Outcome of Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) using 5% Dextrose Water as Irrigant

BackgroundTURP remains the gold standard for simple prostatectomy presently. Different fluids have been used for irrigation while performing monopolar TURP. The choice of irrigation fluid depends on a lot of factors.AimWe sought to find out if the outcome of monopolar TURP using 5% dextrose water in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nigerian journal of clinical practice 2023-10, Vol.26 (10), p.1568-1574
Hauptverfasser: Amu, OC, Affusim, EA, Nnadozie, UU, Nwachukwu, CD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1574
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1568
container_title Nigerian journal of clinical practice
container_volume 26
creator Amu, OC
Affusim, EA
Nnadozie, UU
Nwachukwu, CD
description BackgroundTURP remains the gold standard for simple prostatectomy presently. Different fluids have been used for irrigation while performing monopolar TURP. The choice of irrigation fluid depends on a lot of factors.AimWe sought to find out if the outcome of monopolar TURP using 5% dextrose water in our setting compares with findings in other studies using different fluids as irrigation fluid in monopolar TURP.Materials and MethodsThis was a prospective study of 220 patients who had monopolar TURP using 5% dextrose water as irrigation fluid from 2015 to 2020.ResultsThe study was completed by 220 patients. The mean age was 66.25 yrs. The mean weight of prostate was 53.2 g, and mean resected weight was 30.10 g using a mean irrigation volume of 45.35 liters, 5% dextrose water over a mean resection time of 66.08 mins. The mean changes in International Prostate Symptom Score/quality of life score (IPSS/QOLS) were statistically significant. Early complications recorded were postoperative hematuria with clot retention (1.4%), urinary tract infection (UTI) (13.2%), and secondary hemorrhage (10%). TURP syndrome was not recorded. Late complications seen within 2 years follow-up were transient urinary incontinence (6.4%), urethral stricture (4.1%), and bladder neck contracture (2.3%). There was no repeat TURP for residual adenoma within this period.ConclusionTURP using 5% dextrose water has comparable outcomes to other irrigation fluids for monopolar TURP. It is a good alternative to any other irrigation fluid.
doi_str_mv 10.4103/njcp.njcp_278_23
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2886599024</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A772556260</galeid><sourcerecordid>A772556260</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c262t-966fd97c91ac6cfb1159680deac92000263ca2ead3d8d14b11313f020cca47db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkM9LwzAUgIMoOKd3jwER5qEzP9qkOY75azDYGB2eJGTp69bRtTNJQf97W-fBy3uH7-PB-xC6pWQcU8If6709jvuhmUw142dowBhTkZScnqMBpVRFnEh5ia683xMiFE_pAH0s2mCbA-CmwJkztW8dhJ0zFV6BBxvKpu5R2AFeusYHEwCPsvVq-YBbX9ZbnNzjJ_gKHQP83lGHjccz58qtqcM1uihM5eHmbw_R-uU5m75F88XrbDqZR5YJFiIlRJEraRU1VthiQ2miREpyMFYxQggT3BoGJud5mtO445zygjBirYllvuFDNDrdPbrmswUf9KH0FqrK1NC0XrM0FYlShMWdendSt6YCXdZFE5yxva4nUrIkEUyQziIny3aPeQeFPrryYNy3pkT3vfVv6n-9-Q9iMnTM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2886599024</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Outcome of Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) using 5% Dextrose Water as Irrigant</title><source>African Journals Online (Open Access)</source><source>Medknow Open Access Medical Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Amu, OC ; Affusim, EA ; Nnadozie, UU ; Nwachukwu, CD</creator><creatorcontrib>Amu, OC ; Affusim, EA ; Nnadozie, UU ; Nwachukwu, CD</creatorcontrib><description>BackgroundTURP remains the gold standard for simple prostatectomy presently. Different fluids have been used for irrigation while performing monopolar TURP. The choice of irrigation fluid depends on a lot of factors.AimWe sought to find out if the outcome of monopolar TURP using 5% dextrose water in our setting compares with findings in other studies using different fluids as irrigation fluid in monopolar TURP.Materials and MethodsThis was a prospective study of 220 patients who had monopolar TURP using 5% dextrose water as irrigation fluid from 2015 to 2020.ResultsThe study was completed by 220 patients. The mean age was 66.25 yrs. The mean weight of prostate was 53.2 g, and mean resected weight was 30.10 g using a mean irrigation volume of 45.35 liters, 5% dextrose water over a mean resection time of 66.08 mins. The mean changes in International Prostate Symptom Score/quality of life score (IPSS/QOLS) were statistically significant. Early complications recorded were postoperative hematuria with clot retention (1.4%), urinary tract infection (UTI) (13.2%), and secondary hemorrhage (10%). TURP syndrome was not recorded. Late complications seen within 2 years follow-up were transient urinary incontinence (6.4%), urethral stricture (4.1%), and bladder neck contracture (2.3%). There was no repeat TURP for residual adenoma within this period.ConclusionTURP using 5% dextrose water has comparable outcomes to other irrigation fluids for monopolar TURP. It is a good alternative to any other irrigation fluid.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1119-3077</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2229-7731</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_278_23</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Dextrose ; Glucose ; Irrigation (Medicine) ; Irrigation water ; Patient outcomes ; Prostatectomy, Transurethral ; Solutions (Pharmacy)</subject><ispartof>Nigerian journal of clinical practice, 2023-10, Vol.26 (10), p.1568-1574</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c262t-966fd97c91ac6cfb1159680deac92000263ca2ead3d8d14b11313f020cca47db3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Amu, OC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Affusim, EA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nnadozie, UU</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nwachukwu, CD</creatorcontrib><title>Outcome of Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) using 5% Dextrose Water as Irrigant</title><title>Nigerian journal of clinical practice</title><description>BackgroundTURP remains the gold standard for simple prostatectomy presently. Different fluids have been used for irrigation while performing monopolar TURP. The choice of irrigation fluid depends on a lot of factors.AimWe sought to find out if the outcome of monopolar TURP using 5% dextrose water in our setting compares with findings in other studies using different fluids as irrigation fluid in monopolar TURP.Materials and MethodsThis was a prospective study of 220 patients who had monopolar TURP using 5% dextrose water as irrigation fluid from 2015 to 2020.ResultsThe study was completed by 220 patients. The mean age was 66.25 yrs. The mean weight of prostate was 53.2 g, and mean resected weight was 30.10 g using a mean irrigation volume of 45.35 liters, 5% dextrose water over a mean resection time of 66.08 mins. The mean changes in International Prostate Symptom Score/quality of life score (IPSS/QOLS) were statistically significant. Early complications recorded were postoperative hematuria with clot retention (1.4%), urinary tract infection (UTI) (13.2%), and secondary hemorrhage (10%). TURP syndrome was not recorded. Late complications seen within 2 years follow-up were transient urinary incontinence (6.4%), urethral stricture (4.1%), and bladder neck contracture (2.3%). There was no repeat TURP for residual adenoma within this period.ConclusionTURP using 5% dextrose water has comparable outcomes to other irrigation fluids for monopolar TURP. It is a good alternative to any other irrigation fluid.</description><subject>Dextrose</subject><subject>Glucose</subject><subject>Irrigation (Medicine)</subject><subject>Irrigation water</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Prostatectomy, Transurethral</subject><subject>Solutions (Pharmacy)</subject><issn>1119-3077</issn><issn>2229-7731</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkM9LwzAUgIMoOKd3jwER5qEzP9qkOY75azDYGB2eJGTp69bRtTNJQf97W-fBy3uH7-PB-xC6pWQcU8If6709jvuhmUw142dowBhTkZScnqMBpVRFnEh5ia683xMiFE_pAH0s2mCbA-CmwJkztW8dhJ0zFV6BBxvKpu5R2AFeusYHEwCPsvVq-YBbX9ZbnNzjJ_gKHQP83lGHjccz58qtqcM1uihM5eHmbw_R-uU5m75F88XrbDqZR5YJFiIlRJEraRU1VthiQ2miREpyMFYxQggT3BoGJud5mtO445zygjBirYllvuFDNDrdPbrmswUf9KH0FqrK1NC0XrM0FYlShMWdendSt6YCXdZFE5yxva4nUrIkEUyQziIny3aPeQeFPrryYNy3pkT3vfVv6n-9-Q9iMnTM</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Amu, OC</creator><creator>Affusim, EA</creator><creator>Nnadozie, UU</creator><creator>Nwachukwu, CD</creator><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>Outcome of Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) using 5% Dextrose Water as Irrigant</title><author>Amu, OC ; Affusim, EA ; Nnadozie, UU ; Nwachukwu, CD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c262t-966fd97c91ac6cfb1159680deac92000263ca2ead3d8d14b11313f020cca47db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Dextrose</topic><topic>Glucose</topic><topic>Irrigation (Medicine)</topic><topic>Irrigation water</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Prostatectomy, Transurethral</topic><topic>Solutions (Pharmacy)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Amu, OC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Affusim, EA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nnadozie, UU</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nwachukwu, CD</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nigerian journal of clinical practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Amu, OC</au><au>Affusim, EA</au><au>Nnadozie, UU</au><au>Nwachukwu, CD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Outcome of Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) using 5% Dextrose Water as Irrigant</atitle><jtitle>Nigerian journal of clinical practice</jtitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1568</spage><epage>1574</epage><pages>1568-1574</pages><issn>1119-3077</issn><eissn>2229-7731</eissn><abstract>BackgroundTURP remains the gold standard for simple prostatectomy presently. Different fluids have been used for irrigation while performing monopolar TURP. The choice of irrigation fluid depends on a lot of factors.AimWe sought to find out if the outcome of monopolar TURP using 5% dextrose water in our setting compares with findings in other studies using different fluids as irrigation fluid in monopolar TURP.Materials and MethodsThis was a prospective study of 220 patients who had monopolar TURP using 5% dextrose water as irrigation fluid from 2015 to 2020.ResultsThe study was completed by 220 patients. The mean age was 66.25 yrs. The mean weight of prostate was 53.2 g, and mean resected weight was 30.10 g using a mean irrigation volume of 45.35 liters, 5% dextrose water over a mean resection time of 66.08 mins. The mean changes in International Prostate Symptom Score/quality of life score (IPSS/QOLS) were statistically significant. Early complications recorded were postoperative hematuria with clot retention (1.4%), urinary tract infection (UTI) (13.2%), and secondary hemorrhage (10%). TURP syndrome was not recorded. Late complications seen within 2 years follow-up were transient urinary incontinence (6.4%), urethral stricture (4.1%), and bladder neck contracture (2.3%). There was no repeat TURP for residual adenoma within this period.ConclusionTURP using 5% dextrose water has comparable outcomes to other irrigation fluids for monopolar TURP. It is a good alternative to any other irrigation fluid.</abstract><pub>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</pub><doi>10.4103/njcp.njcp_278_23</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1119-3077
ispartof Nigerian journal of clinical practice, 2023-10, Vol.26 (10), p.1568-1574
issn 1119-3077
2229-7731
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2886599024
source African Journals Online (Open Access); Medknow Open Access Medical Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Dextrose
Glucose
Irrigation (Medicine)
Irrigation water
Patient outcomes
Prostatectomy, Transurethral
Solutions (Pharmacy)
title Outcome of Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) using 5% Dextrose Water as Irrigant
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T01%3A55%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Outcome%20of%20Transurethral%20Resection%20of%20the%20Prostate%20(TURP)%20using%205%25%20Dextrose%20Water%20as%20Irrigant&rft.jtitle=Nigerian%20journal%20of%20clinical%20practice&rft.au=Amu,%20OC&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1568&rft.epage=1574&rft.pages=1568-1574&rft.issn=1119-3077&rft.eissn=2229-7731&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/njcp.njcp_278_23&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA772556260%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2886599024&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A772556260&rfr_iscdi=true