Microbiological contamination present in enteral tube feeding prepared in hospitals and/or at home: a systematic review

Abstract Context The safety of enteral formulas is important to restore and maintain the health of patients. Objective A systematic review of the literature was conducted to assess the microbiological contamination present in enteral tube feeding prepared in hospitals and/or at home. Data sources A...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nutrition reviews 2024-09, Vol.82 (9), p.1226-1238
Hauptverfasser: Kozow, Julia Fernanda Costa, Rabito, Estela Iraci, Kruger, Jenifer Faria, Medeiros, Caroline Opolski, da Costa, Rayane Luizi, Beux, Márcia Regina, Stangarlin-Fiori, Lize
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1238
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1226
container_title Nutrition reviews
container_volume 82
creator Kozow, Julia Fernanda Costa
Rabito, Estela Iraci
Kruger, Jenifer Faria
Medeiros, Caroline Opolski
da Costa, Rayane Luizi
Beux, Márcia Regina
Stangarlin-Fiori, Lize
description Abstract Context The safety of enteral formulas is important to restore and maintain the health of patients. Objective A systematic review of the literature was conducted to assess the microbiological contamination present in enteral tube feeding prepared in hospitals and/or at home. Data sources A systematic search was conducted of the Medline, Scopus, BVS, CAPES/MEC, Embase, Science Direct, and SciELO databases and gray literature. Data extraction Eligible studies that analyzed the contamination of enteral formulas manipulated in hospitals and/or at home were selected; a quality assessment tool was used. Data analysis Twenty-three studies evaluated 1099 enteral formulations. Of these, 44.67% of enteral formulas (n = 491) exceeded the acceptable bacterial count. Samples of homemade enteral formulation preparations (86.03%; n = 191) had the highest bacterial counts, followed by mixed preparations (79.72%; n = 59), and commercial formulas (30.01%; n = 241). The number of samples of enteral formulations that exceeded the bacterial count at home was 70.79% (n = 160 at the hospital was 37.91% (n = 331). Total coliforms (82.68%; n = 406) and mesophilic aerobes (79.22%; n = 389) were the most common microorganisms. Samples with bacterial pathogens were also identified, with Bacillus cereus (4.07%; n = 20) and Listeria monocytogenes (3.66%; n = 18) being the most prevalent. Conclusions A high number of samples of enteral formulations exceeded the bacterial count, but the risk to patient’s health when consuming enteral tube feeding prepared in hospitals or at home may be low. This is because the bacteria present in the samples are not considered potential causes of disease but rather indicators of hygiene conditions. Systematic Review Registration PROSPERO registration no. CRD42022367573.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/nutrit/nuad123
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2877380146</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/nutrit/nuad123</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2877380146</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-11f2e8b6fa59e6cbc1c7a58c14954efeae5fbd393fb21521d810afee625169863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0TtLBDEUBeAgiq6P1lICNlqM5jGPxE4WX7Bio_WQydzRyEwyJhkX_71ZdrWwsbqQfDlcchA6puSCEskv7RS9iWmoljK-hWa0KniWC1FtoxkhTGZlmfM9tB_COyGEMsl30R6vBMs5K2do-Wi0d41xvXs1WvVYOxvVYKyKxlk8eghgIzYWpwE-gTg1gDuA1tjX1f2oPLQr8ObCaKLqA1a2vXQeq5jOBrjCCoevEGFImRp7-DSwPEQ7XaJwtJkH6OX25nl-ny2e7h7m14tMM8FiRmnHQDRlpwoJpW401ZUqhKa5LHLoQEHRNS2XvGsYLRhtBSUqLVeygpZSlPwAna1zR-8-JgixHkzQ0PfKgptCzURVcUFovqKnf-i7m7xN29WcSMmZJJIkdbFW6dtC8NDVozeD8l81JfWqknpdSb2pJD042cROzQDtL__pIIHzNXDT-F_YN7iHmm0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3099329090</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Microbiological contamination present in enteral tube feeding prepared in hospitals and/or at home: a systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Kozow, Julia Fernanda Costa ; Rabito, Estela Iraci ; Kruger, Jenifer Faria ; Medeiros, Caroline Opolski ; da Costa, Rayane Luizi ; Beux, Márcia Regina ; Stangarlin-Fiori, Lize</creator><creatorcontrib>Kozow, Julia Fernanda Costa ; Rabito, Estela Iraci ; Kruger, Jenifer Faria ; Medeiros, Caroline Opolski ; da Costa, Rayane Luizi ; Beux, Márcia Regina ; Stangarlin-Fiori, Lize</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Context The safety of enteral formulas is important to restore and maintain the health of patients. Objective A systematic review of the literature was conducted to assess the microbiological contamination present in enteral tube feeding prepared in hospitals and/or at home. Data sources A systematic search was conducted of the Medline, Scopus, BVS, CAPES/MEC, Embase, Science Direct, and SciELO databases and gray literature. Data extraction Eligible studies that analyzed the contamination of enteral formulas manipulated in hospitals and/or at home were selected; a quality assessment tool was used. Data analysis Twenty-three studies evaluated 1099 enteral formulations. Of these, 44.67% of enteral formulas (n = 491) exceeded the acceptable bacterial count. Samples of homemade enteral formulation preparations (86.03%; n = 191) had the highest bacterial counts, followed by mixed preparations (79.72%; n = 59), and commercial formulas (30.01%; n = 241). The number of samples of enteral formulations that exceeded the bacterial count at home was 70.79% (n = 160 at the hospital was 37.91% (n = 331). Total coliforms (82.68%; n = 406) and mesophilic aerobes (79.22%; n = 389) were the most common microorganisms. Samples with bacterial pathogens were also identified, with Bacillus cereus (4.07%; n = 20) and Listeria monocytogenes (3.66%; n = 18) being the most prevalent. Conclusions A high number of samples of enteral formulations exceeded the bacterial count, but the risk to patient’s health when consuming enteral tube feeding prepared in hospitals or at home may be low. This is because the bacteria present in the samples are not considered potential causes of disease but rather indicators of hygiene conditions. Systematic Review Registration PROSPERO registration no. CRD42022367573.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-6643</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1753-4887</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1753-4887</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/nutrit/nuad123</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37824326</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Aerobes ; Bacteria ; Coliforms ; Contamination ; Data analysis ; Enteral nutrition ; Enteral Nutrition - methods ; Food Contamination - analysis ; Food Contamination - prevention &amp; control ; Food Microbiology ; Food, Formulated - microbiology ; Formulations ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Hygiene ; Literature reviews ; Microbial contamination ; Microorganisms ; Patients ; Quality assessment ; Quality control ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Nutrition reviews, 2024-09, Vol.82 (9), p.1226-1238</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Life Sciences Institute. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Life Sciences Institute. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-11f2e8b6fa59e6cbc1c7a58c14954efeae5fbd393fb21521d810afee625169863</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7904-904X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1585,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37824326$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kozow, Julia Fernanda Costa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabito, Estela Iraci</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kruger, Jenifer Faria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medeiros, Caroline Opolski</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Costa, Rayane Luizi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beux, Márcia Regina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stangarlin-Fiori, Lize</creatorcontrib><title>Microbiological contamination present in enteral tube feeding prepared in hospitals and/or at home: a systematic review</title><title>Nutrition reviews</title><addtitle>Nutr Rev</addtitle><description>Abstract Context The safety of enteral formulas is important to restore and maintain the health of patients. Objective A systematic review of the literature was conducted to assess the microbiological contamination present in enteral tube feeding prepared in hospitals and/or at home. Data sources A systematic search was conducted of the Medline, Scopus, BVS, CAPES/MEC, Embase, Science Direct, and SciELO databases and gray literature. Data extraction Eligible studies that analyzed the contamination of enteral formulas manipulated in hospitals and/or at home were selected; a quality assessment tool was used. Data analysis Twenty-three studies evaluated 1099 enteral formulations. Of these, 44.67% of enteral formulas (n = 491) exceeded the acceptable bacterial count. Samples of homemade enteral formulation preparations (86.03%; n = 191) had the highest bacterial counts, followed by mixed preparations (79.72%; n = 59), and commercial formulas (30.01%; n = 241). The number of samples of enteral formulations that exceeded the bacterial count at home was 70.79% (n = 160 at the hospital was 37.91% (n = 331). Total coliforms (82.68%; n = 406) and mesophilic aerobes (79.22%; n = 389) were the most common microorganisms. Samples with bacterial pathogens were also identified, with Bacillus cereus (4.07%; n = 20) and Listeria monocytogenes (3.66%; n = 18) being the most prevalent. Conclusions A high number of samples of enteral formulations exceeded the bacterial count, but the risk to patient’s health when consuming enteral tube feeding prepared in hospitals or at home may be low. This is because the bacteria present in the samples are not considered potential causes of disease but rather indicators of hygiene conditions. Systematic Review Registration PROSPERO registration no. CRD42022367573.</description><subject>Aerobes</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Coliforms</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Enteral nutrition</subject><subject>Enteral Nutrition - methods</subject><subject>Food Contamination - analysis</subject><subject>Food Contamination - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Food Microbiology</subject><subject>Food, Formulated - microbiology</subject><subject>Formulations</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hygiene</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Microbial contamination</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0029-6643</issn><issn>1753-4887</issn><issn>1753-4887</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0TtLBDEUBeAgiq6P1lICNlqM5jGPxE4WX7Bio_WQydzRyEwyJhkX_71ZdrWwsbqQfDlcchA6puSCEskv7RS9iWmoljK-hWa0KniWC1FtoxkhTGZlmfM9tB_COyGEMsl30R6vBMs5K2do-Wi0d41xvXs1WvVYOxvVYKyKxlk8eghgIzYWpwE-gTg1gDuA1tjX1f2oPLQr8ObCaKLqA1a2vXQeq5jOBrjCCoevEGFImRp7-DSwPEQ7XaJwtJkH6OX25nl-ny2e7h7m14tMM8FiRmnHQDRlpwoJpW401ZUqhKa5LHLoQEHRNS2XvGsYLRhtBSUqLVeygpZSlPwAna1zR-8-JgixHkzQ0PfKgptCzURVcUFovqKnf-i7m7xN29WcSMmZJJIkdbFW6dtC8NDVozeD8l81JfWqknpdSb2pJD042cROzQDtL__pIIHzNXDT-F_YN7iHmm0</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Kozow, Julia Fernanda Costa</creator><creator>Rabito, Estela Iraci</creator><creator>Kruger, Jenifer Faria</creator><creator>Medeiros, Caroline Opolski</creator><creator>da Costa, Rayane Luizi</creator><creator>Beux, Márcia Regina</creator><creator>Stangarlin-Fiori, Lize</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7904-904X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>Microbiological contamination present in enteral tube feeding prepared in hospitals and/or at home: a systematic review</title><author>Kozow, Julia Fernanda Costa ; Rabito, Estela Iraci ; Kruger, Jenifer Faria ; Medeiros, Caroline Opolski ; da Costa, Rayane Luizi ; Beux, Márcia Regina ; Stangarlin-Fiori, Lize</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-11f2e8b6fa59e6cbc1c7a58c14954efeae5fbd393fb21521d810afee625169863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aerobes</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Coliforms</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Enteral nutrition</topic><topic>Enteral Nutrition - methods</topic><topic>Food Contamination - analysis</topic><topic>Food Contamination - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Food Microbiology</topic><topic>Food, Formulated - microbiology</topic><topic>Formulations</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hygiene</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Microbial contamination</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kozow, Julia Fernanda Costa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabito, Estela Iraci</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kruger, Jenifer Faria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medeiros, Caroline Opolski</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Costa, Rayane Luizi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beux, Márcia Regina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stangarlin-Fiori, Lize</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nutrition reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kozow, Julia Fernanda Costa</au><au>Rabito, Estela Iraci</au><au>Kruger, Jenifer Faria</au><au>Medeiros, Caroline Opolski</au><au>da Costa, Rayane Luizi</au><au>Beux, Márcia Regina</au><au>Stangarlin-Fiori, Lize</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Microbiological contamination present in enteral tube feeding prepared in hospitals and/or at home: a systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Nutrition reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Nutr Rev</addtitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1226</spage><epage>1238</epage><pages>1226-1238</pages><issn>0029-6643</issn><issn>1753-4887</issn><eissn>1753-4887</eissn><abstract>Abstract Context The safety of enteral formulas is important to restore and maintain the health of patients. Objective A systematic review of the literature was conducted to assess the microbiological contamination present in enteral tube feeding prepared in hospitals and/or at home. Data sources A systematic search was conducted of the Medline, Scopus, BVS, CAPES/MEC, Embase, Science Direct, and SciELO databases and gray literature. Data extraction Eligible studies that analyzed the contamination of enteral formulas manipulated in hospitals and/or at home were selected; a quality assessment tool was used. Data analysis Twenty-three studies evaluated 1099 enteral formulations. Of these, 44.67% of enteral formulas (n = 491) exceeded the acceptable bacterial count. Samples of homemade enteral formulation preparations (86.03%; n = 191) had the highest bacterial counts, followed by mixed preparations (79.72%; n = 59), and commercial formulas (30.01%; n = 241). The number of samples of enteral formulations that exceeded the bacterial count at home was 70.79% (n = 160 at the hospital was 37.91% (n = 331). Total coliforms (82.68%; n = 406) and mesophilic aerobes (79.22%; n = 389) were the most common microorganisms. Samples with bacterial pathogens were also identified, with Bacillus cereus (4.07%; n = 20) and Listeria monocytogenes (3.66%; n = 18) being the most prevalent. Conclusions A high number of samples of enteral formulations exceeded the bacterial count, but the risk to patient’s health when consuming enteral tube feeding prepared in hospitals or at home may be low. This is because the bacteria present in the samples are not considered potential causes of disease but rather indicators of hygiene conditions. Systematic Review Registration PROSPERO registration no. CRD42022367573.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>37824326</pmid><doi>10.1093/nutrit/nuad123</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7904-904X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0029-6643
ispartof Nutrition reviews, 2024-09, Vol.82 (9), p.1226-1238
issn 0029-6643
1753-4887
1753-4887
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2877380146
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Aerobes
Bacteria
Coliforms
Contamination
Data analysis
Enteral nutrition
Enteral Nutrition - methods
Food Contamination - analysis
Food Contamination - prevention & control
Food Microbiology
Food, Formulated - microbiology
Formulations
Hospitals
Humans
Hygiene
Literature reviews
Microbial contamination
Microorganisms
Patients
Quality assessment
Quality control
Systematic review
title Microbiological contamination present in enteral tube feeding prepared in hospitals and/or at home: a systematic review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T02%3A08%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Microbiological%20contamination%20present%20in%20enteral%20tube%20feeding%20prepared%20in%20hospitals%20and/or%20at%20home:%20a%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Nutrition%20reviews&rft.au=Kozow,%20Julia%20Fernanda%20Costa&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1226&rft.epage=1238&rft.pages=1226-1238&rft.issn=0029-6643&rft.eissn=1753-4887&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/nutrit/nuad123&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2877380146%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3099329090&rft_id=info:pmid/37824326&rft_oup_id=10.1093/nutrit/nuad123&rfr_iscdi=true