Ozanimod Therapy in Patients With COVID-19 Requiring Oxygen Support: A Randomized Open-Label Pilot Trial

Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor ligands (SRLs) dampen immunopathologic damages in models of viral pneumonia. Is it feasible to administer an SRL therapy, here ozanimod (OZA), to acutely ill patients infected with SARS-CoV-2? The prospective randomized open-label COVID-19 Ozanimod Intervention (COZI...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chest 2024-04, Vol.165 (4), p.810-819
Hauptverfasser: Lellouche, François, Blais-Lecours, Pascale, Maltais, François, Sarrazin, Jean-François, Rola, Philippe, Nguyen, Tuyen, Châteauvert, Nathalie, Marsolais, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 819
container_issue 4
container_start_page 810
container_title Chest
container_volume 165
creator Lellouche, François
Blais-Lecours, Pascale
Maltais, François
Sarrazin, Jean-François
Rola, Philippe
Nguyen, Tuyen
Châteauvert, Nathalie
Marsolais, David
description Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor ligands (SRLs) dampen immunopathologic damages in models of viral pneumonia. Is it feasible to administer an SRL therapy, here ozanimod (OZA), to acutely ill patients infected with SARS-CoV-2? The prospective randomized open-label COVID-19 Ozanimod Intervention (COZI) pilot trial was conducted in three Canadian hospitals. Patients admitted for COVID-19 requiring oxygen were eligible. Randomization was stratified for risk factors of poor outcome and oxygen needs at inclusion. Participants were allocated to standard of care or to standard of care plus OZA. OZA (oral, once daily, incremental dosage) was administered for a maximum of 14 days. Primary end point investigated for size effect and variance over time was the assessment of safety and efficacy, evaluated by the daily score on the World Health Organization-adapted six-point ordinal scale for clinical improvement analyzed under the intention-to-treat principle. Twenty-three patients were randomized to the standard of care arm, and 20 were randomized to the OZA arm from September 2020 to February 2022. Evaluation of efficacy showed nonsignificant reductions of median (interquartile range) duration of respiratory support (6 [3-10] vs 9 [4-12] days; P = .34), median duration of hospitalization (9 [6-12] vs 10 [6-18] days; P = .20), and median time to clinical improvement (4 [3-7] vs 7 [3-11] days; P = .12) for OZA compared with standard of care, respectively. Heart rate was significantly lower with OZA (65 [ 63-67] vs 71 [69-72] beats/min; P < .0001). However, QT and PR intervals were not affected. No severe adverse drug reaction was reported. To our knowledge, SRL utility in severe pneumonia has never been tested in patients. This study shows for the first time that this new pharmacologic agent may safely be administered to patients hospitalized for viral pneumonia, with potential clinical benefits. Bradycardia was frequent but well tolerated. ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT04405102; URL: www. gov.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.chest.2023.10.023
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2883583183</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2883583183</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-88913c86db1469ff4c3f06241dec71c71503773890a2decee7c231c347cba8dc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kEtLw0AUhQdBbK3-AkFm6SZxbm6aTNyV-ioUUmrVZZhMbtopySTNA2x_vQErHPjg43AWh7E7EC4ICB73rt5R27me8HAw7oALNoYIwcGpjyN23bZ7IQRAFFyxEYYykiD9MdvFJ2VNWWV8s6NG1UduLF-pzpDtWv5tuh2fx1-LZwcivqZDbxpjtzz-OW7J8o--rqume-IzvlY2q0pzoozHNVlnqVIq-MoUVcc3jVHFDbvMVdHS7ZkT9vn6spm_O8v4bTGfLZ3aA-gcKSNALYMsBT-I8tzXmIvA8yEjHcKQqcAwRBkJ5Q2KKNQegkY_1KmSmcYJe_jbrZvq0A-fJKVpNRWFslT1beJJiVOJIHGo3p-rfVpSltSNKVVzTP7fwV-UxWWb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2883583183</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ozanimod Therapy in Patients With COVID-19 Requiring Oxygen Support: A Randomized Open-Label Pilot Trial</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Lellouche, François ; Blais-Lecours, Pascale ; Maltais, François ; Sarrazin, Jean-François ; Rola, Philippe ; Nguyen, Tuyen ; Châteauvert, Nathalie ; Marsolais, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Lellouche, François ; Blais-Lecours, Pascale ; Maltais, François ; Sarrazin, Jean-François ; Rola, Philippe ; Nguyen, Tuyen ; Châteauvert, Nathalie ; Marsolais, David</creatorcontrib><description>Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor ligands (SRLs) dampen immunopathologic damages in models of viral pneumonia. Is it feasible to administer an SRL therapy, here ozanimod (OZA), to acutely ill patients infected with SARS-CoV-2? The prospective randomized open-label COVID-19 Ozanimod Intervention (COZI) pilot trial was conducted in three Canadian hospitals. Patients admitted for COVID-19 requiring oxygen were eligible. Randomization was stratified for risk factors of poor outcome and oxygen needs at inclusion. Participants were allocated to standard of care or to standard of care plus OZA. OZA (oral, once daily, incremental dosage) was administered for a maximum of 14 days. Primary end point investigated for size effect and variance over time was the assessment of safety and efficacy, evaluated by the daily score on the World Health Organization-adapted six-point ordinal scale for clinical improvement analyzed under the intention-to-treat principle. Twenty-three patients were randomized to the standard of care arm, and 20 were randomized to the OZA arm from September 2020 to February 2022. Evaluation of efficacy showed nonsignificant reductions of median (interquartile range) duration of respiratory support (6 [3-10] vs 9 [4-12] days; P = .34), median duration of hospitalization (9 [6-12] vs 10 [6-18] days; P = .20), and median time to clinical improvement (4 [3-7] vs 7 [3-11] days; P = .12) for OZA compared with standard of care, respectively. Heart rate was significantly lower with OZA (65 [ 63-67] vs 71 [69-72] beats/min; P &lt; .0001). However, QT and PR intervals were not affected. No severe adverse drug reaction was reported. To our knowledge, SRL utility in severe pneumonia has never been tested in patients. This study shows for the first time that this new pharmacologic agent may safely be administered to patients hospitalized for viral pneumonia, with potential clinical benefits. Bradycardia was frequent but well tolerated. ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT04405102; URL: www. gov.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1931-3543</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.10.023</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37898184</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>Chest, 2024-04, Vol.165 (4), p.810-819</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37898184$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lellouche, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blais-Lecours, Pascale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maltais, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarrazin, Jean-François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rola, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Tuyen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Châteauvert, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marsolais, David</creatorcontrib><title>Ozanimod Therapy in Patients With COVID-19 Requiring Oxygen Support: A Randomized Open-Label Pilot Trial</title><title>Chest</title><addtitle>Chest</addtitle><description>Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor ligands (SRLs) dampen immunopathologic damages in models of viral pneumonia. Is it feasible to administer an SRL therapy, here ozanimod (OZA), to acutely ill patients infected with SARS-CoV-2? The prospective randomized open-label COVID-19 Ozanimod Intervention (COZI) pilot trial was conducted in three Canadian hospitals. Patients admitted for COVID-19 requiring oxygen were eligible. Randomization was stratified for risk factors of poor outcome and oxygen needs at inclusion. Participants were allocated to standard of care or to standard of care plus OZA. OZA (oral, once daily, incremental dosage) was administered for a maximum of 14 days. Primary end point investigated for size effect and variance over time was the assessment of safety and efficacy, evaluated by the daily score on the World Health Organization-adapted six-point ordinal scale for clinical improvement analyzed under the intention-to-treat principle. Twenty-three patients were randomized to the standard of care arm, and 20 were randomized to the OZA arm from September 2020 to February 2022. Evaluation of efficacy showed nonsignificant reductions of median (interquartile range) duration of respiratory support (6 [3-10] vs 9 [4-12] days; P = .34), median duration of hospitalization (9 [6-12] vs 10 [6-18] days; P = .20), and median time to clinical improvement (4 [3-7] vs 7 [3-11] days; P = .12) for OZA compared with standard of care, respectively. Heart rate was significantly lower with OZA (65 [ 63-67] vs 71 [69-72] beats/min; P &lt; .0001). However, QT and PR intervals were not affected. No severe adverse drug reaction was reported. To our knowledge, SRL utility in severe pneumonia has never been tested in patients. This study shows for the first time that this new pharmacologic agent may safely be administered to patients hospitalized for viral pneumonia, with potential clinical benefits. Bradycardia was frequent but well tolerated. ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT04405102; URL: www. gov.</description><issn>1931-3543</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1kEtLw0AUhQdBbK3-AkFm6SZxbm6aTNyV-ioUUmrVZZhMbtopySTNA2x_vQErHPjg43AWh7E7EC4ICB73rt5R27me8HAw7oALNoYIwcGpjyN23bZ7IQRAFFyxEYYykiD9MdvFJ2VNWWV8s6NG1UduLF-pzpDtWv5tuh2fx1-LZwcivqZDbxpjtzz-OW7J8o--rqume-IzvlY2q0pzoozHNVlnqVIq-MoUVcc3jVHFDbvMVdHS7ZkT9vn6spm_O8v4bTGfLZ3aA-gcKSNALYMsBT-I8tzXmIvA8yEjHcKQqcAwRBkJ5Q2KKNQegkY_1KmSmcYJe_jbrZvq0A-fJKVpNRWFslT1beJJiVOJIHGo3p-rfVpSltSNKVVzTP7fwV-UxWWb</recordid><startdate>202404</startdate><enddate>202404</enddate><creator>Lellouche, François</creator><creator>Blais-Lecours, Pascale</creator><creator>Maltais, François</creator><creator>Sarrazin, Jean-François</creator><creator>Rola, Philippe</creator><creator>Nguyen, Tuyen</creator><creator>Châteauvert, Nathalie</creator><creator>Marsolais, David</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202404</creationdate><title>Ozanimod Therapy in Patients With COVID-19 Requiring Oxygen Support: A Randomized Open-Label Pilot Trial</title><author>Lellouche, François ; Blais-Lecours, Pascale ; Maltais, François ; Sarrazin, Jean-François ; Rola, Philippe ; Nguyen, Tuyen ; Châteauvert, Nathalie ; Marsolais, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-88913c86db1469ff4c3f06241dec71c71503773890a2decee7c231c347cba8dc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lellouche, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blais-Lecours, Pascale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maltais, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarrazin, Jean-François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rola, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Tuyen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Châteauvert, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marsolais, David</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Chest</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lellouche, François</au><au>Blais-Lecours, Pascale</au><au>Maltais, François</au><au>Sarrazin, Jean-François</au><au>Rola, Philippe</au><au>Nguyen, Tuyen</au><au>Châteauvert, Nathalie</au><au>Marsolais, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ozanimod Therapy in Patients With COVID-19 Requiring Oxygen Support: A Randomized Open-Label Pilot Trial</atitle><jtitle>Chest</jtitle><addtitle>Chest</addtitle><date>2024-04</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>165</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>810</spage><epage>819</epage><pages>810-819</pages><eissn>1931-3543</eissn><abstract>Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor ligands (SRLs) dampen immunopathologic damages in models of viral pneumonia. Is it feasible to administer an SRL therapy, here ozanimod (OZA), to acutely ill patients infected with SARS-CoV-2? The prospective randomized open-label COVID-19 Ozanimod Intervention (COZI) pilot trial was conducted in three Canadian hospitals. Patients admitted for COVID-19 requiring oxygen were eligible. Randomization was stratified for risk factors of poor outcome and oxygen needs at inclusion. Participants were allocated to standard of care or to standard of care plus OZA. OZA (oral, once daily, incremental dosage) was administered for a maximum of 14 days. Primary end point investigated for size effect and variance over time was the assessment of safety and efficacy, evaluated by the daily score on the World Health Organization-adapted six-point ordinal scale for clinical improvement analyzed under the intention-to-treat principle. Twenty-three patients were randomized to the standard of care arm, and 20 were randomized to the OZA arm from September 2020 to February 2022. Evaluation of efficacy showed nonsignificant reductions of median (interquartile range) duration of respiratory support (6 [3-10] vs 9 [4-12] days; P = .34), median duration of hospitalization (9 [6-12] vs 10 [6-18] days; P = .20), and median time to clinical improvement (4 [3-7] vs 7 [3-11] days; P = .12) for OZA compared with standard of care, respectively. Heart rate was significantly lower with OZA (65 [ 63-67] vs 71 [69-72] beats/min; P &lt; .0001). However, QT and PR intervals were not affected. No severe adverse drug reaction was reported. To our knowledge, SRL utility in severe pneumonia has never been tested in patients. This study shows for the first time that this new pharmacologic agent may safely be administered to patients hospitalized for viral pneumonia, with potential clinical benefits. Bradycardia was frequent but well tolerated. ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT04405102; URL: www. gov.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>37898184</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.chest.2023.10.023</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1931-3543
ispartof Chest, 2024-04, Vol.165 (4), p.810-819
issn 1931-3543
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2883583183
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Ozanimod Therapy in Patients With COVID-19 Requiring Oxygen Support: A Randomized Open-Label Pilot Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T23%3A49%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ozanimod%20Therapy%20in%20Patients%20With%20COVID-19%20Requiring%20Oxygen%20Support:%20A%20Randomized%20Open-Label%20Pilot%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Chest&rft.au=Lellouche,%20Fran%C3%A7ois&rft.date=2024-04&rft.volume=165&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=810&rft.epage=819&rft.pages=810-819&rft.eissn=1931-3543&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.chest.2023.10.023&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2883583183%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2883583183&rft_id=info:pmid/37898184&rfr_iscdi=true