Reimagining Thriving Ethics Programs without Ethics Committees

With the increasing professionalization of clinical ethics, some hospitals and health systems utilize both ethics committees and professional clinical ethicists to address their ethics needs. Drawing upon historical critiques of ethics committees and their own experiences, the authors argue that, in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of bioethics 2023-11, p.1-16
Hauptverfasser: Mabel, Hilary, Crites, Joshua S., Cunningham, Thomas V., Potter, Jordan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 16
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title American journal of bioethics
container_volume
creator Mabel, Hilary
Crites, Joshua S.
Cunningham, Thomas V.
Potter, Jordan
description With the increasing professionalization of clinical ethics, some hospitals and health systems utilize both ethics committees and professional clinical ethicists to address their ethics needs. Drawing upon historical critiques of ethics committees and their own experiences, the authors argue that, in ethics programs with one or more professional clinical ethicists, ethics committees should be dissolved when they fail to meet minimum standards of effectiveness. The authors outline several criteria for assessing effectiveness, describe the benefits of a model that places primary responsibility for ethics work with professional clinical ethicists-the PCE-primary model, and offer suggestions for alternative ethics program structures that empower healthcare professionals to contribute to ethics work in ways more tailored to their strengths and skills while minimizing the shortcomings of ethics committees.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/15265161.2023.2276172
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2889995137</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2889995137</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c234t-3d9de31f50f1dfd50aae6a1d03426fabceb29ac327b4de3a7e15501fbfa95a933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_QeilN63nJE3a3Agy5gcMFJnXIW2TNdKPmWSK_96VbVfn5fDwwvsQcouQIZRwj5wKjgIzCpRllBYCC3pGZsiZSAEKfj5lKtIJuiRXIXwBQA7IZuThw7heb9zghk2ybr37mcIytq4OybsfN173Ifl1sR138fRfjH3vYjQmXJMLq7tgbo53Tj6fluvFS7p6e35dPK7SmrI8pqyRjWFoOVhsbMNBayM0NsByKqyualNRqWtGiyrfg7owyDmgrayWXEvG5uTu0Lv14_fOhKh6F2rTdXow4y4oWpZSSo6s2KP8gNZ-DMEbq7Z-P9H_KQQ1-VInX2rypY6-2D9WL155</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2889995137</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reimagining Thriving Ethics Programs without Ethics Committees</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis:Master (3349 titles)</source><creator>Mabel, Hilary ; Crites, Joshua S. ; Cunningham, Thomas V. ; Potter, Jordan</creator><creatorcontrib>Mabel, Hilary ; Crites, Joshua S. ; Cunningham, Thomas V. ; Potter, Jordan</creatorcontrib><description>With the increasing professionalization of clinical ethics, some hospitals and health systems utilize both ethics committees and professional clinical ethicists to address their ethics needs. Drawing upon historical critiques of ethics committees and their own experiences, the authors argue that, in ethics programs with one or more professional clinical ethicists, ethics committees should be dissolved when they fail to meet minimum standards of effectiveness. The authors outline several criteria for assessing effectiveness, describe the benefits of a model that places primary responsibility for ethics work with professional clinical ethicists-the PCE-primary model, and offer suggestions for alternative ethics program structures that empower healthcare professionals to contribute to ethics work in ways more tailored to their strengths and skills while minimizing the shortcomings of ethics committees.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-5161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-0075</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2276172</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>American journal of bioethics, 2023-11, p.1-16</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c234t-3d9de31f50f1dfd50aae6a1d03426fabceb29ac327b4de3a7e15501fbfa95a933</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3688-4664 ; 0000-0003-4710-2373 ; 0000-0002-8306-7782</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mabel, Hilary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crites, Joshua S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunningham, Thomas V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potter, Jordan</creatorcontrib><title>Reimagining Thriving Ethics Programs without Ethics Committees</title><title>American journal of bioethics</title><description>With the increasing professionalization of clinical ethics, some hospitals and health systems utilize both ethics committees and professional clinical ethicists to address their ethics needs. Drawing upon historical critiques of ethics committees and their own experiences, the authors argue that, in ethics programs with one or more professional clinical ethicists, ethics committees should be dissolved when they fail to meet minimum standards of effectiveness. The authors outline several criteria for assessing effectiveness, describe the benefits of a model that places primary responsibility for ethics work with professional clinical ethicists-the PCE-primary model, and offer suggestions for alternative ethics program structures that empower healthcare professionals to contribute to ethics work in ways more tailored to their strengths and skills while minimizing the shortcomings of ethics committees.</description><issn>1526-5161</issn><issn>1536-0075</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1kF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_QeilN63nJE3a3Agy5gcMFJnXIW2TNdKPmWSK_96VbVfn5fDwwvsQcouQIZRwj5wKjgIzCpRllBYCC3pGZsiZSAEKfj5lKtIJuiRXIXwBQA7IZuThw7heb9zghk2ybr37mcIytq4OybsfN173Ifl1sR138fRfjH3vYjQmXJMLq7tgbo53Tj6fluvFS7p6e35dPK7SmrI8pqyRjWFoOVhsbMNBayM0NsByKqyualNRqWtGiyrfg7owyDmgrayWXEvG5uTu0Lv14_fOhKh6F2rTdXow4y4oWpZSSo6s2KP8gNZ-DMEbq7Z-P9H_KQQ1-VInX2rypY6-2D9WL155</recordid><startdate>20231114</startdate><enddate>20231114</enddate><creator>Mabel, Hilary</creator><creator>Crites, Joshua S.</creator><creator>Cunningham, Thomas V.</creator><creator>Potter, Jordan</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3688-4664</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4710-2373</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8306-7782</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231114</creationdate><title>Reimagining Thriving Ethics Programs without Ethics Committees</title><author>Mabel, Hilary ; Crites, Joshua S. ; Cunningham, Thomas V. ; Potter, Jordan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c234t-3d9de31f50f1dfd50aae6a1d03426fabceb29ac327b4de3a7e15501fbfa95a933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mabel, Hilary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crites, Joshua S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunningham, Thomas V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potter, Jordan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of bioethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mabel, Hilary</au><au>Crites, Joshua S.</au><au>Cunningham, Thomas V.</au><au>Potter, Jordan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reimagining Thriving Ethics Programs without Ethics Committees</atitle><jtitle>American journal of bioethics</jtitle><date>2023-11-14</date><risdate>2023</risdate><spage>1</spage><epage>16</epage><pages>1-16</pages><issn>1526-5161</issn><eissn>1536-0075</eissn><abstract>With the increasing professionalization of clinical ethics, some hospitals and health systems utilize both ethics committees and professional clinical ethicists to address their ethics needs. Drawing upon historical critiques of ethics committees and their own experiences, the authors argue that, in ethics programs with one or more professional clinical ethicists, ethics committees should be dissolved when they fail to meet minimum standards of effectiveness. The authors outline several criteria for assessing effectiveness, describe the benefits of a model that places primary responsibility for ethics work with professional clinical ethicists-the PCE-primary model, and offer suggestions for alternative ethics program structures that empower healthcare professionals to contribute to ethics work in ways more tailored to their strengths and skills while minimizing the shortcomings of ethics committees.</abstract><doi>10.1080/15265161.2023.2276172</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3688-4664</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4710-2373</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8306-7782</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1526-5161
ispartof American journal of bioethics, 2023-11, p.1-16
issn 1526-5161
1536-0075
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2889995137
source Taylor & Francis:Master (3349 titles)
title Reimagining Thriving Ethics Programs without Ethics Committees
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T02%3A12%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reimagining%20Thriving%20Ethics%20Programs%20without%20Ethics%20Committees&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20bioethics&rft.au=Mabel,%20Hilary&rft.date=2023-11-14&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=16&rft.pages=1-16&rft.issn=1526-5161&rft.eissn=1536-0075&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/15265161.2023.2276172&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2889995137%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2889995137&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true