An update on intraocular lens power calculations in eyes with previous laser refractive surgery
There is an ever-growing body of research regarding intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations following photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK), and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). This review intends to summarize recent data and offer updated re...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Current opinion in ophthalmology 2024-01, Vol.35 (1), p.34-43 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 43 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 34 |
container_title | Current opinion in ophthalmology |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Savage, Daniel E Pantanelli, Seth M |
description | There is an ever-growing body of research regarding intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations following photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK), and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). This review intends to summarize recent data and offer updated recommendations.
Postmyopic LASIK/PRK eyes have the best refractive outcomes when multiple methods are averaged, or when Barrett True-K is used. Posthyperopic LASIK/PRK eyes also seem to do best when Barrett True-K is used, but with more variable results. With both aforementioned methods, using measured total corneal power incrementally improves results. For post-SMILE eyes, the first nontheoretical data favors raytracing.
Refractive outcomes after cataract surgery in eyes with prior laser refractive surgery are less accurate and more variable compared to virgin eyes. Surgeons may simplify their approach to IOL power calculations in postmyopic and posthyperopic LASIK/PRK by using Barrett True-K, and employing measured total corneal power when available. For post-SMILE eyes, ray tracing seems to work well, but lack of accessibility may hamper its adoption. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/ICU.0000000000001004 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2876636976</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2876636976</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-45c179877c6557094bf54fd710e15a97d1f5a3235da42feeb8864f9b67dcba7d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE9PwzAMxSMEYjD4BgjlyKUjaZI6PU4TfyZN4sLOUZq6UNS1JWmH9u3JtIEQvth6eraffoTccDbjLIf75WI9Y3-KMyZPyAVXgifAUn4aZyZZokHoCbkM4SOaJNPqnEwE6JQx0BfEzFs69qUdkHYtrdvB286NjfW0wTbQvvtCT51t9tpQd1GqW4o7DPSrHt5p73Fbd2OgjQ3R6LHy1g31FmkY_Rv63RU5q2wT8PrYp2T9-PC6eE5WL0_LxXyVOMFgSKRyHHIN4DKlgOWyqJSsSuAMubI5lLxSVqRClVamFWKhdSarvMigdIWFUkzJ3eFu77vPEcNgNnVw2DS2xZjPpBqyTGQ5ZNEqD1bnuxBiZNP7emP9znBm9mhNRGv-o41rt8cPY7HB8nfph6X4Bsx1dWM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2876636976</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An update on intraocular lens power calculations in eyes with previous laser refractive surgery</title><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Savage, Daniel E ; Pantanelli, Seth M</creator><creatorcontrib>Savage, Daniel E ; Pantanelli, Seth M</creatorcontrib><description>There is an ever-growing body of research regarding intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations following photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK), and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). This review intends to summarize recent data and offer updated recommendations.
Postmyopic LASIK/PRK eyes have the best refractive outcomes when multiple methods are averaged, or when Barrett True-K is used. Posthyperopic LASIK/PRK eyes also seem to do best when Barrett True-K is used, but with more variable results. With both aforementioned methods, using measured total corneal power incrementally improves results. For post-SMILE eyes, the first nontheoretical data favors raytracing.
Refractive outcomes after cataract surgery in eyes with prior laser refractive surgery are less accurate and more variable compared to virgin eyes. Surgeons may simplify their approach to IOL power calculations in postmyopic and posthyperopic LASIK/PRK by using Barrett True-K, and employing measured total corneal power when available. For post-SMILE eyes, ray tracing seems to work well, but lack of accessibility may hamper its adoption.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1040-8738</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-7021</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000001004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37820078</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>Current opinion in ophthalmology, 2024-01, Vol.35 (1), p.34-43</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-45c179877c6557094bf54fd710e15a97d1f5a3235da42feeb8864f9b67dcba7d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-45c179877c6557094bf54fd710e15a97d1f5a3235da42feeb8864f9b67dcba7d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37820078$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Savage, Daniel E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pantanelli, Seth M</creatorcontrib><title>An update on intraocular lens power calculations in eyes with previous laser refractive surgery</title><title>Current opinion in ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Curr Opin Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>There is an ever-growing body of research regarding intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations following photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK), and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). This review intends to summarize recent data and offer updated recommendations.
Postmyopic LASIK/PRK eyes have the best refractive outcomes when multiple methods are averaged, or when Barrett True-K is used. Posthyperopic LASIK/PRK eyes also seem to do best when Barrett True-K is used, but with more variable results. With both aforementioned methods, using measured total corneal power incrementally improves results. For post-SMILE eyes, the first nontheoretical data favors raytracing.
Refractive outcomes after cataract surgery in eyes with prior laser refractive surgery are less accurate and more variable compared to virgin eyes. Surgeons may simplify their approach to IOL power calculations in postmyopic and posthyperopic LASIK/PRK by using Barrett True-K, and employing measured total corneal power when available. For post-SMILE eyes, ray tracing seems to work well, but lack of accessibility may hamper its adoption.</description><issn>1040-8738</issn><issn>1531-7021</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkE9PwzAMxSMEYjD4BgjlyKUjaZI6PU4TfyZN4sLOUZq6UNS1JWmH9u3JtIEQvth6eraffoTccDbjLIf75WI9Y3-KMyZPyAVXgifAUn4aZyZZokHoCbkM4SOaJNPqnEwE6JQx0BfEzFs69qUdkHYtrdvB286NjfW0wTbQvvtCT51t9tpQd1GqW4o7DPSrHt5p73Fbd2OgjQ3R6LHy1g31FmkY_Rv63RU5q2wT8PrYp2T9-PC6eE5WL0_LxXyVOMFgSKRyHHIN4DKlgOWyqJSsSuAMubI5lLxSVqRClVamFWKhdSarvMigdIWFUkzJ3eFu77vPEcNgNnVw2DS2xZjPpBqyTGQ5ZNEqD1bnuxBiZNP7emP9znBm9mhNRGv-o41rt8cPY7HB8nfph6X4Bsx1dWM</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Savage, Daniel E</creator><creator>Pantanelli, Seth M</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>An update on intraocular lens power calculations in eyes with previous laser refractive surgery</title><author>Savage, Daniel E ; Pantanelli, Seth M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-45c179877c6557094bf54fd710e15a97d1f5a3235da42feeb8864f9b67dcba7d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Savage, Daniel E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pantanelli, Seth M</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Current opinion in ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Savage, Daniel E</au><au>Pantanelli, Seth M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An update on intraocular lens power calculations in eyes with previous laser refractive surgery</atitle><jtitle>Current opinion in ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Curr Opin Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>34</spage><epage>43</epage><pages>34-43</pages><issn>1040-8738</issn><eissn>1531-7021</eissn><abstract>There is an ever-growing body of research regarding intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations following photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK), and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). This review intends to summarize recent data and offer updated recommendations.
Postmyopic LASIK/PRK eyes have the best refractive outcomes when multiple methods are averaged, or when Barrett True-K is used. Posthyperopic LASIK/PRK eyes also seem to do best when Barrett True-K is used, but with more variable results. With both aforementioned methods, using measured total corneal power incrementally improves results. For post-SMILE eyes, the first nontheoretical data favors raytracing.
Refractive outcomes after cataract surgery in eyes with prior laser refractive surgery are less accurate and more variable compared to virgin eyes. Surgeons may simplify their approach to IOL power calculations in postmyopic and posthyperopic LASIK/PRK by using Barrett True-K, and employing measured total corneal power when available. For post-SMILE eyes, ray tracing seems to work well, but lack of accessibility may hamper its adoption.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>37820078</pmid><doi>10.1097/ICU.0000000000001004</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1040-8738 |
ispartof | Current opinion in ophthalmology, 2024-01, Vol.35 (1), p.34-43 |
issn | 1040-8738 1531-7021 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2876636976 |
source | Journals@Ovid Complete |
title | An update on intraocular lens power calculations in eyes with previous laser refractive surgery |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T15%3A45%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20update%20on%20intraocular%20lens%20power%20calculations%20in%20eyes%20with%20previous%20laser%20refractive%20surgery&rft.jtitle=Current%20opinion%20in%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Savage,%20Daniel%20E&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=34&rft.epage=43&rft.pages=34-43&rft.issn=1040-8738&rft.eissn=1531-7021&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/ICU.0000000000001004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2876636976%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2876636976&rft_id=info:pmid/37820078&rfr_iscdi=true |