Mapping material use and embodied carbon in UK construction

The latest available high-level top-down analysis shows that the embodied carbon of the UK construction in 2018 was 43 MtCO2e, of which 80% came from materials and on-site activities. In this paper, for the first time, we combine a detailed bottom-up model of representative residential and non-resid...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Resources, conservation and recycling conservation and recycling, 2023-10, Vol.197, p.107056, Article 107056
Hauptverfasser: Drewniok, Michał P., Azevedo, José Manuel Cruz, Dunant, Cyrille F., Allwood, Julian M., Cullen, Jonathan M., Ibell, Tim, Hawkins, Will
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 107056
container_title Resources, conservation and recycling
container_volume 197
creator Drewniok, Michał P.
Azevedo, José Manuel Cruz
Dunant, Cyrille F.
Allwood, Julian M.
Cullen, Jonathan M.
Ibell, Tim
Hawkins, Will
description The latest available high-level top-down analysis shows that the embodied carbon of the UK construction in 2018 was 43 MtCO2e, of which 80% came from materials and on-site activities. In this paper, for the first time, we combine a detailed bottom-up model of representative residential and non-residential buildings with top-down infrastructure and other material consumption data to quantify the material use and embodied carbon in UK construction. We found that almost 100 Mt of materials were used with an embodied carbon of 25 Mt CO2e. Half of these emissions were from concrete. We found that existing top-down approaches underestimate emissions by up to 20%. We developed a benchmark for UK building typologies and explore interventions to achieve the UK's carbon reduction goals. We found that conversion from non-domestic to domestic purposes can bring 34% embodied carbon savings of the construction total, 30% by avoiding demolition, 20% by switching to the most material and carbon efficient technology options and by 10% if all new houses were multi-storey buildings. We have shown that the bottom-up approach allows identifying areas with high potential for decarbionisation. Due to the flexibility of the model, it can be successfully used in other countries and regions. [Display omitted]
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107056
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2887988562</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0921344923001921</els_id><sourcerecordid>2887988562</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-12c872ecf74d5cc8dd5af18cb0e606150996657bb045481989b5d38a12ed72663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-BrN00zFJmxeuhsEXjrhx1iFNbiVDm9akFfz3dhhx6-rC4ZxzOR9C15SsKKHidr9KkF0fE7gVI6ycVUm4OEELqqQuiODqFC2IZrQoq0qfo4uc94SQUulyge5e7TCE-IE7O0IKtsVTBmyjx9DVvQ_gsbOp7iMOEe9e8Pwoj2lyY-jjJTprbJvh6vcu0e7h_n3zVGzfHp83623hSi3HgjKnJAPXyMpz55T33DZUuZqAIIJyorUQXNY1qXilqFa65r5UljLwkglRLtHNsXdI_ecEeTRdyA7a1kbop2yYmocqxQWbrfJodanPOUFjhhQ6m74NJeaAy-zNHy5zwGWOuObk-piEeclXgGSyCxAd-DBbR-P78G_HD5vvdsc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2887988562</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mapping material use and embodied carbon in UK construction</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Drewniok, Michał P. ; Azevedo, José Manuel Cruz ; Dunant, Cyrille F. ; Allwood, Julian M. ; Cullen, Jonathan M. ; Ibell, Tim ; Hawkins, Will</creator><creatorcontrib>Drewniok, Michał P. ; Azevedo, José Manuel Cruz ; Dunant, Cyrille F. ; Allwood, Julian M. ; Cullen, Jonathan M. ; Ibell, Tim ; Hawkins, Will</creatorcontrib><description>The latest available high-level top-down analysis shows that the embodied carbon of the UK construction in 2018 was 43 MtCO2e, of which 80% came from materials and on-site activities. In this paper, for the first time, we combine a detailed bottom-up model of representative residential and non-residential buildings with top-down infrastructure and other material consumption data to quantify the material use and embodied carbon in UK construction. We found that almost 100 Mt of materials were used with an embodied carbon of 25 Mt CO2e. Half of these emissions were from concrete. We found that existing top-down approaches underestimate emissions by up to 20%. We developed a benchmark for UK building typologies and explore interventions to achieve the UK's carbon reduction goals. We found that conversion from non-domestic to domestic purposes can bring 34% embodied carbon savings of the construction total, 30% by avoiding demolition, 20% by switching to the most material and carbon efficient technology options and by 10% if all new houses were multi-storey buildings. We have shown that the bottom-up approach allows identifying areas with high potential for decarbionisation. Due to the flexibility of the model, it can be successfully used in other countries and regions. [Display omitted]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-3449</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0658</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107056</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Bottom-up approach ; carbon ; concrete ; Embodied carbon ; infrastructure ; Material flow analysis ; Material use ; UK construction</subject><ispartof>Resources, conservation and recycling, 2023-10, Vol.197, p.107056, Article 107056</ispartof><rights>2023 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-12c872ecf74d5cc8dd5af18cb0e606150996657bb045481989b5d38a12ed72663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-12c872ecf74d5cc8dd5af18cb0e606150996657bb045481989b5d38a12ed72663</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1491-3401</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344923001921$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Drewniok, Michał P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azevedo, José Manuel Cruz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunant, Cyrille F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allwood, Julian M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cullen, Jonathan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibell, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawkins, Will</creatorcontrib><title>Mapping material use and embodied carbon in UK construction</title><title>Resources, conservation and recycling</title><description>The latest available high-level top-down analysis shows that the embodied carbon of the UK construction in 2018 was 43 MtCO2e, of which 80% came from materials and on-site activities. In this paper, for the first time, we combine a detailed bottom-up model of representative residential and non-residential buildings with top-down infrastructure and other material consumption data to quantify the material use and embodied carbon in UK construction. We found that almost 100 Mt of materials were used with an embodied carbon of 25 Mt CO2e. Half of these emissions were from concrete. We found that existing top-down approaches underestimate emissions by up to 20%. We developed a benchmark for UK building typologies and explore interventions to achieve the UK's carbon reduction goals. We found that conversion from non-domestic to domestic purposes can bring 34% embodied carbon savings of the construction total, 30% by avoiding demolition, 20% by switching to the most material and carbon efficient technology options and by 10% if all new houses were multi-storey buildings. We have shown that the bottom-up approach allows identifying areas with high potential for decarbionisation. Due to the flexibility of the model, it can be successfully used in other countries and regions. [Display omitted]</description><subject>Bottom-up approach</subject><subject>carbon</subject><subject>concrete</subject><subject>Embodied carbon</subject><subject>infrastructure</subject><subject>Material flow analysis</subject><subject>Material use</subject><subject>UK construction</subject><issn>0921-3449</issn><issn>1879-0658</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-BrN00zFJmxeuhsEXjrhx1iFNbiVDm9akFfz3dhhx6-rC4ZxzOR9C15SsKKHidr9KkF0fE7gVI6ycVUm4OEELqqQuiODqFC2IZrQoq0qfo4uc94SQUulyge5e7TCE-IE7O0IKtsVTBmyjx9DVvQ_gsbOp7iMOEe9e8Pwoj2lyY-jjJTprbJvh6vcu0e7h_n3zVGzfHp83623hSi3HgjKnJAPXyMpz55T33DZUuZqAIIJyorUQXNY1qXilqFa65r5UljLwkglRLtHNsXdI_ecEeTRdyA7a1kbop2yYmocqxQWbrfJodanPOUFjhhQ6m74NJeaAy-zNHy5zwGWOuObk-piEeclXgGSyCxAd-DBbR-P78G_HD5vvdsc</recordid><startdate>202310</startdate><enddate>202310</enddate><creator>Drewniok, Michał P.</creator><creator>Azevedo, José Manuel Cruz</creator><creator>Dunant, Cyrille F.</creator><creator>Allwood, Julian M.</creator><creator>Cullen, Jonathan M.</creator><creator>Ibell, Tim</creator><creator>Hawkins, Will</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1491-3401</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202310</creationdate><title>Mapping material use and embodied carbon in UK construction</title><author>Drewniok, Michał P. ; Azevedo, José Manuel Cruz ; Dunant, Cyrille F. ; Allwood, Julian M. ; Cullen, Jonathan M. ; Ibell, Tim ; Hawkins, Will</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-12c872ecf74d5cc8dd5af18cb0e606150996657bb045481989b5d38a12ed72663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Bottom-up approach</topic><topic>carbon</topic><topic>concrete</topic><topic>Embodied carbon</topic><topic>infrastructure</topic><topic>Material flow analysis</topic><topic>Material use</topic><topic>UK construction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Drewniok, Michał P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azevedo, José Manuel Cruz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunant, Cyrille F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allwood, Julian M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cullen, Jonathan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibell, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawkins, Will</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Resources, conservation and recycling</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Drewniok, Michał P.</au><au>Azevedo, José Manuel Cruz</au><au>Dunant, Cyrille F.</au><au>Allwood, Julian M.</au><au>Cullen, Jonathan M.</au><au>Ibell, Tim</au><au>Hawkins, Will</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mapping material use and embodied carbon in UK construction</atitle><jtitle>Resources, conservation and recycling</jtitle><date>2023-10</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>197</volume><spage>107056</spage><pages>107056-</pages><artnum>107056</artnum><issn>0921-3449</issn><eissn>1879-0658</eissn><abstract>The latest available high-level top-down analysis shows that the embodied carbon of the UK construction in 2018 was 43 MtCO2e, of which 80% came from materials and on-site activities. In this paper, for the first time, we combine a detailed bottom-up model of representative residential and non-residential buildings with top-down infrastructure and other material consumption data to quantify the material use and embodied carbon in UK construction. We found that almost 100 Mt of materials were used with an embodied carbon of 25 Mt CO2e. Half of these emissions were from concrete. We found that existing top-down approaches underestimate emissions by up to 20%. We developed a benchmark for UK building typologies and explore interventions to achieve the UK's carbon reduction goals. We found that conversion from non-domestic to domestic purposes can bring 34% embodied carbon savings of the construction total, 30% by avoiding demolition, 20% by switching to the most material and carbon efficient technology options and by 10% if all new houses were multi-storey buildings. We have shown that the bottom-up approach allows identifying areas with high potential for decarbionisation. Due to the flexibility of the model, it can be successfully used in other countries and regions. [Display omitted]</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107056</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1491-3401</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0921-3449
ispartof Resources, conservation and recycling, 2023-10, Vol.197, p.107056, Article 107056
issn 0921-3449
1879-0658
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2887988562
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Bottom-up approach
carbon
concrete
Embodied carbon
infrastructure
Material flow analysis
Material use
UK construction
title Mapping material use and embodied carbon in UK construction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T22%3A46%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mapping%20material%20use%20and%20embodied%20carbon%20in%20UK%20construction&rft.jtitle=Resources,%20conservation%20and%20recycling&rft.au=Drewniok,%20Micha%C5%82%20P.&rft.date=2023-10&rft.volume=197&rft.spage=107056&rft.pages=107056-&rft.artnum=107056&rft.issn=0921-3449&rft.eissn=1879-0658&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107056&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2887988562%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2887988562&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0921344923001921&rfr_iscdi=true