The Efficacy and Safety of Metastasis-directed Therapy in Patients with Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies
Metastasis-directed therapy results in promising clinical outcomes and low rates of adverse events. It can be a valuable treatment option either for oligorecurrent patients wishing to avoid androgen deprivation therapy or as a treatment intensification method. Phase 3 trials are necessary. Context:...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European urology 2024-02, Vol.85 (2), p.125-138 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 138 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 125 |
container_title | European urology |
container_volume | 85 |
creator | Miszczyk, Marcin Rajwa, Pawel Yanagisawa, Takafumi Nowicka, Zuzanna Shim, Sungryul Laukhtina, Ekaterina Kawada, Tatsushi von Deimling, Markus Pradere, Benjamin Gómez Rivas, Juan Gandaglia, Giorgio van den Bergh, Roderick C.N. Goldner, Gregor Supiot, Stephane Zilli, Thomas Trinh, Quoc-Dien Nguyen, Paul L. Briganti, Alberto Ost, Piet Ploussard, Guillaume Shariat, Shahrokh F. |
description | Metastasis-directed therapy results in promising clinical outcomes and low rates of adverse events. It can be a valuable treatment option either for oligorecurrent patients wishing to avoid androgen deprivation therapy or as a treatment intensification method. Phase 3 trials are necessary.
Context: Despite the lack of level 1 evidence, metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) is used widely in the management of metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) patients. Data are continuously emerging from well-designed prospective studies.
To summarise and report the evidence on oncological and safety outcomes of MDT in the management of mPCa patients.
Evidence acquisition: We searched the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for prospective studies assessing progression-free survival (PFS), local control (LC), androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)-free survival (ADT-FS), overall survival (OS), and/or adverse events (AEs) in mPCa patients treated with MDT. A meta-analysis was performed for 1- and 2-yr PFS, LC, ADT-FS, OS, and rate of AEs. Meta-regression and sensitivity analysis were performed to account for heterogeneity and identify moderators.
Evidence synthesis: We identified 22 prospective studies (n = 1137), including two randomised controlled trials (n = 116). Two studies were excluded from the meta-analysis (n = 120). The estimated 2-yr PFS was 46% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 36–56%) or 42% (95% CI: 33–52%) after excluding studies using biochemical or ADT-related endpoints. The estimated 2-yr LC, ADT-FS, and OS were 97% (95% CI: 94–98%), 55% (95% CI: 44–65%), and 97% (95% CI: 95–98%), respectively. Rates of treatment-related grade 2 and ≥3 AEs were 2.4% (95% CI: 0.2–7%) and 0.3% (95% CI: 0–1%), respectively.
MDT is a promising treatment strategy associated with favourable PFS, excellent LC, and a low toxicity profile that allows oligorecurrent hormone-sensitive patients to avoid or defer ADT-related toxicity. Integration of MDT with other therapies offers a promising research direction, in particular, in conjunction with systemic treatments and as a component of definitive care for oligometastatic PCa. However, in the absence of randomised trials, using MDT for treatment intensification remains an experimental approach, and the impact on OS is uncertain.
Direct treatment of metastases is a promising option for selected prostate cancer patients. It can delay hormone therapy and is being investigated as a way of intensifying treatment at the expense of manageable t |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.10.012 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2889242258</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0302283823032098</els_id><sourcerecordid>2889242258</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-d69c3dff630d47c8699de7ad5cc05d6f00c36ed29b37e00ba7e0901a45f54c653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kd1KJDEQhYO46Ky7byCSS296rE46_ePFggzuD7gozux1yCQVJsNM92ySVvpBfN9Nb6uXQkig-OqcSh1CznOY55CXV9s59r733ZwB46k0h5wdkVleVzyrRAnHZAYcWMZqXp-SzyFsAYCLhp-QU141hShEPiMvqw3SW2udVnqgqjV0qSzGgXaW_saoQjouZMZ51BENTbhXh4G6lj6o6LCNgT67uKEPvktsRLpQrUZ_TW_ocggR94nS9BGfHD7_1x9VM9Wq3ZCER5ux85DU3RPSZeyNw_CFfLJqF_Dr63tG_ny_XS1-Znf3P34tbu4yXUAdM1M2mhtrSw6mqHRdNo3BShmhNQhTWgDNSzSsWfMKAdYq3Q3kqhBWFLoU_IxcTroH3_3tMUS5d0Hjbqda7PogWV03rGBM1AktJlSncYNHKw_e7ZUfZA5yDERu5RSIHAMZqymQ1Hbx6tCv92jem94SSMC3CcD0z7QkL4NOa9U4rVyazn3s8A-ZnqDf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2889242258</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Efficacy and Safety of Metastasis-directed Therapy in Patients with Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Miszczyk, Marcin ; Rajwa, Pawel ; Yanagisawa, Takafumi ; Nowicka, Zuzanna ; Shim, Sungryul ; Laukhtina, Ekaterina ; Kawada, Tatsushi ; von Deimling, Markus ; Pradere, Benjamin ; Gómez Rivas, Juan ; Gandaglia, Giorgio ; van den Bergh, Roderick C.N. ; Goldner, Gregor ; Supiot, Stephane ; Zilli, Thomas ; Trinh, Quoc-Dien ; Nguyen, Paul L. ; Briganti, Alberto ; Ost, Piet ; Ploussard, Guillaume ; Shariat, Shahrokh F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Miszczyk, Marcin ; Rajwa, Pawel ; Yanagisawa, Takafumi ; Nowicka, Zuzanna ; Shim, Sungryul ; Laukhtina, Ekaterina ; Kawada, Tatsushi ; von Deimling, Markus ; Pradere, Benjamin ; Gómez Rivas, Juan ; Gandaglia, Giorgio ; van den Bergh, Roderick C.N. ; Goldner, Gregor ; Supiot, Stephane ; Zilli, Thomas ; Trinh, Quoc-Dien ; Nguyen, Paul L. ; Briganti, Alberto ; Ost, Piet ; Ploussard, Guillaume ; Shariat, Shahrokh F.</creatorcontrib><description>Metastasis-directed therapy results in promising clinical outcomes and low rates of adverse events. It can be a valuable treatment option either for oligorecurrent patients wishing to avoid androgen deprivation therapy or as a treatment intensification method. Phase 3 trials are necessary.
Context: Despite the lack of level 1 evidence, metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) is used widely in the management of metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) patients. Data are continuously emerging from well-designed prospective studies.
To summarise and report the evidence on oncological and safety outcomes of MDT in the management of mPCa patients.
Evidence acquisition: We searched the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for prospective studies assessing progression-free survival (PFS), local control (LC), androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)-free survival (ADT-FS), overall survival (OS), and/or adverse events (AEs) in mPCa patients treated with MDT. A meta-analysis was performed for 1- and 2-yr PFS, LC, ADT-FS, OS, and rate of AEs. Meta-regression and sensitivity analysis were performed to account for heterogeneity and identify moderators.
Evidence synthesis: We identified 22 prospective studies (n = 1137), including two randomised controlled trials (n = 116). Two studies were excluded from the meta-analysis (n = 120). The estimated 2-yr PFS was 46% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 36–56%) or 42% (95% CI: 33–52%) after excluding studies using biochemical or ADT-related endpoints. The estimated 2-yr LC, ADT-FS, and OS were 97% (95% CI: 94–98%), 55% (95% CI: 44–65%), and 97% (95% CI: 95–98%), respectively. Rates of treatment-related grade 2 and ≥3 AEs were 2.4% (95% CI: 0.2–7%) and 0.3% (95% CI: 0–1%), respectively.
MDT is a promising treatment strategy associated with favourable PFS, excellent LC, and a low toxicity profile that allows oligorecurrent hormone-sensitive patients to avoid or defer ADT-related toxicity. Integration of MDT with other therapies offers a promising research direction, in particular, in conjunction with systemic treatments and as a component of definitive care for oligometastatic PCa. However, in the absence of randomised trials, using MDT for treatment intensification remains an experimental approach, and the impact on OS is uncertain.
Direct treatment of metastases is a promising option for selected prostate cancer patients. It can delay hormone therapy and is being investigated as a way of intensifying treatment at the expense of manageable toxicity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0302-2838</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7560</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.10.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37945451</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Androgen Antagonists - adverse effects ; Hormones ; Humans ; Male ; Metastasectomy ; Metastasis-directed therapy ; Oligometastatic ; Progression-Free Survival ; Prospective Studies ; Prostate cancer ; Prostatic Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Radiation therapy</subject><ispartof>European urology, 2024-02, Vol.85 (2), p.125-138</ispartof><rights>2023 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-d69c3dff630d47c8699de7ad5cc05d6f00c36ed29b37e00ba7e0901a45f54c653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-d69c3dff630d47c8699de7ad5cc05d6f00c36ed29b37e00ba7e0901a45f54c653</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4375-0827</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37945451$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Miszczyk, Marcin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajwa, Pawel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yanagisawa, Takafumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nowicka, Zuzanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shim, Sungryul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laukhtina, Ekaterina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawada, Tatsushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Deimling, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pradere, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez Rivas, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gandaglia, Giorgio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van den Bergh, Roderick C.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldner, Gregor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Supiot, Stephane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zilli, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trinh, Quoc-Dien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Paul L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Briganti, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ost, Piet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ploussard, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shariat, Shahrokh F.</creatorcontrib><title>The Efficacy and Safety of Metastasis-directed Therapy in Patients with Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies</title><title>European urology</title><addtitle>Eur Urol</addtitle><description>Metastasis-directed therapy results in promising clinical outcomes and low rates of adverse events. It can be a valuable treatment option either for oligorecurrent patients wishing to avoid androgen deprivation therapy or as a treatment intensification method. Phase 3 trials are necessary.
Context: Despite the lack of level 1 evidence, metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) is used widely in the management of metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) patients. Data are continuously emerging from well-designed prospective studies.
To summarise and report the evidence on oncological and safety outcomes of MDT in the management of mPCa patients.
Evidence acquisition: We searched the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for prospective studies assessing progression-free survival (PFS), local control (LC), androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)-free survival (ADT-FS), overall survival (OS), and/or adverse events (AEs) in mPCa patients treated with MDT. A meta-analysis was performed for 1- and 2-yr PFS, LC, ADT-FS, OS, and rate of AEs. Meta-regression and sensitivity analysis were performed to account for heterogeneity and identify moderators.
Evidence synthesis: We identified 22 prospective studies (n = 1137), including two randomised controlled trials (n = 116). Two studies were excluded from the meta-analysis (n = 120). The estimated 2-yr PFS was 46% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 36–56%) or 42% (95% CI: 33–52%) after excluding studies using biochemical or ADT-related endpoints. The estimated 2-yr LC, ADT-FS, and OS were 97% (95% CI: 94–98%), 55% (95% CI: 44–65%), and 97% (95% CI: 95–98%), respectively. Rates of treatment-related grade 2 and ≥3 AEs were 2.4% (95% CI: 0.2–7%) and 0.3% (95% CI: 0–1%), respectively.
MDT is a promising treatment strategy associated with favourable PFS, excellent LC, and a low toxicity profile that allows oligorecurrent hormone-sensitive patients to avoid or defer ADT-related toxicity. Integration of MDT with other therapies offers a promising research direction, in particular, in conjunction with systemic treatments and as a component of definitive care for oligometastatic PCa. However, in the absence of randomised trials, using MDT for treatment intensification remains an experimental approach, and the impact on OS is uncertain.
Direct treatment of metastases is a promising option for selected prostate cancer patients. It can delay hormone therapy and is being investigated as a way of intensifying treatment at the expense of manageable toxicity.</description><subject>Androgen Antagonists - adverse effects</subject><subject>Hormones</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Metastasectomy</subject><subject>Metastasis-directed therapy</subject><subject>Oligometastatic</subject><subject>Progression-Free Survival</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><issn>0302-2838</issn><issn>1873-7560</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kd1KJDEQhYO46Ky7byCSS296rE46_ePFggzuD7gozux1yCQVJsNM92ySVvpBfN9Nb6uXQkig-OqcSh1CznOY55CXV9s59r733ZwB46k0h5wdkVleVzyrRAnHZAYcWMZqXp-SzyFsAYCLhp-QU141hShEPiMvqw3SW2udVnqgqjV0qSzGgXaW_saoQjouZMZ51BENTbhXh4G6lj6o6LCNgT67uKEPvktsRLpQrUZ_TW_ocggR94nS9BGfHD7_1x9VM9Wq3ZCER5ux85DU3RPSZeyNw_CFfLJqF_Dr63tG_ny_XS1-Znf3P34tbu4yXUAdM1M2mhtrSw6mqHRdNo3BShmhNQhTWgDNSzSsWfMKAdYq3Q3kqhBWFLoU_IxcTroH3_3tMUS5d0Hjbqda7PogWV03rGBM1AktJlSncYNHKw_e7ZUfZA5yDERu5RSIHAMZqymQ1Hbx6tCv92jem94SSMC3CcD0z7QkL4NOa9U4rVyazn3s8A-ZnqDf</recordid><startdate>202402</startdate><enddate>202402</enddate><creator>Miszczyk, Marcin</creator><creator>Rajwa, Pawel</creator><creator>Yanagisawa, Takafumi</creator><creator>Nowicka, Zuzanna</creator><creator>Shim, Sungryul</creator><creator>Laukhtina, Ekaterina</creator><creator>Kawada, Tatsushi</creator><creator>von Deimling, Markus</creator><creator>Pradere, Benjamin</creator><creator>Gómez Rivas, Juan</creator><creator>Gandaglia, Giorgio</creator><creator>van den Bergh, Roderick C.N.</creator><creator>Goldner, Gregor</creator><creator>Supiot, Stephane</creator><creator>Zilli, Thomas</creator><creator>Trinh, Quoc-Dien</creator><creator>Nguyen, Paul L.</creator><creator>Briganti, Alberto</creator><creator>Ost, Piet</creator><creator>Ploussard, Guillaume</creator><creator>Shariat, Shahrokh F.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4375-0827</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202402</creationdate><title>The Efficacy and Safety of Metastasis-directed Therapy in Patients with Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies</title><author>Miszczyk, Marcin ; Rajwa, Pawel ; Yanagisawa, Takafumi ; Nowicka, Zuzanna ; Shim, Sungryul ; Laukhtina, Ekaterina ; Kawada, Tatsushi ; von Deimling, Markus ; Pradere, Benjamin ; Gómez Rivas, Juan ; Gandaglia, Giorgio ; van den Bergh, Roderick C.N. ; Goldner, Gregor ; Supiot, Stephane ; Zilli, Thomas ; Trinh, Quoc-Dien ; Nguyen, Paul L. ; Briganti, Alberto ; Ost, Piet ; Ploussard, Guillaume ; Shariat, Shahrokh F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-d69c3dff630d47c8699de7ad5cc05d6f00c36ed29b37e00ba7e0901a45f54c653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Androgen Antagonists - adverse effects</topic><topic>Hormones</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Metastasectomy</topic><topic>Metastasis-directed therapy</topic><topic>Oligometastatic</topic><topic>Progression-Free Survival</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miszczyk, Marcin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajwa, Pawel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yanagisawa, Takafumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nowicka, Zuzanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shim, Sungryul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laukhtina, Ekaterina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawada, Tatsushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Deimling, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pradere, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez Rivas, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gandaglia, Giorgio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van den Bergh, Roderick C.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldner, Gregor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Supiot, Stephane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zilli, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trinh, Quoc-Dien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Paul L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Briganti, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ost, Piet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ploussard, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shariat, Shahrokh F.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miszczyk, Marcin</au><au>Rajwa, Pawel</au><au>Yanagisawa, Takafumi</au><au>Nowicka, Zuzanna</au><au>Shim, Sungryul</au><au>Laukhtina, Ekaterina</au><au>Kawada, Tatsushi</au><au>von Deimling, Markus</au><au>Pradere, Benjamin</au><au>Gómez Rivas, Juan</au><au>Gandaglia, Giorgio</au><au>van den Bergh, Roderick C.N.</au><au>Goldner, Gregor</au><au>Supiot, Stephane</au><au>Zilli, Thomas</au><au>Trinh, Quoc-Dien</au><au>Nguyen, Paul L.</au><au>Briganti, Alberto</au><au>Ost, Piet</au><au>Ploussard, Guillaume</au><au>Shariat, Shahrokh F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Efficacy and Safety of Metastasis-directed Therapy in Patients with Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies</atitle><jtitle>European urology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Urol</addtitle><date>2024-02</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>125</spage><epage>138</epage><pages>125-138</pages><issn>0302-2838</issn><eissn>1873-7560</eissn><abstract>Metastasis-directed therapy results in promising clinical outcomes and low rates of adverse events. It can be a valuable treatment option either for oligorecurrent patients wishing to avoid androgen deprivation therapy or as a treatment intensification method. Phase 3 trials are necessary.
Context: Despite the lack of level 1 evidence, metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) is used widely in the management of metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) patients. Data are continuously emerging from well-designed prospective studies.
To summarise and report the evidence on oncological and safety outcomes of MDT in the management of mPCa patients.
Evidence acquisition: We searched the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for prospective studies assessing progression-free survival (PFS), local control (LC), androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)-free survival (ADT-FS), overall survival (OS), and/or adverse events (AEs) in mPCa patients treated with MDT. A meta-analysis was performed for 1- and 2-yr PFS, LC, ADT-FS, OS, and rate of AEs. Meta-regression and sensitivity analysis were performed to account for heterogeneity and identify moderators.
Evidence synthesis: We identified 22 prospective studies (n = 1137), including two randomised controlled trials (n = 116). Two studies were excluded from the meta-analysis (n = 120). The estimated 2-yr PFS was 46% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 36–56%) or 42% (95% CI: 33–52%) after excluding studies using biochemical or ADT-related endpoints. The estimated 2-yr LC, ADT-FS, and OS were 97% (95% CI: 94–98%), 55% (95% CI: 44–65%), and 97% (95% CI: 95–98%), respectively. Rates of treatment-related grade 2 and ≥3 AEs were 2.4% (95% CI: 0.2–7%) and 0.3% (95% CI: 0–1%), respectively.
MDT is a promising treatment strategy associated with favourable PFS, excellent LC, and a low toxicity profile that allows oligorecurrent hormone-sensitive patients to avoid or defer ADT-related toxicity. Integration of MDT with other therapies offers a promising research direction, in particular, in conjunction with systemic treatments and as a component of definitive care for oligometastatic PCa. However, in the absence of randomised trials, using MDT for treatment intensification remains an experimental approach, and the impact on OS is uncertain.
Direct treatment of metastases is a promising option for selected prostate cancer patients. It can delay hormone therapy and is being investigated as a way of intensifying treatment at the expense of manageable toxicity.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>37945451</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.eururo.2023.10.012</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4375-0827</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0302-2838 |
ispartof | European urology, 2024-02, Vol.85 (2), p.125-138 |
issn | 0302-2838 1873-7560 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2889242258 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Androgen Antagonists - adverse effects Hormones Humans Male Metastasectomy Metastasis-directed therapy Oligometastatic Progression-Free Survival Prospective Studies Prostate cancer Prostatic Neoplasms - drug therapy Radiation therapy |
title | The Efficacy and Safety of Metastasis-directed Therapy in Patients with Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T18%3A44%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Efficacy%20and%20Safety%20of%20Metastasis-directed%20Therapy%20in%20Patients%20with%20Prostate%20Cancer:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-analysis%20of%20Prospective%20Studies&rft.jtitle=European%20urology&rft.au=Miszczyk,%20Marcin&rft.date=2024-02&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=125&rft.epage=138&rft.pages=125-138&rft.issn=0302-2838&rft.eissn=1873-7560&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.eururo.2023.10.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2889242258%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2889242258&rft_id=info:pmid/37945451&rft_els_id=S0302283823032098&rfr_iscdi=true |