Current methods for evaluating people's exposure to green space: A scoping review
People's exposure to green space is a critical link between urban green space and urban residents' health. Since green space may affect human health through multiple pathways regarding diverse human health outcomes, the measurement of people's exposure to green space must be tailored...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Social science & medicine (1982) 2023-12, Vol.338, p.116303-116303, Article 116303 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 116303 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 116303 |
container_title | Social science & medicine (1982) |
container_volume | 338 |
creator | Liu, Yang Kwan, Mei-Po Wong, Man Sing Yu, Changda |
description | People's exposure to green space is a critical link between urban green space and urban residents' health. Since green space may affect human health through multiple pathways regarding diverse human health outcomes, the measurement of people's exposure to green space must be tailored to concrete study contexts and research questions. In this scoping review, we systematically categorized the available green space representations and metrics in the last two decades that can be used to derive people's exposure to green space regarding different research topics. A three-phase systematic review was conducted after a generalized search of relevant research articles from the three most-used publication databases, namely Scopus, the Web of Science, and PubMed. We identified 260 research articles that particularly discuss green space representations and metrics. We further developed a multi-pathway framework to articulate the complicated context issues in green space studies. We categorized the most relevant green space representations and metrics into five groups, including green space indices, the delineation, inventory, and usage of green space, the spatiotemporal evolution of green space, the attributes and components of green space, and the green space landscape and fragmentation. Finally, we discussed the inter-conversion between different green space representations and metrics, the “mobility-turn” in green space studies and how it may affect the derivation of people's exposure to green space, and other potential methodological issues in measuring people's exposure to green space. Our scoping review provides the most comprehensive framework and categories for deriving people's exposure to green space to date, which may strongly support a broad range of studies that concern green space's health effects.
•We systematically categorized green space representations and metrics in the last two decades.•A three-phase systematic review was conducted after a generalized search of relevant articles.•We developed a multi-pathway framework to articulate the complicated context issues in green space studies.•We categorized the most relevant green space representations and metrics into 5 groups.•We discussed how the mobility turn may affect the derivation of people's exposure to green space. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116303 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2880823111</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0277953623006603</els_id><sourcerecordid>2880823111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-873344fa8ba6fd3269fd6876592a289b292f3e4a2a28a693cce2496ca641118d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMlOwzAQQC0EoqXwC-AbXBK8pLbDrarYpEoICc6W60xKqiQOdlLg70mUliun0WjebA-hK0piSqi43cbB2WCLCrKYEcZjSgUn_AhNqZI8mvNEHqMpYVJG6ZyLCToLYUsIoUTxUzThUglBJZui12XnPdQtrqD9cFnAufMYdqbsTFvUG9yAa0q4Dhi-Gxc6D7h1eOMBahwaY-EOL3CwrhlYD7sCvs7RSW7KABf7OEPvD_dvy6do9fL4vFysIsslbaP-TJ4kuVFrI_KMM5HmmVBSzFNmmErXLGU5h8QMmREptxZYkgprREIpVRmfoZtxbuPdZweh1VURLJSlqcF1QTOliGK8h3tUjqj1LgQPuW58URn_oynRg0-91X8-9eBTjz77zsv9km491A59B4E9sBgB6F_t3_e6nwK1hazwYFudueLfJb8Gwop0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2880823111</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Current methods for evaluating people's exposure to green space: A scoping review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Liu, Yang ; Kwan, Mei-Po ; Wong, Man Sing ; Yu, Changda</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yang ; Kwan, Mei-Po ; Wong, Man Sing ; Yu, Changda</creatorcontrib><description>People's exposure to green space is a critical link between urban green space and urban residents' health. Since green space may affect human health through multiple pathways regarding diverse human health outcomes, the measurement of people's exposure to green space must be tailored to concrete study contexts and research questions. In this scoping review, we systematically categorized the available green space representations and metrics in the last two decades that can be used to derive people's exposure to green space regarding different research topics. A three-phase systematic review was conducted after a generalized search of relevant research articles from the three most-used publication databases, namely Scopus, the Web of Science, and PubMed. We identified 260 research articles that particularly discuss green space representations and metrics. We further developed a multi-pathway framework to articulate the complicated context issues in green space studies. We categorized the most relevant green space representations and metrics into five groups, including green space indices, the delineation, inventory, and usage of green space, the spatiotemporal evolution of green space, the attributes and components of green space, and the green space landscape and fragmentation. Finally, we discussed the inter-conversion between different green space representations and metrics, the “mobility-turn” in green space studies and how it may affect the derivation of people's exposure to green space, and other potential methodological issues in measuring people's exposure to green space. Our scoping review provides the most comprehensive framework and categories for deriving people's exposure to green space to date, which may strongly support a broad range of studies that concern green space's health effects.
•We systematically categorized green space representations and metrics in the last two decades.•A three-phase systematic review was conducted after a generalized search of relevant articles.•We developed a multi-pathway framework to articulate the complicated context issues in green space studies.•We categorized the most relevant green space representations and metrics into 5 groups.•We discussed how the mobility turn may affect the derivation of people's exposure to green space.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-9536</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5347</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116303</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37866172</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Context ; Exposure measurement ; Green space ; Green space metric ; Green space representation ; Humans ; Multi-pathway framework ; Parks, Recreational ; Urban Health</subject><ispartof>Social science & medicine (1982), 2023-12, Vol.338, p.116303-116303, Article 116303</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-873344fa8ba6fd3269fd6876592a289b292f3e4a2a28a693cce2496ca641118d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-873344fa8ba6fd3269fd6876592a289b292f3e4a2a28a693cce2496ca641118d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5284-9343</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953623006603$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37866172$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwan, Mei-Po</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Man Sing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Changda</creatorcontrib><title>Current methods for evaluating people's exposure to green space: A scoping review</title><title>Social science & medicine (1982)</title><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><description>People's exposure to green space is a critical link between urban green space and urban residents' health. Since green space may affect human health through multiple pathways regarding diverse human health outcomes, the measurement of people's exposure to green space must be tailored to concrete study contexts and research questions. In this scoping review, we systematically categorized the available green space representations and metrics in the last two decades that can be used to derive people's exposure to green space regarding different research topics. A three-phase systematic review was conducted after a generalized search of relevant research articles from the three most-used publication databases, namely Scopus, the Web of Science, and PubMed. We identified 260 research articles that particularly discuss green space representations and metrics. We further developed a multi-pathway framework to articulate the complicated context issues in green space studies. We categorized the most relevant green space representations and metrics into five groups, including green space indices, the delineation, inventory, and usage of green space, the spatiotemporal evolution of green space, the attributes and components of green space, and the green space landscape and fragmentation. Finally, we discussed the inter-conversion between different green space representations and metrics, the “mobility-turn” in green space studies and how it may affect the derivation of people's exposure to green space, and other potential methodological issues in measuring people's exposure to green space. Our scoping review provides the most comprehensive framework and categories for deriving people's exposure to green space to date, which may strongly support a broad range of studies that concern green space's health effects.
•We systematically categorized green space representations and metrics in the last two decades.•A three-phase systematic review was conducted after a generalized search of relevant articles.•We developed a multi-pathway framework to articulate the complicated context issues in green space studies.•We categorized the most relevant green space representations and metrics into 5 groups.•We discussed how the mobility turn may affect the derivation of people's exposure to green space.</description><subject>Context</subject><subject>Exposure measurement</subject><subject>Green space</subject><subject>Green space metric</subject><subject>Green space representation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Multi-pathway framework</subject><subject>Parks, Recreational</subject><subject>Urban Health</subject><issn>0277-9536</issn><issn>1873-5347</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMlOwzAQQC0EoqXwC-AbXBK8pLbDrarYpEoICc6W60xKqiQOdlLg70mUliun0WjebA-hK0piSqi43cbB2WCLCrKYEcZjSgUn_AhNqZI8mvNEHqMpYVJG6ZyLCToLYUsIoUTxUzThUglBJZui12XnPdQtrqD9cFnAufMYdqbsTFvUG9yAa0q4Dhi-Gxc6D7h1eOMBahwaY-EOL3CwrhlYD7sCvs7RSW7KABf7OEPvD_dvy6do9fL4vFysIsslbaP-TJ4kuVFrI_KMM5HmmVBSzFNmmErXLGU5h8QMmREptxZYkgprREIpVRmfoZtxbuPdZweh1VURLJSlqcF1QTOliGK8h3tUjqj1LgQPuW58URn_oynRg0-91X8-9eBTjz77zsv9km491A59B4E9sBgB6F_t3_e6nwK1hazwYFudueLfJb8Gwop0</recordid><startdate>202312</startdate><enddate>202312</enddate><creator>Liu, Yang</creator><creator>Kwan, Mei-Po</creator><creator>Wong, Man Sing</creator><creator>Yu, Changda</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5284-9343</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202312</creationdate><title>Current methods for evaluating people's exposure to green space: A scoping review</title><author>Liu, Yang ; Kwan, Mei-Po ; Wong, Man Sing ; Yu, Changda</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-873344fa8ba6fd3269fd6876592a289b292f3e4a2a28a693cce2496ca641118d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Context</topic><topic>Exposure measurement</topic><topic>Green space</topic><topic>Green space metric</topic><topic>Green space representation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Multi-pathway framework</topic><topic>Parks, Recreational</topic><topic>Urban Health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwan, Mei-Po</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Man Sing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Changda</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Social science & medicine (1982)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Yang</au><au>Kwan, Mei-Po</au><au>Wong, Man Sing</au><au>Yu, Changda</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Current methods for evaluating people's exposure to green space: A scoping review</atitle><jtitle>Social science & medicine (1982)</jtitle><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><date>2023-12</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>338</volume><spage>116303</spage><epage>116303</epage><pages>116303-116303</pages><artnum>116303</artnum><issn>0277-9536</issn><eissn>1873-5347</eissn><abstract>People's exposure to green space is a critical link between urban green space and urban residents' health. Since green space may affect human health through multiple pathways regarding diverse human health outcomes, the measurement of people's exposure to green space must be tailored to concrete study contexts and research questions. In this scoping review, we systematically categorized the available green space representations and metrics in the last two decades that can be used to derive people's exposure to green space regarding different research topics. A three-phase systematic review was conducted after a generalized search of relevant research articles from the three most-used publication databases, namely Scopus, the Web of Science, and PubMed. We identified 260 research articles that particularly discuss green space representations and metrics. We further developed a multi-pathway framework to articulate the complicated context issues in green space studies. We categorized the most relevant green space representations and metrics into five groups, including green space indices, the delineation, inventory, and usage of green space, the spatiotemporal evolution of green space, the attributes and components of green space, and the green space landscape and fragmentation. Finally, we discussed the inter-conversion between different green space representations and metrics, the “mobility-turn” in green space studies and how it may affect the derivation of people's exposure to green space, and other potential methodological issues in measuring people's exposure to green space. Our scoping review provides the most comprehensive framework and categories for deriving people's exposure to green space to date, which may strongly support a broad range of studies that concern green space's health effects.
•We systematically categorized green space representations and metrics in the last two decades.•A three-phase systematic review was conducted after a generalized search of relevant articles.•We developed a multi-pathway framework to articulate the complicated context issues in green space studies.•We categorized the most relevant green space representations and metrics into 5 groups.•We discussed how the mobility turn may affect the derivation of people's exposure to green space.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>37866172</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116303</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5284-9343</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0277-9536 |
ispartof | Social science & medicine (1982), 2023-12, Vol.338, p.116303-116303, Article 116303 |
issn | 0277-9536 1873-5347 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2880823111 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Context Exposure measurement Green space Green space metric Green space representation Humans Multi-pathway framework Parks, Recreational Urban Health |
title | Current methods for evaluating people's exposure to green space: A scoping review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T13%3A09%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Current%20methods%20for%20evaluating%20people's%20exposure%20to%20green%20space:%20A%20scoping%20review&rft.jtitle=Social%20science%20&%20medicine%20(1982)&rft.au=Liu,%20Yang&rft.date=2023-12&rft.volume=338&rft.spage=116303&rft.epage=116303&rft.pages=116303-116303&rft.artnum=116303&rft.issn=0277-9536&rft.eissn=1873-5347&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116303&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2880823111%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2880823111&rft_id=info:pmid/37866172&rft_els_id=S0277953623006603&rfr_iscdi=true |