The power of partnership: Exploring collaboration dynamics in U.S. transplant research

Collaboration is one of the hallmarks of academic research. This study analyzes collaboration patterns in U.S. transplant research, examining publication trends, productive institutions, co-authorship networks, and citation patterns in high-impact transplant journals. 4265 articles published between...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of surgery 2024-01, Vol.227, p.24-33
Hauptverfasser: Faria, I., Montalvan, A., Canizares, S., Martins, P.N., Weber, G.M., Kazimi, M., Eckhoff, D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 33
container_issue
container_start_page 24
container_title The American journal of surgery
container_volume 227
creator Faria, I.
Montalvan, A.
Canizares, S.
Martins, P.N.
Weber, G.M.
Kazimi, M.
Eckhoff, D.
description Collaboration is one of the hallmarks of academic research. This study analyzes collaboration patterns in U.S. transplant research, examining publication trends, productive institutions, co-authorship networks, and citation patterns in high-impact transplant journals. 4265 articles published between 2012 and 2021 were analyzed using scientometric tools, logistic regression, VantagePoint software, and Gephi software for network visualization. 16,003 authors from 1011 institutions and 59 countries were identified, with Harvard, Johns Hopkins, and University of Pennsylvania contributing the most papers. Odds of international collaboration significantly increased over time (OR 1.03; p = 0.040), while odds of citation in single-institution collaborations decreased (OR 0.99; p = 0.016). Five major scientific communities and central institutions (Harvard University and University of Pittsburgh) connecting them were identified, revealing interconnected research clusters. Collaboration enhances knowledge exchange and research productivity, with an increasing trend of institutional and international collaboration in U.S. transplant research. Understanding this community is essential for promoting research impact and forming strategic partnerships. •The transplant research network is highly interconnected through direct or indirect collaborations.•However, only 4% of all potential direct institution collaborations are being explored by the transplant research community.•International collaboration in transplantation slightly increased over the decade, while national and single-institution collaboration remained stable.•The full collaborative transplant network potential should be explored to increase impactful research.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.10.008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2879406135</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002961023005159</els_id><sourcerecordid>2879406135</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-3435ed81a86b10dc7e9d8603250722141a88b98e3cbd1fde1881ca3987e57fcc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtv1DAQgC0EokvhJ4AsceGS4EceDhdUVS0gVeJAy9Vy7EnXUWKHcQL039erXThw4WR55pvXR8hrzkrOePN-LM08pg3vS8GEzLGSMfWE7Lhqu4IrJZ-SHWNMFF3D2Rl5kdKYv5xX8jk5k62qhaqqHfl-uwe6xF-ANA50MbgGwLT3ywd69XuZIvpwT22cJtNHNKuPgbqHYGZvE_WB3pXfSrqiCWmZTFgpQgKDdv-SPBvMlODV6T0nd9dXt5efi5uvn75cXtwUVnZyLWQla3CKG9X0nDnbQudUw6SoWSsEr3JC9Z0CaXvHBwf5Lm6N7FQLdTtYK8_Ju2PfBeOPDdKqZ58s5HUDxC1pkW1UrOGyzujbf9Axbhjydlp0jDWyZUpkqj5SFmNKCINe0M8GHzRn-iBej_okXh_EH8JZfK57c-q-9TO4v1V_TGfg4xGArOOnB9TJeggWnEewq3bR_2fEIwrQlmo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2900637082</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The power of partnership: Exploring collaboration dynamics in U.S. transplant research</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Faria, I. ; Montalvan, A. ; Canizares, S. ; Martins, P.N. ; Weber, G.M. ; Kazimi, M. ; Eckhoff, D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Faria, I. ; Montalvan, A. ; Canizares, S. ; Martins, P.N. ; Weber, G.M. ; Kazimi, M. ; Eckhoff, D.</creatorcontrib><description>Collaboration is one of the hallmarks of academic research. This study analyzes collaboration patterns in U.S. transplant research, examining publication trends, productive institutions, co-authorship networks, and citation patterns in high-impact transplant journals. 4265 articles published between 2012 and 2021 were analyzed using scientometric tools, logistic regression, VantagePoint software, and Gephi software for network visualization. 16,003 authors from 1011 institutions and 59 countries were identified, with Harvard, Johns Hopkins, and University of Pennsylvania contributing the most papers. Odds of international collaboration significantly increased over time (OR 1.03; p = 0.040), while odds of citation in single-institution collaborations decreased (OR 0.99; p = 0.016). Five major scientific communities and central institutions (Harvard University and University of Pittsburgh) connecting them were identified, revealing interconnected research clusters. Collaboration enhances knowledge exchange and research productivity, with an increasing trend of institutional and international collaboration in U.S. transplant research. Understanding this community is essential for promoting research impact and forming strategic partnerships. •The transplant research network is highly interconnected through direct or indirect collaborations.•However, only 4% of all potential direct institution collaborations are being explored by the transplant research community.•International collaboration in transplantation slightly increased over the decade, while national and single-institution collaboration remained stable.•The full collaborative transplant network potential should be explored to increase impactful research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9610</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1879-1883</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.10.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37852844</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Author productivity ; Authorship ; Bibliometrics ; Citations ; Co authorship ; Collaboration ; Cooperation ; Humans ; Institutions ; Interdisciplinary aspects ; International cooperation ; International organizations ; Knowledge management ; Liver transplants ; Open source software ; Organ Transplantation ; Partnerships ; Social network analysis ; Social networks ; Software ; Transplantation ; Trends</subject><ispartof>The American journal of surgery, 2024-01, Vol.227, p.24-33</ispartof><rights>2023</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2023. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-3435ed81a86b10dc7e9d8603250722141a88b98e3cbd1fde1881ca3987e57fcc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-3435ed81a86b10dc7e9d8603250722141a88b98e3cbd1fde1881ca3987e57fcc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3073-5636</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37852844$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Faria, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montalvan, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canizares, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, P.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, G.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kazimi, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckhoff, D.</creatorcontrib><title>The power of partnership: Exploring collaboration dynamics in U.S. transplant research</title><title>The American journal of surgery</title><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><description>Collaboration is one of the hallmarks of academic research. This study analyzes collaboration patterns in U.S. transplant research, examining publication trends, productive institutions, co-authorship networks, and citation patterns in high-impact transplant journals. 4265 articles published between 2012 and 2021 were analyzed using scientometric tools, logistic regression, VantagePoint software, and Gephi software for network visualization. 16,003 authors from 1011 institutions and 59 countries were identified, with Harvard, Johns Hopkins, and University of Pennsylvania contributing the most papers. Odds of international collaboration significantly increased over time (OR 1.03; p = 0.040), while odds of citation in single-institution collaborations decreased (OR 0.99; p = 0.016). Five major scientific communities and central institutions (Harvard University and University of Pittsburgh) connecting them were identified, revealing interconnected research clusters. Collaboration enhances knowledge exchange and research productivity, with an increasing trend of institutional and international collaboration in U.S. transplant research. Understanding this community is essential for promoting research impact and forming strategic partnerships. •The transplant research network is highly interconnected through direct or indirect collaborations.•However, only 4% of all potential direct institution collaborations are being explored by the transplant research community.•International collaboration in transplantation slightly increased over the decade, while national and single-institution collaboration remained stable.•The full collaborative transplant network potential should be explored to increase impactful research.</description><subject>Author productivity</subject><subject>Authorship</subject><subject>Bibliometrics</subject><subject>Citations</subject><subject>Co authorship</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Institutions</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary aspects</subject><subject>International cooperation</subject><subject>International organizations</subject><subject>Knowledge management</subject><subject>Liver transplants</subject><subject>Open source software</subject><subject>Organ Transplantation</subject><subject>Partnerships</subject><subject>Social network analysis</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Transplantation</subject><subject>Trends</subject><issn>0002-9610</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtv1DAQgC0EokvhJ4AsceGS4EceDhdUVS0gVeJAy9Vy7EnXUWKHcQL039erXThw4WR55pvXR8hrzkrOePN-LM08pg3vS8GEzLGSMfWE7Lhqu4IrJZ-SHWNMFF3D2Rl5kdKYv5xX8jk5k62qhaqqHfl-uwe6xF-ANA50MbgGwLT3ywd69XuZIvpwT22cJtNHNKuPgbqHYGZvE_WB3pXfSrqiCWmZTFgpQgKDdv-SPBvMlODV6T0nd9dXt5efi5uvn75cXtwUVnZyLWQla3CKG9X0nDnbQudUw6SoWSsEr3JC9Z0CaXvHBwf5Lm6N7FQLdTtYK8_Ju2PfBeOPDdKqZ58s5HUDxC1pkW1UrOGyzujbf9Axbhjydlp0jDWyZUpkqj5SFmNKCINe0M8GHzRn-iBej_okXh_EH8JZfK57c-q-9TO4v1V_TGfg4xGArOOnB9TJeggWnEewq3bR_2fEIwrQlmo</recordid><startdate>202401</startdate><enddate>202401</enddate><creator>Faria, I.</creator><creator>Montalvan, A.</creator><creator>Canizares, S.</creator><creator>Martins, P.N.</creator><creator>Weber, G.M.</creator><creator>Kazimi, M.</creator><creator>Eckhoff, D.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3073-5636</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202401</creationdate><title>The power of partnership: Exploring collaboration dynamics in U.S. transplant research</title><author>Faria, I. ; Montalvan, A. ; Canizares, S. ; Martins, P.N. ; Weber, G.M. ; Kazimi, M. ; Eckhoff, D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-3435ed81a86b10dc7e9d8603250722141a88b98e3cbd1fde1881ca3987e57fcc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Author productivity</topic><topic>Authorship</topic><topic>Bibliometrics</topic><topic>Citations</topic><topic>Co authorship</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Institutions</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary aspects</topic><topic>International cooperation</topic><topic>International organizations</topic><topic>Knowledge management</topic><topic>Liver transplants</topic><topic>Open source software</topic><topic>Organ Transplantation</topic><topic>Partnerships</topic><topic>Social network analysis</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Transplantation</topic><topic>Trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Faria, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montalvan, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canizares, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, P.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, G.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kazimi, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckhoff, D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Faria, I.</au><au>Montalvan, A.</au><au>Canizares, S.</au><au>Martins, P.N.</au><au>Weber, G.M.</au><au>Kazimi, M.</au><au>Eckhoff, D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The power of partnership: Exploring collaboration dynamics in U.S. transplant research</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><date>2024-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>227</volume><spage>24</spage><epage>33</epage><pages>24-33</pages><issn>0002-9610</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><eissn>1879-1883</eissn><abstract>Collaboration is one of the hallmarks of academic research. This study analyzes collaboration patterns in U.S. transplant research, examining publication trends, productive institutions, co-authorship networks, and citation patterns in high-impact transplant journals. 4265 articles published between 2012 and 2021 were analyzed using scientometric tools, logistic regression, VantagePoint software, and Gephi software for network visualization. 16,003 authors from 1011 institutions and 59 countries were identified, with Harvard, Johns Hopkins, and University of Pennsylvania contributing the most papers. Odds of international collaboration significantly increased over time (OR 1.03; p = 0.040), while odds of citation in single-institution collaborations decreased (OR 0.99; p = 0.016). Five major scientific communities and central institutions (Harvard University and University of Pittsburgh) connecting them were identified, revealing interconnected research clusters. Collaboration enhances knowledge exchange and research productivity, with an increasing trend of institutional and international collaboration in U.S. transplant research. Understanding this community is essential for promoting research impact and forming strategic partnerships. •The transplant research network is highly interconnected through direct or indirect collaborations.•However, only 4% of all potential direct institution collaborations are being explored by the transplant research community.•International collaboration in transplantation slightly increased over the decade, while national and single-institution collaboration remained stable.•The full collaborative transplant network potential should be explored to increase impactful research.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>37852844</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.10.008</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3073-5636</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9610
ispartof The American journal of surgery, 2024-01, Vol.227, p.24-33
issn 0002-9610
1879-1883
1879-1883
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2879406135
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Author productivity
Authorship
Bibliometrics
Citations
Co authorship
Collaboration
Cooperation
Humans
Institutions
Interdisciplinary aspects
International cooperation
International organizations
Knowledge management
Liver transplants
Open source software
Organ Transplantation
Partnerships
Social network analysis
Social networks
Software
Transplantation
Trends
title The power of partnership: Exploring collaboration dynamics in U.S. transplant research
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T04%3A15%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20power%20of%20partnership:%20Exploring%20collaboration%20dynamics%20in%20U.S.%20transplant%20research&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Faria,%20I.&rft.date=2024-01&rft.volume=227&rft.spage=24&rft.epage=33&rft.pages=24-33&rft.issn=0002-9610&rft.eissn=1879-1883&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.10.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2879406135%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2900637082&rft_id=info:pmid/37852844&rft_els_id=S0002961023005159&rfr_iscdi=true