On credibility of simulation studies of telecommunication networks

In telecommunication networks, as in many other areas of science and engineering, the proliferation of computers as research tools has resulted in the adoption of computer simulation as the most commonly used paradigm of scientific investigations. This, together with a plethora of existing simulatio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE communications magazine 2002-01, Vol.40 (1), p.132-139
Hauptverfasser: Pawlikowski, K., Jeong, H.-D.J., Lee, J.-S.R.
Format: Magazinearticle
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 139
container_issue 1
container_start_page 132
container_title IEEE communications magazine
container_volume 40
creator Pawlikowski, K.
Jeong, H.-D.J.
Lee, J.-S.R.
description In telecommunication networks, as in many other areas of science and engineering, the proliferation of computers as research tools has resulted in the adoption of computer simulation as the most commonly used paradigm of scientific investigations. This, together with a plethora of existing simulation languages and packages, has created a popular opinion that simulation is mainly an exercise in computer programming. In new computing environments, programming can be minimized, or even fully replaced, by the manipulation of icons (representing prebuilt programming objects containing basic functional blocks of simulated systems) on a computer monitor. One can say that we have witnessed another success of modern science and technology: the emergence of wonderful and powerful tools for exploring and predicting the behavior of such complex stochastic dynamic systems as telecommunication networks. But this enthusiasm is not shared by all researchers in this area. An opinion is spreading that one cannot rely on the majority of the published results on performance evaluation studies of telecommunication networks based on stochastic simulation, since they lack credibility. Indeed, the spread of this phenomenon is so wide that one can speak about a deep crisis of credibility. In this article this claim is supported by the results of a survey of over 2200 publications on telecommunication networks in proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM and such journals as IEEE Transactions on Communications, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, and Performance Evaluation Journal. The discussion focuses on two important necessary conditions of a credible simulation study: use of appropriate pseudo-random generators of independent uniformly distributed numbers, and appropriate analysis of simulation output data. Having considered their perils and pitfalls, we formulate guidelines that, if observed, could help to ensure a basic level of credibility of simulation studies of telecommunication networks.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/35.978060
format Magazinearticle
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28777913</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>978060</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>27594041</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-70523bec8de7d392e097f5aaf5db640153e926b46f7314e0ae394ab8ef0d2fbb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0TtLxEAQB_BFFDwfha1VsFAscs5m36UevuDgGq2XPGZhzyR7ZhPkvr05clhYaDUw82OG4U_IBYU5pWDumJgbpUHCAZlRIXRKtZGHZAZUslRq4MfkJMY1ACil9Yw8rNqk7LDyha99v02CS6JvhjrvfWiT2A-Vx7jr9lhjGZpmaH05DVvsv0L3Ec_IkcvriOf7ekrenx7fFi_pcvX8urhfpiWHrE8ViIwVWOoKVcVMhmCUE3nuRFVIDlQwNJksuHSKUY6QIzM8LzQ6qDJXFOyU3Ex7N134HDD2tvGxxLrOWwxDtAaU0SoDM8rrP2WmlVKGsv-hEoYDpyO8-gXXYeja8V2rNedGS7E7ezuhsgsxdujspvNN3m0tBbtLxzJhp3RGezlZj4g_bj_8BnQtiak</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><pqid>884498659</pqid></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>On credibility of simulation studies of telecommunication networks</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Pawlikowski, K. ; Jeong, H.-D.J. ; Lee, J.-S.R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pawlikowski, K. ; Jeong, H.-D.J. ; Lee, J.-S.R.</creatorcontrib><description>In telecommunication networks, as in many other areas of science and engineering, the proliferation of computers as research tools has resulted in the adoption of computer simulation as the most commonly used paradigm of scientific investigations. This, together with a plethora of existing simulation languages and packages, has created a popular opinion that simulation is mainly an exercise in computer programming. In new computing environments, programming can be minimized, or even fully replaced, by the manipulation of icons (representing prebuilt programming objects containing basic functional blocks of simulated systems) on a computer monitor. One can say that we have witnessed another success of modern science and technology: the emergence of wonderful and powerful tools for exploring and predicting the behavior of such complex stochastic dynamic systems as telecommunication networks. But this enthusiasm is not shared by all researchers in this area. An opinion is spreading that one cannot rely on the majority of the published results on performance evaluation studies of telecommunication networks based on stochastic simulation, since they lack credibility. Indeed, the spread of this phenomenon is so wide that one can speak about a deep crisis of credibility. In this article this claim is supported by the results of a survey of over 2200 publications on telecommunication networks in proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM and such journals as IEEE Transactions on Communications, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, and Performance Evaluation Journal. The discussion focuses on two important necessary conditions of a credible simulation study: use of appropriate pseudo-random generators of independent uniformly distributed numbers, and appropriate analysis of simulation output data. Having considered their perils and pitfalls, we formulate guidelines that, if observed, could help to ensure a basic level of credibility of simulation studies of telecommunication networks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0163-6804</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-1896</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/35.978060</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ICOMD9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Analytical models ; Computational modeling ; Computer displays ; Computer networks ; Computer programs ; Computer simulation ; Dynamical systems ; Dynamics ; Functional programming ; Mathematical models ; Networks ; Packaging ; Performance evaluation ; Programming ; Stochastic processes ; Stochastic systems ; Studies ; Telecommunication computing ; Telecommunications</subject><ispartof>IEEE communications magazine, 2002-01, Vol.40 (1), p.132-139</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2002</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-70523bec8de7d392e097f5aaf5db640153e926b46f7314e0ae394ab8ef0d2fbb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-70523bec8de7d392e097f5aaf5db640153e926b46f7314e0ae394ab8ef0d2fbb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/978060$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>780,784,796,27925,54758</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/978060$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pawlikowski, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, H.-D.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, J.-S.R.</creatorcontrib><title>On credibility of simulation studies of telecommunication networks</title><title>IEEE communications magazine</title><addtitle>COM-M</addtitle><description>In telecommunication networks, as in many other areas of science and engineering, the proliferation of computers as research tools has resulted in the adoption of computer simulation as the most commonly used paradigm of scientific investigations. This, together with a plethora of existing simulation languages and packages, has created a popular opinion that simulation is mainly an exercise in computer programming. In new computing environments, programming can be minimized, or even fully replaced, by the manipulation of icons (representing prebuilt programming objects containing basic functional blocks of simulated systems) on a computer monitor. One can say that we have witnessed another success of modern science and technology: the emergence of wonderful and powerful tools for exploring and predicting the behavior of such complex stochastic dynamic systems as telecommunication networks. But this enthusiasm is not shared by all researchers in this area. An opinion is spreading that one cannot rely on the majority of the published results on performance evaluation studies of telecommunication networks based on stochastic simulation, since they lack credibility. Indeed, the spread of this phenomenon is so wide that one can speak about a deep crisis of credibility. In this article this claim is supported by the results of a survey of over 2200 publications on telecommunication networks in proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM and such journals as IEEE Transactions on Communications, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, and Performance Evaluation Journal. The discussion focuses on two important necessary conditions of a credible simulation study: use of appropriate pseudo-random generators of independent uniformly distributed numbers, and appropriate analysis of simulation output data. Having considered their perils and pitfalls, we formulate guidelines that, if observed, could help to ensure a basic level of credibility of simulation studies of telecommunication networks.</description><subject>Analytical models</subject><subject>Computational modeling</subject><subject>Computer displays</subject><subject>Computer networks</subject><subject>Computer programs</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Dynamical systems</subject><subject>Dynamics</subject><subject>Functional programming</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Packaging</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Programming</subject><subject>Stochastic processes</subject><subject>Stochastic systems</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Telecommunication computing</subject><subject>Telecommunications</subject><issn>0163-6804</issn><issn>1558-1896</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0TtLxEAQB_BFFDwfha1VsFAscs5m36UevuDgGq2XPGZhzyR7ZhPkvr05clhYaDUw82OG4U_IBYU5pWDumJgbpUHCAZlRIXRKtZGHZAZUslRq4MfkJMY1ACil9Yw8rNqk7LDyha99v02CS6JvhjrvfWiT2A-Vx7jr9lhjGZpmaH05DVvsv0L3Ec_IkcvriOf7ekrenx7fFi_pcvX8urhfpiWHrE8ViIwVWOoKVcVMhmCUE3nuRFVIDlQwNJksuHSKUY6QIzM8LzQ6qDJXFOyU3Ex7N134HDD2tvGxxLrOWwxDtAaU0SoDM8rrP2WmlVKGsv-hEoYDpyO8-gXXYeja8V2rNedGS7E7ezuhsgsxdujspvNN3m0tBbtLxzJhp3RGezlZj4g_bj_8BnQtiak</recordid><startdate>200201</startdate><enddate>200201</enddate><creator>Pawlikowski, K.</creator><creator>Jeong, H.-D.J.</creator><creator>Lee, J.-S.R.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200201</creationdate><title>On credibility of simulation studies of telecommunication networks</title><author>Pawlikowski, K. ; Jeong, H.-D.J. ; Lee, J.-S.R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-70523bec8de7d392e097f5aaf5db640153e926b46f7314e0ae394ab8ef0d2fbb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Analytical models</topic><topic>Computational modeling</topic><topic>Computer displays</topic><topic>Computer networks</topic><topic>Computer programs</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Dynamical systems</topic><topic>Dynamics</topic><topic>Functional programming</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Packaging</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Programming</topic><topic>Stochastic processes</topic><topic>Stochastic systems</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Telecommunication computing</topic><topic>Telecommunications</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pawlikowski, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, H.-D.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, J.-S.R.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>IEEE communications magazine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pawlikowski, K.</au><au>Jeong, H.-D.J.</au><au>Lee, J.-S.R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On credibility of simulation studies of telecommunication networks</atitle><jtitle>IEEE communications magazine</jtitle><stitle>COM-M</stitle><date>2002-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>132</spage><epage>139</epage><pages>132-139</pages><issn>0163-6804</issn><eissn>1558-1896</eissn><coden>ICOMD9</coden><abstract>In telecommunication networks, as in many other areas of science and engineering, the proliferation of computers as research tools has resulted in the adoption of computer simulation as the most commonly used paradigm of scientific investigations. This, together with a plethora of existing simulation languages and packages, has created a popular opinion that simulation is mainly an exercise in computer programming. In new computing environments, programming can be minimized, or even fully replaced, by the manipulation of icons (representing prebuilt programming objects containing basic functional blocks of simulated systems) on a computer monitor. One can say that we have witnessed another success of modern science and technology: the emergence of wonderful and powerful tools for exploring and predicting the behavior of such complex stochastic dynamic systems as telecommunication networks. But this enthusiasm is not shared by all researchers in this area. An opinion is spreading that one cannot rely on the majority of the published results on performance evaluation studies of telecommunication networks based on stochastic simulation, since they lack credibility. Indeed, the spread of this phenomenon is so wide that one can speak about a deep crisis of credibility. In this article this claim is supported by the results of a survey of over 2200 publications on telecommunication networks in proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM and such journals as IEEE Transactions on Communications, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, and Performance Evaluation Journal. The discussion focuses on two important necessary conditions of a credible simulation study: use of appropriate pseudo-random generators of independent uniformly distributed numbers, and appropriate analysis of simulation output data. Having considered their perils and pitfalls, we formulate guidelines that, if observed, could help to ensure a basic level of credibility of simulation studies of telecommunication networks.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/35.978060</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0163-6804
ispartof IEEE communications magazine, 2002-01, Vol.40 (1), p.132-139
issn 0163-6804
1558-1896
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28777913
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
subjects Analytical models
Computational modeling
Computer displays
Computer networks
Computer programs
Computer simulation
Dynamical systems
Dynamics
Functional programming
Mathematical models
Networks
Packaging
Performance evaluation
Programming
Stochastic processes
Stochastic systems
Studies
Telecommunication computing
Telecommunications
title On credibility of simulation studies of telecommunication networks
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T15%3A02%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20credibility%20of%20simulation%20studies%20of%20telecommunication%20networks&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20communications%20magazine&rft.au=Pawlikowski,%20K.&rft.date=2002-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=132&rft.epage=139&rft.pages=132-139&rft.issn=0163-6804&rft.eissn=1558-1896&rft.coden=ICOMD9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/35.978060&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E27594041%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=884498659&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=978060&rfr_iscdi=true