Using MCQ response certainty to determine how aspects of self‐monitoring develop through a medical course

Introduction Self‐monitoring of clinical‐decision‐making is essential for health care professional practice. Using certainty in responses to assessment items could allow self‐monitoring of clinical‐decision‐making by medical students to be tracked over time. This research introduces how aspects of i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical education 2024-05, Vol.58 (5), p.535-543
Hauptverfasser: Tweed, Mike, Willink, Robin, Wilkinson, Tim J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 543
container_issue 5
container_start_page 535
container_title Medical education
container_volume 58
creator Tweed, Mike
Willink, Robin
Wilkinson, Tim J.
description Introduction Self‐monitoring of clinical‐decision‐making is essential for health care professional practice. Using certainty in responses to assessment items could allow self‐monitoring of clinical‐decision‐making by medical students to be tracked over time. This research introduces how aspects of insightfulness, safety and efficiency could be based on certainty in, and correctness of, multiple‐choice question (MCQ) responses. We also show how these measures change over time. Methods With each answer on twice yearly MCQ progress tests, medical students provided their certainty of correctness. An insightful student would be more likely to be correct for those answers given with increasing certainty. A safe student would be expected to have a high probability of being correct for answers given with a high certainty. An efficient student would be expected to have a sufficiently low probability of being correct when they have no certainty. The system was developed using first principles and data from one cohort of students. A dataset from a second cohort was then used as an independent validation sample. Results The patterns of aspects of self‐monitoring were similar for both cohorts. Almost all the students met the criteria for insightfulness on all tests. Most students had an undetermined outcome for the safety aspect. When a definitive result for safety was obtained, absence of safety was most prevalent in the middle of the course, while the presence of safety increased later. Most of the students met the criteria for efficiency, with the highest prevalence mid‐course, but efficiency was more likely to be absent later. Discussion Throughout the course, students showed reassuring levels of insightfulness. The results suggest that students may balance safety with efficiency. This may be explained by students learning the positive implications of decisions before the negative implications, making them initially more efficient, but later being more cautious and safer. This research uses students' certainty when responding to Multiple Choice Questions to reveal that self‐monitoring efficiency develops early in one's training, but then reduces as safety increases.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/medu.15253
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2886941057</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3038310891</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-64a4412113a7c91665b5105c06c54113673eee54c8559b8976f1865584d86c2e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctKxDAUhoMoOl42PoAE3IhQTZomTZYyXkERwVmHTOZ0pto2NWmV2fkIPqNPYsYZXbjwbA4cPj5-zo_QPiUnNM5pDZP-hPKUszU0oEzwJFUpW0cDwohMCKVkC22H8EQIyXkmN9EWyxVLFScD9DwKZTPFd8MH7CG0rgmALfjOlE03x53DE-jA12UDeObesAkt2C5gV-AAVfH5_lG7puycX0gm8AqVa3E3866fzrDBMVlpTYWt632AXbRRmCrA3mrvoNHlxePwOrm9v7oZnt0mlinGEpGZLKMppczkVlEh-JhTwi0RlmfxKnIGADyzknM1lioXBZWCc5lNpLApsB10tPS23r30EDpdl8FCVZkGXB90KqVQWVTmET38gz7FqE1MpxlhklEiFY3U8ZKy3oXgodCtL2vj55oSvahALyrQ3xVE-GCl7Mfx_Iv-_DwCdAm8lRXM_1Hpu4vz0VL6BWj1kMg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3038310891</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using MCQ response certainty to determine how aspects of self‐monitoring develop through a medical course</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Tweed, Mike ; Willink, Robin ; Wilkinson, Tim J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tweed, Mike ; Willink, Robin ; Wilkinson, Tim J.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Self‐monitoring of clinical‐decision‐making is essential for health care professional practice. Using certainty in responses to assessment items could allow self‐monitoring of clinical‐decision‐making by medical students to be tracked over time. This research introduces how aspects of insightfulness, safety and efficiency could be based on certainty in, and correctness of, multiple‐choice question (MCQ) responses. We also show how these measures change over time. Methods With each answer on twice yearly MCQ progress tests, medical students provided their certainty of correctness. An insightful student would be more likely to be correct for those answers given with increasing certainty. A safe student would be expected to have a high probability of being correct for answers given with a high certainty. An efficient student would be expected to have a sufficiently low probability of being correct when they have no certainty. The system was developed using first principles and data from one cohort of students. A dataset from a second cohort was then used as an independent validation sample. Results The patterns of aspects of self‐monitoring were similar for both cohorts. Almost all the students met the criteria for insightfulness on all tests. Most students had an undetermined outcome for the safety aspect. When a definitive result for safety was obtained, absence of safety was most prevalent in the middle of the course, while the presence of safety increased later. Most of the students met the criteria for efficiency, with the highest prevalence mid‐course, but efficiency was more likely to be absent later. Discussion Throughout the course, students showed reassuring levels of insightfulness. The results suggest that students may balance safety with efficiency. This may be explained by students learning the positive implications of decisions before the negative implications, making them initially more efficient, but later being more cautious and safer. This research uses students' certainty when responding to Multiple Choice Questions to reveal that self‐monitoring efficiency develops early in one's training, but then reduces as safety increases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0308-0110</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1365-2923</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2923</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/medu.15253</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37932950</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Clinical Competence ; Clinical Decision-Making ; Educational Measurement - methods ; Efficiency ; Humans ; Learning ; Medical education ; Medical students ; Multiple choice ; Students, Medical</subject><ispartof>Medical education, 2024-05, Vol.58 (5), p.535-543</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by Association for the Study of Medical Education and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. Medical Education published by Association for the Study of Medical Education and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-64a4412113a7c91665b5105c06c54113673eee54c8559b8976f1865584d86c2e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-64a4412113a7c91665b5105c06c54113673eee54c8559b8976f1865584d86c2e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5447-3626 ; 0000-0002-4080-4164 ; 0000-0002-8936-9538</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fmedu.15253$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fmedu.15253$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37932950$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tweed, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willink, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilkinson, Tim J.</creatorcontrib><title>Using MCQ response certainty to determine how aspects of self‐monitoring develop through a medical course</title><title>Medical education</title><addtitle>Med Educ</addtitle><description>Introduction Self‐monitoring of clinical‐decision‐making is essential for health care professional practice. Using certainty in responses to assessment items could allow self‐monitoring of clinical‐decision‐making by medical students to be tracked over time. This research introduces how aspects of insightfulness, safety and efficiency could be based on certainty in, and correctness of, multiple‐choice question (MCQ) responses. We also show how these measures change over time. Methods With each answer on twice yearly MCQ progress tests, medical students provided their certainty of correctness. An insightful student would be more likely to be correct for those answers given with increasing certainty. A safe student would be expected to have a high probability of being correct for answers given with a high certainty. An efficient student would be expected to have a sufficiently low probability of being correct when they have no certainty. The system was developed using first principles and data from one cohort of students. A dataset from a second cohort was then used as an independent validation sample. Results The patterns of aspects of self‐monitoring were similar for both cohorts. Almost all the students met the criteria for insightfulness on all tests. Most students had an undetermined outcome for the safety aspect. When a definitive result for safety was obtained, absence of safety was most prevalent in the middle of the course, while the presence of safety increased later. Most of the students met the criteria for efficiency, with the highest prevalence mid‐course, but efficiency was more likely to be absent later. Discussion Throughout the course, students showed reassuring levels of insightfulness. The results suggest that students may balance safety with efficiency. This may be explained by students learning the positive implications of decisions before the negative implications, making them initially more efficient, but later being more cautious and safer. This research uses students' certainty when responding to Multiple Choice Questions to reveal that self‐monitoring efficiency develops early in one's training, but then reduces as safety increases.</description><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Clinical Decision-Making</subject><subject>Educational Measurement - methods</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Medical education</subject><subject>Medical students</subject><subject>Multiple choice</subject><subject>Students, Medical</subject><issn>0308-0110</issn><issn>1365-2923</issn><issn>1365-2923</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctKxDAUhoMoOl42PoAE3IhQTZomTZYyXkERwVmHTOZ0pto2NWmV2fkIPqNPYsYZXbjwbA4cPj5-zo_QPiUnNM5pDZP-hPKUszU0oEzwJFUpW0cDwohMCKVkC22H8EQIyXkmN9EWyxVLFScD9DwKZTPFd8MH7CG0rgmALfjOlE03x53DE-jA12UDeObesAkt2C5gV-AAVfH5_lG7puycX0gm8AqVa3E3866fzrDBMVlpTYWt632AXbRRmCrA3mrvoNHlxePwOrm9v7oZnt0mlinGEpGZLKMppczkVlEh-JhTwi0RlmfxKnIGADyzknM1lioXBZWCc5lNpLApsB10tPS23r30EDpdl8FCVZkGXB90KqVQWVTmET38gz7FqE1MpxlhklEiFY3U8ZKy3oXgodCtL2vj55oSvahALyrQ3xVE-GCl7Mfx_Iv-_DwCdAm8lRXM_1Hpu4vz0VL6BWj1kMg</recordid><startdate>202405</startdate><enddate>202405</enddate><creator>Tweed, Mike</creator><creator>Willink, Robin</creator><creator>Wilkinson, Tim J.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5447-3626</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4080-4164</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8936-9538</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202405</creationdate><title>Using MCQ response certainty to determine how aspects of self‐monitoring develop through a medical course</title><author>Tweed, Mike ; Willink, Robin ; Wilkinson, Tim J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-64a4412113a7c91665b5105c06c54113673eee54c8559b8976f1865584d86c2e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Clinical Decision-Making</topic><topic>Educational Measurement - methods</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Medical education</topic><topic>Medical students</topic><topic>Multiple choice</topic><topic>Students, Medical</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tweed, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willink, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilkinson, Tim J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tweed, Mike</au><au>Willink, Robin</au><au>Wilkinson, Tim J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using MCQ response certainty to determine how aspects of self‐monitoring develop through a medical course</atitle><jtitle>Medical education</jtitle><addtitle>Med Educ</addtitle><date>2024-05</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>535</spage><epage>543</epage><pages>535-543</pages><issn>0308-0110</issn><issn>1365-2923</issn><eissn>1365-2923</eissn><abstract>Introduction Self‐monitoring of clinical‐decision‐making is essential for health care professional practice. Using certainty in responses to assessment items could allow self‐monitoring of clinical‐decision‐making by medical students to be tracked over time. This research introduces how aspects of insightfulness, safety and efficiency could be based on certainty in, and correctness of, multiple‐choice question (MCQ) responses. We also show how these measures change over time. Methods With each answer on twice yearly MCQ progress tests, medical students provided their certainty of correctness. An insightful student would be more likely to be correct for those answers given with increasing certainty. A safe student would be expected to have a high probability of being correct for answers given with a high certainty. An efficient student would be expected to have a sufficiently low probability of being correct when they have no certainty. The system was developed using first principles and data from one cohort of students. A dataset from a second cohort was then used as an independent validation sample. Results The patterns of aspects of self‐monitoring were similar for both cohorts. Almost all the students met the criteria for insightfulness on all tests. Most students had an undetermined outcome for the safety aspect. When a definitive result for safety was obtained, absence of safety was most prevalent in the middle of the course, while the presence of safety increased later. Most of the students met the criteria for efficiency, with the highest prevalence mid‐course, but efficiency was more likely to be absent later. Discussion Throughout the course, students showed reassuring levels of insightfulness. The results suggest that students may balance safety with efficiency. This may be explained by students learning the positive implications of decisions before the negative implications, making them initially more efficient, but later being more cautious and safer. This research uses students' certainty when responding to Multiple Choice Questions to reveal that self‐monitoring efficiency develops early in one's training, but then reduces as safety increases.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>37932950</pmid><doi>10.1111/medu.15253</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5447-3626</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4080-4164</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8936-9538</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0308-0110
ispartof Medical education, 2024-05, Vol.58 (5), p.535-543
issn 0308-0110
1365-2923
1365-2923
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2886941057
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Clinical Competence
Clinical Decision-Making
Educational Measurement - methods
Efficiency
Humans
Learning
Medical education
Medical students
Multiple choice
Students, Medical
title Using MCQ response certainty to determine how aspects of self‐monitoring develop through a medical course
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T11%3A44%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20MCQ%20response%20certainty%20to%20determine%20how%20aspects%20of%20self%E2%80%90monitoring%20develop%20through%20a%20medical%20course&rft.jtitle=Medical%20education&rft.au=Tweed,%20Mike&rft.date=2024-05&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=535&rft.epage=543&rft.pages=535-543&rft.issn=0308-0110&rft.eissn=1365-2923&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/medu.15253&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3038310891%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3038310891&rft_id=info:pmid/37932950&rfr_iscdi=true