Transcatheter Vacuum-Assisted Mass Extraction versus Surgical Debridement for Vegetations in Tricuspid Valve Infective Endocarditis: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
Tricuspid valve infective endocarditis (TVIE), often associated with vegetation in people who inject drugs, has introduced a less invasive option for vegetation removal: transcatheter vacuum-assisted mass extraction (TVME). This technique is emerging as an alternative to standard surgical debridemen...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of cardiology 2024-01, Vol.210, p.69-75 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 75 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 69 |
container_title | The American journal of cardiology |
container_volume | 210 |
creator | Kim, Andrew Geunwon Salazar, Adolfo Martinez Panama, Gabriel Saeed, Moiz Sabanci, Rand Al-Asad, Khalid Saeed Yavari, Majid Prasad, Rohan Madhu Rayamajhi, Supratik Abela, George S. |
description | Tricuspid valve infective endocarditis (TVIE), often associated with vegetation in people who inject drugs, has introduced a less invasive option for vegetation removal: transcatheter vacuum-assisted mass extraction (TVME). This technique is emerging as an alternative to standard surgical debridement (SD) and valve repair. However, the comparative effectiveness of TVME versus SD in treating TVIE has yet to be investigated.
A comprehensive systematic literature search was performed on PUBMED, EMBASE, and COCHRANE to identify all relevant studies comparing TVME with SD in patients with TVIE. The search covered studies from inception up to August 15, 2023. For data analysis, Review Manager (RevMan) 5.4 software was employed, using a random-effects model to calculate risk ratios (RR), mean differences, and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Five studies included a total of 431 patients (244 in the TVME arm and 187 in the SD arm). In-hospital mortality (p=0.72), procedural mortality (p=0.77), 30-day mortality (p=0.25), and 1-year mortality (p=0.44) insignificantly favored SD over TVME. Overall mortality across the five studies insignificantly favored TVME over SD (RR=0.66, 95% CI 0.31-1.39, p=0.27, I2=57%). When addressing heterogeneity by excluding one study, no statistical significance in the difference between the two arms regarding overall mortality was observed (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.60-1.63, p=0.97, I2=0%).
This meta-analysis of the five observational studies found no significant difference in overall mortality between TVME and SD for the treatment of TVIE. However, prospective randomized controlled trials are necessary to further understand and compare the outcomes of these two approaches. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.10.021 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2878018090</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002914923011554</els_id><sourcerecordid>2878018090</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-37bcdb27f1859bca92ad6f9f35aeda841583a1fc26926ea03ab1b61595c517c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctuUzEQhi0EoqHwCCBLbLo5wZeci9mgqIRSqVUXjdhaPvac4uhcgseO6EPxjvg0gQUbVh6Pvv-f0fyEvOVsyRmvPuyWZthZE9xSMCFzb8kEf0YWvKlVwRWXz8mCMSYKxVfqjLxC3OUv52X1kpzJupGqUmxBfm2DGdGa-B0iBPrN2JSGYo3oMYKjtwaRbn7GYGz000gPEDAhvU_hwVvT08_QBu9ggDHSbsp6eIBoZhSpH-k2eJtw71027g9Ar8cOslGuNqOb5u199PiRrultlhXr0fSPeTKdOnrXIoTDk1Wecx-T84CvyYvO9AhvTu852X7ZbC-_Fjd3V9eX65vCSiVjIevWulbUHW9K1VqjhHFVpzpZGnCmWfGykYZ3VlRKVGCYNC1vK16q0pa8tvKcXBxt92H6kQCjHjxa6HszwpRQi6ZuGG-YYhl9_w-6m1LIK8-UamStBFtlqjxSNkyIATq9D34w4VFzpuc49U6f4tRznHM7x5l1707uqR3A_VX9yS8Dn44A5GscPASN1sNowfmQL63d5P8z4jfI5bcy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2898379204</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transcatheter Vacuum-Assisted Mass Extraction versus Surgical Debridement for Vegetations in Tricuspid Valve Infective Endocarditis: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Kim, Andrew Geunwon ; Salazar, Adolfo Martinez ; Panama, Gabriel ; Saeed, Moiz ; Sabanci, Rand ; Al-Asad, Khalid Saeed ; Yavari, Majid ; Prasad, Rohan Madhu ; Rayamajhi, Supratik ; Abela, George S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Andrew Geunwon ; Salazar, Adolfo Martinez ; Panama, Gabriel ; Saeed, Moiz ; Sabanci, Rand ; Al-Asad, Khalid Saeed ; Yavari, Majid ; Prasad, Rohan Madhu ; Rayamajhi, Supratik ; Abela, George S.</creatorcontrib><description>Tricuspid valve infective endocarditis (TVIE), often associated with vegetation in people who inject drugs, has introduced a less invasive option for vegetation removal: transcatheter vacuum-assisted mass extraction (TVME). This technique is emerging as an alternative to standard surgical debridement (SD) and valve repair. However, the comparative effectiveness of TVME versus SD in treating TVIE has yet to be investigated.
A comprehensive systematic literature search was performed on PUBMED, EMBASE, and COCHRANE to identify all relevant studies comparing TVME with SD in patients with TVIE. The search covered studies from inception up to August 15, 2023. For data analysis, Review Manager (RevMan) 5.4 software was employed, using a random-effects model to calculate risk ratios (RR), mean differences, and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Five studies included a total of 431 patients (244 in the TVME arm and 187 in the SD arm). In-hospital mortality (p=0.72), procedural mortality (p=0.77), 30-day mortality (p=0.25), and 1-year mortality (p=0.44) insignificantly favored SD over TVME. Overall mortality across the five studies insignificantly favored TVME over SD (RR=0.66, 95% CI 0.31-1.39, p=0.27, I2=57%). When addressing heterogeneity by excluding one study, no statistical significance in the difference between the two arms regarding overall mortality was observed (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.60-1.63, p=0.97, I2=0%).
This meta-analysis of the five observational studies found no significant difference in overall mortality between TVME and SD for the treatment of TVIE. However, prospective randomized controlled trials are necessary to further understand and compare the outcomes of these two approaches.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9149</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1879-1913</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1913</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.10.021</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37839690</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>angiovac ; Case reports ; Clinical outcomes ; Clinical trials ; Data analysis ; Debridement ; Drug use ; Endocarditis ; Endocarditis - complications ; Heterogeneity ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Intervention ; intraveous drug use ; Meta-analysis ; Mortality ; Observational studies ; Observational Studies as Topic ; Patients ; Prospective Studies ; Software ; Statistical analysis ; suction thrombectomy ; Surgery ; surgical tricuspid valve repair ; transcatheter vacuum-assisted mass extraction ; Treatment Outcome ; Tricuspid valve ; Tricuspid Valve - surgery ; tricuspid valve infective endocarditis ; Vacuum ; Vegetation</subject><ispartof>The American journal of cardiology, 2024-01, Vol.210, p.69-75</ispartof><rights>2023</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2023. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-37bcdb27f1859bca92ad6f9f35aeda841583a1fc26926ea03ab1b61595c517c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-37bcdb27f1859bca92ad6f9f35aeda841583a1fc26926ea03ab1b61595c517c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1009-9396</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2898379204?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,64384,64386,64388,72240</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37839690$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Andrew Geunwon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salazar, Adolfo Martinez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panama, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saeed, Moiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabanci, Rand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Asad, Khalid Saeed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yavari, Majid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prasad, Rohan Madhu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rayamajhi, Supratik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abela, George S.</creatorcontrib><title>Transcatheter Vacuum-Assisted Mass Extraction versus Surgical Debridement for Vegetations in Tricuspid Valve Infective Endocarditis: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies</title><title>The American journal of cardiology</title><addtitle>Am J Cardiol</addtitle><description>Tricuspid valve infective endocarditis (TVIE), often associated with vegetation in people who inject drugs, has introduced a less invasive option for vegetation removal: transcatheter vacuum-assisted mass extraction (TVME). This technique is emerging as an alternative to standard surgical debridement (SD) and valve repair. However, the comparative effectiveness of TVME versus SD in treating TVIE has yet to be investigated.
A comprehensive systematic literature search was performed on PUBMED, EMBASE, and COCHRANE to identify all relevant studies comparing TVME with SD in patients with TVIE. The search covered studies from inception up to August 15, 2023. For data analysis, Review Manager (RevMan) 5.4 software was employed, using a random-effects model to calculate risk ratios (RR), mean differences, and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Five studies included a total of 431 patients (244 in the TVME arm and 187 in the SD arm). In-hospital mortality (p=0.72), procedural mortality (p=0.77), 30-day mortality (p=0.25), and 1-year mortality (p=0.44) insignificantly favored SD over TVME. Overall mortality across the five studies insignificantly favored TVME over SD (RR=0.66, 95% CI 0.31-1.39, p=0.27, I2=57%). When addressing heterogeneity by excluding one study, no statistical significance in the difference between the two arms regarding overall mortality was observed (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.60-1.63, p=0.97, I2=0%).
This meta-analysis of the five observational studies found no significant difference in overall mortality between TVME and SD for the treatment of TVIE. However, prospective randomized controlled trials are necessary to further understand and compare the outcomes of these two approaches.</description><subject>angiovac</subject><subject>Case reports</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Debridement</subject><subject>Drug use</subject><subject>Endocarditis</subject><subject>Endocarditis - complications</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>intraveous drug use</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Observational studies</subject><subject>Observational Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>suction thrombectomy</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>surgical tricuspid valve repair</subject><subject>transcatheter vacuum-assisted mass extraction</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tricuspid valve</subject><subject>Tricuspid Valve - surgery</subject><subject>tricuspid valve infective endocarditis</subject><subject>Vacuum</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><issn>0002-9149</issn><issn>1879-1913</issn><issn>1879-1913</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctuUzEQhi0EoqHwCCBLbLo5wZeci9mgqIRSqVUXjdhaPvac4uhcgseO6EPxjvg0gQUbVh6Pvv-f0fyEvOVsyRmvPuyWZthZE9xSMCFzb8kEf0YWvKlVwRWXz8mCMSYKxVfqjLxC3OUv52X1kpzJupGqUmxBfm2DGdGa-B0iBPrN2JSGYo3oMYKjtwaRbn7GYGz000gPEDAhvU_hwVvT08_QBu9ggDHSbsp6eIBoZhSpH-k2eJtw71027g9Ar8cOslGuNqOb5u199PiRrultlhXr0fSPeTKdOnrXIoTDk1Wecx-T84CvyYvO9AhvTu852X7ZbC-_Fjd3V9eX65vCSiVjIevWulbUHW9K1VqjhHFVpzpZGnCmWfGykYZ3VlRKVGCYNC1vK16q0pa8tvKcXBxt92H6kQCjHjxa6HszwpRQi6ZuGG-YYhl9_w-6m1LIK8-UamStBFtlqjxSNkyIATq9D34w4VFzpuc49U6f4tRznHM7x5l1707uqR3A_VX9yS8Dn44A5GscPASN1sNowfmQL63d5P8z4jfI5bcy</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Kim, Andrew Geunwon</creator><creator>Salazar, Adolfo Martinez</creator><creator>Panama, Gabriel</creator><creator>Saeed, Moiz</creator><creator>Sabanci, Rand</creator><creator>Al-Asad, Khalid Saeed</creator><creator>Yavari, Majid</creator><creator>Prasad, Rohan Madhu</creator><creator>Rayamajhi, Supratik</creator><creator>Abela, George S.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1009-9396</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>Transcatheter Vacuum-Assisted Mass Extraction versus Surgical Debridement for Vegetations in Tricuspid Valve Infective Endocarditis: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies</title><author>Kim, Andrew Geunwon ; Salazar, Adolfo Martinez ; Panama, Gabriel ; Saeed, Moiz ; Sabanci, Rand ; Al-Asad, Khalid Saeed ; Yavari, Majid ; Prasad, Rohan Madhu ; Rayamajhi, Supratik ; Abela, George S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-37bcdb27f1859bca92ad6f9f35aeda841583a1fc26926ea03ab1b61595c517c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>angiovac</topic><topic>Case reports</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Debridement</topic><topic>Drug use</topic><topic>Endocarditis</topic><topic>Endocarditis - complications</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>intraveous drug use</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Observational studies</topic><topic>Observational Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>suction thrombectomy</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>surgical tricuspid valve repair</topic><topic>transcatheter vacuum-assisted mass extraction</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tricuspid valve</topic><topic>Tricuspid Valve - surgery</topic><topic>tricuspid valve infective endocarditis</topic><topic>Vacuum</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Andrew Geunwon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salazar, Adolfo Martinez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panama, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saeed, Moiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabanci, Rand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Asad, Khalid Saeed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yavari, Majid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prasad, Rohan Madhu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rayamajhi, Supratik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abela, George S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Andrew Geunwon</au><au>Salazar, Adolfo Martinez</au><au>Panama, Gabriel</au><au>Saeed, Moiz</au><au>Sabanci, Rand</au><au>Al-Asad, Khalid Saeed</au><au>Yavari, Majid</au><au>Prasad, Rohan Madhu</au><au>Rayamajhi, Supratik</au><au>Abela, George S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transcatheter Vacuum-Assisted Mass Extraction versus Surgical Debridement for Vegetations in Tricuspid Valve Infective Endocarditis: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Cardiol</addtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>210</volume><spage>69</spage><epage>75</epage><pages>69-75</pages><issn>0002-9149</issn><issn>1879-1913</issn><eissn>1879-1913</eissn><abstract>Tricuspid valve infective endocarditis (TVIE), often associated with vegetation in people who inject drugs, has introduced a less invasive option for vegetation removal: transcatheter vacuum-assisted mass extraction (TVME). This technique is emerging as an alternative to standard surgical debridement (SD) and valve repair. However, the comparative effectiveness of TVME versus SD in treating TVIE has yet to be investigated.
A comprehensive systematic literature search was performed on PUBMED, EMBASE, and COCHRANE to identify all relevant studies comparing TVME with SD in patients with TVIE. The search covered studies from inception up to August 15, 2023. For data analysis, Review Manager (RevMan) 5.4 software was employed, using a random-effects model to calculate risk ratios (RR), mean differences, and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Five studies included a total of 431 patients (244 in the TVME arm and 187 in the SD arm). In-hospital mortality (p=0.72), procedural mortality (p=0.77), 30-day mortality (p=0.25), and 1-year mortality (p=0.44) insignificantly favored SD over TVME. Overall mortality across the five studies insignificantly favored TVME over SD (RR=0.66, 95% CI 0.31-1.39, p=0.27, I2=57%). When addressing heterogeneity by excluding one study, no statistical significance in the difference between the two arms regarding overall mortality was observed (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.60-1.63, p=0.97, I2=0%).
This meta-analysis of the five observational studies found no significant difference in overall mortality between TVME and SD for the treatment of TVIE. However, prospective randomized controlled trials are necessary to further understand and compare the outcomes of these two approaches.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>37839690</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.10.021</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1009-9396</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9149 |
ispartof | The American journal of cardiology, 2024-01, Vol.210, p.69-75 |
issn | 0002-9149 1879-1913 1879-1913 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2878018090 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | angiovac Case reports Clinical outcomes Clinical trials Data analysis Debridement Drug use Endocarditis Endocarditis - complications Heterogeneity Hospitalization Humans Intervention intraveous drug use Meta-analysis Mortality Observational studies Observational Studies as Topic Patients Prospective Studies Software Statistical analysis suction thrombectomy Surgery surgical tricuspid valve repair transcatheter vacuum-assisted mass extraction Treatment Outcome Tricuspid valve Tricuspid Valve - surgery tricuspid valve infective endocarditis Vacuum Vegetation |
title | Transcatheter Vacuum-Assisted Mass Extraction versus Surgical Debridement for Vegetations in Tricuspid Valve Infective Endocarditis: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T10%3A55%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transcatheter%20Vacuum-Assisted%20Mass%20Extraction%20versus%20Surgical%20Debridement%20for%20Vegetations%20in%20Tricuspid%20Valve%20Infective%20Endocarditis:%20A%20Meta-Analysis%20of%20Observational%20Studies&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20cardiology&rft.au=Kim,%20Andrew%20Geunwon&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=210&rft.spage=69&rft.epage=75&rft.pages=69-75&rft.issn=0002-9149&rft.eissn=1879-1913&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.10.021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2878018090%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2898379204&rft_id=info:pmid/37839690&rft_els_id=S0002914923011554&rfr_iscdi=true |