Transfer of Minors to Adult Court in California: Investigating the Legal/Demographic Factors that Make the Difference

In light of California’s passage of Proposition 57 in 2016, the present study examined the relationship between legal/demographic variables and decisions to transfer juveniles to the adult court system. Following Prop 57, transfer decisions were entrusted solely with judges and prosecutors could no...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychological reports 2023-09, p.332941231202453-332941231202453
Hauptverfasser: Goldschmied, Nadav, Ramona, Ally, Stilman, Eden, Bomberger, Emily, Lehman, Francesca, Malek, Kristina, Minagawa, Rahn
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 332941231202453
container_issue
container_start_page 332941231202453
container_title Psychological reports
container_volume
creator Goldschmied, Nadav
Ramona, Ally
Stilman, Eden
Bomberger, Emily
Lehman, Francesca
Malek, Kristina
Minagawa, Rahn
description In light of California’s passage of Proposition 57 in 2016, the present study examined the relationship between legal/demographic variables and decisions to transfer juveniles to the adult court system. Following Prop 57, transfer decisions were entrusted solely with judges and prosecutors could no longer direct file. We used a sample of 106 reports written by forensic psychologists on behalf of the defense examining the life circumstances of minors who allegedly committed serious crimes. Close to two-thirds of minors were kept in the juvenile system whereas the rest were transferred. Utilizing regression analysis, we found that minors with at least one murder charge were more likely to end up in adult court. In regards to race, we detected an overall considerable overrepresentation of Black and Latino juveniles and an underrepresentation of Whites with charges against them but no support of racial bias in transfer decisions in our restricted data set.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/00332941231202453
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2871659204</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2871659204</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c230t-b6166a6c41e9f0df01aad9156f422c9be59ba4a77cb09c55662b2ad13e5c97823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkD9PwzAUxC0EEqXwAdg8soT6T-zUbFWhUKkVS5HYohfHTg1pXGwHiW9P2rIxPZ3eT3enQ-iWkntKi2JCCOdM5ZRxygjLBT9DIyrENJOKvp-j0eGfHYBLdBXjxyAp4cUI9ZsAXbQmYG_x2nU-RJw8ntV9m_Dc9yFh1-E5tM760Dl4wMvu28TkGkiua3DaGrwyDbSTR7PzTYD91mm8AJ2OTltIeA2f5sg9OjsEmU6ba3RhoY3m5u-O0dviaTN_yVavz8v5bJVpxknKKkmlBKlzapQltSUUoFZUSJszplVlhKogh6LQFVFaCClZxaCm3AitiinjY3R38t0H_9UPtcudi9q0LXTG97Fk04JKoRjJB5SeUB18jMHYch_cDsJPSUl5mLj8NzH_BQAFbsc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2871659204</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transfer of Minors to Adult Court in California: Investigating the Legal/Demographic Factors that Make the Difference</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Goldschmied, Nadav ; Ramona, Ally ; Stilman, Eden ; Bomberger, Emily ; Lehman, Francesca ; Malek, Kristina ; Minagawa, Rahn</creator><creatorcontrib>Goldschmied, Nadav ; Ramona, Ally ; Stilman, Eden ; Bomberger, Emily ; Lehman, Francesca ; Malek, Kristina ; Minagawa, Rahn</creatorcontrib><description>In light of California’s passage of Proposition 57 in 2016, the present study examined the relationship between legal/demographic variables and decisions to transfer juveniles to the adult court system. Following Prop 57, transfer decisions were entrusted solely with judges and prosecutors could no longer direct file. We used a sample of 106 reports written by forensic psychologists on behalf of the defense examining the life circumstances of minors who allegedly committed serious crimes. Close to two-thirds of minors were kept in the juvenile system whereas the rest were transferred. Utilizing regression analysis, we found that minors with at least one murder charge were more likely to end up in adult court. In regards to race, we detected an overall considerable overrepresentation of Black and Latino juveniles and an underrepresentation of Whites with charges against them but no support of racial bias in transfer decisions in our restricted data set.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2941</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-691X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/00332941231202453</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Psychological reports, 2023-09, p.332941231202453-332941231202453</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c230t-b6166a6c41e9f0df01aad9156f422c9be59ba4a77cb09c55662b2ad13e5c97823</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7645-5058</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goldschmied, Nadav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramona, Ally</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stilman, Eden</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bomberger, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lehman, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malek, Kristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minagawa, Rahn</creatorcontrib><title>Transfer of Minors to Adult Court in California: Investigating the Legal/Demographic Factors that Make the Difference</title><title>Psychological reports</title><description>In light of California’s passage of Proposition 57 in 2016, the present study examined the relationship between legal/demographic variables and decisions to transfer juveniles to the adult court system. Following Prop 57, transfer decisions were entrusted solely with judges and prosecutors could no longer direct file. We used a sample of 106 reports written by forensic psychologists on behalf of the defense examining the life circumstances of minors who allegedly committed serious crimes. Close to two-thirds of minors were kept in the juvenile system whereas the rest were transferred. Utilizing regression analysis, we found that minors with at least one murder charge were more likely to end up in adult court. In regards to race, we detected an overall considerable overrepresentation of Black and Latino juveniles and an underrepresentation of Whites with charges against them but no support of racial bias in transfer decisions in our restricted data set.</description><issn>0033-2941</issn><issn>1558-691X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkD9PwzAUxC0EEqXwAdg8soT6T-zUbFWhUKkVS5HYohfHTg1pXGwHiW9P2rIxPZ3eT3enQ-iWkntKi2JCCOdM5ZRxygjLBT9DIyrENJOKvp-j0eGfHYBLdBXjxyAp4cUI9ZsAXbQmYG_x2nU-RJw8ntV9m_Dc9yFh1-E5tM760Dl4wMvu28TkGkiua3DaGrwyDbSTR7PzTYD91mm8AJ2OTltIeA2f5sg9OjsEmU6ba3RhoY3m5u-O0dviaTN_yVavz8v5bJVpxknKKkmlBKlzapQltSUUoFZUSJszplVlhKogh6LQFVFaCClZxaCm3AitiinjY3R38t0H_9UPtcudi9q0LXTG97Fk04JKoRjJB5SeUB18jMHYch_cDsJPSUl5mLj8NzH_BQAFbsc</recordid><startdate>20230928</startdate><enddate>20230928</enddate><creator>Goldschmied, Nadav</creator><creator>Ramona, Ally</creator><creator>Stilman, Eden</creator><creator>Bomberger, Emily</creator><creator>Lehman, Francesca</creator><creator>Malek, Kristina</creator><creator>Minagawa, Rahn</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7645-5058</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230928</creationdate><title>Transfer of Minors to Adult Court in California: Investigating the Legal/Demographic Factors that Make the Difference</title><author>Goldschmied, Nadav ; Ramona, Ally ; Stilman, Eden ; Bomberger, Emily ; Lehman, Francesca ; Malek, Kristina ; Minagawa, Rahn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c230t-b6166a6c41e9f0df01aad9156f422c9be59ba4a77cb09c55662b2ad13e5c97823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goldschmied, Nadav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramona, Ally</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stilman, Eden</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bomberger, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lehman, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malek, Kristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minagawa, Rahn</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goldschmied, Nadav</au><au>Ramona, Ally</au><au>Stilman, Eden</au><au>Bomberger, Emily</au><au>Lehman, Francesca</au><au>Malek, Kristina</au><au>Minagawa, Rahn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transfer of Minors to Adult Court in California: Investigating the Legal/Demographic Factors that Make the Difference</atitle><jtitle>Psychological reports</jtitle><date>2023-09-28</date><risdate>2023</risdate><spage>332941231202453</spage><epage>332941231202453</epage><pages>332941231202453-332941231202453</pages><issn>0033-2941</issn><eissn>1558-691X</eissn><abstract>In light of California’s passage of Proposition 57 in 2016, the present study examined the relationship between legal/demographic variables and decisions to transfer juveniles to the adult court system. Following Prop 57, transfer decisions were entrusted solely with judges and prosecutors could no longer direct file. We used a sample of 106 reports written by forensic psychologists on behalf of the defense examining the life circumstances of minors who allegedly committed serious crimes. Close to two-thirds of minors were kept in the juvenile system whereas the rest were transferred. Utilizing regression analysis, we found that minors with at least one murder charge were more likely to end up in adult court. In regards to race, we detected an overall considerable overrepresentation of Black and Latino juveniles and an underrepresentation of Whites with charges against them but no support of racial bias in transfer decisions in our restricted data set.</abstract><doi>10.1177/00332941231202453</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7645-5058</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-2941
ispartof Psychological reports, 2023-09, p.332941231202453-332941231202453
issn 0033-2941
1558-691X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2871659204
source Business Source Complete; SAGE Complete A-Z List
title Transfer of Minors to Adult Court in California: Investigating the Legal/Demographic Factors that Make the Difference
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T03%3A02%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transfer%20of%20Minors%20to%20Adult%20Court%20in%20California:%20Investigating%20the%20Legal/Demographic%20Factors%20that%20Make%20the%20Difference&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20reports&rft.au=Goldschmied,%20Nadav&rft.date=2023-09-28&rft.spage=332941231202453&rft.epage=332941231202453&rft.pages=332941231202453-332941231202453&rft.issn=0033-2941&rft.eissn=1558-691X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/00332941231202453&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2871659204%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2871659204&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true