Diagnosis and management of anastomotic leaks after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: a single-center experience

Purpose Esophageal anastomotic leaks (ALs) after esophagectomy are a common and serious complication. The incidence, diagnostic approach, and management have changed over time. We described the diagnosis and management of patients who developed an esophageal AL after an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy at o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Langenbeck's archives of surgery 2023-10, Vol.408 (1), p.397-397, Article 397
Hauptverfasser: Latorre-Rodríguez, Andrés R., Huang, Jasmine, Schaheen, Lara, Smith, Michael A., Hashimi, Samad, Bremner, Ross M., Mittal, Sumeet K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 397
container_issue 1
container_start_page 397
container_title Langenbeck's archives of surgery
container_volume 408
creator Latorre-Rodríguez, Andrés R.
Huang, Jasmine
Schaheen, Lara
Smith, Michael A.
Hashimi, Samad
Bremner, Ross M.
Mittal, Sumeet K.
description Purpose Esophageal anastomotic leaks (ALs) after esophagectomy are a common and serious complication. The incidence, diagnostic approach, and management have changed over time. We described the diagnosis and management of patients who developed an esophageal AL after an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy at our center. Methods After IRB approval, we queried our prospectively maintained database for patients who developed an esophageal AL after esophagectomy from August 2016 through July 2022. Data pertaining to demographics, comorbidities, surgical and oncological characteristics, and clinical course were extracted and analyzed. Results During the study period, 145 patients underwent an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy; 10 (6.9%) developed an AL, diagnosed a median of 7.5 days after surgery, and detected by enteric contents in wound drains ( n  = 3), endoscopy ( n  = 3), CT ( n  = 2), and contrast esophagogram ( n  = 2). Nine patients (90%) had an increasing white blood cell count and additional signs of sepsis. One asymptomatic patient was identified by contrast esophagography. All patients received enteral nutritional support, intravenous antibiotics, and antifungals. Primary treatment of ALs included endoscopic placement of a self-expanding metal stent (SEMS; n  = 6), surgery ( n  = 2), and SEMS with endoluminal vacuum therapy ( n  = 2). One patient required surgery after SEMS placement. The median length of ICU and total hospital stays were 11.5 and 22.5 days, respectively. There was no 30-day mortality. Conclusion The incidence of esophageal ALs at our center is similar to that of other high-volume centers. Most ALs can be managed without surgery; however, ALs remain a significant source of postoperative morbidity despite clinical advancements that have improved mortality.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00423-023-03121-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2877385466</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2877385466</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-b43b6d29b353d4e793b68b6cf8dca277ae64d078d0cd6909af1a73e7af6d67773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPhDAYRRujccbRP-DCsHSDFgotuDPja5JJ3Oi6Ke0HwwgttqAz_94S1Lhy8aWvc27Si9B5hK8ijNm1wziJSYjHIVEchbsDNI8SkoZxkkaHf_YzdOLcFmNMWZ4coxlhmRcwnqPNXS0qbVztAqFV0AotKmhB94Ep_Y1wvWlNX8ugAfHmmbIHG6w-jA3W8OklcKbbeEV6bn8TiMDVumoglD7Ck7DrwNagJZyio1I0Ds6-1wV6fbh_WT6F6-fH1fJ2Hco4z_qwSEhBVZwXJCUqAZb7Y1ZQWWZKipgxATRRmGUKS0VznIsyEowAEyVVlDFGFuhyyu2seR_A9bytnYSmERrM4HiceShLE0o9Gk-otMY5CyXvbN0Ku-cR5mPDfGqY43HGhvnOSxff-UPRgvpVfir1AJkA5590BZZvzWC1__N_sV-x0Ii0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2877385466</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnosis and management of anastomotic leaks after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: a single-center experience</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Latorre-Rodríguez, Andrés R. ; Huang, Jasmine ; Schaheen, Lara ; Smith, Michael A. ; Hashimi, Samad ; Bremner, Ross M. ; Mittal, Sumeet K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Latorre-Rodríguez, Andrés R. ; Huang, Jasmine ; Schaheen, Lara ; Smith, Michael A. ; Hashimi, Samad ; Bremner, Ross M. ; Mittal, Sumeet K.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Esophageal anastomotic leaks (ALs) after esophagectomy are a common and serious complication. The incidence, diagnostic approach, and management have changed over time. We described the diagnosis and management of patients who developed an esophageal AL after an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy at our center. Methods After IRB approval, we queried our prospectively maintained database for patients who developed an esophageal AL after esophagectomy from August 2016 through July 2022. Data pertaining to demographics, comorbidities, surgical and oncological characteristics, and clinical course were extracted and analyzed. Results During the study period, 145 patients underwent an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy; 10 (6.9%) developed an AL, diagnosed a median of 7.5 days after surgery, and detected by enteric contents in wound drains ( n  = 3), endoscopy ( n  = 3), CT ( n  = 2), and contrast esophagogram ( n  = 2). Nine patients (90%) had an increasing white blood cell count and additional signs of sepsis. One asymptomatic patient was identified by contrast esophagography. All patients received enteral nutritional support, intravenous antibiotics, and antifungals. Primary treatment of ALs included endoscopic placement of a self-expanding metal stent (SEMS; n  = 6), surgery ( n  = 2), and SEMS with endoluminal vacuum therapy ( n  = 2). One patient required surgery after SEMS placement. The median length of ICU and total hospital stays were 11.5 and 22.5 days, respectively. There was no 30-day mortality. Conclusion The incidence of esophageal ALs at our center is similar to that of other high-volume centers. Most ALs can be managed without surgery; however, ALs remain a significant source of postoperative morbidity despite clinical advancements that have improved mortality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1435-2451</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-2451</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-03121-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37831200</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Abdominal Surgery ; Anastomosis, Surgical - adverse effects ; Anastomotic Leak - diagnosis ; Anastomotic Leak - etiology ; Anastomotic Leak - therapy ; Cardiac Surgery ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - adverse effects ; Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery ; Esophagectomy - adverse effects ; General Surgery ; Humans ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Postoperative Complications - diagnosis ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Thoracic Surgery ; Traumatic Surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Vascular Surgery</subject><ispartof>Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2023-10, Vol.408 (1), p.397-397, Article 397</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-b43b6d29b353d4e793b68b6cf8dca277ae64d078d0cd6909af1a73e7af6d67773</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00423-023-03121-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00423-023-03121-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37831200$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Latorre-Rodríguez, Andrés R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Jasmine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaheen, Lara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hashimi, Samad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bremner, Ross M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mittal, Sumeet K.</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnosis and management of anastomotic leaks after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: a single-center experience</title><title>Langenbeck's archives of surgery</title><addtitle>Langenbecks Arch Surg</addtitle><addtitle>Langenbecks Arch Surg</addtitle><description>Purpose Esophageal anastomotic leaks (ALs) after esophagectomy are a common and serious complication. The incidence, diagnostic approach, and management have changed over time. We described the diagnosis and management of patients who developed an esophageal AL after an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy at our center. Methods After IRB approval, we queried our prospectively maintained database for patients who developed an esophageal AL after esophagectomy from August 2016 through July 2022. Data pertaining to demographics, comorbidities, surgical and oncological characteristics, and clinical course were extracted and analyzed. Results During the study period, 145 patients underwent an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy; 10 (6.9%) developed an AL, diagnosed a median of 7.5 days after surgery, and detected by enteric contents in wound drains ( n  = 3), endoscopy ( n  = 3), CT ( n  = 2), and contrast esophagogram ( n  = 2). Nine patients (90%) had an increasing white blood cell count and additional signs of sepsis. One asymptomatic patient was identified by contrast esophagography. All patients received enteral nutritional support, intravenous antibiotics, and antifungals. Primary treatment of ALs included endoscopic placement of a self-expanding metal stent (SEMS; n  = 6), surgery ( n  = 2), and SEMS with endoluminal vacuum therapy ( n  = 2). One patient required surgery after SEMS placement. The median length of ICU and total hospital stays were 11.5 and 22.5 days, respectively. There was no 30-day mortality. Conclusion The incidence of esophageal ALs at our center is similar to that of other high-volume centers. Most ALs can be managed without surgery; however, ALs remain a significant source of postoperative morbidity despite clinical advancements that have improved mortality.</description><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Anastomosis, Surgical - adverse effects</subject><subject>Anastomotic Leak - diagnosis</subject><subject>Anastomotic Leak - etiology</subject><subject>Anastomotic Leak - therapy</subject><subject>Cardiac Surgery</subject><subject>Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - adverse effects</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Esophagectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>General Surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - diagnosis</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Thoracic Surgery</subject><subject>Traumatic Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vascular Surgery</subject><issn>1435-2451</issn><issn>1435-2451</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtPhDAYRRujccbRP-DCsHSDFgotuDPja5JJ3Oi6Ke0HwwgttqAz_94S1Lhy8aWvc27Si9B5hK8ijNm1wziJSYjHIVEchbsDNI8SkoZxkkaHf_YzdOLcFmNMWZ4coxlhmRcwnqPNXS0qbVztAqFV0AotKmhB94Ep_Y1wvWlNX8ugAfHmmbIHG6w-jA3W8OklcKbbeEV6bn8TiMDVumoglD7Ck7DrwNagJZyio1I0Ds6-1wV6fbh_WT6F6-fH1fJ2Hco4z_qwSEhBVZwXJCUqAZb7Y1ZQWWZKipgxATRRmGUKS0VznIsyEowAEyVVlDFGFuhyyu2seR_A9bytnYSmERrM4HiceShLE0o9Gk-otMY5CyXvbN0Ku-cR5mPDfGqY43HGhvnOSxff-UPRgvpVfir1AJkA5590BZZvzWC1__N_sV-x0Ii0</recordid><startdate>20231013</startdate><enddate>20231013</enddate><creator>Latorre-Rodríguez, Andrés R.</creator><creator>Huang, Jasmine</creator><creator>Schaheen, Lara</creator><creator>Smith, Michael A.</creator><creator>Hashimi, Samad</creator><creator>Bremner, Ross M.</creator><creator>Mittal, Sumeet K.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231013</creationdate><title>Diagnosis and management of anastomotic leaks after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: a single-center experience</title><author>Latorre-Rodríguez, Andrés R. ; Huang, Jasmine ; Schaheen, Lara ; Smith, Michael A. ; Hashimi, Samad ; Bremner, Ross M. ; Mittal, Sumeet K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-b43b6d29b353d4e793b68b6cf8dca277ae64d078d0cd6909af1a73e7af6d67773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Anastomosis, Surgical - adverse effects</topic><topic>Anastomotic Leak - diagnosis</topic><topic>Anastomotic Leak - etiology</topic><topic>Anastomotic Leak - therapy</topic><topic>Cardiac Surgery</topic><topic>Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - adverse effects</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Esophagectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>General Surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - diagnosis</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Thoracic Surgery</topic><topic>Traumatic Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vascular Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Latorre-Rodríguez, Andrés R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Jasmine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaheen, Lara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hashimi, Samad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bremner, Ross M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mittal, Sumeet K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Langenbeck's archives of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Latorre-Rodríguez, Andrés R.</au><au>Huang, Jasmine</au><au>Schaheen, Lara</au><au>Smith, Michael A.</au><au>Hashimi, Samad</au><au>Bremner, Ross M.</au><au>Mittal, Sumeet K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnosis and management of anastomotic leaks after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: a single-center experience</atitle><jtitle>Langenbeck's archives of surgery</jtitle><stitle>Langenbecks Arch Surg</stitle><addtitle>Langenbecks Arch Surg</addtitle><date>2023-10-13</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>408</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>397</spage><epage>397</epage><pages>397-397</pages><artnum>397</artnum><issn>1435-2451</issn><eissn>1435-2451</eissn><abstract>Purpose Esophageal anastomotic leaks (ALs) after esophagectomy are a common and serious complication. The incidence, diagnostic approach, and management have changed over time. We described the diagnosis and management of patients who developed an esophageal AL after an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy at our center. Methods After IRB approval, we queried our prospectively maintained database for patients who developed an esophageal AL after esophagectomy from August 2016 through July 2022. Data pertaining to demographics, comorbidities, surgical and oncological characteristics, and clinical course were extracted and analyzed. Results During the study period, 145 patients underwent an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy; 10 (6.9%) developed an AL, diagnosed a median of 7.5 days after surgery, and detected by enteric contents in wound drains ( n  = 3), endoscopy ( n  = 3), CT ( n  = 2), and contrast esophagogram ( n  = 2). Nine patients (90%) had an increasing white blood cell count and additional signs of sepsis. One asymptomatic patient was identified by contrast esophagography. All patients received enteral nutritional support, intravenous antibiotics, and antifungals. Primary treatment of ALs included endoscopic placement of a self-expanding metal stent (SEMS; n  = 6), surgery ( n  = 2), and SEMS with endoluminal vacuum therapy ( n  = 2). One patient required surgery after SEMS placement. The median length of ICU and total hospital stays were 11.5 and 22.5 days, respectively. There was no 30-day mortality. Conclusion The incidence of esophageal ALs at our center is similar to that of other high-volume centers. Most ALs can be managed without surgery; however, ALs remain a significant source of postoperative morbidity despite clinical advancements that have improved mortality.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>37831200</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00423-023-03121-x</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1435-2451
ispartof Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2023-10, Vol.408 (1), p.397-397, Article 397
issn 1435-2451
1435-2451
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2877385466
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Abdominal Surgery
Anastomosis, Surgical - adverse effects
Anastomotic Leak - diagnosis
Anastomotic Leak - etiology
Anastomotic Leak - therapy
Cardiac Surgery
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - adverse effects
Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery
Esophagectomy - adverse effects
General Surgery
Humans
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Postoperative Complications - diagnosis
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Retrospective Studies
Thoracic Surgery
Traumatic Surgery
Treatment Outcome
Vascular Surgery
title Diagnosis and management of anastomotic leaks after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: a single-center experience
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T04%3A47%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnosis%20and%20management%20of%20anastomotic%20leaks%20after%20Ivor%20Lewis%20esophagectomy:%20a%20single-center%20experience&rft.jtitle=Langenbeck's%20archives%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Latorre-Rodr%C3%ADguez,%20Andr%C3%A9s%20R.&rft.date=2023-10-13&rft.volume=408&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=397&rft.epage=397&rft.pages=397-397&rft.artnum=397&rft.issn=1435-2451&rft.eissn=1435-2451&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00423-023-03121-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2877385466%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2877385466&rft_id=info:pmid/37831200&rfr_iscdi=true