Mapping material use and embodied carbon in UK construction
The latest available high-level top-down analysis shows that the embodied carbon of the UK construction in 2018 was 43 MtCO2e, of which 80% came from materials and on-site activities. In this paper, for the first time, we combine a detailed bottom-up model of representative residential and non-resid...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Resources, conservation and recycling conservation and recycling, 2023-10, Vol.197, p.107056, Article 107056 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 107056 |
container_title | Resources, conservation and recycling |
container_volume | 197 |
creator | Drewniok, Michał P. Azevedo, José Manuel Cruz Dunant, Cyrille F. Allwood, Julian M. Cullen, Jonathan M. Ibell, Tim Hawkins, Will |
description | The latest available high-level top-down analysis shows that the embodied carbon of the UK construction in 2018 was 43 MtCO2e, of which 80% came from materials and on-site activities. In this paper, for the first time, we combine a detailed bottom-up model of representative residential and non-residential buildings with top-down infrastructure and other material consumption data to quantify the material use and embodied carbon in UK construction. We found that almost 100 Mt of materials were used with an embodied carbon of 25 Mt CO2e. Half of these emissions were from concrete. We found that existing top-down approaches underestimate emissions by up to 20%. We developed a benchmark for UK building typologies and explore interventions to achieve the UK's carbon reduction goals. We found that conversion from non-domestic to domestic purposes can bring 34% embodied carbon savings of the construction total, 30% by avoiding demolition, 20% by switching to the most material and carbon efficient technology options and by 10% if all new houses were multi-storey buildings. We have shown that the bottom-up approach allows identifying areas with high potential for decarbionisation. Due to the flexibility of the model, it can be successfully used in other countries and regions.
[Display omitted] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107056 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2887988562</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0921344923001921</els_id><sourcerecordid>2887988562</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-12c872ecf74d5cc8dd5af18cb0e606150996657bb045481989b5d38a12ed72663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-BrN00zFJmxeuhsEXjrhx1iFNbiVDm9akFfz3dhhx6-rC4ZxzOR9C15SsKKHidr9KkF0fE7gVI6ycVUm4OEELqqQuiODqFC2IZrQoq0qfo4uc94SQUulyge5e7TCE-IE7O0IKtsVTBmyjx9DVvQ_gsbOp7iMOEe9e8Pwoj2lyY-jjJTprbJvh6vcu0e7h_n3zVGzfHp83623hSi3HgjKnJAPXyMpz55T33DZUuZqAIIJyorUQXNY1qXilqFa65r5UljLwkglRLtHNsXdI_ecEeTRdyA7a1kbop2yYmocqxQWbrfJodanPOUFjhhQ6m74NJeaAy-zNHy5zwGWOuObk-piEeclXgGSyCxAd-DBbR-P78G_HD5vvdsc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2887988562</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mapping material use and embodied carbon in UK construction</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Drewniok, Michał P. ; Azevedo, José Manuel Cruz ; Dunant, Cyrille F. ; Allwood, Julian M. ; Cullen, Jonathan M. ; Ibell, Tim ; Hawkins, Will</creator><creatorcontrib>Drewniok, Michał P. ; Azevedo, José Manuel Cruz ; Dunant, Cyrille F. ; Allwood, Julian M. ; Cullen, Jonathan M. ; Ibell, Tim ; Hawkins, Will</creatorcontrib><description>The latest available high-level top-down analysis shows that the embodied carbon of the UK construction in 2018 was 43 MtCO2e, of which 80% came from materials and on-site activities. In this paper, for the first time, we combine a detailed bottom-up model of representative residential and non-residential buildings with top-down infrastructure and other material consumption data to quantify the material use and embodied carbon in UK construction. We found that almost 100 Mt of materials were used with an embodied carbon of 25 Mt CO2e. Half of these emissions were from concrete. We found that existing top-down approaches underestimate emissions by up to 20%. We developed a benchmark for UK building typologies and explore interventions to achieve the UK's carbon reduction goals. We found that conversion from non-domestic to domestic purposes can bring 34% embodied carbon savings of the construction total, 30% by avoiding demolition, 20% by switching to the most material and carbon efficient technology options and by 10% if all new houses were multi-storey buildings. We have shown that the bottom-up approach allows identifying areas with high potential for decarbionisation. Due to the flexibility of the model, it can be successfully used in other countries and regions.
[Display omitted]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-3449</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0658</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107056</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Bottom-up approach ; carbon ; concrete ; Embodied carbon ; infrastructure ; Material flow analysis ; Material use ; UK construction</subject><ispartof>Resources, conservation and recycling, 2023-10, Vol.197, p.107056, Article 107056</ispartof><rights>2023 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-12c872ecf74d5cc8dd5af18cb0e606150996657bb045481989b5d38a12ed72663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-12c872ecf74d5cc8dd5af18cb0e606150996657bb045481989b5d38a12ed72663</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1491-3401</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344923001921$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Drewniok, Michał P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azevedo, José Manuel Cruz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunant, Cyrille F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allwood, Julian M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cullen, Jonathan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibell, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawkins, Will</creatorcontrib><title>Mapping material use and embodied carbon in UK construction</title><title>Resources, conservation and recycling</title><description>The latest available high-level top-down analysis shows that the embodied carbon of the UK construction in 2018 was 43 MtCO2e, of which 80% came from materials and on-site activities. In this paper, for the first time, we combine a detailed bottom-up model of representative residential and non-residential buildings with top-down infrastructure and other material consumption data to quantify the material use and embodied carbon in UK construction. We found that almost 100 Mt of materials were used with an embodied carbon of 25 Mt CO2e. Half of these emissions were from concrete. We found that existing top-down approaches underestimate emissions by up to 20%. We developed a benchmark for UK building typologies and explore interventions to achieve the UK's carbon reduction goals. We found that conversion from non-domestic to domestic purposes can bring 34% embodied carbon savings of the construction total, 30% by avoiding demolition, 20% by switching to the most material and carbon efficient technology options and by 10% if all new houses were multi-storey buildings. We have shown that the bottom-up approach allows identifying areas with high potential for decarbionisation. Due to the flexibility of the model, it can be successfully used in other countries and regions.
[Display omitted]</description><subject>Bottom-up approach</subject><subject>carbon</subject><subject>concrete</subject><subject>Embodied carbon</subject><subject>infrastructure</subject><subject>Material flow analysis</subject><subject>Material use</subject><subject>UK construction</subject><issn>0921-3449</issn><issn>1879-0658</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-BrN00zFJmxeuhsEXjrhx1iFNbiVDm9akFfz3dhhx6-rC4ZxzOR9C15SsKKHidr9KkF0fE7gVI6ycVUm4OEELqqQuiODqFC2IZrQoq0qfo4uc94SQUulyge5e7TCE-IE7O0IKtsVTBmyjx9DVvQ_gsbOp7iMOEe9e8Pwoj2lyY-jjJTprbJvh6vcu0e7h_n3zVGzfHp83623hSi3HgjKnJAPXyMpz55T33DZUuZqAIIJyorUQXNY1qXilqFa65r5UljLwkglRLtHNsXdI_ecEeTRdyA7a1kbop2yYmocqxQWbrfJodanPOUFjhhQ6m74NJeaAy-zNHy5zwGWOuObk-piEeclXgGSyCxAd-DBbR-P78G_HD5vvdsc</recordid><startdate>202310</startdate><enddate>202310</enddate><creator>Drewniok, Michał P.</creator><creator>Azevedo, José Manuel Cruz</creator><creator>Dunant, Cyrille F.</creator><creator>Allwood, Julian M.</creator><creator>Cullen, Jonathan M.</creator><creator>Ibell, Tim</creator><creator>Hawkins, Will</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1491-3401</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202310</creationdate><title>Mapping material use and embodied carbon in UK construction</title><author>Drewniok, Michał P. ; Azevedo, José Manuel Cruz ; Dunant, Cyrille F. ; Allwood, Julian M. ; Cullen, Jonathan M. ; Ibell, Tim ; Hawkins, Will</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-12c872ecf74d5cc8dd5af18cb0e606150996657bb045481989b5d38a12ed72663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Bottom-up approach</topic><topic>carbon</topic><topic>concrete</topic><topic>Embodied carbon</topic><topic>infrastructure</topic><topic>Material flow analysis</topic><topic>Material use</topic><topic>UK construction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Drewniok, Michał P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azevedo, José Manuel Cruz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunant, Cyrille F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allwood, Julian M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cullen, Jonathan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibell, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawkins, Will</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Resources, conservation and recycling</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Drewniok, Michał P.</au><au>Azevedo, José Manuel Cruz</au><au>Dunant, Cyrille F.</au><au>Allwood, Julian M.</au><au>Cullen, Jonathan M.</au><au>Ibell, Tim</au><au>Hawkins, Will</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mapping material use and embodied carbon in UK construction</atitle><jtitle>Resources, conservation and recycling</jtitle><date>2023-10</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>197</volume><spage>107056</spage><pages>107056-</pages><artnum>107056</artnum><issn>0921-3449</issn><eissn>1879-0658</eissn><abstract>The latest available high-level top-down analysis shows that the embodied carbon of the UK construction in 2018 was 43 MtCO2e, of which 80% came from materials and on-site activities. In this paper, for the first time, we combine a detailed bottom-up model of representative residential and non-residential buildings with top-down infrastructure and other material consumption data to quantify the material use and embodied carbon in UK construction. We found that almost 100 Mt of materials were used with an embodied carbon of 25 Mt CO2e. Half of these emissions were from concrete. We found that existing top-down approaches underestimate emissions by up to 20%. We developed a benchmark for UK building typologies and explore interventions to achieve the UK's carbon reduction goals. We found that conversion from non-domestic to domestic purposes can bring 34% embodied carbon savings of the construction total, 30% by avoiding demolition, 20% by switching to the most material and carbon efficient technology options and by 10% if all new houses were multi-storey buildings. We have shown that the bottom-up approach allows identifying areas with high potential for decarbionisation. Due to the flexibility of the model, it can be successfully used in other countries and regions.
[Display omitted]</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107056</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1491-3401</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0921-3449 |
ispartof | Resources, conservation and recycling, 2023-10, Vol.197, p.107056, Article 107056 |
issn | 0921-3449 1879-0658 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2887988562 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Bottom-up approach carbon concrete Embodied carbon infrastructure Material flow analysis Material use UK construction |
title | Mapping material use and embodied carbon in UK construction |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T22%3A46%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mapping%20material%20use%20and%20embodied%20carbon%20in%20UK%20construction&rft.jtitle=Resources,%20conservation%20and%20recycling&rft.au=Drewniok,%20Micha%C5%82%20P.&rft.date=2023-10&rft.volume=197&rft.spage=107056&rft.pages=107056-&rft.artnum=107056&rft.issn=0921-3449&rft.eissn=1879-0658&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107056&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2887988562%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2887988562&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0921344923001921&rfr_iscdi=true |