Improving the Reporting of Primary Care Research: Consensus Reporting Items for Studies in Primary Care-the CRISP Statement

Primary care (PC) is a unique clinical specialty and research discipline with its own perspectives and methods. Research in this field uses varied research methods and study designs to investigate myriad topics. The diversity of PC presents challenges for reporting, and despite the proliferation of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of family medicine 2023-11, Vol.21 (6), p.549-555
Hauptverfasser: Phillips, William R, Sturgiss, Elizabeth, Glasziou, Paul, Olde Hartman, Tim C, Orkin, Aaron M, Prathivadi, Pallavi, Reeve, Joanne, Russell, Grant M, van Weel, Chris
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 555
container_issue 6
container_start_page 549
container_title Annals of family medicine
container_volume 21
creator Phillips, William R
Sturgiss, Elizabeth
Glasziou, Paul
Olde Hartman, Tim C
Orkin, Aaron M
Prathivadi, Pallavi
Reeve, Joanne
Russell, Grant M
van Weel, Chris
description Primary care (PC) is a unique clinical specialty and research discipline with its own perspectives and methods. Research in this field uses varied research methods and study designs to investigate myriad topics. The diversity of PC presents challenges for reporting, and despite the proliferation of reporting guidelines, none focuses specifically on the needs of PC. The Consensus Reporting Items for Studies in Primary Care (CRISP) Checklist guides reporting of PC research to include the information needed by the diverse PC community, including practitioners, patients, and communities. CRISP complements current guidelines to enhance the reporting, dissemination, and application of PC research findings and results. Prior CRISP studies documented opportunities to improve research reporting in this field. Our surveys of the international, interdisciplinary, and interprofessional PC community identified essential items to include in PC research reports. A 2-round Delphi study identified a consensus list of items considered necessary. The CRISP Checklist contains 24 items that describe the research team, patients, study participants, health conditions, clinical encounters, care teams, interventions, study measures, settings of care, and implementation of findings/results in PC. Not every item applies to every study design or topic. The CRISP guidelines inform the design and reporting of (1) studies done by PC researchers, (2) studies done by other investigators in PC populations and settings, and (3) studies intended for application in PC practice. Improved reporting of the context of the clinical services and the process of research is critical to interpreting study findings/results and applying them to diverse populations and varied settings in PC. article.
doi_str_mv 10.1370/afm.3029
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2872807563</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A780131164</galeid><sourcerecordid>A780131164</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-1b1336a5efd3effbad5136846f1ff82dc9b736567af794673422f1965ca6d6a43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0VtLwzAUB_AgipsX8BNIQRBfqrm0SeubFC8DQXH6HLL2ZKu0yUxSQfzytmwOBz7l9sshJ3-ETgi-JEzgK6XbS4ZpvoPGJE2SmAgidjdznI_QgffvGFNCGd1HIyZEluUJHaPvSbt09rM28ygsIHqBpXVhWFkdPbu6Ve4rKpQbTjwoVy6uo8IaD8Z3_o-eBGh9pK2LpqGravBRbbbux0P14mUyfe6F6jWYcIT2tGo8HK_HQ_R2d_taPMSPT_eT4uYxLpMMh5jMCGNcpaArBlrPVJUSxrOEa6J1RqsynwnGUy6UFnnCBUso1STnaal4xVXCDtHFqm7f6UcHPsi29iU0jTJgOy9pJmiGRcpZT89WdK4akLXRNjhVDlzeiAwTRggfCsb_qDkYcKqxBnTdb2_58z9-AaoJC2-bLtT9V27D9UtLZ713oOVy9YeSYDkkLfuk5ZB0T0_XTXWzFqoN_I2W_QCamKHJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2872807563</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improving the Reporting of Primary Care Research: Consensus Reporting Items for Studies in Primary Care-the CRISP Statement</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Phillips, William R ; Sturgiss, Elizabeth ; Glasziou, Paul ; Olde Hartman, Tim C ; Orkin, Aaron M ; Prathivadi, Pallavi ; Reeve, Joanne ; Russell, Grant M ; van Weel, Chris</creator><creatorcontrib>Phillips, William R ; Sturgiss, Elizabeth ; Glasziou, Paul ; Olde Hartman, Tim C ; Orkin, Aaron M ; Prathivadi, Pallavi ; Reeve, Joanne ; Russell, Grant M ; van Weel, Chris</creatorcontrib><description>Primary care (PC) is a unique clinical specialty and research discipline with its own perspectives and methods. Research in this field uses varied research methods and study designs to investigate myriad topics. The diversity of PC presents challenges for reporting, and despite the proliferation of reporting guidelines, none focuses specifically on the needs of PC. The Consensus Reporting Items for Studies in Primary Care (CRISP) Checklist guides reporting of PC research to include the information needed by the diverse PC community, including practitioners, patients, and communities. CRISP complements current guidelines to enhance the reporting, dissemination, and application of PC research findings and results. Prior CRISP studies documented opportunities to improve research reporting in this field. Our surveys of the international, interdisciplinary, and interprofessional PC community identified essential items to include in PC research reports. A 2-round Delphi study identified a consensus list of items considered necessary. The CRISP Checklist contains 24 items that describe the research team, patients, study participants, health conditions, clinical encounters, care teams, interventions, study measures, settings of care, and implementation of findings/results in PC. Not every item applies to every study design or topic. The CRISP guidelines inform the design and reporting of (1) studies done by PC researchers, (2) studies done by other investigators in PC populations and settings, and (3) studies intended for application in PC practice. Improved reporting of the context of the clinical services and the process of research is critical to interpreting study findings/results and applying them to diverse populations and varied settings in PC. article.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1544-1709</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1544-1717</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1544-1717</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1370/afm.3029</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37788942</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Annals of Family Medicine</publisher><subject>Checklist ; Consensus ; Humans ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Medical research ; Medical writing ; Medicine, Experimental ; Primary Health Care ; Quality management ; Research Design ; Research Report</subject><ispartof>Annals of family medicine, 2023-11, Vol.21 (6), p.549-555</ispartof><rights>2023 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Annals of Family Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-1b1336a5efd3effbad5136846f1ff82dc9b736567af794673422f1965ca6d6a43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37788942$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Phillips, William R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sturgiss, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glasziou, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olde Hartman, Tim C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orkin, Aaron M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prathivadi, Pallavi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reeve, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russell, Grant M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Weel, Chris</creatorcontrib><title>Improving the Reporting of Primary Care Research: Consensus Reporting Items for Studies in Primary Care-the CRISP Statement</title><title>Annals of family medicine</title><addtitle>Ann Fam Med</addtitle><description>Primary care (PC) is a unique clinical specialty and research discipline with its own perspectives and methods. Research in this field uses varied research methods and study designs to investigate myriad topics. The diversity of PC presents challenges for reporting, and despite the proliferation of reporting guidelines, none focuses specifically on the needs of PC. The Consensus Reporting Items for Studies in Primary Care (CRISP) Checklist guides reporting of PC research to include the information needed by the diverse PC community, including practitioners, patients, and communities. CRISP complements current guidelines to enhance the reporting, dissemination, and application of PC research findings and results. Prior CRISP studies documented opportunities to improve research reporting in this field. Our surveys of the international, interdisciplinary, and interprofessional PC community identified essential items to include in PC research reports. A 2-round Delphi study identified a consensus list of items considered necessary. The CRISP Checklist contains 24 items that describe the research team, patients, study participants, health conditions, clinical encounters, care teams, interventions, study measures, settings of care, and implementation of findings/results in PC. Not every item applies to every study design or topic. The CRISP guidelines inform the design and reporting of (1) studies done by PC researchers, (2) studies done by other investigators in PC populations and settings, and (3) studies intended for application in PC practice. Improved reporting of the context of the clinical services and the process of research is critical to interpreting study findings/results and applying them to diverse populations and varied settings in PC. article.</description><subject>Checklist</subject><subject>Consensus</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medical writing</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Primary Health Care</subject><subject>Quality management</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Research Report</subject><issn>1544-1709</issn><issn>1544-1717</issn><issn>1544-1717</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0VtLwzAUB_AgipsX8BNIQRBfqrm0SeubFC8DQXH6HLL2ZKu0yUxSQfzytmwOBz7l9sshJ3-ETgi-JEzgK6XbS4ZpvoPGJE2SmAgidjdznI_QgffvGFNCGd1HIyZEluUJHaPvSbt09rM28ygsIHqBpXVhWFkdPbu6Ve4rKpQbTjwoVy6uo8IaD8Z3_o-eBGh9pK2LpqGravBRbbbux0P14mUyfe6F6jWYcIT2tGo8HK_HQ_R2d_taPMSPT_eT4uYxLpMMh5jMCGNcpaArBlrPVJUSxrOEa6J1RqsynwnGUy6UFnnCBUso1STnaal4xVXCDtHFqm7f6UcHPsi29iU0jTJgOy9pJmiGRcpZT89WdK4akLXRNjhVDlzeiAwTRggfCsb_qDkYcKqxBnTdb2_58z9-AaoJC2-bLtT9V27D9UtLZ713oOVy9YeSYDkkLfuk5ZB0T0_XTXWzFqoN_I2W_QCamKHJ</recordid><startdate>20231101</startdate><enddate>20231101</enddate><creator>Phillips, William R</creator><creator>Sturgiss, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Glasziou, Paul</creator><creator>Olde Hartman, Tim C</creator><creator>Orkin, Aaron M</creator><creator>Prathivadi, Pallavi</creator><creator>Reeve, Joanne</creator><creator>Russell, Grant M</creator><creator>van Weel, Chris</creator><general>Annals of Family Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231101</creationdate><title>Improving the Reporting of Primary Care Research: Consensus Reporting Items for Studies in Primary Care-the CRISP Statement</title><author>Phillips, William R ; Sturgiss, Elizabeth ; Glasziou, Paul ; Olde Hartman, Tim C ; Orkin, Aaron M ; Prathivadi, Pallavi ; Reeve, Joanne ; Russell, Grant M ; van Weel, Chris</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-1b1336a5efd3effbad5136846f1ff82dc9b736567af794673422f1965ca6d6a43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Checklist</topic><topic>Consensus</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medical writing</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Primary Health Care</topic><topic>Quality management</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Research Report</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Phillips, William R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sturgiss, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glasziou, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olde Hartman, Tim C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orkin, Aaron M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prathivadi, Pallavi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reeve, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russell, Grant M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Weel, Chris</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of family medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Phillips, William R</au><au>Sturgiss, Elizabeth</au><au>Glasziou, Paul</au><au>Olde Hartman, Tim C</au><au>Orkin, Aaron M</au><au>Prathivadi, Pallavi</au><au>Reeve, Joanne</au><au>Russell, Grant M</au><au>van Weel, Chris</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improving the Reporting of Primary Care Research: Consensus Reporting Items for Studies in Primary Care-the CRISP Statement</atitle><jtitle>Annals of family medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Fam Med</addtitle><date>2023-11-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>549</spage><epage>555</epage><pages>549-555</pages><issn>1544-1709</issn><issn>1544-1717</issn><eissn>1544-1717</eissn><abstract>Primary care (PC) is a unique clinical specialty and research discipline with its own perspectives and methods. Research in this field uses varied research methods and study designs to investigate myriad topics. The diversity of PC presents challenges for reporting, and despite the proliferation of reporting guidelines, none focuses specifically on the needs of PC. The Consensus Reporting Items for Studies in Primary Care (CRISP) Checklist guides reporting of PC research to include the information needed by the diverse PC community, including practitioners, patients, and communities. CRISP complements current guidelines to enhance the reporting, dissemination, and application of PC research findings and results. Prior CRISP studies documented opportunities to improve research reporting in this field. Our surveys of the international, interdisciplinary, and interprofessional PC community identified essential items to include in PC research reports. A 2-round Delphi study identified a consensus list of items considered necessary. The CRISP Checklist contains 24 items that describe the research team, patients, study participants, health conditions, clinical encounters, care teams, interventions, study measures, settings of care, and implementation of findings/results in PC. Not every item applies to every study design or topic. The CRISP guidelines inform the design and reporting of (1) studies done by PC researchers, (2) studies done by other investigators in PC populations and settings, and (3) studies intended for application in PC practice. Improved reporting of the context of the clinical services and the process of research is critical to interpreting study findings/results and applying them to diverse populations and varied settings in PC. article.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Annals of Family Medicine</pub><pmid>37788942</pmid><doi>10.1370/afm.3029</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1544-1709
ispartof Annals of family medicine, 2023-11, Vol.21 (6), p.549-555
issn 1544-1709
1544-1717
1544-1717
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2872807563
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Checklist
Consensus
Humans
Laws, regulations and rules
Medical research
Medical writing
Medicine, Experimental
Primary Health Care
Quality management
Research Design
Research Report
title Improving the Reporting of Primary Care Research: Consensus Reporting Items for Studies in Primary Care-the CRISP Statement
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T17%3A05%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improving%20the%20Reporting%20of%20Primary%20Care%20Research:%20Consensus%20Reporting%20Items%20for%20Studies%20in%20Primary%20Care-the%20CRISP%20Statement&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20family%20medicine&rft.au=Phillips,%20William%20R&rft.date=2023-11-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=549&rft.epage=555&rft.pages=549-555&rft.issn=1544-1709&rft.eissn=1544-1717&rft_id=info:doi/10.1370/afm.3029&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA780131164%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2872807563&rft_id=info:pmid/37788942&rft_galeid=A780131164&rfr_iscdi=true