Universal School-Based Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) for Diverse Student Subgroups: Implications for Enhancing Equity Through SEL

School-based, universal social and emotional learning (SEL) has been widely practiced and promoted as a promising approach to prevent youth mental, emotional, and behavioral problems. Although prior research has accumulated robust evidence of the average effects of universal SEL, it remains unclear...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Prevention science 2023-07, Vol.24 (5), p.1011-1022
Hauptverfasser: Lee, Juyeon, Shapiro, Valerie B., Kim, Bo-Kyung Elizabeth
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1022
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1011
container_title Prevention science
container_volume 24
creator Lee, Juyeon
Shapiro, Valerie B.
Kim, Bo-Kyung Elizabeth
description School-based, universal social and emotional learning (SEL) has been widely practiced and promoted as a promising approach to prevent youth mental, emotional, and behavioral problems. Although prior research has accumulated robust evidence of the average effects of universal SEL, it remains unclear whether it works similarly or differentially across diverse sociocultural subgroups of students. Investigating subgroup effects has implications for understanding the impact of universal SEL on possible subgroup disparities in student social-emotional competence (SEC). This study examined whether the effects of a universal SEL program on student SEC development differed across diverse student subgroups classified by gender, race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, disability status, and English learner status. Data came from student SEC progress monitoring collected during a 1-year quasi-experimental study of a universal SEL program ( N  = 1592; Grades K–2). The results of multigroup latent growth modeling suggest that (a) the intervention effects were slightly larger for Black students, compared to White or other racial-ethnic subgroups, and (b) the effects were not different across other examined subgroups. This study also found that in the comparison condition, the SEC disparities between Black and White students tended to widen throughout the year, whereas in the intervention condition, Black students showed a similar rate of growth as their White peers. Findings suggest that universal SEL may be similarly beneficial across many diverse student subgroups, while it may yield larger benefits among some racially marginalized subgroups, preventing racial disparities from further widening. Yet the benefits of SEL may not be sufficient to reduce existing subgroup disparities. These findings suggest a need for more studies to examine differential effects of universal preventive programs by diverse subgroups to better inform practices that enhance equity in youth outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11121-023-01552-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2890030917</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1388378</ericid><sourcerecordid>2821341665</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-89438a7d434715e0d215200b82219aa6964397060b85749f80114cdfae495d5a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhS0Eou3ACyCBLLEpi4Cv_90dlABFI7FIu448iTOTKmNP7QRpnqCvjWdSisQCsfL1Pd-5tu5B6BWQ90CI-pAAgEJBKCsICEGL_RN0CkKxQkojnuaaaVNwo-UJOkvplhCQgpHn6IQpKnIJp-j-xvc_XUx2wFWzCWEoPtnkWlyFps8961tcbsPYB59vS2ej7_0an1fl8h3uQsSfj26Hq3FqnR9xNa3WMUy7dIGvtruhb-zBm45s6TfWNwd_eTf14x5fbzK63uA87QV61tkhuZcP5wLdfCmvL78Vyx9fry4_LouGMzIW2nCmrWo54wqEIy0FQQlZaUrBWCuN5MwoInNHKG46TQB403bWcSNaYdkCnc9zdzHcTS6N9bZPjRsG612YUk21IYQRA-o_UAqMg8yLXKC3f6G3YYp5ZQeKKyGZ1CZTdKaaGFKKrqt3sd_auK-B1IdE6znROidaHxOt99n05mH0tNq69tHyO8IMvJ4BF_vmUS6_5_A1UzrrbNZT1vzaxT9_-8ezvwB6lbOF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2847563689</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Universal School-Based Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) for Diverse Student Subgroups: Implications for Enhancing Equity Through SEL</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Journals</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Lee, Juyeon ; Shapiro, Valerie B. ; Kim, Bo-Kyung Elizabeth</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Juyeon ; Shapiro, Valerie B. ; Kim, Bo-Kyung Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><description>School-based, universal social and emotional learning (SEL) has been widely practiced and promoted as a promising approach to prevent youth mental, emotional, and behavioral problems. Although prior research has accumulated robust evidence of the average effects of universal SEL, it remains unclear whether it works similarly or differentially across diverse sociocultural subgroups of students. Investigating subgroup effects has implications for understanding the impact of universal SEL on possible subgroup disparities in student social-emotional competence (SEC). This study examined whether the effects of a universal SEL program on student SEC development differed across diverse student subgroups classified by gender, race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, disability status, and English learner status. Data came from student SEC progress monitoring collected during a 1-year quasi-experimental study of a universal SEL program ( N  = 1592; Grades K–2). The results of multigroup latent growth modeling suggest that (a) the intervention effects were slightly larger for Black students, compared to White or other racial-ethnic subgroups, and (b) the effects were not different across other examined subgroups. This study also found that in the comparison condition, the SEC disparities between Black and White students tended to widen throughout the year, whereas in the intervention condition, Black students showed a similar rate of growth as their White peers. Findings suggest that universal SEL may be similarly beneficial across many diverse student subgroups, while it may yield larger benefits among some racially marginalized subgroups, preventing racial disparities from further widening. Yet the benefits of SEL may not be sufficient to reduce existing subgroup disparities. These findings suggest a need for more studies to examine differential effects of universal preventive programs by diverse subgroups to better inform practices that enhance equity in youth outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1389-4986</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-6695</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11121-023-01552-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37256531</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Behavior problems ; Black people ; Black students ; Child and School Psychology ; Disability ; Elementary Secondary Education ; Emotional intelligence ; Emotions ; English Language Learners ; Ethnicity ; Gender Differences ; Health Psychology ; Humans ; Intervention ; Learning ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Prevention programs ; Program Effectiveness ; Public Health ; Quasi-experimental methods ; Race ; Racial Differences ; Racial inequality ; Schools ; Social &amp; emotional learning ; Social Learning ; Sociocultural factors ; Socioeconomic Status ; Student Diversity ; Students ; Students - psychology ; Students with Disabilities ; Youth</subject><ispartof>Prevention science, 2023-07, Vol.24 (5), p.1011-1022</ispartof><rights>Society for Prevention Research 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2023. Society for Prevention Research.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-89438a7d434715e0d215200b82219aa6964397060b85749f80114cdfae495d5a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-89438a7d434715e0d215200b82219aa6964397060b85749f80114cdfae495d5a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3304-5139</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11121-023-01552-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11121-023-01552-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27843,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1388378$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37256531$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Juyeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, Valerie B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Bo-Kyung Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><title>Universal School-Based Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) for Diverse Student Subgroups: Implications for Enhancing Equity Through SEL</title><title>Prevention science</title><addtitle>Prev Sci</addtitle><addtitle>Prev Sci</addtitle><description>School-based, universal social and emotional learning (SEL) has been widely practiced and promoted as a promising approach to prevent youth mental, emotional, and behavioral problems. Although prior research has accumulated robust evidence of the average effects of universal SEL, it remains unclear whether it works similarly or differentially across diverse sociocultural subgroups of students. Investigating subgroup effects has implications for understanding the impact of universal SEL on possible subgroup disparities in student social-emotional competence (SEC). This study examined whether the effects of a universal SEL program on student SEC development differed across diverse student subgroups classified by gender, race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, disability status, and English learner status. Data came from student SEC progress monitoring collected during a 1-year quasi-experimental study of a universal SEL program ( N  = 1592; Grades K–2). The results of multigroup latent growth modeling suggest that (a) the intervention effects were slightly larger for Black students, compared to White or other racial-ethnic subgroups, and (b) the effects were not different across other examined subgroups. This study also found that in the comparison condition, the SEC disparities between Black and White students tended to widen throughout the year, whereas in the intervention condition, Black students showed a similar rate of growth as their White peers. Findings suggest that universal SEL may be similarly beneficial across many diverse student subgroups, while it may yield larger benefits among some racially marginalized subgroups, preventing racial disparities from further widening. Yet the benefits of SEL may not be sufficient to reduce existing subgroup disparities. These findings suggest a need for more studies to examine differential effects of universal preventive programs by diverse subgroups to better inform practices that enhance equity in youth outcomes.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Behavior problems</subject><subject>Black people</subject><subject>Black students</subject><subject>Child and School Psychology</subject><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Elementary Secondary Education</subject><subject>Emotional intelligence</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>English Language Learners</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Gender Differences</subject><subject>Health Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Prevention programs</subject><subject>Program Effectiveness</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Quasi-experimental methods</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>Racial Differences</subject><subject>Racial inequality</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>Social &amp; emotional learning</subject><subject>Social Learning</subject><subject>Sociocultural factors</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Status</subject><subject>Student Diversity</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Students - psychology</subject><subject>Students with Disabilities</subject><subject>Youth</subject><issn>1389-4986</issn><issn>1573-6695</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhS0Eou3ACyCBLLEpi4Cv_90dlABFI7FIu448iTOTKmNP7QRpnqCvjWdSisQCsfL1Pd-5tu5B6BWQ90CI-pAAgEJBKCsICEGL_RN0CkKxQkojnuaaaVNwo-UJOkvplhCQgpHn6IQpKnIJp-j-xvc_XUx2wFWzCWEoPtnkWlyFps8961tcbsPYB59vS2ej7_0an1fl8h3uQsSfj26Hq3FqnR9xNa3WMUy7dIGvtruhb-zBm45s6TfWNwd_eTf14x5fbzK63uA87QV61tkhuZcP5wLdfCmvL78Vyx9fry4_LouGMzIW2nCmrWo54wqEIy0FQQlZaUrBWCuN5MwoInNHKG46TQB403bWcSNaYdkCnc9zdzHcTS6N9bZPjRsG612YUk21IYQRA-o_UAqMg8yLXKC3f6G3YYp5ZQeKKyGZ1CZTdKaaGFKKrqt3sd_auK-B1IdE6znROidaHxOt99n05mH0tNq69tHyO8IMvJ4BF_vmUS6_5_A1UzrrbNZT1vzaxT9_-8ezvwB6lbOF</recordid><startdate>20230701</startdate><enddate>20230701</enddate><creator>Lee, Juyeon</creator><creator>Shapiro, Valerie B.</creator><creator>Kim, Bo-Kyung Elizabeth</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3304-5139</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230701</creationdate><title>Universal School-Based Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) for Diverse Student Subgroups: Implications for Enhancing Equity Through SEL</title><author>Lee, Juyeon ; Shapiro, Valerie B. ; Kim, Bo-Kyung Elizabeth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-89438a7d434715e0d215200b82219aa6964397060b85749f80114cdfae495d5a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Behavior problems</topic><topic>Black people</topic><topic>Black students</topic><topic>Child and School Psychology</topic><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Elementary Secondary Education</topic><topic>Emotional intelligence</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>English Language Learners</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Gender Differences</topic><topic>Health Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Prevention programs</topic><topic>Program Effectiveness</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Quasi-experimental methods</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>Racial Differences</topic><topic>Racial inequality</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>Social &amp; emotional learning</topic><topic>Social Learning</topic><topic>Sociocultural factors</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Status</topic><topic>Student Diversity</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Students - psychology</topic><topic>Students with Disabilities</topic><topic>Youth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Juyeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, Valerie B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Bo-Kyung Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Political Science Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Prevention science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Juyeon</au><au>Shapiro, Valerie B.</au><au>Kim, Bo-Kyung Elizabeth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1388378</ericid><atitle>Universal School-Based Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) for Diverse Student Subgroups: Implications for Enhancing Equity Through SEL</atitle><jtitle>Prevention science</jtitle><stitle>Prev Sci</stitle><addtitle>Prev Sci</addtitle><date>2023-07-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1011</spage><epage>1022</epage><pages>1011-1022</pages><issn>1389-4986</issn><eissn>1573-6695</eissn><abstract>School-based, universal social and emotional learning (SEL) has been widely practiced and promoted as a promising approach to prevent youth mental, emotional, and behavioral problems. Although prior research has accumulated robust evidence of the average effects of universal SEL, it remains unclear whether it works similarly or differentially across diverse sociocultural subgroups of students. Investigating subgroup effects has implications for understanding the impact of universal SEL on possible subgroup disparities in student social-emotional competence (SEC). This study examined whether the effects of a universal SEL program on student SEC development differed across diverse student subgroups classified by gender, race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, disability status, and English learner status. Data came from student SEC progress monitoring collected during a 1-year quasi-experimental study of a universal SEL program ( N  = 1592; Grades K–2). The results of multigroup latent growth modeling suggest that (a) the intervention effects were slightly larger for Black students, compared to White or other racial-ethnic subgroups, and (b) the effects were not different across other examined subgroups. This study also found that in the comparison condition, the SEC disparities between Black and White students tended to widen throughout the year, whereas in the intervention condition, Black students showed a similar rate of growth as their White peers. Findings suggest that universal SEL may be similarly beneficial across many diverse student subgroups, while it may yield larger benefits among some racially marginalized subgroups, preventing racial disparities from further widening. Yet the benefits of SEL may not be sufficient to reduce existing subgroup disparities. These findings suggest a need for more studies to examine differential effects of universal preventive programs by diverse subgroups to better inform practices that enhance equity in youth outcomes.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>37256531</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11121-023-01552-y</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3304-5139</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1389-4986
ispartof Prevention science, 2023-07, Vol.24 (5), p.1011-1022
issn 1389-4986
1573-6695
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2890030917
source MEDLINE; Springer Journals; PAIS Index
subjects Adolescent
Behavior problems
Black people
Black students
Child and School Psychology
Disability
Elementary Secondary Education
Emotional intelligence
Emotions
English Language Learners
Ethnicity
Gender Differences
Health Psychology
Humans
Intervention
Learning
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Prevention programs
Program Effectiveness
Public Health
Quasi-experimental methods
Race
Racial Differences
Racial inequality
Schools
Social & emotional learning
Social Learning
Sociocultural factors
Socioeconomic Status
Student Diversity
Students
Students - psychology
Students with Disabilities
Youth
title Universal School-Based Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) for Diverse Student Subgroups: Implications for Enhancing Equity Through SEL
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T01%3A56%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Universal%20School-Based%20Social%20and%20Emotional%20Learning%20(SEL)%20for%20Diverse%20Student%20Subgroups:%20Implications%20for%20Enhancing%20Equity%20Through%20SEL&rft.jtitle=Prevention%20science&rft.au=Lee,%20Juyeon&rft.date=2023-07-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1011&rft.epage=1022&rft.pages=1011-1022&rft.issn=1389-4986&rft.eissn=1573-6695&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11121-023-01552-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2821341665%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2847563689&rft_id=info:pmid/37256531&rft_ericid=EJ1388378&rfr_iscdi=true