The effect of types of sensory feedback on the acquisition and retention of squat performance: A randomized, double‐blind, controlled trial

Various sensory feedback methods are considered important for motor learning, but the effect of each sensory feedback method on effective squat learning still needs to be clarified. This study aimed to investigate the effect of sensory feedback types on the acquisition and retention of a squat. A do...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports 2024-01, Vol.34 (1), p.e14531-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Shin, Ho‐Jin, Kim, Sung‐Hyeon, Cho, Hwi‐Young
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 1
container_start_page e14531
container_title Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports
container_volume 34
creator Shin, Ho‐Jin
Kim, Sung‐Hyeon
Cho, Hwi‐Young
description Various sensory feedback methods are considered important for motor learning, but the effect of each sensory feedback method on effective squat learning still needs to be clarified. This study aimed to investigate the effect of sensory feedback types on the acquisition and retention of a squat. A double‐blinded, randomized controlled trial was carried out. Thirty‐healthy people were recruited and randomly assigned to the visual feedback group (VFG = 10), tactile feedback group (TFG = 10), and control group (CG = 10). VFG received visual feedback through video data of the participant performing squats, and TFG received tactile feedback through manual contact with a physical therapist. Both groups received feedback on the movements that needed correction after each set was completed. CG maintained rest without receiving any feedback. The retro‐reflexive marker, force plate, and electromyography were used to measure body angle, foot center of pressure (COP), and muscle activity. All assessments were measured to confirm a squat acquisition. VFG and TFG showed significant differences in neutral knee position (NKP), trunk forward lean (TFL), anterior knee displacement (AKD), and anteroposterior (AP) foot COP (p  0.050). This study demonstrated that visual feedback positively affects the acquisition and retention of squats. Therefore, we recommend the use of visual feedback for squat acquisition and retention in exercise novices.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/sms.14531
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2885539684</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2885539684</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3131-659c8b58eb62142a15ccd067eecb4110537e31ee21ac84ca4e3bf3553c7bc74d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10cFqFTEUBuAgir1WF76ABNwoOG3OZDKT6a4UtYWKi9Z1SDJnMDUzuTfJILervoDgM_ok5vZWF4LZJAe-_Bz4CXkJ7AjKOU5TOoJGcHhEVtAyVjHJ5WOyYj0TVQdSHpBnKd0wBl3fiKfkgHc9tKLvV-TH9VekOI5oMw0jzds1pt0j4ZxC3NIRcTDafqNhprlQbTeLSy67Mut5oBEzzvfT7tNm0ZmuMY4hTnq2eEJPaSwsTO4Wh3d0CIvx-Ovup_FuLrMNc47Bexxojk775-TJqH3CFw_3Ifny4f312Xl1-fnjxdnpZWU5cKjK6lYaIdG0NTS1BmHtwNoO0ZoGgAneIQfEGrSVjdUNcjNyIbjtjO2agR-SN_vcdQybBVNWk0sWvdczhiWpWsqi-1Y2hb7-h96EJc5lO1X3IFktO14X9XavbAwpRRzVOrpJx60CpnYdqdKRuu-o2FcPiYuZcPgr_5RSwPEefHcet_9PUlefrvaRvwGKDJ29</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2918028732</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of types of sensory feedback on the acquisition and retention of squat performance: A randomized, double‐blind, controlled trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Shin, Ho‐Jin ; Kim, Sung‐Hyeon ; Cho, Hwi‐Young</creator><creatorcontrib>Shin, Ho‐Jin ; Kim, Sung‐Hyeon ; Cho, Hwi‐Young</creatorcontrib><description>Various sensory feedback methods are considered important for motor learning, but the effect of each sensory feedback method on effective squat learning still needs to be clarified. This study aimed to investigate the effect of sensory feedback types on the acquisition and retention of a squat. A double‐blinded, randomized controlled trial was carried out. Thirty‐healthy people were recruited and randomly assigned to the visual feedback group (VFG = 10), tactile feedback group (TFG = 10), and control group (CG = 10). VFG received visual feedback through video data of the participant performing squats, and TFG received tactile feedback through manual contact with a physical therapist. Both groups received feedback on the movements that needed correction after each set was completed. CG maintained rest without receiving any feedback. The retro‐reflexive marker, force plate, and electromyography were used to measure body angle, foot center of pressure (COP), and muscle activity. All assessments were measured to confirm a squat acquisition. VFG and TFG showed significant differences in neutral knee position (NKP), trunk forward lean (TFL), anterior knee displacement (AKD), and anteroposterior (AP) foot COP (p &lt; 0.050). In addition, the acquisition was retained until 3 days later for NKP and a week later for TFL, AKD, and AP foot COP in VFG (p &lt; 0.050), while the acquisition was not retained in TFG (p &gt; 0.050). There was no statistically significant change in CG (p &gt; 0.050). This study demonstrated that visual feedback positively affects the acquisition and retention of squats. Therefore, we recommend the use of visual feedback for squat acquisition and retention in exercise novices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0905-7188</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0838</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/sms.14531</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37916599</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Electromyography ; Feedback, Sensory - physiology ; Humans ; Knee Joint ; motor learning ; Movement - physiology ; Posture ; Retention ; sensory feedback ; squat</subject><ispartof>Scandinavian journal of medicine &amp; science in sports, 2024-01, Vol.34 (1), p.e14531-n/a</ispartof><rights>2023 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3131-659c8b58eb62142a15ccd067eecb4110537e31ee21ac84ca4e3bf3553c7bc74d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0465-9665</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fsms.14531$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fsms.14531$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37916599$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shin, Ho‐Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sung‐Hyeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Hwi‐Young</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of types of sensory feedback on the acquisition and retention of squat performance: A randomized, double‐blind, controlled trial</title><title>Scandinavian journal of medicine &amp; science in sports</title><addtitle>Scand J Med Sci Sports</addtitle><description>Various sensory feedback methods are considered important for motor learning, but the effect of each sensory feedback method on effective squat learning still needs to be clarified. This study aimed to investigate the effect of sensory feedback types on the acquisition and retention of a squat. A double‐blinded, randomized controlled trial was carried out. Thirty‐healthy people were recruited and randomly assigned to the visual feedback group (VFG = 10), tactile feedback group (TFG = 10), and control group (CG = 10). VFG received visual feedback through video data of the participant performing squats, and TFG received tactile feedback through manual contact with a physical therapist. Both groups received feedback on the movements that needed correction after each set was completed. CG maintained rest without receiving any feedback. The retro‐reflexive marker, force plate, and electromyography were used to measure body angle, foot center of pressure (COP), and muscle activity. All assessments were measured to confirm a squat acquisition. VFG and TFG showed significant differences in neutral knee position (NKP), trunk forward lean (TFL), anterior knee displacement (AKD), and anteroposterior (AP) foot COP (p &lt; 0.050). In addition, the acquisition was retained until 3 days later for NKP and a week later for TFL, AKD, and AP foot COP in VFG (p &lt; 0.050), while the acquisition was not retained in TFG (p &gt; 0.050). There was no statistically significant change in CG (p &gt; 0.050). This study demonstrated that visual feedback positively affects the acquisition and retention of squats. Therefore, we recommend the use of visual feedback for squat acquisition and retention in exercise novices.</description><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>Feedback, Sensory - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knee Joint</subject><subject>motor learning</subject><subject>Movement - physiology</subject><subject>Posture</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>sensory feedback</subject><subject>squat</subject><issn>0905-7188</issn><issn>1600-0838</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10cFqFTEUBuAgir1WF76ABNwoOG3OZDKT6a4UtYWKi9Z1SDJnMDUzuTfJILervoDgM_ok5vZWF4LZJAe-_Bz4CXkJ7AjKOU5TOoJGcHhEVtAyVjHJ5WOyYj0TVQdSHpBnKd0wBl3fiKfkgHc9tKLvV-TH9VekOI5oMw0jzds1pt0j4ZxC3NIRcTDafqNhprlQbTeLSy67Mut5oBEzzvfT7tNm0ZmuMY4hTnq2eEJPaSwsTO4Wh3d0CIvx-Ovup_FuLrMNc47Bexxojk775-TJqH3CFw_3Ifny4f312Xl1-fnjxdnpZWU5cKjK6lYaIdG0NTS1BmHtwNoO0ZoGgAneIQfEGrSVjdUNcjNyIbjtjO2agR-SN_vcdQybBVNWk0sWvdczhiWpWsqi-1Y2hb7-h96EJc5lO1X3IFktO14X9XavbAwpRRzVOrpJx60CpnYdqdKRuu-o2FcPiYuZcPgr_5RSwPEefHcet_9PUlefrvaRvwGKDJ29</recordid><startdate>202401</startdate><enddate>202401</enddate><creator>Shin, Ho‐Jin</creator><creator>Kim, Sung‐Hyeon</creator><creator>Cho, Hwi‐Young</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0465-9665</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202401</creationdate><title>The effect of types of sensory feedback on the acquisition and retention of squat performance: A randomized, double‐blind, controlled trial</title><author>Shin, Ho‐Jin ; Kim, Sung‐Hyeon ; Cho, Hwi‐Young</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3131-659c8b58eb62142a15ccd067eecb4110537e31ee21ac84ca4e3bf3553c7bc74d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>Feedback, Sensory - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knee Joint</topic><topic>motor learning</topic><topic>Movement - physiology</topic><topic>Posture</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>sensory feedback</topic><topic>squat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shin, Ho‐Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sung‐Hyeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Hwi‐Young</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of medicine &amp; science in sports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shin, Ho‐Jin</au><au>Kim, Sung‐Hyeon</au><au>Cho, Hwi‐Young</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of types of sensory feedback on the acquisition and retention of squat performance: A randomized, double‐blind, controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of medicine &amp; science in sports</jtitle><addtitle>Scand J Med Sci Sports</addtitle><date>2024-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e14531</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e14531-n/a</pages><issn>0905-7188</issn><eissn>1600-0838</eissn><abstract>Various sensory feedback methods are considered important for motor learning, but the effect of each sensory feedback method on effective squat learning still needs to be clarified. This study aimed to investigate the effect of sensory feedback types on the acquisition and retention of a squat. A double‐blinded, randomized controlled trial was carried out. Thirty‐healthy people were recruited and randomly assigned to the visual feedback group (VFG = 10), tactile feedback group (TFG = 10), and control group (CG = 10). VFG received visual feedback through video data of the participant performing squats, and TFG received tactile feedback through manual contact with a physical therapist. Both groups received feedback on the movements that needed correction after each set was completed. CG maintained rest without receiving any feedback. The retro‐reflexive marker, force plate, and electromyography were used to measure body angle, foot center of pressure (COP), and muscle activity. All assessments were measured to confirm a squat acquisition. VFG and TFG showed significant differences in neutral knee position (NKP), trunk forward lean (TFL), anterior knee displacement (AKD), and anteroposterior (AP) foot COP (p &lt; 0.050). In addition, the acquisition was retained until 3 days later for NKP and a week later for TFL, AKD, and AP foot COP in VFG (p &lt; 0.050), while the acquisition was not retained in TFG (p &gt; 0.050). There was no statistically significant change in CG (p &gt; 0.050). This study demonstrated that visual feedback positively affects the acquisition and retention of squats. Therefore, we recommend the use of visual feedback for squat acquisition and retention in exercise novices.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>37916599</pmid><doi>10.1111/sms.14531</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0465-9665</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0905-7188
ispartof Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2024-01, Vol.34 (1), p.e14531-n/a
issn 0905-7188
1600-0838
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2885539684
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Electromyography
Feedback, Sensory - physiology
Humans
Knee Joint
motor learning
Movement - physiology
Posture
Retention
sensory feedback
squat
title The effect of types of sensory feedback on the acquisition and retention of squat performance: A randomized, double‐blind, controlled trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T12%3A15%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20types%20of%20sensory%20feedback%20on%20the%20acquisition%20and%20retention%20of%20squat%20performance:%20A%20randomized,%20double%E2%80%90blind,%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=Scandinavian%20journal%20of%20medicine%20&%20science%20in%20sports&rft.au=Shin,%20Ho%E2%80%90Jin&rft.date=2024-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e14531&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e14531-n/a&rft.issn=0905-7188&rft.eissn=1600-0838&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/sms.14531&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2885539684%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2918028732&rft_id=info:pmid/37916599&rfr_iscdi=true