Relation of Crown Failure Load to Flexural Strength for Three Contemporary Dental Polymers
Polymeric materials show great promise for use in a variety of dental applications. Manufacturers generally provide flexural strength information based on standardized (ISO and ASTM) specimen dimensions and loading conditions. It is not clear, however, if flexural strength data are predictive of the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Polymers 2023-11, Vol.15 (21), p.4312 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 21 |
container_start_page | 4312 |
container_title | Polymers |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Alghazzawi, Tariq F. |
description | Polymeric materials show great promise for use in a variety of dental applications. Manufacturers generally provide flexural strength information based on standardized (ISO and ASTM) specimen dimensions and loading conditions. It is not clear, however, if flexural strength data are predictive of the clinical performance of dental crowns. The objectives of this study were, therefore, to determine whether flexural strengths, as measured via three-point bending (3PB), would be predictive of failure loads assessed via crunch-the-crown (CTC) tests. Three brands of polymers (Trilor, Juvora, and Pekkton) were fabricated into rectangular bars and fully contoured crowns (10 specimens of each polymer brand, 30 specimens of each shape). Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and burn off tests were used to characterize/confirm the materials. Bars were tested blindly in 3PB to determine flexural strength, and crowns were CTC-tested to determine failure load after luting to resin abutments. The statistical significance of the test results was evaluated via one-way ANOVA (α = 0.05) and Pearson’s correlation coefficient, while regression analysis was used to test for a correlation between 3PB and CTC results. The fracture mechanisms and failure surface characteristics were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). There were significant differences (p < 0.05) in the mean crown failure loads (Trilor (7033 N) > Juvora (5217 N) > Pekkton (3023 N)) and mean flexural strengths of the bars (Trilor (468 MPa) > Juvora (197 MPa) = Pekkton (192 MPa)). The mode of crown fracture was different between the materials and included deformation (Juvora), ductile-to-brittle fracture (Pekkton), and a combination of cracks and deformation (Trilor). Flexural strengths did not correlate with the corresponding crown failure loads for any of the materials tested. These results suggest that dental practitioners should not rely on the flexural strengths reported from three-point bending tests, as advertised by the manufacturer, to predict the performance of polymeric crowns. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/polym15214312 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2889992564</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A772535703</galeid><sourcerecordid>A772535703</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-509c997ef8b1e00de6140679f617dc6ed42e0297228102b1ee762a4f0f5838353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1LAzEQhhdRsKhH7wEvXrbmY5NsjqVaFQqKHxcvS9yd6JZsUpMs2n9vSj2oM4cZhmdeXmaK4pTgKWMKX6y93QyEU1IxQveKCcWSlRUTeP9Xf1icxLjCOSouBJGT4uUBrE69d8gbNA_-06GF7u0YAC297lDyaGHhawzaoscUwL2ld2R8QE_vAQDNvUswrH3QYYMuwaWM3W-dQIjHxYHRNsLJTz0qnhdXT_Obcnl3fTufLcuWSZFKjlWrlARTvxLAuANBKiykMtlf1wroKgqYKklpTTDNDEhBdWWw4TWrGWdHxflOdx38xwgxNUMfW7BWO_BjbGhdK6UoF1VGz_6hKz8Gl91tqSxGea0yNd1Rb9pC0zvjU9Btzg6GvvUOTJ_nMykpZ1xilhfK3UIbfIwBTLMO_ZBP0hDcbL_T_PkO-wbUKoEu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2888352589</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relation of Crown Failure Load to Flexural Strength for Three Contemporary Dental Polymers</title><source>PubMed Central 开放获取</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Alghazzawi, Tariq F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Alghazzawi, Tariq F.</creatorcontrib><description>Polymeric materials show great promise for use in a variety of dental applications. Manufacturers generally provide flexural strength information based on standardized (ISO and ASTM) specimen dimensions and loading conditions. It is not clear, however, if flexural strength data are predictive of the clinical performance of dental crowns. The objectives of this study were, therefore, to determine whether flexural strengths, as measured via three-point bending (3PB), would be predictive of failure loads assessed via crunch-the-crown (CTC) tests. Three brands of polymers (Trilor, Juvora, and Pekkton) were fabricated into rectangular bars and fully contoured crowns (10 specimens of each polymer brand, 30 specimens of each shape). Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and burn off tests were used to characterize/confirm the materials. Bars were tested blindly in 3PB to determine flexural strength, and crowns were CTC-tested to determine failure load after luting to resin abutments. The statistical significance of the test results was evaluated via one-way ANOVA (α = 0.05) and Pearson’s correlation coefficient, while regression analysis was used to test for a correlation between 3PB and CTC results. The fracture mechanisms and failure surface characteristics were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). There were significant differences (p < 0.05) in the mean crown failure loads (Trilor (7033 N) > Juvora (5217 N) > Pekkton (3023 N)) and mean flexural strengths of the bars (Trilor (468 MPa) > Juvora (197 MPa) = Pekkton (192 MPa)). The mode of crown fracture was different between the materials and included deformation (Juvora), ductile-to-brittle fracture (Pekkton), and a combination of cracks and deformation (Trilor). Flexural strengths did not correlate with the corresponding crown failure loads for any of the materials tested. These results suggest that dental practitioners should not rely on the flexural strengths reported from three-point bending tests, as advertised by the manufacturer, to predict the performance of polymeric crowns.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2073-4360</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2073-4360</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/polym15214312</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Composite materials ; Correlation coefficients ; Deformation ; Dental crowns ; Dental materials ; Dentures ; Ductile fracture ; Ductile-brittle transition ; Failure ; Failure load ; Failure surface ; Flexural strength ; Fourier transforms ; Fracture mechanics ; Manufacturers ; Mean ; Mechanical properties ; Modulus of rupture in bending ; Performance prediction ; Polyethylene ; Polymers ; Regression analysis ; Spectrum analysis ; Statistical analysis ; Surface properties ; Transplants & implants</subject><ispartof>Polymers, 2023-11, Vol.15 (21), p.4312</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-509c997ef8b1e00de6140679f617dc6ed42e0297228102b1ee762a4f0f5838353</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-509c997ef8b1e00de6140679f617dc6ed42e0297228102b1ee762a4f0f5838353</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alghazzawi, Tariq F.</creatorcontrib><title>Relation of Crown Failure Load to Flexural Strength for Three Contemporary Dental Polymers</title><title>Polymers</title><description>Polymeric materials show great promise for use in a variety of dental applications. Manufacturers generally provide flexural strength information based on standardized (ISO and ASTM) specimen dimensions and loading conditions. It is not clear, however, if flexural strength data are predictive of the clinical performance of dental crowns. The objectives of this study were, therefore, to determine whether flexural strengths, as measured via three-point bending (3PB), would be predictive of failure loads assessed via crunch-the-crown (CTC) tests. Three brands of polymers (Trilor, Juvora, and Pekkton) were fabricated into rectangular bars and fully contoured crowns (10 specimens of each polymer brand, 30 specimens of each shape). Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and burn off tests were used to characterize/confirm the materials. Bars were tested blindly in 3PB to determine flexural strength, and crowns were CTC-tested to determine failure load after luting to resin abutments. The statistical significance of the test results was evaluated via one-way ANOVA (α = 0.05) and Pearson’s correlation coefficient, while regression analysis was used to test for a correlation between 3PB and CTC results. The fracture mechanisms and failure surface characteristics were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). There were significant differences (p < 0.05) in the mean crown failure loads (Trilor (7033 N) > Juvora (5217 N) > Pekkton (3023 N)) and mean flexural strengths of the bars (Trilor (468 MPa) > Juvora (197 MPa) = Pekkton (192 MPa)). The mode of crown fracture was different between the materials and included deformation (Juvora), ductile-to-brittle fracture (Pekkton), and a combination of cracks and deformation (Trilor). Flexural strengths did not correlate with the corresponding crown failure loads for any of the materials tested. These results suggest that dental practitioners should not rely on the flexural strengths reported from three-point bending tests, as advertised by the manufacturer, to predict the performance of polymeric crowns.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Composite materials</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Deformation</subject><subject>Dental crowns</subject><subject>Dental materials</subject><subject>Dentures</subject><subject>Ductile fracture</subject><subject>Ductile-brittle transition</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Failure load</subject><subject>Failure surface</subject><subject>Flexural strength</subject><subject>Fourier transforms</subject><subject>Fracture mechanics</subject><subject>Manufacturers</subject><subject>Mean</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Modulus of rupture in bending</subject><subject>Performance prediction</subject><subject>Polyethylene</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Spectrum analysis</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surface properties</subject><subject>Transplants & implants</subject><issn>2073-4360</issn><issn>2073-4360</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1LAzEQhhdRsKhH7wEvXrbmY5NsjqVaFQqKHxcvS9yd6JZsUpMs2n9vSj2oM4cZhmdeXmaK4pTgKWMKX6y93QyEU1IxQveKCcWSlRUTeP9Xf1icxLjCOSouBJGT4uUBrE69d8gbNA_-06GF7u0YAC297lDyaGHhawzaoscUwL2ld2R8QE_vAQDNvUswrH3QYYMuwaWM3W-dQIjHxYHRNsLJTz0qnhdXT_Obcnl3fTufLcuWSZFKjlWrlARTvxLAuANBKiykMtlf1wroKgqYKklpTTDNDEhBdWWw4TWrGWdHxflOdx38xwgxNUMfW7BWO_BjbGhdK6UoF1VGz_6hKz8Gl91tqSxGea0yNd1Rb9pC0zvjU9Btzg6GvvUOTJ_nMykpZ1xilhfK3UIbfIwBTLMO_ZBP0hDcbL_T_PkO-wbUKoEu</recordid><startdate>20231101</startdate><enddate>20231101</enddate><creator>Alghazzawi, Tariq F.</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231101</creationdate><title>Relation of Crown Failure Load to Flexural Strength for Three Contemporary Dental Polymers</title><author>Alghazzawi, Tariq F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-509c997ef8b1e00de6140679f617dc6ed42e0297228102b1ee762a4f0f5838353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Composite materials</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Deformation</topic><topic>Dental crowns</topic><topic>Dental materials</topic><topic>Dentures</topic><topic>Ductile fracture</topic><topic>Ductile-brittle transition</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Failure load</topic><topic>Failure surface</topic><topic>Flexural strength</topic><topic>Fourier transforms</topic><topic>Fracture mechanics</topic><topic>Manufacturers</topic><topic>Mean</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Modulus of rupture in bending</topic><topic>Performance prediction</topic><topic>Polyethylene</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Spectrum analysis</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surface properties</topic><topic>Transplants & implants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alghazzawi, Tariq F.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Polymers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alghazzawi, Tariq F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relation of Crown Failure Load to Flexural Strength for Three Contemporary Dental Polymers</atitle><jtitle>Polymers</jtitle><date>2023-11-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>21</issue><spage>4312</spage><pages>4312-</pages><issn>2073-4360</issn><eissn>2073-4360</eissn><abstract>Polymeric materials show great promise for use in a variety of dental applications. Manufacturers generally provide flexural strength information based on standardized (ISO and ASTM) specimen dimensions and loading conditions. It is not clear, however, if flexural strength data are predictive of the clinical performance of dental crowns. The objectives of this study were, therefore, to determine whether flexural strengths, as measured via three-point bending (3PB), would be predictive of failure loads assessed via crunch-the-crown (CTC) tests. Three brands of polymers (Trilor, Juvora, and Pekkton) were fabricated into rectangular bars and fully contoured crowns (10 specimens of each polymer brand, 30 specimens of each shape). Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and burn off tests were used to characterize/confirm the materials. Bars were tested blindly in 3PB to determine flexural strength, and crowns were CTC-tested to determine failure load after luting to resin abutments. The statistical significance of the test results was evaluated via one-way ANOVA (α = 0.05) and Pearson’s correlation coefficient, while regression analysis was used to test for a correlation between 3PB and CTC results. The fracture mechanisms and failure surface characteristics were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). There were significant differences (p < 0.05) in the mean crown failure loads (Trilor (7033 N) > Juvora (5217 N) > Pekkton (3023 N)) and mean flexural strengths of the bars (Trilor (468 MPa) > Juvora (197 MPa) = Pekkton (192 MPa)). The mode of crown fracture was different between the materials and included deformation (Juvora), ductile-to-brittle fracture (Pekkton), and a combination of cracks and deformation (Trilor). Flexural strengths did not correlate with the corresponding crown failure loads for any of the materials tested. These results suggest that dental practitioners should not rely on the flexural strengths reported from three-point bending tests, as advertised by the manufacturer, to predict the performance of polymeric crowns.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/polym15214312</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2073-4360 |
ispartof | Polymers, 2023-11, Vol.15 (21), p.4312 |
issn | 2073-4360 2073-4360 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2889992564 |
source | PubMed Central 开放获取; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Analysis Composite materials Correlation coefficients Deformation Dental crowns Dental materials Dentures Ductile fracture Ductile-brittle transition Failure Failure load Failure surface Flexural strength Fourier transforms Fracture mechanics Manufacturers Mean Mechanical properties Modulus of rupture in bending Performance prediction Polyethylene Polymers Regression analysis Spectrum analysis Statistical analysis Surface properties Transplants & implants |
title | Relation of Crown Failure Load to Flexural Strength for Three Contemporary Dental Polymers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T10%3A35%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relation%20of%20Crown%20Failure%20Load%20to%20Flexural%20Strength%20for%20Three%20Contemporary%20Dental%20Polymers&rft.jtitle=Polymers&rft.au=Alghazzawi,%20Tariq%20F.&rft.date=2023-11-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=4312&rft.pages=4312-&rft.issn=2073-4360&rft.eissn=2073-4360&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/polym15214312&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA772535703%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2888352589&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A772535703&rfr_iscdi=true |