine the range and proportion of professionalism dilemmas heard of, witnessed, or experienced by Chinese residents. Mixed methods were used, comprising qualitative (document analysis and focus group interviews) and quantitative (a small-scale questionnaire survey) data. Document analysis summarized professionalism dilemma items from previous publications. For focus group interviews, we used narrative inquiry to explore and make sense of residents’ experiences and perceptions of professionalism dilemmas. A small-scale questionnaire survey was conducted during each focus group to investigate the proportion of professionalism dilemma items that residents reported to have heard of, witnessed, or experienced. Through document analysis and focus group interviews, we developed a checklist of professionalism dilemmas based on a behavior-based professionalism framework. The checklist included 58 items over four domains, with 10 sub-domains (compassion, respect, communication, collaboration, integrity, duty, pursuit of excellence, fair stewardship of health care resources, patient confidentiality, and informed consent). We also sought a preliminarily subjective impression by exploring the proportion of residents who have heard of, witnessed, and experienced each of the professionalism dilemma items and residents’ perspectives when faced with professionalism dilemmas. Residents inevitably encounter or experience a diverse range of professionalism dilemmas. This checklist of professionalism dilemmas that was developed could prove to be a significant reference for targeted professionalism education, both for the resident as well as for faculty. It can also act as a helpful tool for improving hospital management guidelines and patient education.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>36595184</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10459-022-10198-4</doi><tpages>28</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1382-4996 |
| ispartof | Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice, 2023-08, Vol.28 (3), p.939-966 |
| issn | 1382-4996 1573-1677 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2890043017 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Accreditation Behavior Check Lists Decision Making Education Focus groups Foreign Countries Health care policy Health insurance Health Services Hospitals Identity formation Insurance coverage Interviews Medical Education Medical Students Patient Education Physicians Professional identity Professionalism Questionnaires Student Attitudes Student Experience |
| title | “It really puts me in a bind”, professionalism dilemmas reported by Chinese residents |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T21%3A55%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%9CIt%20really%20puts%20me%20in%20a%20bind%E2%80%9D,%20professionalism%20dilemmas%20reported%20by%20Chinese%20residents&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20health%20sciences%20education%20:%20theory%20and%20practice&rft.au=Song,%20Xinzhi&rft.date=2023-08-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=939&rft.epage=966&rft.pages=939-966&rft.issn=1382-4996&rft.eissn=1573-1677&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10459-022-10198-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2839648406%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2839648406&rft_id=info:pmid/36595184&rft_ericid=EJ1385172&rfr_iscdi=true |