Universal School-Based Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) for Diverse Student Subgroups: Implications for Enhancing Equity Through SEL
School-based, universal social and emotional learning (SEL) has been widely practiced and promoted as a promising approach to prevent youth mental, emotional, and behavioral problems. Although prior research has accumulated robust evidence of the average effects of universal SEL, it remains unclear...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Prevention science 2023-07, Vol.24 (5), p.1011-1022 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1022 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1011 |
container_title | Prevention science |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Lee, Juyeon Shapiro, Valerie B. Kim, Bo-Kyung Elizabeth |
description | School-based, universal social and emotional learning (SEL) has been widely practiced and promoted as a promising approach to prevent youth mental, emotional, and behavioral problems. Although prior research has accumulated robust evidence of the average effects of universal SEL, it remains unclear whether it works similarly or differentially across diverse sociocultural subgroups of students. Investigating subgroup effects has implications for understanding the impact of universal SEL on possible subgroup disparities in student social-emotional competence (SEC). This study examined whether the effects of a universal SEL program on student SEC development differed across diverse student subgroups classified by gender, race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, disability status, and English learner status. Data came from student SEC progress monitoring collected during a 1-year quasi-experimental study of a universal SEL program (
N
= 1592; Grades K–2). The results of multigroup latent growth modeling suggest that (a) the intervention effects were slightly larger for Black students, compared to White or other racial-ethnic subgroups, and (b) the effects were not different across other examined subgroups. This study also found that in the comparison condition, the SEC disparities between Black and White students tended to widen throughout the year, whereas in the intervention condition, Black students showed a similar rate of growth as their White peers. Findings suggest that universal SEL may be similarly beneficial across many diverse student subgroups, while it may yield larger benefits among some racially marginalized subgroups, preventing racial disparities from further widening. Yet the benefits of SEL may not be sufficient to reduce existing subgroup disparities. These findings suggest a need for more studies to examine differential effects of universal preventive programs by diverse subgroups to better inform practices that enhance equity in youth outcomes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11121-023-01552-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2890030917</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1388378</ericid><sourcerecordid>2821341665</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-89438a7d434715e0d215200b82219aa6964397060b85749f80114cdfae495d5a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhS0Eou3ACyCBLLEpi4Cv_90dlABFI7FIu448iTOTKmNP7QRpnqCvjWdSisQCsfL1Pd-5tu5B6BWQ90CI-pAAgEJBKCsICEGL_RN0CkKxQkojnuaaaVNwo-UJOkvplhCQgpHn6IQpKnIJp-j-xvc_XUx2wFWzCWEoPtnkWlyFps8961tcbsPYB59vS2ej7_0an1fl8h3uQsSfj26Hq3FqnR9xNa3WMUy7dIGvtruhb-zBm45s6TfWNwd_eTf14x5fbzK63uA87QV61tkhuZcP5wLdfCmvL78Vyx9fry4_LouGMzIW2nCmrWo54wqEIy0FQQlZaUrBWCuN5MwoInNHKG46TQB403bWcSNaYdkCnc9zdzHcTS6N9bZPjRsG612YUk21IYQRA-o_UAqMg8yLXKC3f6G3YYp5ZQeKKyGZ1CZTdKaaGFKKrqt3sd_auK-B1IdE6znROidaHxOt99n05mH0tNq69tHyO8IMvJ4BF_vmUS6_5_A1UzrrbNZT1vzaxT9_-8ezvwB6lbOF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2847563689</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Universal School-Based Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) for Diverse Student Subgroups: Implications for Enhancing Equity Through SEL</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Journals</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Lee, Juyeon ; Shapiro, Valerie B. ; Kim, Bo-Kyung Elizabeth</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Juyeon ; Shapiro, Valerie B. ; Kim, Bo-Kyung Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><description>School-based, universal social and emotional learning (SEL) has been widely practiced and promoted as a promising approach to prevent youth mental, emotional, and behavioral problems. Although prior research has accumulated robust evidence of the average effects of universal SEL, it remains unclear whether it works similarly or differentially across diverse sociocultural subgroups of students. Investigating subgroup effects has implications for understanding the impact of universal SEL on possible subgroup disparities in student social-emotional competence (SEC). This study examined whether the effects of a universal SEL program on student SEC development differed across diverse student subgroups classified by gender, race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, disability status, and English learner status. Data came from student SEC progress monitoring collected during a 1-year quasi-experimental study of a universal SEL program (
N
= 1592; Grades K–2). The results of multigroup latent growth modeling suggest that (a) the intervention effects were slightly larger for Black students, compared to White or other racial-ethnic subgroups, and (b) the effects were not different across other examined subgroups. This study also found that in the comparison condition, the SEC disparities between Black and White students tended to widen throughout the year, whereas in the intervention condition, Black students showed a similar rate of growth as their White peers. Findings suggest that universal SEL may be similarly beneficial across many diverse student subgroups, while it may yield larger benefits among some racially marginalized subgroups, preventing racial disparities from further widening. Yet the benefits of SEL may not be sufficient to reduce existing subgroup disparities. These findings suggest a need for more studies to examine differential effects of universal preventive programs by diverse subgroups to better inform practices that enhance equity in youth outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1389-4986</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-6695</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11121-023-01552-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37256531</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Behavior problems ; Black people ; Black students ; Child and School Psychology ; Disability ; Elementary Secondary Education ; Emotional intelligence ; Emotions ; English Language Learners ; Ethnicity ; Gender Differences ; Health Psychology ; Humans ; Intervention ; Learning ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Prevention programs ; Program Effectiveness ; Public Health ; Quasi-experimental methods ; Race ; Racial Differences ; Racial inequality ; Schools ; Social & emotional learning ; Social Learning ; Sociocultural factors ; Socioeconomic Status ; Student Diversity ; Students ; Students - psychology ; Students with Disabilities ; Youth</subject><ispartof>Prevention science, 2023-07, Vol.24 (5), p.1011-1022</ispartof><rights>Society for Prevention Research 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2023. Society for Prevention Research.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-89438a7d434715e0d215200b82219aa6964397060b85749f80114cdfae495d5a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-89438a7d434715e0d215200b82219aa6964397060b85749f80114cdfae495d5a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3304-5139</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11121-023-01552-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11121-023-01552-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27843,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1388378$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37256531$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Juyeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, Valerie B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Bo-Kyung Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><title>Universal School-Based Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) for Diverse Student Subgroups: Implications for Enhancing Equity Through SEL</title><title>Prevention science</title><addtitle>Prev Sci</addtitle><addtitle>Prev Sci</addtitle><description>School-based, universal social and emotional learning (SEL) has been widely practiced and promoted as a promising approach to prevent youth mental, emotional, and behavioral problems. Although prior research has accumulated robust evidence of the average effects of universal SEL, it remains unclear whether it works similarly or differentially across diverse sociocultural subgroups of students. Investigating subgroup effects has implications for understanding the impact of universal SEL on possible subgroup disparities in student social-emotional competence (SEC). This study examined whether the effects of a universal SEL program on student SEC development differed across diverse student subgroups classified by gender, race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, disability status, and English learner status. Data came from student SEC progress monitoring collected during a 1-year quasi-experimental study of a universal SEL program (
N
= 1592; Grades K–2). The results of multigroup latent growth modeling suggest that (a) the intervention effects were slightly larger for Black students, compared to White or other racial-ethnic subgroups, and (b) the effects were not different across other examined subgroups. This study also found that in the comparison condition, the SEC disparities between Black and White students tended to widen throughout the year, whereas in the intervention condition, Black students showed a similar rate of growth as their White peers. Findings suggest that universal SEL may be similarly beneficial across many diverse student subgroups, while it may yield larger benefits among some racially marginalized subgroups, preventing racial disparities from further widening. Yet the benefits of SEL may not be sufficient to reduce existing subgroup disparities. These findings suggest a need for more studies to examine differential effects of universal preventive programs by diverse subgroups to better inform practices that enhance equity in youth outcomes.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Behavior problems</subject><subject>Black people</subject><subject>Black students</subject><subject>Child and School Psychology</subject><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Elementary Secondary Education</subject><subject>Emotional intelligence</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>English Language Learners</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Gender Differences</subject><subject>Health Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Prevention programs</subject><subject>Program Effectiveness</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Quasi-experimental methods</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>Racial Differences</subject><subject>Racial inequality</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>Social & emotional learning</subject><subject>Social Learning</subject><subject>Sociocultural factors</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Status</subject><subject>Student Diversity</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Students - psychology</subject><subject>Students with Disabilities</subject><subject>Youth</subject><issn>1389-4986</issn><issn>1573-6695</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhS0Eou3ACyCBLLEpi4Cv_90dlABFI7FIu448iTOTKmNP7QRpnqCvjWdSisQCsfL1Pd-5tu5B6BWQ90CI-pAAgEJBKCsICEGL_RN0CkKxQkojnuaaaVNwo-UJOkvplhCQgpHn6IQpKnIJp-j-xvc_XUx2wFWzCWEoPtnkWlyFps8961tcbsPYB59vS2ej7_0an1fl8h3uQsSfj26Hq3FqnR9xNa3WMUy7dIGvtruhb-zBm45s6TfWNwd_eTf14x5fbzK63uA87QV61tkhuZcP5wLdfCmvL78Vyx9fry4_LouGMzIW2nCmrWo54wqEIy0FQQlZaUrBWCuN5MwoInNHKG46TQB403bWcSNaYdkCnc9zdzHcTS6N9bZPjRsG612YUk21IYQRA-o_UAqMg8yLXKC3f6G3YYp5ZQeKKyGZ1CZTdKaaGFKKrqt3sd_auK-B1IdE6znROidaHxOt99n05mH0tNq69tHyO8IMvJ4BF_vmUS6_5_A1UzrrbNZT1vzaxT9_-8ezvwB6lbOF</recordid><startdate>20230701</startdate><enddate>20230701</enddate><creator>Lee, Juyeon</creator><creator>Shapiro, Valerie B.</creator><creator>Kim, Bo-Kyung Elizabeth</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3304-5139</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230701</creationdate><title>Universal School-Based Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) for Diverse Student Subgroups: Implications for Enhancing Equity Through SEL</title><author>Lee, Juyeon ; Shapiro, Valerie B. ; Kim, Bo-Kyung Elizabeth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-89438a7d434715e0d215200b82219aa6964397060b85749f80114cdfae495d5a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Behavior problems</topic><topic>Black people</topic><topic>Black students</topic><topic>Child and School Psychology</topic><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Elementary Secondary Education</topic><topic>Emotional intelligence</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>English Language Learners</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Gender Differences</topic><topic>Health Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Prevention programs</topic><topic>Program Effectiveness</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Quasi-experimental methods</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>Racial Differences</topic><topic>Racial inequality</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>Social & emotional learning</topic><topic>Social Learning</topic><topic>Sociocultural factors</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Status</topic><topic>Student Diversity</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Students - psychology</topic><topic>Students with Disabilities</topic><topic>Youth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Juyeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, Valerie B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Bo-Kyung Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Political Science Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Prevention science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Juyeon</au><au>Shapiro, Valerie B.</au><au>Kim, Bo-Kyung Elizabeth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1388378</ericid><atitle>Universal School-Based Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) for Diverse Student Subgroups: Implications for Enhancing Equity Through SEL</atitle><jtitle>Prevention science</jtitle><stitle>Prev Sci</stitle><addtitle>Prev Sci</addtitle><date>2023-07-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1011</spage><epage>1022</epage><pages>1011-1022</pages><issn>1389-4986</issn><eissn>1573-6695</eissn><abstract>School-based, universal social and emotional learning (SEL) has been widely practiced and promoted as a promising approach to prevent youth mental, emotional, and behavioral problems. Although prior research has accumulated robust evidence of the average effects of universal SEL, it remains unclear whether it works similarly or differentially across diverse sociocultural subgroups of students. Investigating subgroup effects has implications for understanding the impact of universal SEL on possible subgroup disparities in student social-emotional competence (SEC). This study examined whether the effects of a universal SEL program on student SEC development differed across diverse student subgroups classified by gender, race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, disability status, and English learner status. Data came from student SEC progress monitoring collected during a 1-year quasi-experimental study of a universal SEL program (
N
= 1592; Grades K–2). The results of multigroup latent growth modeling suggest that (a) the intervention effects were slightly larger for Black students, compared to White or other racial-ethnic subgroups, and (b) the effects were not different across other examined subgroups. This study also found that in the comparison condition, the SEC disparities between Black and White students tended to widen throughout the year, whereas in the intervention condition, Black students showed a similar rate of growth as their White peers. Findings suggest that universal SEL may be similarly beneficial across many diverse student subgroups, while it may yield larger benefits among some racially marginalized subgroups, preventing racial disparities from further widening. Yet the benefits of SEL may not be sufficient to reduce existing subgroup disparities. These findings suggest a need for more studies to examine differential effects of universal preventive programs by diverse subgroups to better inform practices that enhance equity in youth outcomes.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>37256531</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11121-023-01552-y</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3304-5139</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1389-4986 |
ispartof | Prevention science, 2023-07, Vol.24 (5), p.1011-1022 |
issn | 1389-4986 1573-6695 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2890030917 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Journals; PAIS Index |
subjects | Adolescent Behavior problems Black people Black students Child and School Psychology Disability Elementary Secondary Education Emotional intelligence Emotions English Language Learners Ethnicity Gender Differences Health Psychology Humans Intervention Learning Medicine Medicine & Public Health Prevention programs Program Effectiveness Public Health Quasi-experimental methods Race Racial Differences Racial inequality Schools Social & emotional learning Social Learning Sociocultural factors Socioeconomic Status Student Diversity Students Students - psychology Students with Disabilities Youth |
title | Universal School-Based Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) for Diverse Student Subgroups: Implications for Enhancing Equity Through SEL |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T01%3A56%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Universal%20School-Based%20Social%20and%20Emotional%20Learning%20(SEL)%20for%20Diverse%20Student%20Subgroups:%20Implications%20for%20Enhancing%20Equity%20Through%20SEL&rft.jtitle=Prevention%20science&rft.au=Lee,%20Juyeon&rft.date=2023-07-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1011&rft.epage=1022&rft.pages=1011-1022&rft.issn=1389-4986&rft.eissn=1573-6695&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11121-023-01552-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2821341665%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2847563689&rft_id=info:pmid/37256531&rft_ericid=EJ1388378&rfr_iscdi=true |