Changes to Registered and Pivotal Clinical Trials after the 2011 Tri-Societies Guidelines for Clinical Endpoints and Response Criteria in Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome

Guidelines for mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome clinical trials were published in 2011 to standardize endpoint criteria and trial design. Our retrospective cohort study of mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov and pivotal trials supporting drug appro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of investigative dermatology 2024-04, Vol.144 (4), p.855-861.e1
Hauptverfasser: Gunter, Simon J., Kim, Ellen J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 861.e1
container_issue 4
container_start_page 855
container_title Journal of investigative dermatology
container_volume 144
creator Gunter, Simon J.
Kim, Ellen J.
description Guidelines for mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome clinical trials were published in 2011 to standardize endpoint criteria and trial design. Our retrospective cohort study of mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov and pivotal trials supporting drug approvals and label extensions evaluates adherence to these guidelines. Sixty-three trials met our inclusion criteria. In a subpopulation of trials, mean adherence to the guidelines was approximately 60%. When comparing trials that began in the first 6 years after their publication with those that started after, we found no difference in mean adherence (4.12 vs 3.41) (P = .15). Among the 8 pivotal trials supporting new mycosis fungoides or Sézary syndrome systemic therapies from 1990 to 2020, systemic trials published after 2011 were more likely to randomize patients (100 vs 0%, P = .036), perform superiority testing (100 vs 0%, P = .036), and use an intention-to-treat analysis (100 vs 0%, P = .036). The design of trials registered on Clinicaltrials.gov did not change significantly between the first 6 years after the publication of the guidelines and after. This demonstrates that the guidelines are still not consistently implemented across all trials. However, registrational trials were more likely to implement the recommendations.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jid.2023.10.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2886329533</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022202X23030385</els_id><sourcerecordid>2886329533</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-73dba0d7961f82ba14638879a854d2337c7ae8dc42bec3dd1680acd4d81788e83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1uEzEUhS0EoqHwAGyQl2wm-Gdm7IgVGrWlUhGoKRI7y7HvpI4mdrBnKqVvxI536ItxQwrsWPn6-pzP1z6EvOZszhlv323mm-DnggmJ-znj_AmZ8UbIiqtaPSUzxoSo8PjbCXlRyoahp270c3Ii1UI0rG1n5Gd3a-MaCh0TvYZ1KCNk8NRGT7-EuzTagXZDiMFhcZODHQq1PWroeAtU4JWHbrVMLsAYEHMxBQ9owLJP-Z_3LPpdCnEsv9HXUHYpFqBdDggLloZIP-1dKqHQ8ymuE1KO0uXDj3ub93S5jz6nLbwkz3qcAl49rqfk6_nZTfexuvp8cdl9uKqcZM1YKelXlnm1aHmvxcryupVaq4XVTe2FlMopC9q7WqzASe95q5l1vvaaK61By1Py9sjd5fR9gjKabSgOhsFGSFMxQutWikUjJUr5UepyKiVDb3Y5bHFow5k5BGU2BoMyh6AOLfw19Lx5xE-rLfi_jj_JoOD9UQD4yLsA2RT84-jAhwxuND6F_-B_AaCOplU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2886329533</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Changes to Registered and Pivotal Clinical Trials after the 2011 Tri-Societies Guidelines for Clinical Endpoints and Response Criteria in Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Gunter, Simon J. ; Kim, Ellen J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gunter, Simon J. ; Kim, Ellen J.</creatorcontrib><description>Guidelines for mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome clinical trials were published in 2011 to standardize endpoint criteria and trial design. Our retrospective cohort study of mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov and pivotal trials supporting drug approvals and label extensions evaluates adherence to these guidelines. Sixty-three trials met our inclusion criteria. In a subpopulation of trials, mean adherence to the guidelines was approximately 60%. When comparing trials that began in the first 6 years after their publication with those that started after, we found no difference in mean adherence (4.12 vs 3.41) (P = .15). Among the 8 pivotal trials supporting new mycosis fungoides or Sézary syndrome systemic therapies from 1990 to 2020, systemic trials published after 2011 were more likely to randomize patients (100 vs 0%, P = .036), perform superiority testing (100 vs 0%, P = .036), and use an intention-to-treat analysis (100 vs 0%, P = .036). The design of trials registered on Clinicaltrials.gov did not change significantly between the first 6 years after the publication of the guidelines and after. This demonstrates that the guidelines are still not consistently implemented across all trials. However, registrational trials were more likely to implement the recommendations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-202X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-1747</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2023.10.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37925066</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Clinical endpoints ; Clinical trials ; Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma ; Humans ; Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous - drug therapy ; Mycosis fungoides ; Mycosis Fungoides - diagnosis ; Mycosis Fungoides - drug therapy ; Retrospective Studies ; Sezary Syndrome - drug therapy ; Skin Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Skin Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Sézary syndrome</subject><ispartof>Journal of investigative dermatology, 2024-04, Vol.144 (4), p.855-861.e1</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-73dba0d7961f82ba14638879a854d2337c7ae8dc42bec3dd1680acd4d81788e83</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9099-7614 ; 0000-0001-7125-9296</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37925066$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gunter, Simon J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ellen J.</creatorcontrib><title>Changes to Registered and Pivotal Clinical Trials after the 2011 Tri-Societies Guidelines for Clinical Endpoints and Response Criteria in Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome</title><title>Journal of investigative dermatology</title><addtitle>J Invest Dermatol</addtitle><description>Guidelines for mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome clinical trials were published in 2011 to standardize endpoint criteria and trial design. Our retrospective cohort study of mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov and pivotal trials supporting drug approvals and label extensions evaluates adherence to these guidelines. Sixty-three trials met our inclusion criteria. In a subpopulation of trials, mean adherence to the guidelines was approximately 60%. When comparing trials that began in the first 6 years after their publication with those that started after, we found no difference in mean adherence (4.12 vs 3.41) (P = .15). Among the 8 pivotal trials supporting new mycosis fungoides or Sézary syndrome systemic therapies from 1990 to 2020, systemic trials published after 2011 were more likely to randomize patients (100 vs 0%, P = .036), perform superiority testing (100 vs 0%, P = .036), and use an intention-to-treat analysis (100 vs 0%, P = .036). The design of trials registered on Clinicaltrials.gov did not change significantly between the first 6 years after the publication of the guidelines and after. This demonstrates that the guidelines are still not consistently implemented across all trials. However, registrational trials were more likely to implement the recommendations.</description><subject>Clinical endpoints</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous - drug therapy</subject><subject>Mycosis fungoides</subject><subject>Mycosis Fungoides - diagnosis</subject><subject>Mycosis Fungoides - drug therapy</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sezary Syndrome - drug therapy</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Sézary syndrome</subject><issn>0022-202X</issn><issn>1523-1747</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1uEzEUhS0EoqHwAGyQl2wm-Gdm7IgVGrWlUhGoKRI7y7HvpI4mdrBnKqVvxI536ItxQwrsWPn6-pzP1z6EvOZszhlv323mm-DnggmJ-znj_AmZ8UbIiqtaPSUzxoSo8PjbCXlRyoahp270c3Ii1UI0rG1n5Gd3a-MaCh0TvYZ1KCNk8NRGT7-EuzTagXZDiMFhcZODHQq1PWroeAtU4JWHbrVMLsAYEHMxBQ9owLJP-Z_3LPpdCnEsv9HXUHYpFqBdDggLloZIP-1dKqHQ8ymuE1KO0uXDj3ub93S5jz6nLbwkz3qcAl49rqfk6_nZTfexuvp8cdl9uKqcZM1YKelXlnm1aHmvxcryupVaq4XVTe2FlMopC9q7WqzASe95q5l1vvaaK61By1Py9sjd5fR9gjKabSgOhsFGSFMxQutWikUjJUr5UepyKiVDb3Y5bHFow5k5BGU2BoMyh6AOLfw19Lx5xE-rLfi_jj_JoOD9UQD4yLsA2RT84-jAhwxuND6F_-B_AaCOplU</recordid><startdate>202404</startdate><enddate>202404</enddate><creator>Gunter, Simon J.</creator><creator>Kim, Ellen J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9099-7614</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7125-9296</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202404</creationdate><title>Changes to Registered and Pivotal Clinical Trials after the 2011 Tri-Societies Guidelines for Clinical Endpoints and Response Criteria in Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome</title><author>Gunter, Simon J. ; Kim, Ellen J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-73dba0d7961f82ba14638879a854d2337c7ae8dc42bec3dd1680acd4d81788e83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Clinical endpoints</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous - drug therapy</topic><topic>Mycosis fungoides</topic><topic>Mycosis Fungoides - diagnosis</topic><topic>Mycosis Fungoides - drug therapy</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sezary Syndrome - drug therapy</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Sézary syndrome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gunter, Simon J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ellen J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of investigative dermatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gunter, Simon J.</au><au>Kim, Ellen J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Changes to Registered and Pivotal Clinical Trials after the 2011 Tri-Societies Guidelines for Clinical Endpoints and Response Criteria in Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome</atitle><jtitle>Journal of investigative dermatology</jtitle><addtitle>J Invest Dermatol</addtitle><date>2024-04</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>144</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>855</spage><epage>861.e1</epage><pages>855-861.e1</pages><issn>0022-202X</issn><eissn>1523-1747</eissn><abstract>Guidelines for mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome clinical trials were published in 2011 to standardize endpoint criteria and trial design. Our retrospective cohort study of mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov and pivotal trials supporting drug approvals and label extensions evaluates adherence to these guidelines. Sixty-three trials met our inclusion criteria. In a subpopulation of trials, mean adherence to the guidelines was approximately 60%. When comparing trials that began in the first 6 years after their publication with those that started after, we found no difference in mean adherence (4.12 vs 3.41) (P = .15). Among the 8 pivotal trials supporting new mycosis fungoides or Sézary syndrome systemic therapies from 1990 to 2020, systemic trials published after 2011 were more likely to randomize patients (100 vs 0%, P = .036), perform superiority testing (100 vs 0%, P = .036), and use an intention-to-treat analysis (100 vs 0%, P = .036). The design of trials registered on Clinicaltrials.gov did not change significantly between the first 6 years after the publication of the guidelines and after. This demonstrates that the guidelines are still not consistently implemented across all trials. However, registrational trials were more likely to implement the recommendations.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>37925066</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jid.2023.10.011</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9099-7614</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7125-9296</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-202X
ispartof Journal of investigative dermatology, 2024-04, Vol.144 (4), p.855-861.e1
issn 0022-202X
1523-1747
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2886329533
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Clinical endpoints
Clinical trials
Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma
Humans
Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous - drug therapy
Mycosis fungoides
Mycosis Fungoides - diagnosis
Mycosis Fungoides - drug therapy
Retrospective Studies
Sezary Syndrome - drug therapy
Skin Neoplasms - diagnosis
Skin Neoplasms - drug therapy
Sézary syndrome
title Changes to Registered and Pivotal Clinical Trials after the 2011 Tri-Societies Guidelines for Clinical Endpoints and Response Criteria in Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T21%3A58%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Changes%20to%20Registered%20and%20Pivotal%20Clinical%20Trials%20after%20the%202011%20Tri-Societies%20Guidelines%20for%20Clinical%20Endpoints%20and%20Response%20Criteria%20in%20Mycosis%20Fungoides%20and%20S%C3%A9zary%20Syndrome&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20investigative%20dermatology&rft.au=Gunter,%20Simon%20J.&rft.date=2024-04&rft.volume=144&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=855&rft.epage=861.e1&rft.pages=855-861.e1&rft.issn=0022-202X&rft.eissn=1523-1747&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jid.2023.10.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2886329533%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2886329533&rft_id=info:pmid/37925066&rft_els_id=S0022202X23030385&rfr_iscdi=true