The power of partnership: Exploring collaboration dynamics in U.S. transplant research
Collaboration is one of the hallmarks of academic research. This study analyzes collaboration patterns in U.S. transplant research, examining publication trends, productive institutions, co-authorship networks, and citation patterns in high-impact transplant journals. 4265 articles published between...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of surgery 2024-01, Vol.227, p.24-33 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 33 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 24 |
container_title | The American journal of surgery |
container_volume | 227 |
creator | Faria, I. Montalvan, A. Canizares, S. Martins, P.N. Weber, G.M. Kazimi, M. Eckhoff, D. |
description | Collaboration is one of the hallmarks of academic research. This study analyzes collaboration patterns in U.S. transplant research, examining publication trends, productive institutions, co-authorship networks, and citation patterns in high-impact transplant journals.
4265 articles published between 2012 and 2021 were analyzed using scientometric tools, logistic regression, VantagePoint software, and Gephi software for network visualization.
16,003 authors from 1011 institutions and 59 countries were identified, with Harvard, Johns Hopkins, and University of Pennsylvania contributing the most papers. Odds of international collaboration significantly increased over time (OR 1.03; p = 0.040), while odds of citation in single-institution collaborations decreased (OR 0.99; p = 0.016). Five major scientific communities and central institutions (Harvard University and University of Pittsburgh) connecting them were identified, revealing interconnected research clusters.
Collaboration enhances knowledge exchange and research productivity, with an increasing trend of institutional and international collaboration in U.S. transplant research. Understanding this community is essential for promoting research impact and forming strategic partnerships.
•The transplant research network is highly interconnected through direct or indirect collaborations.•However, only 4% of all potential direct institution collaborations are being explored by the transplant research community.•International collaboration in transplantation slightly increased over the decade, while national and single-institution collaboration remained stable.•The full collaborative transplant network potential should be explored to increase impactful research. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.10.008 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2879406135</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002961023005159</els_id><sourcerecordid>2879406135</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-3435ed81a86b10dc7e9d8603250722141a88b98e3cbd1fde1881ca3987e57fcc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtv1DAQgC0EokvhJ4AsceGS4EceDhdUVS0gVeJAy9Vy7EnXUWKHcQL039erXThw4WR55pvXR8hrzkrOePN-LM08pg3vS8GEzLGSMfWE7Lhqu4IrJZ-SHWNMFF3D2Rl5kdKYv5xX8jk5k62qhaqqHfl-uwe6xF-ANA50MbgGwLT3ywd69XuZIvpwT22cJtNHNKuPgbqHYGZvE_WB3pXfSrqiCWmZTFgpQgKDdv-SPBvMlODV6T0nd9dXt5efi5uvn75cXtwUVnZyLWQla3CKG9X0nDnbQudUw6SoWSsEr3JC9Z0CaXvHBwf5Lm6N7FQLdTtYK8_Ju2PfBeOPDdKqZ58s5HUDxC1pkW1UrOGyzujbf9Axbhjydlp0jDWyZUpkqj5SFmNKCINe0M8GHzRn-iBej_okXh_EH8JZfK57c-q-9TO4v1V_TGfg4xGArOOnB9TJeggWnEewq3bR_2fEIwrQlmo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2900637082</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The power of partnership: Exploring collaboration dynamics in U.S. transplant research</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Faria, I. ; Montalvan, A. ; Canizares, S. ; Martins, P.N. ; Weber, G.M. ; Kazimi, M. ; Eckhoff, D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Faria, I. ; Montalvan, A. ; Canizares, S. ; Martins, P.N. ; Weber, G.M. ; Kazimi, M. ; Eckhoff, D.</creatorcontrib><description>Collaboration is one of the hallmarks of academic research. This study analyzes collaboration patterns in U.S. transplant research, examining publication trends, productive institutions, co-authorship networks, and citation patterns in high-impact transplant journals.
4265 articles published between 2012 and 2021 were analyzed using scientometric tools, logistic regression, VantagePoint software, and Gephi software for network visualization.
16,003 authors from 1011 institutions and 59 countries were identified, with Harvard, Johns Hopkins, and University of Pennsylvania contributing the most papers. Odds of international collaboration significantly increased over time (OR 1.03; p = 0.040), while odds of citation in single-institution collaborations decreased (OR 0.99; p = 0.016). Five major scientific communities and central institutions (Harvard University and University of Pittsburgh) connecting them were identified, revealing interconnected research clusters.
Collaboration enhances knowledge exchange and research productivity, with an increasing trend of institutional and international collaboration in U.S. transplant research. Understanding this community is essential for promoting research impact and forming strategic partnerships.
•The transplant research network is highly interconnected through direct or indirect collaborations.•However, only 4% of all potential direct institution collaborations are being explored by the transplant research community.•International collaboration in transplantation slightly increased over the decade, while national and single-institution collaboration remained stable.•The full collaborative transplant network potential should be explored to increase impactful research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9610</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1879-1883</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.10.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37852844</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Author productivity ; Authorship ; Bibliometrics ; Citations ; Co authorship ; Collaboration ; Cooperation ; Humans ; Institutions ; Interdisciplinary aspects ; International cooperation ; International organizations ; Knowledge management ; Liver transplants ; Open source software ; Organ Transplantation ; Partnerships ; Social network analysis ; Social networks ; Software ; Transplantation ; Trends</subject><ispartof>The American journal of surgery, 2024-01, Vol.227, p.24-33</ispartof><rights>2023</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2023. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-3435ed81a86b10dc7e9d8603250722141a88b98e3cbd1fde1881ca3987e57fcc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-3435ed81a86b10dc7e9d8603250722141a88b98e3cbd1fde1881ca3987e57fcc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3073-5636</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37852844$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Faria, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montalvan, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canizares, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, P.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, G.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kazimi, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckhoff, D.</creatorcontrib><title>The power of partnership: Exploring collaboration dynamics in U.S. transplant research</title><title>The American journal of surgery</title><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><description>Collaboration is one of the hallmarks of academic research. This study analyzes collaboration patterns in U.S. transplant research, examining publication trends, productive institutions, co-authorship networks, and citation patterns in high-impact transplant journals.
4265 articles published between 2012 and 2021 were analyzed using scientometric tools, logistic regression, VantagePoint software, and Gephi software for network visualization.
16,003 authors from 1011 institutions and 59 countries were identified, with Harvard, Johns Hopkins, and University of Pennsylvania contributing the most papers. Odds of international collaboration significantly increased over time (OR 1.03; p = 0.040), while odds of citation in single-institution collaborations decreased (OR 0.99; p = 0.016). Five major scientific communities and central institutions (Harvard University and University of Pittsburgh) connecting them were identified, revealing interconnected research clusters.
Collaboration enhances knowledge exchange and research productivity, with an increasing trend of institutional and international collaboration in U.S. transplant research. Understanding this community is essential for promoting research impact and forming strategic partnerships.
•The transplant research network is highly interconnected through direct or indirect collaborations.•However, only 4% of all potential direct institution collaborations are being explored by the transplant research community.•International collaboration in transplantation slightly increased over the decade, while national and single-institution collaboration remained stable.•The full collaborative transplant network potential should be explored to increase impactful research.</description><subject>Author productivity</subject><subject>Authorship</subject><subject>Bibliometrics</subject><subject>Citations</subject><subject>Co authorship</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Institutions</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary aspects</subject><subject>International cooperation</subject><subject>International organizations</subject><subject>Knowledge management</subject><subject>Liver transplants</subject><subject>Open source software</subject><subject>Organ Transplantation</subject><subject>Partnerships</subject><subject>Social network analysis</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Transplantation</subject><subject>Trends</subject><issn>0002-9610</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtv1DAQgC0EokvhJ4AsceGS4EceDhdUVS0gVeJAy9Vy7EnXUWKHcQL039erXThw4WR55pvXR8hrzkrOePN-LM08pg3vS8GEzLGSMfWE7Lhqu4IrJZ-SHWNMFF3D2Rl5kdKYv5xX8jk5k62qhaqqHfl-uwe6xF-ANA50MbgGwLT3ywd69XuZIvpwT22cJtNHNKuPgbqHYGZvE_WB3pXfSrqiCWmZTFgpQgKDdv-SPBvMlODV6T0nd9dXt5efi5uvn75cXtwUVnZyLWQla3CKG9X0nDnbQudUw6SoWSsEr3JC9Z0CaXvHBwf5Lm6N7FQLdTtYK8_Ju2PfBeOPDdKqZ58s5HUDxC1pkW1UrOGyzujbf9Axbhjydlp0jDWyZUpkqj5SFmNKCINe0M8GHzRn-iBej_okXh_EH8JZfK57c-q-9TO4v1V_TGfg4xGArOOnB9TJeggWnEewq3bR_2fEIwrQlmo</recordid><startdate>202401</startdate><enddate>202401</enddate><creator>Faria, I.</creator><creator>Montalvan, A.</creator><creator>Canizares, S.</creator><creator>Martins, P.N.</creator><creator>Weber, G.M.</creator><creator>Kazimi, M.</creator><creator>Eckhoff, D.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3073-5636</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202401</creationdate><title>The power of partnership: Exploring collaboration dynamics in U.S. transplant research</title><author>Faria, I. ; Montalvan, A. ; Canizares, S. ; Martins, P.N. ; Weber, G.M. ; Kazimi, M. ; Eckhoff, D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-3435ed81a86b10dc7e9d8603250722141a88b98e3cbd1fde1881ca3987e57fcc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Author productivity</topic><topic>Authorship</topic><topic>Bibliometrics</topic><topic>Citations</topic><topic>Co authorship</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Institutions</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary aspects</topic><topic>International cooperation</topic><topic>International organizations</topic><topic>Knowledge management</topic><topic>Liver transplants</topic><topic>Open source software</topic><topic>Organ Transplantation</topic><topic>Partnerships</topic><topic>Social network analysis</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Transplantation</topic><topic>Trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Faria, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montalvan, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canizares, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, P.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, G.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kazimi, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckhoff, D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Faria, I.</au><au>Montalvan, A.</au><au>Canizares, S.</au><au>Martins, P.N.</au><au>Weber, G.M.</au><au>Kazimi, M.</au><au>Eckhoff, D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The power of partnership: Exploring collaboration dynamics in U.S. transplant research</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><date>2024-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>227</volume><spage>24</spage><epage>33</epage><pages>24-33</pages><issn>0002-9610</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><eissn>1879-1883</eissn><abstract>Collaboration is one of the hallmarks of academic research. This study analyzes collaboration patterns in U.S. transplant research, examining publication trends, productive institutions, co-authorship networks, and citation patterns in high-impact transplant journals.
4265 articles published between 2012 and 2021 were analyzed using scientometric tools, logistic regression, VantagePoint software, and Gephi software for network visualization.
16,003 authors from 1011 institutions and 59 countries were identified, with Harvard, Johns Hopkins, and University of Pennsylvania contributing the most papers. Odds of international collaboration significantly increased over time (OR 1.03; p = 0.040), while odds of citation in single-institution collaborations decreased (OR 0.99; p = 0.016). Five major scientific communities and central institutions (Harvard University and University of Pittsburgh) connecting them were identified, revealing interconnected research clusters.
Collaboration enhances knowledge exchange and research productivity, with an increasing trend of institutional and international collaboration in U.S. transplant research. Understanding this community is essential for promoting research impact and forming strategic partnerships.
•The transplant research network is highly interconnected through direct or indirect collaborations.•However, only 4% of all potential direct institution collaborations are being explored by the transplant research community.•International collaboration in transplantation slightly increased over the decade, while national and single-institution collaboration remained stable.•The full collaborative transplant network potential should be explored to increase impactful research.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>37852844</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.10.008</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3073-5636</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9610 |
ispartof | The American journal of surgery, 2024-01, Vol.227, p.24-33 |
issn | 0002-9610 1879-1883 1879-1883 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2879406135 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Author productivity Authorship Bibliometrics Citations Co authorship Collaboration Cooperation Humans Institutions Interdisciplinary aspects International cooperation International organizations Knowledge management Liver transplants Open source software Organ Transplantation Partnerships Social network analysis Social networks Software Transplantation Trends |
title | The power of partnership: Exploring collaboration dynamics in U.S. transplant research |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T04%3A15%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20power%20of%20partnership:%20Exploring%20collaboration%20dynamics%20in%20U.S.%20transplant%20research&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Faria,%20I.&rft.date=2024-01&rft.volume=227&rft.spage=24&rft.epage=33&rft.pages=24-33&rft.issn=0002-9610&rft.eissn=1879-1883&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.10.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2879406135%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2900637082&rft_id=info:pmid/37852844&rft_els_id=S0002961023005159&rfr_iscdi=true |