Diagnosis and management of anastomotic leaks after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: a single-center experience
Purpose Esophageal anastomotic leaks (ALs) after esophagectomy are a common and serious complication. The incidence, diagnostic approach, and management have changed over time. We described the diagnosis and management of patients who developed an esophageal AL after an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy at o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Langenbeck's archives of surgery 2023-10, Vol.408 (1), p.397-397, Article 397 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 397 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 397 |
container_title | Langenbeck's archives of surgery |
container_volume | 408 |
creator | Latorre-Rodríguez, Andrés R. Huang, Jasmine Schaheen, Lara Smith, Michael A. Hashimi, Samad Bremner, Ross M. Mittal, Sumeet K. |
description | Purpose
Esophageal anastomotic leaks (ALs) after esophagectomy are a common and serious complication. The incidence, diagnostic approach, and management have changed over time. We described the diagnosis and management of patients who developed an esophageal AL after an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy at our center.
Methods
After IRB approval, we queried our prospectively maintained database for patients who developed an esophageal AL after esophagectomy from August 2016 through July 2022. Data pertaining to demographics, comorbidities, surgical and oncological characteristics, and clinical course were extracted and analyzed.
Results
During the study period, 145 patients underwent an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy; 10 (6.9%) developed an AL, diagnosed a median of 7.5 days after surgery, and detected by enteric contents in wound drains (
n
= 3), endoscopy (
n
= 3), CT (
n
= 2), and contrast esophagogram (
n
= 2). Nine patients (90%) had an increasing white blood cell count and additional signs of sepsis. One asymptomatic patient was identified by contrast esophagography. All patients received enteral nutritional support, intravenous antibiotics, and antifungals. Primary treatment of ALs included endoscopic placement of a self-expanding metal stent (SEMS;
n
= 6), surgery (
n
= 2), and SEMS with endoluminal vacuum therapy (
n
= 2). One patient required surgery after SEMS placement. The median length of ICU and total hospital stays were 11.5 and 22.5 days, respectively. There was no 30-day mortality.
Conclusion
The incidence of esophageal ALs at our center is similar to that of other high-volume centers. Most ALs can be managed without surgery; however, ALs remain a significant source of postoperative morbidity despite clinical advancements that have improved mortality. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00423-023-03121-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2877385466</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2877385466</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-b43b6d29b353d4e793b68b6cf8dca277ae64d078d0cd6909af1a73e7af6d67773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPhDAYRRujccbRP-DCsHSDFgotuDPja5JJ3Oi6Ke0HwwgttqAz_94S1Lhy8aWvc27Si9B5hK8ijNm1wziJSYjHIVEchbsDNI8SkoZxkkaHf_YzdOLcFmNMWZ4coxlhmRcwnqPNXS0qbVztAqFV0AotKmhB94Ep_Y1wvWlNX8ugAfHmmbIHG6w-jA3W8OklcKbbeEV6bn8TiMDVumoglD7Ck7DrwNagJZyio1I0Ds6-1wV6fbh_WT6F6-fH1fJ2Hco4z_qwSEhBVZwXJCUqAZb7Y1ZQWWZKipgxATRRmGUKS0VznIsyEowAEyVVlDFGFuhyyu2seR_A9bytnYSmERrM4HiceShLE0o9Gk-otMY5CyXvbN0Ku-cR5mPDfGqY43HGhvnOSxff-UPRgvpVfir1AJkA5590BZZvzWC1__N_sV-x0Ii0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2877385466</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnosis and management of anastomotic leaks after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: a single-center experience</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Latorre-Rodríguez, Andrés R. ; Huang, Jasmine ; Schaheen, Lara ; Smith, Michael A. ; Hashimi, Samad ; Bremner, Ross M. ; Mittal, Sumeet K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Latorre-Rodríguez, Andrés R. ; Huang, Jasmine ; Schaheen, Lara ; Smith, Michael A. ; Hashimi, Samad ; Bremner, Ross M. ; Mittal, Sumeet K.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
Esophageal anastomotic leaks (ALs) after esophagectomy are a common and serious complication. The incidence, diagnostic approach, and management have changed over time. We described the diagnosis and management of patients who developed an esophageal AL after an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy at our center.
Methods
After IRB approval, we queried our prospectively maintained database for patients who developed an esophageal AL after esophagectomy from August 2016 through July 2022. Data pertaining to demographics, comorbidities, surgical and oncological characteristics, and clinical course were extracted and analyzed.
Results
During the study period, 145 patients underwent an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy; 10 (6.9%) developed an AL, diagnosed a median of 7.5 days after surgery, and detected by enteric contents in wound drains (
n
= 3), endoscopy (
n
= 3), CT (
n
= 2), and contrast esophagogram (
n
= 2). Nine patients (90%) had an increasing white blood cell count and additional signs of sepsis. One asymptomatic patient was identified by contrast esophagography. All patients received enteral nutritional support, intravenous antibiotics, and antifungals. Primary treatment of ALs included endoscopic placement of a self-expanding metal stent (SEMS;
n
= 6), surgery (
n
= 2), and SEMS with endoluminal vacuum therapy (
n
= 2). One patient required surgery after SEMS placement. The median length of ICU and total hospital stays were 11.5 and 22.5 days, respectively. There was no 30-day mortality.
Conclusion
The incidence of esophageal ALs at our center is similar to that of other high-volume centers. Most ALs can be managed without surgery; however, ALs remain a significant source of postoperative morbidity despite clinical advancements that have improved mortality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1435-2451</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-2451</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-03121-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37831200</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Abdominal Surgery ; Anastomosis, Surgical - adverse effects ; Anastomotic Leak - diagnosis ; Anastomotic Leak - etiology ; Anastomotic Leak - therapy ; Cardiac Surgery ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - adverse effects ; Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery ; Esophagectomy - adverse effects ; General Surgery ; Humans ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Postoperative Complications - diagnosis ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Thoracic Surgery ; Traumatic Surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Vascular Surgery</subject><ispartof>Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2023-10, Vol.408 (1), p.397-397, Article 397</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-b43b6d29b353d4e793b68b6cf8dca277ae64d078d0cd6909af1a73e7af6d67773</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00423-023-03121-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00423-023-03121-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37831200$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Latorre-Rodríguez, Andrés R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Jasmine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaheen, Lara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hashimi, Samad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bremner, Ross M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mittal, Sumeet K.</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnosis and management of anastomotic leaks after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: a single-center experience</title><title>Langenbeck's archives of surgery</title><addtitle>Langenbecks Arch Surg</addtitle><addtitle>Langenbecks Arch Surg</addtitle><description>Purpose
Esophageal anastomotic leaks (ALs) after esophagectomy are a common and serious complication. The incidence, diagnostic approach, and management have changed over time. We described the diagnosis and management of patients who developed an esophageal AL after an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy at our center.
Methods
After IRB approval, we queried our prospectively maintained database for patients who developed an esophageal AL after esophagectomy from August 2016 through July 2022. Data pertaining to demographics, comorbidities, surgical and oncological characteristics, and clinical course were extracted and analyzed.
Results
During the study period, 145 patients underwent an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy; 10 (6.9%) developed an AL, diagnosed a median of 7.5 days after surgery, and detected by enteric contents in wound drains (
n
= 3), endoscopy (
n
= 3), CT (
n
= 2), and contrast esophagogram (
n
= 2). Nine patients (90%) had an increasing white blood cell count and additional signs of sepsis. One asymptomatic patient was identified by contrast esophagography. All patients received enteral nutritional support, intravenous antibiotics, and antifungals. Primary treatment of ALs included endoscopic placement of a self-expanding metal stent (SEMS;
n
= 6), surgery (
n
= 2), and SEMS with endoluminal vacuum therapy (
n
= 2). One patient required surgery after SEMS placement. The median length of ICU and total hospital stays were 11.5 and 22.5 days, respectively. There was no 30-day mortality.
Conclusion
The incidence of esophageal ALs at our center is similar to that of other high-volume centers. Most ALs can be managed without surgery; however, ALs remain a significant source of postoperative morbidity despite clinical advancements that have improved mortality.</description><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Anastomosis, Surgical - adverse effects</subject><subject>Anastomotic Leak - diagnosis</subject><subject>Anastomotic Leak - etiology</subject><subject>Anastomotic Leak - therapy</subject><subject>Cardiac Surgery</subject><subject>Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - adverse effects</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Esophagectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>General Surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - diagnosis</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Thoracic Surgery</subject><subject>Traumatic Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vascular Surgery</subject><issn>1435-2451</issn><issn>1435-2451</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtPhDAYRRujccbRP-DCsHSDFgotuDPja5JJ3Oi6Ke0HwwgttqAz_94S1Lhy8aWvc27Si9B5hK8ijNm1wziJSYjHIVEchbsDNI8SkoZxkkaHf_YzdOLcFmNMWZ4coxlhmRcwnqPNXS0qbVztAqFV0AotKmhB94Ep_Y1wvWlNX8ugAfHmmbIHG6w-jA3W8OklcKbbeEV6bn8TiMDVumoglD7Ck7DrwNagJZyio1I0Ds6-1wV6fbh_WT6F6-fH1fJ2Hco4z_qwSEhBVZwXJCUqAZb7Y1ZQWWZKipgxATRRmGUKS0VznIsyEowAEyVVlDFGFuhyyu2seR_A9bytnYSmERrM4HiceShLE0o9Gk-otMY5CyXvbN0Ku-cR5mPDfGqY43HGhvnOSxff-UPRgvpVfir1AJkA5590BZZvzWC1__N_sV-x0Ii0</recordid><startdate>20231013</startdate><enddate>20231013</enddate><creator>Latorre-Rodríguez, Andrés R.</creator><creator>Huang, Jasmine</creator><creator>Schaheen, Lara</creator><creator>Smith, Michael A.</creator><creator>Hashimi, Samad</creator><creator>Bremner, Ross M.</creator><creator>Mittal, Sumeet K.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231013</creationdate><title>Diagnosis and management of anastomotic leaks after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: a single-center experience</title><author>Latorre-Rodríguez, Andrés R. ; Huang, Jasmine ; Schaheen, Lara ; Smith, Michael A. ; Hashimi, Samad ; Bremner, Ross M. ; Mittal, Sumeet K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-b43b6d29b353d4e793b68b6cf8dca277ae64d078d0cd6909af1a73e7af6d67773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Anastomosis, Surgical - adverse effects</topic><topic>Anastomotic Leak - diagnosis</topic><topic>Anastomotic Leak - etiology</topic><topic>Anastomotic Leak - therapy</topic><topic>Cardiac Surgery</topic><topic>Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - adverse effects</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Esophagectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>General Surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - diagnosis</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Thoracic Surgery</topic><topic>Traumatic Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vascular Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Latorre-Rodríguez, Andrés R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Jasmine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaheen, Lara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hashimi, Samad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bremner, Ross M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mittal, Sumeet K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Langenbeck's archives of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Latorre-Rodríguez, Andrés R.</au><au>Huang, Jasmine</au><au>Schaheen, Lara</au><au>Smith, Michael A.</au><au>Hashimi, Samad</au><au>Bremner, Ross M.</au><au>Mittal, Sumeet K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnosis and management of anastomotic leaks after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: a single-center experience</atitle><jtitle>Langenbeck's archives of surgery</jtitle><stitle>Langenbecks Arch Surg</stitle><addtitle>Langenbecks Arch Surg</addtitle><date>2023-10-13</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>408</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>397</spage><epage>397</epage><pages>397-397</pages><artnum>397</artnum><issn>1435-2451</issn><eissn>1435-2451</eissn><abstract>Purpose
Esophageal anastomotic leaks (ALs) after esophagectomy are a common and serious complication. The incidence, diagnostic approach, and management have changed over time. We described the diagnosis and management of patients who developed an esophageal AL after an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy at our center.
Methods
After IRB approval, we queried our prospectively maintained database for patients who developed an esophageal AL after esophagectomy from August 2016 through July 2022. Data pertaining to demographics, comorbidities, surgical and oncological characteristics, and clinical course were extracted and analyzed.
Results
During the study period, 145 patients underwent an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy; 10 (6.9%) developed an AL, diagnosed a median of 7.5 days after surgery, and detected by enteric contents in wound drains (
n
= 3), endoscopy (
n
= 3), CT (
n
= 2), and contrast esophagogram (
n
= 2). Nine patients (90%) had an increasing white blood cell count and additional signs of sepsis. One asymptomatic patient was identified by contrast esophagography. All patients received enteral nutritional support, intravenous antibiotics, and antifungals. Primary treatment of ALs included endoscopic placement of a self-expanding metal stent (SEMS;
n
= 6), surgery (
n
= 2), and SEMS with endoluminal vacuum therapy (
n
= 2). One patient required surgery after SEMS placement. The median length of ICU and total hospital stays were 11.5 and 22.5 days, respectively. There was no 30-day mortality.
Conclusion
The incidence of esophageal ALs at our center is similar to that of other high-volume centers. Most ALs can be managed without surgery; however, ALs remain a significant source of postoperative morbidity despite clinical advancements that have improved mortality.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>37831200</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00423-023-03121-x</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1435-2451 |
ispartof | Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2023-10, Vol.408 (1), p.397-397, Article 397 |
issn | 1435-2451 1435-2451 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2877385466 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Abdominal Surgery Anastomosis, Surgical - adverse effects Anastomotic Leak - diagnosis Anastomotic Leak - etiology Anastomotic Leak - therapy Cardiac Surgery Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - adverse effects Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery Esophagectomy - adverse effects General Surgery Humans Medicine Medicine & Public Health Postoperative Complications - diagnosis Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Postoperative Complications - etiology Retrospective Studies Thoracic Surgery Traumatic Surgery Treatment Outcome Vascular Surgery |
title | Diagnosis and management of anastomotic leaks after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: a single-center experience |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T04%3A47%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnosis%20and%20management%20of%20anastomotic%20leaks%20after%20Ivor%20Lewis%20esophagectomy:%20a%20single-center%20experience&rft.jtitle=Langenbeck's%20archives%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Latorre-Rodr%C3%ADguez,%20Andr%C3%A9s%20R.&rft.date=2023-10-13&rft.volume=408&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=397&rft.epage=397&rft.pages=397-397&rft.artnum=397&rft.issn=1435-2451&rft.eissn=1435-2451&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00423-023-03121-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2877385466%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2877385466&rft_id=info:pmid/37831200&rfr_iscdi=true |