Thoracic endovascular repair after total aortic arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk for type A aortic dissection

The management of residual aortic dissection after initial type A repair with the Frozen elephant trunk technique remains mostly unexplored. This work aimed to evaluate endovascular second-stage surgery for patients with residual aortic dissection. A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of vascular surgery 2024-02, Vol.99, p.290-297
Hauptverfasser: Fortin, W., C-H, Gautier, Escande, R., Bel, A., Sutter, W., El Batti, S., Julia, P., Achouh, P., J-M, Alsac
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 297
container_issue
container_start_page 290
container_title Annals of vascular surgery
container_volume 99
creator Fortin, W.
C-H, Gautier
Escande, R.
Bel, A.
Sutter, W.
El Batti, S.
Julia, P.
Achouh, P.
J-M, Alsac
description The management of residual aortic dissection after initial type A repair with the Frozen elephant trunk technique remains mostly unexplored. This work aimed to evaluate endovascular second-stage surgery for patients with residual aortic dissection. A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients that underwent Type A aortic repair with Frozen elephant trunk, followed by a second-stage endovascular procedure was done from March 2016 to December 2021. The primary outcome was aortic-related adverse events or mortality, and secondary outcomes were aortic remodeling and perioperative complications. Remodeling was assessed by comparing the difference in ratios for true lumen/total aortic diameters on pre- and follow-up scans. 34 patients underwent second-stage surgery after Type A repair during the study period (seven TEVAR extensions, one STABLE/PETTICOAT and 26 STABILISE). Median follow-up was 23 months (range 2-66 months). There were no perioperative deaths or major complications and one reoperation for left subclavian re-embolization. At the last follow-up, there was no aortic-related mortality. There were five aortic-related adverse events, including another subclavian re-embolization and a preplanned open conversion. Risk factors were connective tissue disorders (p = 0.01) and aortic aneurysms > 55mm (p = 0.03). Distal remodeling reached statistical significance in all segments (p < 0.01) and was greater for patients treated with the STABILISE technique when compared to extended TEVAR (p = 0.01). Second-stage endovascular management of residual aortic dissection after initial Frozen elephant trunk repair showed excellent perioperative and good midterm outcomes and induced significant remodeling of the entire aorta in most cases, particularly with the STABILISE procedure.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.08.026
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2880107554</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0890509623006829</els_id><sourcerecordid>2880107554</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-1f0f21d33147eda906bdbfc25868b45432792b82519ef28abfc8ec31a420dee73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhi1EVbbb_gEOlY9cEsbOlyP1glCBSkhc6Nly7DHrJRuntrMt_Pp6tdBjTyPN-6GZh5BzBiUD1l5uS7WPTyUHXpUgSuDtCVmxljVF09fdKVmB6KFooG_PyKcYtwCMi1p8JGdVJxrRdmxF_jxufFDaaYqT8XsV9TKqQAPOygWqbMJAk09qpMqHlG0q6M1BHpXGHU6J_nZpQ23wrzhRHHHeqLxMYZmeqfU5_DIjvXpPGxcj6uT89Jl8sGqM-OVtrsnPm--P13fF_cPtj-ur-0JXTZsKZsFyZqqK1R0a1UM7mMFqns8XQ93UFe96PgjesB4tFyprAnXFVM3BIHbVmlwce-fgfy0Yk9y5qHEc1YR-iZILAQy6JletCT9adfAxBrRyDm6nwotkIA_E5VYeiMsDcQlCZuI59PWtfxl2aP5F3hFnw7ejAfOXe4dBRu1w0mhcyCik8e5__X8BZ0yUvg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2880107554</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Thoracic endovascular repair after total aortic arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk for type A aortic dissection</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Fortin, W. ; C-H, Gautier ; Escande, R. ; Bel, A. ; Sutter, W. ; El Batti, S. ; Julia, P. ; Achouh, P. ; J-M, Alsac</creator><creatorcontrib>Fortin, W. ; C-H, Gautier ; Escande, R. ; Bel, A. ; Sutter, W. ; El Batti, S. ; Julia, P. ; Achouh, P. ; J-M, Alsac</creatorcontrib><description>The management of residual aortic dissection after initial type A repair with the Frozen elephant trunk technique remains mostly unexplored. This work aimed to evaluate endovascular second-stage surgery for patients with residual aortic dissection. A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients that underwent Type A aortic repair with Frozen elephant trunk, followed by a second-stage endovascular procedure was done from March 2016 to December 2021. The primary outcome was aortic-related adverse events or mortality, and secondary outcomes were aortic remodeling and perioperative complications. Remodeling was assessed by comparing the difference in ratios for true lumen/total aortic diameters on pre- and follow-up scans. 34 patients underwent second-stage surgery after Type A repair during the study period (seven TEVAR extensions, one STABLE/PETTICOAT and 26 STABILISE). Median follow-up was 23 months (range 2-66 months). There were no perioperative deaths or major complications and one reoperation for left subclavian re-embolization. At the last follow-up, there was no aortic-related mortality. There were five aortic-related adverse events, including another subclavian re-embolization and a preplanned open conversion. Risk factors were connective tissue disorders (p = 0.01) and aortic aneurysms &gt; 55mm (p = 0.03). Distal remodeling reached statistical significance in all segments (p &lt; 0.01) and was greater for patients treated with the STABILISE technique when compared to extended TEVAR (p = 0.01). Second-stage endovascular management of residual aortic dissection after initial Frozen elephant trunk repair showed excellent perioperative and good midterm outcomes and induced significant remodeling of the entire aorta in most cases, particularly with the STABILISE procedure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-5096</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1615-5947</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.08.026</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37858671</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aorta, Thoracic - diagnostic imaging ; Aorta, Thoracic - surgery ; Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic - diagnostic imaging ; Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic - etiology ; Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic - surgery ; Aortic dissection ; Aortic Dissection - diagnostic imaging ; Aortic Dissection - surgery ; Aortic remodeling ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - methods ; Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ; Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects ; Endovascular Procedures - methods ; Frozen-elephant trunk technique ; Humans ; Residual aortic dissection ; Retrospective Studies ; STABILISE technique ; Stents ; Thoracic endovascular aortic repair ; Treatment Outcome ; Type A Aortic dissection</subject><ispartof>Annals of vascular surgery, 2024-02, Vol.99, p.290-297</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-1f0f21d33147eda906bdbfc25868b45432792b82519ef28abfc8ec31a420dee73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-1f0f21d33147eda906bdbfc25868b45432792b82519ef28abfc8ec31a420dee73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3877-2298</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37858671$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fortin, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>C-H, Gautier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Escande, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bel, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutter, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El Batti, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Julia, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Achouh, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>J-M, Alsac</creatorcontrib><title>Thoracic endovascular repair after total aortic arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk for type A aortic dissection</title><title>Annals of vascular surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Vasc Surg</addtitle><description>The management of residual aortic dissection after initial type A repair with the Frozen elephant trunk technique remains mostly unexplored. This work aimed to evaluate endovascular second-stage surgery for patients with residual aortic dissection. A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients that underwent Type A aortic repair with Frozen elephant trunk, followed by a second-stage endovascular procedure was done from March 2016 to December 2021. The primary outcome was aortic-related adverse events or mortality, and secondary outcomes were aortic remodeling and perioperative complications. Remodeling was assessed by comparing the difference in ratios for true lumen/total aortic diameters on pre- and follow-up scans. 34 patients underwent second-stage surgery after Type A repair during the study period (seven TEVAR extensions, one STABLE/PETTICOAT and 26 STABILISE). Median follow-up was 23 months (range 2-66 months). There were no perioperative deaths or major complications and one reoperation for left subclavian re-embolization. At the last follow-up, there was no aortic-related mortality. There were five aortic-related adverse events, including another subclavian re-embolization and a preplanned open conversion. Risk factors were connective tissue disorders (p = 0.01) and aortic aneurysms &gt; 55mm (p = 0.03). Distal remodeling reached statistical significance in all segments (p &lt; 0.01) and was greater for patients treated with the STABILISE technique when compared to extended TEVAR (p = 0.01). Second-stage endovascular management of residual aortic dissection after initial Frozen elephant trunk repair showed excellent perioperative and good midterm outcomes and induced significant remodeling of the entire aorta in most cases, particularly with the STABILISE procedure.</description><subject>Aorta, Thoracic - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Aorta, Thoracic - surgery</subject><subject>Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic - etiology</subject><subject>Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic - surgery</subject><subject>Aortic dissection</subject><subject>Aortic Dissection - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Aortic Dissection - surgery</subject><subject>Aortic remodeling</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - methods</subject><subject>Endovascular Aneurysm Repair</subject><subject>Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Endovascular Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Frozen-elephant trunk technique</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Residual aortic dissection</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>STABILISE technique</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Thoracic endovascular aortic repair</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Type A Aortic dissection</subject><issn>0890-5096</issn><issn>1615-5947</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhi1EVbbb_gEOlY9cEsbOlyP1glCBSkhc6Nly7DHrJRuntrMt_Pp6tdBjTyPN-6GZh5BzBiUD1l5uS7WPTyUHXpUgSuDtCVmxljVF09fdKVmB6KFooG_PyKcYtwCMi1p8JGdVJxrRdmxF_jxufFDaaYqT8XsV9TKqQAPOygWqbMJAk09qpMqHlG0q6M1BHpXGHU6J_nZpQ23wrzhRHHHeqLxMYZmeqfU5_DIjvXpPGxcj6uT89Jl8sGqM-OVtrsnPm--P13fF_cPtj-ur-0JXTZsKZsFyZqqK1R0a1UM7mMFqns8XQ93UFe96PgjesB4tFyprAnXFVM3BIHbVmlwce-fgfy0Yk9y5qHEc1YR-iZILAQy6JletCT9adfAxBrRyDm6nwotkIA_E5VYeiMsDcQlCZuI59PWtfxl2aP5F3hFnw7ejAfOXe4dBRu1w0mhcyCik8e5__X8BZ0yUvg</recordid><startdate>202402</startdate><enddate>202402</enddate><creator>Fortin, W.</creator><creator>C-H, Gautier</creator><creator>Escande, R.</creator><creator>Bel, A.</creator><creator>Sutter, W.</creator><creator>El Batti, S.</creator><creator>Julia, P.</creator><creator>Achouh, P.</creator><creator>J-M, Alsac</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3877-2298</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202402</creationdate><title>Thoracic endovascular repair after total aortic arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk for type A aortic dissection</title><author>Fortin, W. ; C-H, Gautier ; Escande, R. ; Bel, A. ; Sutter, W. ; El Batti, S. ; Julia, P. ; Achouh, P. ; J-M, Alsac</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-1f0f21d33147eda906bdbfc25868b45432792b82519ef28abfc8ec31a420dee73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aorta, Thoracic - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Aorta, Thoracic - surgery</topic><topic>Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic - etiology</topic><topic>Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic - surgery</topic><topic>Aortic dissection</topic><topic>Aortic Dissection - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Aortic Dissection - surgery</topic><topic>Aortic remodeling</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - methods</topic><topic>Endovascular Aneurysm Repair</topic><topic>Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Endovascular Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Frozen-elephant trunk technique</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Residual aortic dissection</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>STABILISE technique</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Thoracic endovascular aortic repair</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Type A Aortic dissection</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fortin, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>C-H, Gautier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Escande, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bel, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutter, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El Batti, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Julia, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Achouh, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>J-M, Alsac</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of vascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fortin, W.</au><au>C-H, Gautier</au><au>Escande, R.</au><au>Bel, A.</au><au>Sutter, W.</au><au>El Batti, S.</au><au>Julia, P.</au><au>Achouh, P.</au><au>J-M, Alsac</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Thoracic endovascular repair after total aortic arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk for type A aortic dissection</atitle><jtitle>Annals of vascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Vasc Surg</addtitle><date>2024-02</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>99</volume><spage>290</spage><epage>297</epage><pages>290-297</pages><issn>0890-5096</issn><eissn>1615-5947</eissn><abstract>The management of residual aortic dissection after initial type A repair with the Frozen elephant trunk technique remains mostly unexplored. This work aimed to evaluate endovascular second-stage surgery for patients with residual aortic dissection. A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients that underwent Type A aortic repair with Frozen elephant trunk, followed by a second-stage endovascular procedure was done from March 2016 to December 2021. The primary outcome was aortic-related adverse events or mortality, and secondary outcomes were aortic remodeling and perioperative complications. Remodeling was assessed by comparing the difference in ratios for true lumen/total aortic diameters on pre- and follow-up scans. 34 patients underwent second-stage surgery after Type A repair during the study period (seven TEVAR extensions, one STABLE/PETTICOAT and 26 STABILISE). Median follow-up was 23 months (range 2-66 months). There were no perioperative deaths or major complications and one reoperation for left subclavian re-embolization. At the last follow-up, there was no aortic-related mortality. There were five aortic-related adverse events, including another subclavian re-embolization and a preplanned open conversion. Risk factors were connective tissue disorders (p = 0.01) and aortic aneurysms &gt; 55mm (p = 0.03). Distal remodeling reached statistical significance in all segments (p &lt; 0.01) and was greater for patients treated with the STABILISE technique when compared to extended TEVAR (p = 0.01). Second-stage endovascular management of residual aortic dissection after initial Frozen elephant trunk repair showed excellent perioperative and good midterm outcomes and induced significant remodeling of the entire aorta in most cases, particularly with the STABILISE procedure.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>37858671</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.avsg.2023.08.026</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3877-2298</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0890-5096
ispartof Annals of vascular surgery, 2024-02, Vol.99, p.290-297
issn 0890-5096
1615-5947
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2880107554
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aorta, Thoracic - diagnostic imaging
Aorta, Thoracic - surgery
Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic - diagnostic imaging
Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic - etiology
Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic - surgery
Aortic dissection
Aortic Dissection - diagnostic imaging
Aortic Dissection - surgery
Aortic remodeling
Blood Vessel Prosthesis
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - methods
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects
Endovascular Procedures - methods
Frozen-elephant trunk technique
Humans
Residual aortic dissection
Retrospective Studies
STABILISE technique
Stents
Thoracic endovascular aortic repair
Treatment Outcome
Type A Aortic dissection
title Thoracic endovascular repair after total aortic arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk for type A aortic dissection
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T06%3A21%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Thoracic%20endovascular%20repair%20after%20total%20aortic%20arch%20replacement%20with%20frozen%20elephant%20trunk%20for%20type%20A%20aortic%20dissection&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20vascular%20surgery&rft.au=Fortin,%20W.&rft.date=2024-02&rft.volume=99&rft.spage=290&rft.epage=297&rft.pages=290-297&rft.issn=0890-5096&rft.eissn=1615-5947&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.avsg.2023.08.026&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2880107554%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2880107554&rft_id=info:pmid/37858671&rft_els_id=S0890509623006829&rfr_iscdi=true