The impact of integrated care on health care utilization and costs in a socially deprived urban area in Germany: A difference‐in‐differences approach within an event‐study framework

We investigated the impact of an integrated care initiative in a socially deprived urban area in Germany. Using administrative data, we empirically assessed the causal effect of its two sub‐interventions, which differed by the extent to which their instruments targeted the supply and demand side of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Health economics 2024-02, Vol.33 (2), p.229-247
Hauptverfasser: Ress, Vanessa, Wild, Eva‐Maria
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 247
container_issue 2
container_start_page 229
container_title Health economics
container_volume 33
creator Ress, Vanessa
Wild, Eva‐Maria
description We investigated the impact of an integrated care initiative in a socially deprived urban area in Germany. Using administrative data, we empirically assessed the causal effect of its two sub‐interventions, which differed by the extent to which their instruments targeted the supply and demand side of healthcare provision. We addressed confounding using propensity score matching via the Super Learner machine learning algorithm. For our baseline model, we used a two‐way fixed‐effects difference‐in‐differences approach to identify causal effects. We then employed difference‐in‐differences analyses within an event‐study framework to explore the heterogeneity of treatment effects over time, allowing us to disentangle the effects of the sub‐interventions and improve causal interpretation and generalizability. The initiative led to a significant increase in hospital and emergency admissions and non‐hospital outpatient visits, as well as inpatient, non‐hospital outpatient, and total costs. Increased utilization may indicate that the intervention improved access to care or identified unmet need.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/hec.4771
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2881712180</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2881712180</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4561-cf29c7eec48bdd1944ab097bf7918d1542c05c9938ec288a0973da30f8fa16f23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u1DAQxyMEoqUg8QIgS730ktbOp82tWvUDqRKXco4mzpi4JPZiO12FE4_A-_A2PAmOdtuFSlw8npnf_GfsSZK3jJ4ySrOzHuVpUdfsWXLIqBApoyV9_tf9IHnl_R2l0afVy-Qgr3ldMcYOk1-3PRI9rkEGYhXRJuAXBwE7IsEhsYb0CEPot-4U9KC_Q9AxDiYy1gcfiwgQb6WGYZhJh2un76PA5FqIGYewEFfoRjDzB3JOOq0UOjQSf__4qU089hFPYL12FmRPNjr0i7QheI8mRMyHqZuJcjDixrqvr5MXCgaPb3b2KPl8eXG7uk5vPl19XJ3fpLIoK5ZKlQlZI8qCt13HRFFAS0Xdqlow3rGyyCQtpRA5R5lxDjGXd5BTxRWwSmX5UXKy1Y2DfZvQh2bUXuIwgEE7-SYWsZpljNOIHj9B7-zkTJyuyQTljOU8L_aC0lnvHaomftkIbm4YbZaFNnGhzbLQiL7fCU7tiN0j-LDBCJAtgNIa7fdKnFMuyqLKI5JukY0ecP5vr-b6YrXr-e4fycX4YN3y0Ixm-R8LTcOB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2908113834</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impact of integrated care on health care utilization and costs in a socially deprived urban area in Germany: A difference‐in‐differences approach within an event‐study framework</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Ress, Vanessa ; Wild, Eva‐Maria</creator><creatorcontrib>Ress, Vanessa ; Wild, Eva‐Maria</creatorcontrib><description>We investigated the impact of an integrated care initiative in a socially deprived urban area in Germany. Using administrative data, we empirically assessed the causal effect of its two sub‐interventions, which differed by the extent to which their instruments targeted the supply and demand side of healthcare provision. We addressed confounding using propensity score matching via the Super Learner machine learning algorithm. For our baseline model, we used a two‐way fixed‐effects difference‐in‐differences approach to identify causal effects. We then employed difference‐in‐differences analyses within an event‐study framework to explore the heterogeneity of treatment effects over time, allowing us to disentangle the effects of the sub‐interventions and improve causal interpretation and generalizability. The initiative led to a significant increase in hospital and emergency admissions and non‐hospital outpatient visits, as well as inpatient, non‐hospital outpatient, and total costs. Increased utilization may indicate that the intervention improved access to care or identified unmet need.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1099-1050</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1057-9230</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hec.4771</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37876111</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, NJ: Wiley</publisher><subject>Delivery of Health Care, Integrated ; difference‐in‐differences ; Emergency admissions ; evaluation ; event study ; Generalizability ; Germany ; Health Care Costs ; Health care expenditures ; health care utilization and costs ; Health economics ; Health services utilization ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Inpatient care ; Integrated care ; Intervention ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care ; Patient admissions ; Propensity ; socially deprived urban area ; Supply &amp; demand ; Urban areas</subject><ispartof>Health economics, 2024-02, Vol.33 (2), p.229-247</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. Health Economics published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4561-cf29c7eec48bdd1944ab097bf7918d1542c05c9938ec288a0973da30f8fa16f23</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2989-8638 ; 0000-0001-7243-5984</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fhec.4771$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fhec.4771$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,31004,45579,45580</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37876111$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ress, Vanessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wild, Eva‐Maria</creatorcontrib><title>The impact of integrated care on health care utilization and costs in a socially deprived urban area in Germany: A difference‐in‐differences approach within an event‐study framework</title><title>Health economics</title><addtitle>Health Econ</addtitle><description>We investigated the impact of an integrated care initiative in a socially deprived urban area in Germany. Using administrative data, we empirically assessed the causal effect of its two sub‐interventions, which differed by the extent to which their instruments targeted the supply and demand side of healthcare provision. We addressed confounding using propensity score matching via the Super Learner machine learning algorithm. For our baseline model, we used a two‐way fixed‐effects difference‐in‐differences approach to identify causal effects. We then employed difference‐in‐differences analyses within an event‐study framework to explore the heterogeneity of treatment effects over time, allowing us to disentangle the effects of the sub‐interventions and improve causal interpretation and generalizability. The initiative led to a significant increase in hospital and emergency admissions and non‐hospital outpatient visits, as well as inpatient, non‐hospital outpatient, and total costs. Increased utilization may indicate that the intervention improved access to care or identified unmet need.</description><subject>Delivery of Health Care, Integrated</subject><subject>difference‐in‐differences</subject><subject>Emergency admissions</subject><subject>evaluation</subject><subject>event study</subject><subject>Generalizability</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Health Care Costs</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>health care utilization and costs</subject><subject>Health economics</subject><subject>Health services utilization</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inpatient care</subject><subject>Integrated care</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</subject><subject>Patient admissions</subject><subject>Propensity</subject><subject>socially deprived urban area</subject><subject>Supply &amp; demand</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><issn>1099-1050</issn><issn>1057-9230</issn><issn>1099-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1u1DAQxyMEoqUg8QIgS730ktbOp82tWvUDqRKXco4mzpi4JPZiO12FE4_A-_A2PAmOdtuFSlw8npnf_GfsSZK3jJ4ySrOzHuVpUdfsWXLIqBApoyV9_tf9IHnl_R2l0afVy-Qgr3ldMcYOk1-3PRI9rkEGYhXRJuAXBwE7IsEhsYb0CEPot-4U9KC_Q9AxDiYy1gcfiwgQb6WGYZhJh2un76PA5FqIGYewEFfoRjDzB3JOOq0UOjQSf__4qU089hFPYL12FmRPNjr0i7QheI8mRMyHqZuJcjDixrqvr5MXCgaPb3b2KPl8eXG7uk5vPl19XJ3fpLIoK5ZKlQlZI8qCt13HRFFAS0Xdqlow3rGyyCQtpRA5R5lxDjGXd5BTxRWwSmX5UXKy1Y2DfZvQh2bUXuIwgEE7-SYWsZpljNOIHj9B7-zkTJyuyQTljOU8L_aC0lnvHaomftkIbm4YbZaFNnGhzbLQiL7fCU7tiN0j-LDBCJAtgNIa7fdKnFMuyqLKI5JukY0ecP5vr-b6YrXr-e4fycX4YN3y0Ixm-R8LTcOB</recordid><startdate>202402</startdate><enddate>202402</enddate><creator>Ress, Vanessa</creator><creator>Wild, Eva‐Maria</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>OT2</scope><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2989-8638</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7243-5984</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202402</creationdate><title>The impact of integrated care on health care utilization and costs in a socially deprived urban area in Germany: A difference‐in‐differences approach within an event‐study framework</title><author>Ress, Vanessa ; Wild, Eva‐Maria</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4561-cf29c7eec48bdd1944ab097bf7918d1542c05c9938ec288a0973da30f8fa16f23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Delivery of Health Care, Integrated</topic><topic>difference‐in‐differences</topic><topic>Emergency admissions</topic><topic>evaluation</topic><topic>event study</topic><topic>Generalizability</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Health Care Costs</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>health care utilization and costs</topic><topic>Health economics</topic><topic>Health services utilization</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inpatient care</topic><topic>Integrated care</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</topic><topic>Patient admissions</topic><topic>Propensity</topic><topic>socially deprived urban area</topic><topic>Supply &amp; demand</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ress, Vanessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wild, Eva‐Maria</creatorcontrib><collection>EconStor</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Health economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ress, Vanessa</au><au>Wild, Eva‐Maria</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impact of integrated care on health care utilization and costs in a socially deprived urban area in Germany: A difference‐in‐differences approach within an event‐study framework</atitle><jtitle>Health economics</jtitle><addtitle>Health Econ</addtitle><date>2024-02</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>229</spage><epage>247</epage><pages>229-247</pages><issn>1099-1050</issn><issn>1057-9230</issn><eissn>1099-1050</eissn><abstract>We investigated the impact of an integrated care initiative in a socially deprived urban area in Germany. Using administrative data, we empirically assessed the causal effect of its two sub‐interventions, which differed by the extent to which their instruments targeted the supply and demand side of healthcare provision. We addressed confounding using propensity score matching via the Super Learner machine learning algorithm. For our baseline model, we used a two‐way fixed‐effects difference‐in‐differences approach to identify causal effects. We then employed difference‐in‐differences analyses within an event‐study framework to explore the heterogeneity of treatment effects over time, allowing us to disentangle the effects of the sub‐interventions and improve causal interpretation and generalizability. The initiative led to a significant increase in hospital and emergency admissions and non‐hospital outpatient visits, as well as inpatient, non‐hospital outpatient, and total costs. Increased utilization may indicate that the intervention improved access to care or identified unmet need.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, NJ</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><pmid>37876111</pmid><doi>10.1002/hec.4771</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2989-8638</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7243-5984</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1099-1050
ispartof Health economics, 2024-02, Vol.33 (2), p.229-247
issn 1099-1050
1057-9230
1099-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2881712180
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Delivery of Health Care, Integrated
difference‐in‐differences
Emergency admissions
evaluation
event study
Generalizability
Germany
Health Care Costs
Health care expenditures
health care utilization and costs
Health economics
Health services utilization
Hospitalization
Humans
Inpatient care
Integrated care
Intervention
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
Patient admissions
Propensity
socially deprived urban area
Supply & demand
Urban areas
title The impact of integrated care on health care utilization and costs in a socially deprived urban area in Germany: A difference‐in‐differences approach within an event‐study framework
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T12%3A06%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impact%20of%20integrated%20care%20on%20health%20care%20utilization%20and%20costs%20in%20a%20socially%20deprived%20urban%20area%20in%20Germany:%20A%20difference%E2%80%90in%E2%80%90differences%20approach%20within%20an%20event%E2%80%90study%20framework&rft.jtitle=Health%20economics&rft.au=Ress,%20Vanessa&rft.date=2024-02&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=229&rft.epage=247&rft.pages=229-247&rft.issn=1099-1050&rft.eissn=1099-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hec.4771&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2881712180%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2908113834&rft_id=info:pmid/37876111&rfr_iscdi=true