Relation of Crown Failure Load to Flexural Strength for Three Contemporary Dental Polymers

Polymeric materials show great promise for use in a variety of dental applications. Manufacturers generally provide flexural strength information based on standardized (ISO and ASTM) specimen dimensions and loading conditions. It is not clear, however, if flexural strength data are predictive of the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Polymers 2023-11, Vol.15 (21), p.4312
1. Verfasser: Alghazzawi, Tariq F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 21
container_start_page 4312
container_title Polymers
container_volume 15
creator Alghazzawi, Tariq F.
description Polymeric materials show great promise for use in a variety of dental applications. Manufacturers generally provide flexural strength information based on standardized (ISO and ASTM) specimen dimensions and loading conditions. It is not clear, however, if flexural strength data are predictive of the clinical performance of dental crowns. The objectives of this study were, therefore, to determine whether flexural strengths, as measured via three-point bending (3PB), would be predictive of failure loads assessed via crunch-the-crown (CTC) tests. Three brands of polymers (Trilor, Juvora, and Pekkton) were fabricated into rectangular bars and fully contoured crowns (10 specimens of each polymer brand, 30 specimens of each shape). Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and burn off tests were used to characterize/confirm the materials. Bars were tested blindly in 3PB to determine flexural strength, and crowns were CTC-tested to determine failure load after luting to resin abutments. The statistical significance of the test results was evaluated via one-way ANOVA (α = 0.05) and Pearson’s correlation coefficient, while regression analysis was used to test for a correlation between 3PB and CTC results. The fracture mechanisms and failure surface characteristics were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). There were significant differences (p < 0.05) in the mean crown failure loads (Trilor (7033 N) > Juvora (5217 N) > Pekkton (3023 N)) and mean flexural strengths of the bars (Trilor (468 MPa) > Juvora (197 MPa) = Pekkton (192 MPa)). The mode of crown fracture was different between the materials and included deformation (Juvora), ductile-to-brittle fracture (Pekkton), and a combination of cracks and deformation (Trilor). Flexural strengths did not correlate with the corresponding crown failure loads for any of the materials tested. These results suggest that dental practitioners should not rely on the flexural strengths reported from three-point bending tests, as advertised by the manufacturer, to predict the performance of polymeric crowns.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/polym15214312
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2889992564</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A772535703</galeid><sourcerecordid>A772535703</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-509c997ef8b1e00de6140679f617dc6ed42e0297228102b1ee762a4f0f5838353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1LAzEQhhdRsKhH7wEvXrbmY5NsjqVaFQqKHxcvS9yd6JZsUpMs2n9vSj2oM4cZhmdeXmaK4pTgKWMKX6y93QyEU1IxQveKCcWSlRUTeP9Xf1icxLjCOSouBJGT4uUBrE69d8gbNA_-06GF7u0YAC297lDyaGHhawzaoscUwL2ld2R8QE_vAQDNvUswrH3QYYMuwaWM3W-dQIjHxYHRNsLJTz0qnhdXT_Obcnl3fTufLcuWSZFKjlWrlARTvxLAuANBKiykMtlf1wroKgqYKklpTTDNDEhBdWWw4TWrGWdHxflOdx38xwgxNUMfW7BWO_BjbGhdK6UoF1VGz_6hKz8Gl91tqSxGea0yNd1Rb9pC0zvjU9Btzg6GvvUOTJ_nMykpZ1xilhfK3UIbfIwBTLMO_ZBP0hDcbL_T_PkO-wbUKoEu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2888352589</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relation of Crown Failure Load to Flexural Strength for Three Contemporary Dental Polymers</title><source>PubMed Central 开放获取</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Alghazzawi, Tariq F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Alghazzawi, Tariq F.</creatorcontrib><description>Polymeric materials show great promise for use in a variety of dental applications. Manufacturers generally provide flexural strength information based on standardized (ISO and ASTM) specimen dimensions and loading conditions. It is not clear, however, if flexural strength data are predictive of the clinical performance of dental crowns. The objectives of this study were, therefore, to determine whether flexural strengths, as measured via three-point bending (3PB), would be predictive of failure loads assessed via crunch-the-crown (CTC) tests. Three brands of polymers (Trilor, Juvora, and Pekkton) were fabricated into rectangular bars and fully contoured crowns (10 specimens of each polymer brand, 30 specimens of each shape). Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and burn off tests were used to characterize/confirm the materials. Bars were tested blindly in 3PB to determine flexural strength, and crowns were CTC-tested to determine failure load after luting to resin abutments. The statistical significance of the test results was evaluated via one-way ANOVA (α = 0.05) and Pearson’s correlation coefficient, while regression analysis was used to test for a correlation between 3PB and CTC results. The fracture mechanisms and failure surface characteristics were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). There were significant differences (p &lt; 0.05) in the mean crown failure loads (Trilor (7033 N) &gt; Juvora (5217 N) &gt; Pekkton (3023 N)) and mean flexural strengths of the bars (Trilor (468 MPa) &gt; Juvora (197 MPa) = Pekkton (192 MPa)). The mode of crown fracture was different between the materials and included deformation (Juvora), ductile-to-brittle fracture (Pekkton), and a combination of cracks and deformation (Trilor). Flexural strengths did not correlate with the corresponding crown failure loads for any of the materials tested. These results suggest that dental practitioners should not rely on the flexural strengths reported from three-point bending tests, as advertised by the manufacturer, to predict the performance of polymeric crowns.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2073-4360</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2073-4360</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/polym15214312</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Composite materials ; Correlation coefficients ; Deformation ; Dental crowns ; Dental materials ; Dentures ; Ductile fracture ; Ductile-brittle transition ; Failure ; Failure load ; Failure surface ; Flexural strength ; Fourier transforms ; Fracture mechanics ; Manufacturers ; Mean ; Mechanical properties ; Modulus of rupture in bending ; Performance prediction ; Polyethylene ; Polymers ; Regression analysis ; Spectrum analysis ; Statistical analysis ; Surface properties ; Transplants &amp; implants</subject><ispartof>Polymers, 2023-11, Vol.15 (21), p.4312</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-509c997ef8b1e00de6140679f617dc6ed42e0297228102b1ee762a4f0f5838353</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-509c997ef8b1e00de6140679f617dc6ed42e0297228102b1ee762a4f0f5838353</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alghazzawi, Tariq F.</creatorcontrib><title>Relation of Crown Failure Load to Flexural Strength for Three Contemporary Dental Polymers</title><title>Polymers</title><description>Polymeric materials show great promise for use in a variety of dental applications. Manufacturers generally provide flexural strength information based on standardized (ISO and ASTM) specimen dimensions and loading conditions. It is not clear, however, if flexural strength data are predictive of the clinical performance of dental crowns. The objectives of this study were, therefore, to determine whether flexural strengths, as measured via three-point bending (3PB), would be predictive of failure loads assessed via crunch-the-crown (CTC) tests. Three brands of polymers (Trilor, Juvora, and Pekkton) were fabricated into rectangular bars and fully contoured crowns (10 specimens of each polymer brand, 30 specimens of each shape). Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and burn off tests were used to characterize/confirm the materials. Bars were tested blindly in 3PB to determine flexural strength, and crowns were CTC-tested to determine failure load after luting to resin abutments. The statistical significance of the test results was evaluated via one-way ANOVA (α = 0.05) and Pearson’s correlation coefficient, while regression analysis was used to test for a correlation between 3PB and CTC results. The fracture mechanisms and failure surface characteristics were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). There were significant differences (p &lt; 0.05) in the mean crown failure loads (Trilor (7033 N) &gt; Juvora (5217 N) &gt; Pekkton (3023 N)) and mean flexural strengths of the bars (Trilor (468 MPa) &gt; Juvora (197 MPa) = Pekkton (192 MPa)). The mode of crown fracture was different between the materials and included deformation (Juvora), ductile-to-brittle fracture (Pekkton), and a combination of cracks and deformation (Trilor). Flexural strengths did not correlate with the corresponding crown failure loads for any of the materials tested. These results suggest that dental practitioners should not rely on the flexural strengths reported from three-point bending tests, as advertised by the manufacturer, to predict the performance of polymeric crowns.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Composite materials</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Deformation</subject><subject>Dental crowns</subject><subject>Dental materials</subject><subject>Dentures</subject><subject>Ductile fracture</subject><subject>Ductile-brittle transition</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Failure load</subject><subject>Failure surface</subject><subject>Flexural strength</subject><subject>Fourier transforms</subject><subject>Fracture mechanics</subject><subject>Manufacturers</subject><subject>Mean</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Modulus of rupture in bending</subject><subject>Performance prediction</subject><subject>Polyethylene</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Spectrum analysis</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surface properties</subject><subject>Transplants &amp; implants</subject><issn>2073-4360</issn><issn>2073-4360</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1LAzEQhhdRsKhH7wEvXrbmY5NsjqVaFQqKHxcvS9yd6JZsUpMs2n9vSj2oM4cZhmdeXmaK4pTgKWMKX6y93QyEU1IxQveKCcWSlRUTeP9Xf1icxLjCOSouBJGT4uUBrE69d8gbNA_-06GF7u0YAC297lDyaGHhawzaoscUwL2ld2R8QE_vAQDNvUswrH3QYYMuwaWM3W-dQIjHxYHRNsLJTz0qnhdXT_Obcnl3fTufLcuWSZFKjlWrlARTvxLAuANBKiykMtlf1wroKgqYKklpTTDNDEhBdWWw4TWrGWdHxflOdx38xwgxNUMfW7BWO_BjbGhdK6UoF1VGz_6hKz8Gl91tqSxGea0yNd1Rb9pC0zvjU9Btzg6GvvUOTJ_nMykpZ1xilhfK3UIbfIwBTLMO_ZBP0hDcbL_T_PkO-wbUKoEu</recordid><startdate>20231101</startdate><enddate>20231101</enddate><creator>Alghazzawi, Tariq F.</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231101</creationdate><title>Relation of Crown Failure Load to Flexural Strength for Three Contemporary Dental Polymers</title><author>Alghazzawi, Tariq F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-509c997ef8b1e00de6140679f617dc6ed42e0297228102b1ee762a4f0f5838353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Composite materials</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Deformation</topic><topic>Dental crowns</topic><topic>Dental materials</topic><topic>Dentures</topic><topic>Ductile fracture</topic><topic>Ductile-brittle transition</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Failure load</topic><topic>Failure surface</topic><topic>Flexural strength</topic><topic>Fourier transforms</topic><topic>Fracture mechanics</topic><topic>Manufacturers</topic><topic>Mean</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Modulus of rupture in bending</topic><topic>Performance prediction</topic><topic>Polyethylene</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Spectrum analysis</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surface properties</topic><topic>Transplants &amp; implants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alghazzawi, Tariq F.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Polymers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alghazzawi, Tariq F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relation of Crown Failure Load to Flexural Strength for Three Contemporary Dental Polymers</atitle><jtitle>Polymers</jtitle><date>2023-11-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>21</issue><spage>4312</spage><pages>4312-</pages><issn>2073-4360</issn><eissn>2073-4360</eissn><abstract>Polymeric materials show great promise for use in a variety of dental applications. Manufacturers generally provide flexural strength information based on standardized (ISO and ASTM) specimen dimensions and loading conditions. It is not clear, however, if flexural strength data are predictive of the clinical performance of dental crowns. The objectives of this study were, therefore, to determine whether flexural strengths, as measured via three-point bending (3PB), would be predictive of failure loads assessed via crunch-the-crown (CTC) tests. Three brands of polymers (Trilor, Juvora, and Pekkton) were fabricated into rectangular bars and fully contoured crowns (10 specimens of each polymer brand, 30 specimens of each shape). Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and burn off tests were used to characterize/confirm the materials. Bars were tested blindly in 3PB to determine flexural strength, and crowns were CTC-tested to determine failure load after luting to resin abutments. The statistical significance of the test results was evaluated via one-way ANOVA (α = 0.05) and Pearson’s correlation coefficient, while regression analysis was used to test for a correlation between 3PB and CTC results. The fracture mechanisms and failure surface characteristics were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). There were significant differences (p &lt; 0.05) in the mean crown failure loads (Trilor (7033 N) &gt; Juvora (5217 N) &gt; Pekkton (3023 N)) and mean flexural strengths of the bars (Trilor (468 MPa) &gt; Juvora (197 MPa) = Pekkton (192 MPa)). The mode of crown fracture was different between the materials and included deformation (Juvora), ductile-to-brittle fracture (Pekkton), and a combination of cracks and deformation (Trilor). Flexural strengths did not correlate with the corresponding crown failure loads for any of the materials tested. These results suggest that dental practitioners should not rely on the flexural strengths reported from three-point bending tests, as advertised by the manufacturer, to predict the performance of polymeric crowns.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/polym15214312</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2073-4360
ispartof Polymers, 2023-11, Vol.15 (21), p.4312
issn 2073-4360
2073-4360
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2889992564
source PubMed Central 开放获取; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Analysis
Composite materials
Correlation coefficients
Deformation
Dental crowns
Dental materials
Dentures
Ductile fracture
Ductile-brittle transition
Failure
Failure load
Failure surface
Flexural strength
Fourier transforms
Fracture mechanics
Manufacturers
Mean
Mechanical properties
Modulus of rupture in bending
Performance prediction
Polyethylene
Polymers
Regression analysis
Spectrum analysis
Statistical analysis
Surface properties
Transplants & implants
title Relation of Crown Failure Load to Flexural Strength for Three Contemporary Dental Polymers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T10%3A35%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relation%20of%20Crown%20Failure%20Load%20to%20Flexural%20Strength%20for%20Three%20Contemporary%20Dental%20Polymers&rft.jtitle=Polymers&rft.au=Alghazzawi,%20Tariq%20F.&rft.date=2023-11-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=4312&rft.pages=4312-&rft.issn=2073-4360&rft.eissn=2073-4360&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/polym15214312&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA772535703%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2888352589&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A772535703&rfr_iscdi=true