Using MCQ response certainty to determine how aspects of self‐monitoring develop through a medical course
Introduction Self‐monitoring of clinical‐decision‐making is essential for health care professional practice. Using certainty in responses to assessment items could allow self‐monitoring of clinical‐decision‐making by medical students to be tracked over time. This research introduces how aspects of i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical education 2024-05, Vol.58 (5), p.535-543 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 543 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 535 |
container_title | Medical education |
container_volume | 58 |
creator | Tweed, Mike Willink, Robin Wilkinson, Tim J. |
description | Introduction
Self‐monitoring of clinical‐decision‐making is essential for health care professional practice. Using certainty in responses to assessment items could allow self‐monitoring of clinical‐decision‐making by medical students to be tracked over time. This research introduces how aspects of insightfulness, safety and efficiency could be based on certainty in, and correctness of, multiple‐choice question (MCQ) responses. We also show how these measures change over time.
Methods
With each answer on twice yearly MCQ progress tests, medical students provided their certainty of correctness. An insightful student would be more likely to be correct for those answers given with increasing certainty. A safe student would be expected to have a high probability of being correct for answers given with a high certainty. An efficient student would be expected to have a sufficiently low probability of being correct when they have no certainty. The system was developed using first principles and data from one cohort of students. A dataset from a second cohort was then used as an independent validation sample.
Results
The patterns of aspects of self‐monitoring were similar for both cohorts. Almost all the students met the criteria for insightfulness on all tests. Most students had an undetermined outcome for the safety aspect. When a definitive result for safety was obtained, absence of safety was most prevalent in the middle of the course, while the presence of safety increased later. Most of the students met the criteria for efficiency, with the highest prevalence mid‐course, but efficiency was more likely to be absent later.
Discussion
Throughout the course, students showed reassuring levels of insightfulness. The results suggest that students may balance safety with efficiency. This may be explained by students learning the positive implications of decisions before the negative implications, making them initially more efficient, but later being more cautious and safer.
This research uses students' certainty when responding to Multiple Choice Questions to reveal that self‐monitoring efficiency develops early in one's training, but then reduces as safety increases. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/medu.15253 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2886941057</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3038310891</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-64a4412113a7c91665b5105c06c54113673eee54c8559b8976f1865584d86c2e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctKxDAUhoMoOl42PoAE3IhQTZomTZYyXkERwVmHTOZ0pto2NWmV2fkIPqNPYsYZXbjwbA4cPj5-zo_QPiUnNM5pDZP-hPKUszU0oEzwJFUpW0cDwohMCKVkC22H8EQIyXkmN9EWyxVLFScD9DwKZTPFd8MH7CG0rgmALfjOlE03x53DE-jA12UDeObesAkt2C5gV-AAVfH5_lG7puycX0gm8AqVa3E3866fzrDBMVlpTYWt632AXbRRmCrA3mrvoNHlxePwOrm9v7oZnt0mlinGEpGZLKMppczkVlEh-JhTwi0RlmfxKnIGADyzknM1lioXBZWCc5lNpLApsB10tPS23r30EDpdl8FCVZkGXB90KqVQWVTmET38gz7FqE1MpxlhklEiFY3U8ZKy3oXgodCtL2vj55oSvahALyrQ3xVE-GCl7Mfx_Iv-_DwCdAm8lRXM_1Hpu4vz0VL6BWj1kMg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3038310891</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using MCQ response certainty to determine how aspects of self‐monitoring develop through a medical course</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Tweed, Mike ; Willink, Robin ; Wilkinson, Tim J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tweed, Mike ; Willink, Robin ; Wilkinson, Tim J.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
Self‐monitoring of clinical‐decision‐making is essential for health care professional practice. Using certainty in responses to assessment items could allow self‐monitoring of clinical‐decision‐making by medical students to be tracked over time. This research introduces how aspects of insightfulness, safety and efficiency could be based on certainty in, and correctness of, multiple‐choice question (MCQ) responses. We also show how these measures change over time.
Methods
With each answer on twice yearly MCQ progress tests, medical students provided their certainty of correctness. An insightful student would be more likely to be correct for those answers given with increasing certainty. A safe student would be expected to have a high probability of being correct for answers given with a high certainty. An efficient student would be expected to have a sufficiently low probability of being correct when they have no certainty. The system was developed using first principles and data from one cohort of students. A dataset from a second cohort was then used as an independent validation sample.
Results
The patterns of aspects of self‐monitoring were similar for both cohorts. Almost all the students met the criteria for insightfulness on all tests. Most students had an undetermined outcome for the safety aspect. When a definitive result for safety was obtained, absence of safety was most prevalent in the middle of the course, while the presence of safety increased later. Most of the students met the criteria for efficiency, with the highest prevalence mid‐course, but efficiency was more likely to be absent later.
Discussion
Throughout the course, students showed reassuring levels of insightfulness. The results suggest that students may balance safety with efficiency. This may be explained by students learning the positive implications of decisions before the negative implications, making them initially more efficient, but later being more cautious and safer.
This research uses students' certainty when responding to Multiple Choice Questions to reveal that self‐monitoring efficiency develops early in one's training, but then reduces as safety increases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0308-0110</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1365-2923</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2923</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/medu.15253</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37932950</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Clinical Competence ; Clinical Decision-Making ; Educational Measurement - methods ; Efficiency ; Humans ; Learning ; Medical education ; Medical students ; Multiple choice ; Students, Medical</subject><ispartof>Medical education, 2024-05, Vol.58 (5), p.535-543</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by Association for the Study of Medical Education and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. Medical Education published by Association for the Study of Medical Education and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-64a4412113a7c91665b5105c06c54113673eee54c8559b8976f1865584d86c2e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-64a4412113a7c91665b5105c06c54113673eee54c8559b8976f1865584d86c2e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5447-3626 ; 0000-0002-4080-4164 ; 0000-0002-8936-9538</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fmedu.15253$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fmedu.15253$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37932950$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tweed, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willink, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilkinson, Tim J.</creatorcontrib><title>Using MCQ response certainty to determine how aspects of self‐monitoring develop through a medical course</title><title>Medical education</title><addtitle>Med Educ</addtitle><description>Introduction
Self‐monitoring of clinical‐decision‐making is essential for health care professional practice. Using certainty in responses to assessment items could allow self‐monitoring of clinical‐decision‐making by medical students to be tracked over time. This research introduces how aspects of insightfulness, safety and efficiency could be based on certainty in, and correctness of, multiple‐choice question (MCQ) responses. We also show how these measures change over time.
Methods
With each answer on twice yearly MCQ progress tests, medical students provided their certainty of correctness. An insightful student would be more likely to be correct for those answers given with increasing certainty. A safe student would be expected to have a high probability of being correct for answers given with a high certainty. An efficient student would be expected to have a sufficiently low probability of being correct when they have no certainty. The system was developed using first principles and data from one cohort of students. A dataset from a second cohort was then used as an independent validation sample.
Results
The patterns of aspects of self‐monitoring were similar for both cohorts. Almost all the students met the criteria for insightfulness on all tests. Most students had an undetermined outcome for the safety aspect. When a definitive result for safety was obtained, absence of safety was most prevalent in the middle of the course, while the presence of safety increased later. Most of the students met the criteria for efficiency, with the highest prevalence mid‐course, but efficiency was more likely to be absent later.
Discussion
Throughout the course, students showed reassuring levels of insightfulness. The results suggest that students may balance safety with efficiency. This may be explained by students learning the positive implications of decisions before the negative implications, making them initially more efficient, but later being more cautious and safer.
This research uses students' certainty when responding to Multiple Choice Questions to reveal that self‐monitoring efficiency develops early in one's training, but then reduces as safety increases.</description><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Clinical Decision-Making</subject><subject>Educational Measurement - methods</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Medical education</subject><subject>Medical students</subject><subject>Multiple choice</subject><subject>Students, Medical</subject><issn>0308-0110</issn><issn>1365-2923</issn><issn>1365-2923</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctKxDAUhoMoOl42PoAE3IhQTZomTZYyXkERwVmHTOZ0pto2NWmV2fkIPqNPYsYZXbjwbA4cPj5-zo_QPiUnNM5pDZP-hPKUszU0oEzwJFUpW0cDwohMCKVkC22H8EQIyXkmN9EWyxVLFScD9DwKZTPFd8MH7CG0rgmALfjOlE03x53DE-jA12UDeObesAkt2C5gV-AAVfH5_lG7puycX0gm8AqVa3E3866fzrDBMVlpTYWt632AXbRRmCrA3mrvoNHlxePwOrm9v7oZnt0mlinGEpGZLKMppczkVlEh-JhTwi0RlmfxKnIGADyzknM1lioXBZWCc5lNpLApsB10tPS23r30EDpdl8FCVZkGXB90KqVQWVTmET38gz7FqE1MpxlhklEiFY3U8ZKy3oXgodCtL2vj55oSvahALyrQ3xVE-GCl7Mfx_Iv-_DwCdAm8lRXM_1Hpu4vz0VL6BWj1kMg</recordid><startdate>202405</startdate><enddate>202405</enddate><creator>Tweed, Mike</creator><creator>Willink, Robin</creator><creator>Wilkinson, Tim J.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5447-3626</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4080-4164</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8936-9538</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202405</creationdate><title>Using MCQ response certainty to determine how aspects of self‐monitoring develop through a medical course</title><author>Tweed, Mike ; Willink, Robin ; Wilkinson, Tim J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-64a4412113a7c91665b5105c06c54113673eee54c8559b8976f1865584d86c2e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Clinical Decision-Making</topic><topic>Educational Measurement - methods</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Medical education</topic><topic>Medical students</topic><topic>Multiple choice</topic><topic>Students, Medical</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tweed, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willink, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilkinson, Tim J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tweed, Mike</au><au>Willink, Robin</au><au>Wilkinson, Tim J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using MCQ response certainty to determine how aspects of self‐monitoring develop through a medical course</atitle><jtitle>Medical education</jtitle><addtitle>Med Educ</addtitle><date>2024-05</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>535</spage><epage>543</epage><pages>535-543</pages><issn>0308-0110</issn><issn>1365-2923</issn><eissn>1365-2923</eissn><abstract>Introduction
Self‐monitoring of clinical‐decision‐making is essential for health care professional practice. Using certainty in responses to assessment items could allow self‐monitoring of clinical‐decision‐making by medical students to be tracked over time. This research introduces how aspects of insightfulness, safety and efficiency could be based on certainty in, and correctness of, multiple‐choice question (MCQ) responses. We also show how these measures change over time.
Methods
With each answer on twice yearly MCQ progress tests, medical students provided their certainty of correctness. An insightful student would be more likely to be correct for those answers given with increasing certainty. A safe student would be expected to have a high probability of being correct for answers given with a high certainty. An efficient student would be expected to have a sufficiently low probability of being correct when they have no certainty. The system was developed using first principles and data from one cohort of students. A dataset from a second cohort was then used as an independent validation sample.
Results
The patterns of aspects of self‐monitoring were similar for both cohorts. Almost all the students met the criteria for insightfulness on all tests. Most students had an undetermined outcome for the safety aspect. When a definitive result for safety was obtained, absence of safety was most prevalent in the middle of the course, while the presence of safety increased later. Most of the students met the criteria for efficiency, with the highest prevalence mid‐course, but efficiency was more likely to be absent later.
Discussion
Throughout the course, students showed reassuring levels of insightfulness. The results suggest that students may balance safety with efficiency. This may be explained by students learning the positive implications of decisions before the negative implications, making them initially more efficient, but later being more cautious and safer.
This research uses students' certainty when responding to Multiple Choice Questions to reveal that self‐monitoring efficiency develops early in one's training, but then reduces as safety increases.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>37932950</pmid><doi>10.1111/medu.15253</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5447-3626</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4080-4164</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8936-9538</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0308-0110 |
ispartof | Medical education, 2024-05, Vol.58 (5), p.535-543 |
issn | 0308-0110 1365-2923 1365-2923 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2886941057 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Clinical Competence Clinical Decision-Making Educational Measurement - methods Efficiency Humans Learning Medical education Medical students Multiple choice Students, Medical |
title | Using MCQ response certainty to determine how aspects of self‐monitoring develop through a medical course |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T11%3A44%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20MCQ%20response%20certainty%20to%20determine%20how%20aspects%20of%20self%E2%80%90monitoring%20develop%20through%20a%20medical%20course&rft.jtitle=Medical%20education&rft.au=Tweed,%20Mike&rft.date=2024-05&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=535&rft.epage=543&rft.pages=535-543&rft.issn=0308-0110&rft.eissn=1365-2923&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/medu.15253&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3038310891%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3038310891&rft_id=info:pmid/37932950&rfr_iscdi=true |