Effectiveness of Television Streaming on Hearing Aid User Performance and Satisfaction in Quiet and in Noise

PURPOSEThe purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of television (TV) streaming on hearing aid user performance and satisfaction in quiet and in noise.METHODTwenty experienced hearing aid users were evaluated in quiet and in noise (5 dB SNR) under three hearing aid conditions: heari...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of audiology 2024-03, Vol.33 (1), p.17-30
Hauptverfasser: Plyler, Patrick N., Razavi, Sarah, Hausladen, Jennifer, Humphrey, Elizabeth
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 30
container_issue 1
container_start_page 17
container_title American journal of audiology
container_volume 33
creator Plyler, Patrick N.
Razavi, Sarah
Hausladen, Jennifer
Humphrey, Elizabeth
description PURPOSEThe purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of television (TV) streaming on hearing aid user performance and satisfaction in quiet and in noise.METHODTwenty experienced hearing aid users were evaluated in quiet and in noise (5 dB SNR) under three hearing aid conditions: hearing aids, streaming with hearing aid microphones attenuated by 6 dB, and streaming with hearing aid microphones muted. The audiovisual Connected Speech Test served as the signal, and the ipsilateral competing message from the Synthetic Sentence Identification-Ipsilateral Competing Message (SSI-ICM) served as the noise. Measures of speech understanding, satisfaction with sound quality and clarity, and preference were obtained.RESULTSSpeech understanding was significantly better in quiet than in noise, and streaming improved performance in noise when the hearing aid microphones were muted. Sound quality satisfaction was significantly better in quiet than in noise but was not impacted significantly by the hearing aid settings. Speech clarity satisfaction was significantly better in quiet than in noise, and streaming improved satisfaction in noise when the hearing aid microphones were muted. More participants preferred streaming with the microphones muted in quiet, in noise, and overall; however, results did not reach statistical significance.CONCLUSIONSHearing aid users did not benefit from TV streaming with the microphones attenuated or muted when listening in quiet. TV streaming was more beneficial to hearing aid users when listening in noise with the microphones muted. Hearing aid users should be counseled on the impact of the hearing aid microphone settings when using a TV streamer, particularly in noise.
doi_str_mv 10.1044/2023_AJA-23-00169
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2886937460</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2886937460</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c230t-ade05328c5e598d23c339fc53d44fe63f2dfbb9c5f5b257c5ede66c337bb91b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kMtOwzAURC0EEqXwAey8ZBPwI07sZVQVCqp4qO3acpxrZJRHsdNK_D1uC6uZufdoFoPQLSX3lOT5AyOM6-qlyhjPCKGFOkMTKoTMFOXlefJEqIxIqS7RVYxfCWFKsglq586BHf0eeogRDw6voYW9j37o8WoMYDrff-IUFmDCwVa-wZsIAb9DcEPoTG8Bm77BKzP66EwqS7Tv8cfOw3j8pPA6-AjX6MKZNsLNn07R5nG-ni2y5dvT86xaZpZxMmamASI4k1aAULJh3HKunBW8yXMHBXescXWtrHCiZqJMWANFkaAyXWld8Cm6O_Vuw_C9gzjqzkcLbWt6GHZRMykLxcu8IAmlJ9SGIcYATm-D70z40ZTow7L6f1md5Lgs_wV_SG1D</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2886937460</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of Television Streaming on Hearing Aid User Performance and Satisfaction in Quiet and in Noise</title><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Plyler, Patrick N. ; Razavi, Sarah ; Hausladen, Jennifer ; Humphrey, Elizabeth</creator><creatorcontrib>Plyler, Patrick N. ; Razavi, Sarah ; Hausladen, Jennifer ; Humphrey, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><description>PURPOSEThe purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of television (TV) streaming on hearing aid user performance and satisfaction in quiet and in noise.METHODTwenty experienced hearing aid users were evaluated in quiet and in noise (5 dB SNR) under three hearing aid conditions: hearing aids, streaming with hearing aid microphones attenuated by 6 dB, and streaming with hearing aid microphones muted. The audiovisual Connected Speech Test served as the signal, and the ipsilateral competing message from the Synthetic Sentence Identification-Ipsilateral Competing Message (SSI-ICM) served as the noise. Measures of speech understanding, satisfaction with sound quality and clarity, and preference were obtained.RESULTSSpeech understanding was significantly better in quiet than in noise, and streaming improved performance in noise when the hearing aid microphones were muted. Sound quality satisfaction was significantly better in quiet than in noise but was not impacted significantly by the hearing aid settings. Speech clarity satisfaction was significantly better in quiet than in noise, and streaming improved satisfaction in noise when the hearing aid microphones were muted. More participants preferred streaming with the microphones muted in quiet, in noise, and overall; however, results did not reach statistical significance.CONCLUSIONSHearing aid users did not benefit from TV streaming with the microphones attenuated or muted when listening in quiet. TV streaming was more beneficial to hearing aid users when listening in noise with the microphones muted. Hearing aid users should be counseled on the impact of the hearing aid microphone settings when using a TV streamer, particularly in noise.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1059-0889</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-9137</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1044/2023_AJA-23-00169</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>American journal of audiology, 2024-03, Vol.33 (1), p.17-30</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c230t-ade05328c5e598d23c339fc53d44fe63f2dfbb9c5f5b257c5ede66c337bb91b63</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7108-6807</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Plyler, Patrick N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Razavi, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hausladen, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humphrey, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of Television Streaming on Hearing Aid User Performance and Satisfaction in Quiet and in Noise</title><title>American journal of audiology</title><description>PURPOSEThe purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of television (TV) streaming on hearing aid user performance and satisfaction in quiet and in noise.METHODTwenty experienced hearing aid users were evaluated in quiet and in noise (5 dB SNR) under three hearing aid conditions: hearing aids, streaming with hearing aid microphones attenuated by 6 dB, and streaming with hearing aid microphones muted. The audiovisual Connected Speech Test served as the signal, and the ipsilateral competing message from the Synthetic Sentence Identification-Ipsilateral Competing Message (SSI-ICM) served as the noise. Measures of speech understanding, satisfaction with sound quality and clarity, and preference were obtained.RESULTSSpeech understanding was significantly better in quiet than in noise, and streaming improved performance in noise when the hearing aid microphones were muted. Sound quality satisfaction was significantly better in quiet than in noise but was not impacted significantly by the hearing aid settings. Speech clarity satisfaction was significantly better in quiet than in noise, and streaming improved satisfaction in noise when the hearing aid microphones were muted. More participants preferred streaming with the microphones muted in quiet, in noise, and overall; however, results did not reach statistical significance.CONCLUSIONSHearing aid users did not benefit from TV streaming with the microphones attenuated or muted when listening in quiet. TV streaming was more beneficial to hearing aid users when listening in noise with the microphones muted. Hearing aid users should be counseled on the impact of the hearing aid microphone settings when using a TV streamer, particularly in noise.</description><issn>1059-0889</issn><issn>1558-9137</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1kMtOwzAURC0EEqXwAey8ZBPwI07sZVQVCqp4qO3acpxrZJRHsdNK_D1uC6uZufdoFoPQLSX3lOT5AyOM6-qlyhjPCKGFOkMTKoTMFOXlefJEqIxIqS7RVYxfCWFKsglq586BHf0eeogRDw6voYW9j37o8WoMYDrff-IUFmDCwVa-wZsIAb9DcEPoTG8Bm77BKzP66EwqS7Tv8cfOw3j8pPA6-AjX6MKZNsLNn07R5nG-ni2y5dvT86xaZpZxMmamASI4k1aAULJh3HKunBW8yXMHBXescXWtrHCiZqJMWANFkaAyXWld8Cm6O_Vuw_C9gzjqzkcLbWt6GHZRMykLxcu8IAmlJ9SGIcYATm-D70z40ZTow7L6f1md5Lgs_wV_SG1D</recordid><startdate>20240301</startdate><enddate>20240301</enddate><creator>Plyler, Patrick N.</creator><creator>Razavi, Sarah</creator><creator>Hausladen, Jennifer</creator><creator>Humphrey, Elizabeth</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7108-6807</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240301</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of Television Streaming on Hearing Aid User Performance and Satisfaction in Quiet and in Noise</title><author>Plyler, Patrick N. ; Razavi, Sarah ; Hausladen, Jennifer ; Humphrey, Elizabeth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c230t-ade05328c5e598d23c339fc53d44fe63f2dfbb9c5f5b257c5ede66c337bb91b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Plyler, Patrick N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Razavi, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hausladen, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humphrey, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of audiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Plyler, Patrick N.</au><au>Razavi, Sarah</au><au>Hausladen, Jennifer</au><au>Humphrey, Elizabeth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of Television Streaming on Hearing Aid User Performance and Satisfaction in Quiet and in Noise</atitle><jtitle>American journal of audiology</jtitle><date>2024-03-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>17</spage><epage>30</epage><pages>17-30</pages><issn>1059-0889</issn><eissn>1558-9137</eissn><abstract>PURPOSEThe purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of television (TV) streaming on hearing aid user performance and satisfaction in quiet and in noise.METHODTwenty experienced hearing aid users were evaluated in quiet and in noise (5 dB SNR) under three hearing aid conditions: hearing aids, streaming with hearing aid microphones attenuated by 6 dB, and streaming with hearing aid microphones muted. The audiovisual Connected Speech Test served as the signal, and the ipsilateral competing message from the Synthetic Sentence Identification-Ipsilateral Competing Message (SSI-ICM) served as the noise. Measures of speech understanding, satisfaction with sound quality and clarity, and preference were obtained.RESULTSSpeech understanding was significantly better in quiet than in noise, and streaming improved performance in noise when the hearing aid microphones were muted. Sound quality satisfaction was significantly better in quiet than in noise but was not impacted significantly by the hearing aid settings. Speech clarity satisfaction was significantly better in quiet than in noise, and streaming improved satisfaction in noise when the hearing aid microphones were muted. More participants preferred streaming with the microphones muted in quiet, in noise, and overall; however, results did not reach statistical significance.CONCLUSIONSHearing aid users did not benefit from TV streaming with the microphones attenuated or muted when listening in quiet. TV streaming was more beneficial to hearing aid users when listening in noise with the microphones muted. Hearing aid users should be counseled on the impact of the hearing aid microphone settings when using a TV streamer, particularly in noise.</abstract><doi>10.1044/2023_AJA-23-00169</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7108-6807</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1059-0889
ispartof American journal of audiology, 2024-03, Vol.33 (1), p.17-30
issn 1059-0889
1558-9137
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2886937460
source EBSCOhost Education Source; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Effectiveness of Television Streaming on Hearing Aid User Performance and Satisfaction in Quiet and in Noise
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T23%3A16%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20Television%20Streaming%20on%20Hearing%20Aid%20User%20Performance%20and%20Satisfaction%20in%20Quiet%20and%20in%20Noise&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20audiology&rft.au=Plyler,%20Patrick%20N.&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=17&rft.epage=30&rft.pages=17-30&rft.issn=1059-0889&rft.eissn=1558-9137&rft_id=info:doi/10.1044/2023_AJA-23-00169&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2886937460%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2886937460&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true