Buprenorphine Versus Diclofenac for Pain Relief in Acute Pancreatitis: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

Although both nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids are used for analgesia in acute pancreatitis (AP), the analgesic of choice is not known. We compared buprenorphine, an opioid, and diclofenac, an NSAID, for analgesia in AP. In a double-blind randomized controlled trial, AP pati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology 2024-03, Vol.22 (3), p.532-541.e8
Hauptverfasser: Saini, Mayank, Samanta, Jayanta, Kumar, Antriksh, Choudhury, Arup, Dhar, Jahnvi, Jafra, Anudeep, Chauhan, Rajeev, Muktesh, Gaurav, Gupta, Pankaj, Gupta, Vikas, Yadav, Thakur Deen, Kochhar, Rakesh, Capurso, Gabriele, De-Madaria, Enrique, Facciorusso, Antonio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 541.e8
container_issue 3
container_start_page 532
container_title Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology
container_volume 22
creator Saini, Mayank
Samanta, Jayanta
Kumar, Antriksh
Choudhury, Arup
Dhar, Jahnvi
Jafra, Anudeep
Chauhan, Rajeev
Muktesh, Gaurav
Gupta, Pankaj
Gupta, Vikas
Yadav, Thakur Deen
Kochhar, Rakesh
Capurso, Gabriele
De-Madaria, Enrique
Facciorusso, Antonio
description Although both nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids are used for analgesia in acute pancreatitis (AP), the analgesic of choice is not known. We compared buprenorphine, an opioid, and diclofenac, an NSAID, for analgesia in AP. In a double-blind randomized controlled trial, AP patients were randomized to receive intravenous diclofenac or intravenous buprenorphine. Fentanyl was used as rescue analgesia, delivered through a patient-controlled analgesia pump. Primary outcome was the difference in the dose of rescue fentanyl required. Secondary outcomes were the number of effective and ineffective demands of rescue fentanyl, pain-free interval, reduction in visual analogue scale (VAS) score, adverse events, and organ failure development. Twenty-four patients were randomized to diclofenac and 24 to buprenorphine. The 2 groups were matched at baseline. The total amount of rescue fentanyl required was significantly lower in the buprenorphine group:130 μg, interquartile range (IQR), 80–255 vs 520 μg, IQR, 380–1065 (P < .001). The number of total demands was 32 (IQR, 21–69) in the diclofenac arm vs 8 (IQR, 4–15) in the buprenorphine arm (P < .001). The buprenorphine group had more prolonged pain-free interval (20 vs 4 hours; P < .001), with greater reduction in the VAS score at 24, 48, and 72 hours compared with the diclofenac group. These findings were confirmed in the subgroup of moderately severe/severe pancreatitis. Adverse events profile was similar in the 2 groups. Compared with diclofenac, buprenorphine appears to be more effective and equally safe for pain management in AP patients, even in the subcohort of moderately severe or severe pancreatitis (Trial Registration number: CTRI/2020/07/026914). [Display omitted]
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.10.021
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2886329708</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1542356523008649</els_id><sourcerecordid>2886329708</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-2523c0f8502a6e506a3ee8b73b085cad0b221f35484c5176b6f1bb4930ff70ed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPGzEUhS1UxCPlB3RTednNDH6M59GukvCUkECIsrU8nuviyLFTewYJfj2OknbJ6p57dO6R7ofQN0pKSmh9vir1n5eSEcbzXhJGD9AJFRUrmoZWX_aai1oco9OUVoSwruqaI3TMm45VrRAnKC2mTQQf4ubFesDPENOU8IXVLhjwSmMTIn5Q1uNHcBYMzmqupxGy6XUENdrRpp94ji_C1DsoFs76AQb8qPwQ1vY9y2XwYwzOZfkUrXJf0aFRLsHZfs7Q76vLp-VNcXd_fbuc3xWaCz4WTDCuiWkFYaoGQWrFAdq-4T1phVYD6RmjhouqrbSgTd3XhvZ91XFiTENg4DP0Y9e7ieHvBGmUa5s0OKc8hClJ1rY1Z11D2hylu6iOIaUIRm6iXav4JimRW9ZyJTNruWW9tTLrfPN9Xz_1axj-X_yDmwO_dgHIT75aiDJpC17DYCPoUQ7BflL_AVEfj00</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2886329708</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Buprenorphine Versus Diclofenac for Pain Relief in Acute Pancreatitis: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Saini, Mayank ; Samanta, Jayanta ; Kumar, Antriksh ; Choudhury, Arup ; Dhar, Jahnvi ; Jafra, Anudeep ; Chauhan, Rajeev ; Muktesh, Gaurav ; Gupta, Pankaj ; Gupta, Vikas ; Yadav, Thakur Deen ; Kochhar, Rakesh ; Capurso, Gabriele ; De-Madaria, Enrique ; Facciorusso, Antonio</creator><creatorcontrib>Saini, Mayank ; Samanta, Jayanta ; Kumar, Antriksh ; Choudhury, Arup ; Dhar, Jahnvi ; Jafra, Anudeep ; Chauhan, Rajeev ; Muktesh, Gaurav ; Gupta, Pankaj ; Gupta, Vikas ; Yadav, Thakur Deen ; Kochhar, Rakesh ; Capurso, Gabriele ; De-Madaria, Enrique ; Facciorusso, Antonio</creatorcontrib><description>Although both nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids are used for analgesia in acute pancreatitis (AP), the analgesic of choice is not known. We compared buprenorphine, an opioid, and diclofenac, an NSAID, for analgesia in AP. In a double-blind randomized controlled trial, AP patients were randomized to receive intravenous diclofenac or intravenous buprenorphine. Fentanyl was used as rescue analgesia, delivered through a patient-controlled analgesia pump. Primary outcome was the difference in the dose of rescue fentanyl required. Secondary outcomes were the number of effective and ineffective demands of rescue fentanyl, pain-free interval, reduction in visual analogue scale (VAS) score, adverse events, and organ failure development. Twenty-four patients were randomized to diclofenac and 24 to buprenorphine. The 2 groups were matched at baseline. The total amount of rescue fentanyl required was significantly lower in the buprenorphine group:130 μg, interquartile range (IQR), 80–255 vs 520 μg, IQR, 380–1065 (P &lt; .001). The number of total demands was 32 (IQR, 21–69) in the diclofenac arm vs 8 (IQR, 4–15) in the buprenorphine arm (P &lt; .001). The buprenorphine group had more prolonged pain-free interval (20 vs 4 hours; P &lt; .001), with greater reduction in the VAS score at 24, 48, and 72 hours compared with the diclofenac group. These findings were confirmed in the subgroup of moderately severe/severe pancreatitis. Adverse events profile was similar in the 2 groups. Compared with diclofenac, buprenorphine appears to be more effective and equally safe for pain management in AP patients, even in the subcohort of moderately severe or severe pancreatitis (Trial Registration number: CTRI/2020/07/026914). [Display omitted]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1542-3565</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1542-7714</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.10.021</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37924855</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Analgesics ; Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs ; Opioids ; Patient-Controlled Analgesia ; Visual Analogue Scale</subject><ispartof>Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology, 2024-03, Vol.22 (3), p.532-541.e8</ispartof><rights>2024 AGA Institute</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-2523c0f8502a6e506a3ee8b73b085cad0b221f35484c5176b6f1bb4930ff70ed3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-2523c0f8502a6e506a3ee8b73b085cad0b221f35484c5176b6f1bb4930ff70ed3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9277-5086</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2023.10.021$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37924855$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saini, Mayank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samanta, Jayanta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Antriksh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choudhury, Arup</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhar, Jahnvi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jafra, Anudeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chauhan, Rajeev</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muktesh, Gaurav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Pankaj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Vikas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yadav, Thakur Deen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kochhar, Rakesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capurso, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De-Madaria, Enrique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Facciorusso, Antonio</creatorcontrib><title>Buprenorphine Versus Diclofenac for Pain Relief in Acute Pancreatitis: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial</title><title>Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology</title><addtitle>Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol</addtitle><description>Although both nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids are used for analgesia in acute pancreatitis (AP), the analgesic of choice is not known. We compared buprenorphine, an opioid, and diclofenac, an NSAID, for analgesia in AP. In a double-blind randomized controlled trial, AP patients were randomized to receive intravenous diclofenac or intravenous buprenorphine. Fentanyl was used as rescue analgesia, delivered through a patient-controlled analgesia pump. Primary outcome was the difference in the dose of rescue fentanyl required. Secondary outcomes were the number of effective and ineffective demands of rescue fentanyl, pain-free interval, reduction in visual analogue scale (VAS) score, adverse events, and organ failure development. Twenty-four patients were randomized to diclofenac and 24 to buprenorphine. The 2 groups were matched at baseline. The total amount of rescue fentanyl required was significantly lower in the buprenorphine group:130 μg, interquartile range (IQR), 80–255 vs 520 μg, IQR, 380–1065 (P &lt; .001). The number of total demands was 32 (IQR, 21–69) in the diclofenac arm vs 8 (IQR, 4–15) in the buprenorphine arm (P &lt; .001). The buprenorphine group had more prolonged pain-free interval (20 vs 4 hours; P &lt; .001), with greater reduction in the VAS score at 24, 48, and 72 hours compared with the diclofenac group. These findings were confirmed in the subgroup of moderately severe/severe pancreatitis. Adverse events profile was similar in the 2 groups. Compared with diclofenac, buprenorphine appears to be more effective and equally safe for pain management in AP patients, even in the subcohort of moderately severe or severe pancreatitis (Trial Registration number: CTRI/2020/07/026914). [Display omitted]</description><subject>Analgesics</subject><subject>Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs</subject><subject>Opioids</subject><subject>Patient-Controlled Analgesia</subject><subject>Visual Analogue Scale</subject><issn>1542-3565</issn><issn>1542-7714</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtPGzEUhS1UxCPlB3RTednNDH6M59GukvCUkECIsrU8nuviyLFTewYJfj2OknbJ6p57dO6R7ofQN0pKSmh9vir1n5eSEcbzXhJGD9AJFRUrmoZWX_aai1oco9OUVoSwruqaI3TMm45VrRAnKC2mTQQf4ubFesDPENOU8IXVLhjwSmMTIn5Q1uNHcBYMzmqupxGy6XUENdrRpp94ji_C1DsoFs76AQb8qPwQ1vY9y2XwYwzOZfkUrXJf0aFRLsHZfs7Q76vLp-VNcXd_fbuc3xWaCz4WTDCuiWkFYaoGQWrFAdq-4T1phVYD6RmjhouqrbSgTd3XhvZ91XFiTENg4DP0Y9e7ieHvBGmUa5s0OKc8hClJ1rY1Z11D2hylu6iOIaUIRm6iXav4JimRW9ZyJTNruWW9tTLrfPN9Xz_1axj-X_yDmwO_dgHIT75aiDJpC17DYCPoUQ7BflL_AVEfj00</recordid><startdate>20240301</startdate><enddate>20240301</enddate><creator>Saini, Mayank</creator><creator>Samanta, Jayanta</creator><creator>Kumar, Antriksh</creator><creator>Choudhury, Arup</creator><creator>Dhar, Jahnvi</creator><creator>Jafra, Anudeep</creator><creator>Chauhan, Rajeev</creator><creator>Muktesh, Gaurav</creator><creator>Gupta, Pankaj</creator><creator>Gupta, Vikas</creator><creator>Yadav, Thakur Deen</creator><creator>Kochhar, Rakesh</creator><creator>Capurso, Gabriele</creator><creator>De-Madaria, Enrique</creator><creator>Facciorusso, Antonio</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9277-5086</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240301</creationdate><title>Buprenorphine Versus Diclofenac for Pain Relief in Acute Pancreatitis: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial</title><author>Saini, Mayank ; Samanta, Jayanta ; Kumar, Antriksh ; Choudhury, Arup ; Dhar, Jahnvi ; Jafra, Anudeep ; Chauhan, Rajeev ; Muktesh, Gaurav ; Gupta, Pankaj ; Gupta, Vikas ; Yadav, Thakur Deen ; Kochhar, Rakesh ; Capurso, Gabriele ; De-Madaria, Enrique ; Facciorusso, Antonio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-2523c0f8502a6e506a3ee8b73b085cad0b221f35484c5176b6f1bb4930ff70ed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Analgesics</topic><topic>Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs</topic><topic>Opioids</topic><topic>Patient-Controlled Analgesia</topic><topic>Visual Analogue Scale</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saini, Mayank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samanta, Jayanta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Antriksh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choudhury, Arup</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhar, Jahnvi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jafra, Anudeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chauhan, Rajeev</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muktesh, Gaurav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Pankaj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Vikas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yadav, Thakur Deen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kochhar, Rakesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capurso, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De-Madaria, Enrique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Facciorusso, Antonio</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saini, Mayank</au><au>Samanta, Jayanta</au><au>Kumar, Antriksh</au><au>Choudhury, Arup</au><au>Dhar, Jahnvi</au><au>Jafra, Anudeep</au><au>Chauhan, Rajeev</au><au>Muktesh, Gaurav</au><au>Gupta, Pankaj</au><au>Gupta, Vikas</au><au>Yadav, Thakur Deen</au><au>Kochhar, Rakesh</au><au>Capurso, Gabriele</au><au>De-Madaria, Enrique</au><au>Facciorusso, Antonio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Buprenorphine Versus Diclofenac for Pain Relief in Acute Pancreatitis: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial</atitle><jtitle>Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol</addtitle><date>2024-03-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>532</spage><epage>541.e8</epage><pages>532-541.e8</pages><issn>1542-3565</issn><eissn>1542-7714</eissn><abstract>Although both nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids are used for analgesia in acute pancreatitis (AP), the analgesic of choice is not known. We compared buprenorphine, an opioid, and diclofenac, an NSAID, for analgesia in AP. In a double-blind randomized controlled trial, AP patients were randomized to receive intravenous diclofenac or intravenous buprenorphine. Fentanyl was used as rescue analgesia, delivered through a patient-controlled analgesia pump. Primary outcome was the difference in the dose of rescue fentanyl required. Secondary outcomes were the number of effective and ineffective demands of rescue fentanyl, pain-free interval, reduction in visual analogue scale (VAS) score, adverse events, and organ failure development. Twenty-four patients were randomized to diclofenac and 24 to buprenorphine. The 2 groups were matched at baseline. The total amount of rescue fentanyl required was significantly lower in the buprenorphine group:130 μg, interquartile range (IQR), 80–255 vs 520 μg, IQR, 380–1065 (P &lt; .001). The number of total demands was 32 (IQR, 21–69) in the diclofenac arm vs 8 (IQR, 4–15) in the buprenorphine arm (P &lt; .001). The buprenorphine group had more prolonged pain-free interval (20 vs 4 hours; P &lt; .001), with greater reduction in the VAS score at 24, 48, and 72 hours compared with the diclofenac group. These findings were confirmed in the subgroup of moderately severe/severe pancreatitis. Adverse events profile was similar in the 2 groups. Compared with diclofenac, buprenorphine appears to be more effective and equally safe for pain management in AP patients, even in the subcohort of moderately severe or severe pancreatitis (Trial Registration number: CTRI/2020/07/026914). [Display omitted]</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>37924855</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cgh.2023.10.021</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9277-5086</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1542-3565
ispartof Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology, 2024-03, Vol.22 (3), p.532-541.e8
issn 1542-3565
1542-7714
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2886329708
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Analgesics
Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs
Opioids
Patient-Controlled Analgesia
Visual Analogue Scale
title Buprenorphine Versus Diclofenac for Pain Relief in Acute Pancreatitis: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T04%3A13%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Buprenorphine%20Versus%20Diclofenac%20for%20Pain%20Relief%20in%20Acute%20Pancreatitis:%20A%20Double-Blinded%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20gastroenterology%20and%20hepatology&rft.au=Saini,%20Mayank&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=532&rft.epage=541.e8&rft.pages=532-541.e8&rft.issn=1542-3565&rft.eissn=1542-7714&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cgh.2023.10.021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2886329708%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2886329708&rft_id=info:pmid/37924855&rft_els_id=S1542356523008649&rfr_iscdi=true