Effect of Controlled Drainage and Vegetative Buffers on Drainage Water Quality from Wastewater Irrigated Fields

Lagoon effluent is routinely applied to agricultural fields as fertilizer to utilize nutrients derived from animal manures. In humid regions, effluent is also applied to fields in order to manage the lagoon stage within acceptable levels. To minimize the risk of applied nutrients being transported t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering 2006-04, Vol.132 (2), p.159-170
Hauptverfasser: Jia, Z, Evans, R. O, Smith, J. T
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 170
container_issue 2
container_start_page 159
container_title Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering
container_volume 132
creator Jia, Z
Evans, R. O
Smith, J. T
description Lagoon effluent is routinely applied to agricultural fields as fertilizer to utilize nutrients derived from animal manures. In humid regions, effluent is also applied to fields in order to manage the lagoon stage within acceptable levels. To minimize the risk of applied nutrients being transported to surface waters, best management practices such as vegetative buffers and controlled drainage are often recommended. This paper presents the results of a field study to evaluate the effectiveness of controlled drainage and vegetative buffers in reducing the transport of wastewater nutrients from land application fields. Swine lagoon effluent was spray irrigated to Bermudagrass fields drained by a parallel ditch system. Drainage outflow was monitored continuously for a 3 year period. Vegetative buffers reduced the average concentration of phosphorus by about 30%, but the average concentration of nitrogen was not affected. Controlled drainage resulted in higher individual event nitrogen concentrations, which were due primarily to irrigation onto fields at times when they were too wet to be effectively irrigated. In most cases, the concentration of total N in drainage was comparable to the values observed from other agricultural fields receiving inorganic fertilizer. However, the nitrogen was mainly in the ammonium form rather than nitrate, which could pose greater environmental risk to some fish and other aquatic species in surface waters. The peak concentrations were higher for the controlled drainage treatments than for conventional drainage. The loss of nitrogen in drainage water accounted for roughly 10% of the amount applied (8% on the conventional drainage treatments and 11% on the controlled drainage treatments). On two plots (one controlled, one conventional), more than 40% of the total N transport over the 3 year study period was associated with one extended flow event when wastewater was applied several times while the water table was near the surface. These poorly scheduled irrigations onto already wet fields resulted in as much N and P transport in one event as occurred during the remainder of the study when irrigation was properly scheduled onto dry fields. These observations suggest that irrigation scheduling and proper management were more important to water quality than remedial actions such as controlled drainage or vegetative buffers.
doi_str_mv 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2006)132:2(159)
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28781654</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>28781654</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a407t-1ccbfd927b8122d0c223c1d00bac456085837b4df01dced64d470d827dec3fbc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9vEzEQxS1EJULKZ8AnSA5LZ2xnvekBqYSUVqqEUCkcLa__RFtt1q3tBfXb19ugcoPTjJ5-epp5j5D3CB8QajxZnF1vtkuQnFdrweWCAdRL5OyULXC1Xr4gMyx6JaQUL8nsmXtFXqd0C4BCAsxI2HrvTKbB000Ycgx97yz9HHU36J2jerD0h9u5rHP3y9FPY6FjomH4i_zU2UX6bdR9lx-oj2FfpJTd7yf9MsZuVzZLzzvX23RMjrzuk3vzZ87Jzfn2--aiuvr65XJzdlVpATJXaEzr7ZrJtkHGLBjGuEEL0GojVjU0q4bLVlgPaI2ztbDlHdswaZ3hvjV8Tt4dfO9iuB9dymrfJeP6Xg8ujEmxRjZYr8R_QZRYNzWrC_jxAJoYUorOq7vY7XV8UAhqakSpqRE1Ja2mpNXUiCqNKKZKI8Xg7cHA66D0LnZJ3VwzQA4IjeDlwzk5PRC6XKBuwxiHktGz_7_tHwHcnJtR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17168626</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of Controlled Drainage and Vegetative Buffers on Drainage Water Quality from Wastewater Irrigated Fields</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><creator>Jia, Z ; Evans, R. O ; Smith, J. T</creator><creatorcontrib>Jia, Z ; Evans, R. O ; Smith, J. T</creatorcontrib><description>Lagoon effluent is routinely applied to agricultural fields as fertilizer to utilize nutrients derived from animal manures. In humid regions, effluent is also applied to fields in order to manage the lagoon stage within acceptable levels. To minimize the risk of applied nutrients being transported to surface waters, best management practices such as vegetative buffers and controlled drainage are often recommended. This paper presents the results of a field study to evaluate the effectiveness of controlled drainage and vegetative buffers in reducing the transport of wastewater nutrients from land application fields. Swine lagoon effluent was spray irrigated to Bermudagrass fields drained by a parallel ditch system. Drainage outflow was monitored continuously for a 3 year period. Vegetative buffers reduced the average concentration of phosphorus by about 30%, but the average concentration of nitrogen was not affected. Controlled drainage resulted in higher individual event nitrogen concentrations, which were due primarily to irrigation onto fields at times when they were too wet to be effectively irrigated. In most cases, the concentration of total N in drainage was comparable to the values observed from other agricultural fields receiving inorganic fertilizer. However, the nitrogen was mainly in the ammonium form rather than nitrate, which could pose greater environmental risk to some fish and other aquatic species in surface waters. The peak concentrations were higher for the controlled drainage treatments than for conventional drainage. The loss of nitrogen in drainage water accounted for roughly 10% of the amount applied (8% on the conventional drainage treatments and 11% on the controlled drainage treatments). On two plots (one controlled, one conventional), more than 40% of the total N transport over the 3 year study period was associated with one extended flow event when wastewater was applied several times while the water table was near the surface. These poorly scheduled irrigations onto already wet fields resulted in as much N and P transport in one event as occurred during the remainder of the study when irrigation was properly scheduled onto dry fields. These observations suggest that irrigation scheduling and proper management were more important to water quality than remedial actions such as controlled drainage or vegetative buffers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-9437</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-4774</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2006)132:2(159)</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>drainage water ; filter strips ; irrigation water ; pig manure ; pollution control ; TECHNICAL PAPERS ; wastewater irrigation ; water pollution ; water quality</subject><ispartof>Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering, 2006-04, Vol.132 (2), p.159-170</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a407t-1ccbfd927b8122d0c223c1d00bac456085837b4df01dced64d470d827dec3fbc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a407t-1ccbfd927b8122d0c223c1d00bac456085837b4df01dced64d470d827dec3fbc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2006)132:2(159)$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2006)132:2(159)$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,75936,75944</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jia, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, R. O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, J. T</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of Controlled Drainage and Vegetative Buffers on Drainage Water Quality from Wastewater Irrigated Fields</title><title>Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering</title><description>Lagoon effluent is routinely applied to agricultural fields as fertilizer to utilize nutrients derived from animal manures. In humid regions, effluent is also applied to fields in order to manage the lagoon stage within acceptable levels. To minimize the risk of applied nutrients being transported to surface waters, best management practices such as vegetative buffers and controlled drainage are often recommended. This paper presents the results of a field study to evaluate the effectiveness of controlled drainage and vegetative buffers in reducing the transport of wastewater nutrients from land application fields. Swine lagoon effluent was spray irrigated to Bermudagrass fields drained by a parallel ditch system. Drainage outflow was monitored continuously for a 3 year period. Vegetative buffers reduced the average concentration of phosphorus by about 30%, but the average concentration of nitrogen was not affected. Controlled drainage resulted in higher individual event nitrogen concentrations, which were due primarily to irrigation onto fields at times when they were too wet to be effectively irrigated. In most cases, the concentration of total N in drainage was comparable to the values observed from other agricultural fields receiving inorganic fertilizer. However, the nitrogen was mainly in the ammonium form rather than nitrate, which could pose greater environmental risk to some fish and other aquatic species in surface waters. The peak concentrations were higher for the controlled drainage treatments than for conventional drainage. The loss of nitrogen in drainage water accounted for roughly 10% of the amount applied (8% on the conventional drainage treatments and 11% on the controlled drainage treatments). On two plots (one controlled, one conventional), more than 40% of the total N transport over the 3 year study period was associated with one extended flow event when wastewater was applied several times while the water table was near the surface. These poorly scheduled irrigations onto already wet fields resulted in as much N and P transport in one event as occurred during the remainder of the study when irrigation was properly scheduled onto dry fields. These observations suggest that irrigation scheduling and proper management were more important to water quality than remedial actions such as controlled drainage or vegetative buffers.</description><subject>drainage water</subject><subject>filter strips</subject><subject>irrigation water</subject><subject>pig manure</subject><subject>pollution control</subject><subject>TECHNICAL PAPERS</subject><subject>wastewater irrigation</subject><subject>water pollution</subject><subject>water quality</subject><issn>0733-9437</issn><issn>1943-4774</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU9vEzEQxS1EJULKZ8AnSA5LZ2xnvekBqYSUVqqEUCkcLa__RFtt1q3tBfXb19ugcoPTjJ5-epp5j5D3CB8QajxZnF1vtkuQnFdrweWCAdRL5OyULXC1Xr4gMyx6JaQUL8nsmXtFXqd0C4BCAsxI2HrvTKbB000Ycgx97yz9HHU36J2jerD0h9u5rHP3y9FPY6FjomH4i_zU2UX6bdR9lx-oj2FfpJTd7yf9MsZuVzZLzzvX23RMjrzuk3vzZ87Jzfn2--aiuvr65XJzdlVpATJXaEzr7ZrJtkHGLBjGuEEL0GojVjU0q4bLVlgPaI2ztbDlHdswaZ3hvjV8Tt4dfO9iuB9dymrfJeP6Xg8ujEmxRjZYr8R_QZRYNzWrC_jxAJoYUorOq7vY7XV8UAhqakSpqRE1Ja2mpNXUiCqNKKZKI8Xg7cHA66D0LnZJ3VwzQA4IjeDlwzk5PRC6XKBuwxiHktGz_7_tHwHcnJtR</recordid><startdate>20060401</startdate><enddate>20060401</enddate><creator>Jia, Z</creator><creator>Evans, R. O</creator><creator>Smith, J. T</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060401</creationdate><title>Effect of Controlled Drainage and Vegetative Buffers on Drainage Water Quality from Wastewater Irrigated Fields</title><author>Jia, Z ; Evans, R. O ; Smith, J. T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a407t-1ccbfd927b8122d0c223c1d00bac456085837b4df01dced64d470d827dec3fbc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>drainage water</topic><topic>filter strips</topic><topic>irrigation water</topic><topic>pig manure</topic><topic>pollution control</topic><topic>TECHNICAL PAPERS</topic><topic>wastewater irrigation</topic><topic>water pollution</topic><topic>water quality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jia, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, R. O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, J. T</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jia, Z</au><au>Evans, R. O</au><au>Smith, J. T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of Controlled Drainage and Vegetative Buffers on Drainage Water Quality from Wastewater Irrigated Fields</atitle><jtitle>Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering</jtitle><date>2006-04-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>132</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>159</spage><epage>170</epage><pages>159-170</pages><issn>0733-9437</issn><eissn>1943-4774</eissn><abstract>Lagoon effluent is routinely applied to agricultural fields as fertilizer to utilize nutrients derived from animal manures. In humid regions, effluent is also applied to fields in order to manage the lagoon stage within acceptable levels. To minimize the risk of applied nutrients being transported to surface waters, best management practices such as vegetative buffers and controlled drainage are often recommended. This paper presents the results of a field study to evaluate the effectiveness of controlled drainage and vegetative buffers in reducing the transport of wastewater nutrients from land application fields. Swine lagoon effluent was spray irrigated to Bermudagrass fields drained by a parallel ditch system. Drainage outflow was monitored continuously for a 3 year period. Vegetative buffers reduced the average concentration of phosphorus by about 30%, but the average concentration of nitrogen was not affected. Controlled drainage resulted in higher individual event nitrogen concentrations, which were due primarily to irrigation onto fields at times when they were too wet to be effectively irrigated. In most cases, the concentration of total N in drainage was comparable to the values observed from other agricultural fields receiving inorganic fertilizer. However, the nitrogen was mainly in the ammonium form rather than nitrate, which could pose greater environmental risk to some fish and other aquatic species in surface waters. The peak concentrations were higher for the controlled drainage treatments than for conventional drainage. The loss of nitrogen in drainage water accounted for roughly 10% of the amount applied (8% on the conventional drainage treatments and 11% on the controlled drainage treatments). On two plots (one controlled, one conventional), more than 40% of the total N transport over the 3 year study period was associated with one extended flow event when wastewater was applied several times while the water table was near the surface. These poorly scheduled irrigations onto already wet fields resulted in as much N and P transport in one event as occurred during the remainder of the study when irrigation was properly scheduled onto dry fields. These observations suggest that irrigation scheduling and proper management were more important to water quality than remedial actions such as controlled drainage or vegetative buffers.</abstract><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2006)132:2(159)</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0733-9437
ispartof Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering, 2006-04, Vol.132 (2), p.159-170
issn 0733-9437
1943-4774
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28781654
source American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014
subjects drainage water
filter strips
irrigation water
pig manure
pollution control
TECHNICAL PAPERS
wastewater irrigation
water pollution
water quality
title Effect of Controlled Drainage and Vegetative Buffers on Drainage Water Quality from Wastewater Irrigated Fields
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T17%3A29%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20Controlled%20Drainage%20and%20Vegetative%20Buffers%20on%20Drainage%20Water%20Quality%20from%20Wastewater%20Irrigated%20Fields&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20irrigation%20and%20drainage%20engineering&rft.au=Jia,%20Z&rft.date=2006-04-01&rft.volume=132&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=159&rft.epage=170&rft.pages=159-170&rft.issn=0733-9437&rft.eissn=1943-4774&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2006)132:2(159)&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E28781654%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17168626&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true