Can Optical Surface Imaging Replace Non-coplanar Cone-beam Computed Tomography for Non-coplanar Set-up Verification in Single-isocentre Non-coplanar Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Single and Multiple Brain Metastases?

To conduct a direct comparison regarding the non-coplanar positioning accuracy between the optical surface imaging system Catalyst HDTM and non-coplanar cone-beam computed tomography (NC-CBCT) in intracranial single-isocentre non-coplanar stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and hypofractionated stereota...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)) 2023-12, Vol.35 (12), p.e657-e665
Hauptverfasser: Lai, J.L., Liu, S.P., Jiang, X.X., Liu, J., Li, A., Li, B., Li, X.K., Ye, X.J., Lei, K.J., Zhou, L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e665
container_issue 12
container_start_page e657
container_title Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))
container_volume 35
creator Lai, J.L.
Liu, S.P.
Jiang, X.X.
Liu, J.
Li, A.
Li, B.
Li, X.K.
Ye, X.J.
Lei, K.J.
Zhou, L.
description To conduct a direct comparison regarding the non-coplanar positioning accuracy between the optical surface imaging system Catalyst HDTM and non-coplanar cone-beam computed tomography (NC-CBCT) in intracranial single-isocentre non-coplanar stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT). Twenty patients with between one and five brain metastases who underwent single-isocentre non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (NC-VMAT) SRS or HSRT were enrolled in this study. For each non-zero couch angle, both Catalyst HDTM and NC-CBCT were used for set-up verification prior to beam delivery. The set-up error reported by Catalyst HDTM was compared with the set-up error derived from NC-CBCT, which was defined as the gold standard. Additionally, the dose delivery accuracy of each non-coplanar field after using Catalyst HDTM and NC-CBCT for set-up correction was measured with SRS MapCHECKTM. The median set-up error differences (absolute values) between the two positioning methods were 0.30 mm, 0.40 mm, 0.50 mm, 0.15°, 0.10° and 0.10° in the vertical, longitudinal, lateral, yaw, pitch and roll directions, respectively. The largest absolute set-up error differences regarding translation and rotation were 1.5 mm and 1.1°, which occurred in the longitudinal and yaw directions, respectively. Only 35.71% of the pairs of measurements were within the tolerance of 0.5 mm and 0.5° simultaneously. In addition, the non-coplanar field with NC-CBCT correction yielded a higher gamma passing rate than that with Catalyst HDTM correction (P < 0.05), especially for evaluation criteria of 1%/1 mm with a median increase of 12.8%. Catalyst HDTM may not replace NC-CBCT for non-coplanar set-up corrections in single-isocentre NC-VMAT SRS and HSRT for single and multiple brain metastases. The potential role of Catalyst HDTM in intracranial SRS/HSRT needs to be further studied in the future. •Focusing on non-coplanar set-up correction in single-isocentre non-coplanar SRS/HSRT.•Direct non-coplanar positioning accuracy comparison between Catalyst HDTM and non-coplanar CBCT.•Only 35.71% of the absolute set-up error difference between Catalyst HDTM and non-coplanar CBCT was within 0.5 mm/0.5°.•Non-coplanar VMAT using non-coplanar CBCT yields higher delivery accuracy than non-coplanar VMAT using Catalyst HDTM.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.clon.2023.09.007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2871655201</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0936655523003278</els_id><sourcerecordid>2871655201</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-8c200b1d23bfb710d3978cc8d603b9698bd225020c334f0d25dfc76b9f8f2ae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UV1rFDEUHUVp1-of8EHy6MuM-eh8BATRpbWF1kJ38TVkkpttlplkTDLC_nszbhVUEAK5l3vuOedyiuI1wRXBpHm3r9TgXUUxZRXmFcbt02JFzhkrKe_Is2KFOWvKpq7r0-JFjHuMMe06flKcsrZtO97S1ZOTtXTobkpWyQFt5mCkAnQ9yp11O3QP07D0X7wrlc-1kwGtvYOyBznmapzmBBpt_eh3QU4PB2R8-BO-gVTOE_oKwZoskqx3yDq0yfwDlDZ6BS6FvzQ2CQL4JFX2he6ltj7OYQfhgKTT6OoweROWoXdy0f8Xnh4g-znaOUr93Lydh2Sn3HwKMpu4hSRjfhA_vCyeGzlEePX4nxXby4vt-qq8uft8vf54UypWk1R2imLcE01Zb_qWYM142ynV6Qaznje86zWlNaZYMXZusKa1Nqptem46QyWws-LtkXYK_tsMMYnRRgVDPhv8HAXtWpIDo5hkKD1CVfAxBjBiCnaU4SAIFkv-Yi-W_MWSv8Bc5Pzz0ptH_rkfQf9e-RV4Brw_AiAf-d1CEFFZcAq0DaCS0N7-j_8Hc6vIGw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2871655201</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can Optical Surface Imaging Replace Non-coplanar Cone-beam Computed Tomography for Non-coplanar Set-up Verification in Single-isocentre Non-coplanar Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Single and Multiple Brain Metastases?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Lai, J.L. ; Liu, S.P. ; Jiang, X.X. ; Liu, J. ; Li, A. ; Li, B. ; Li, X.K. ; Ye, X.J. ; Lei, K.J. ; Zhou, L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lai, J.L. ; Liu, S.P. ; Jiang, X.X. ; Liu, J. ; Li, A. ; Li, B. ; Li, X.K. ; Ye, X.J. ; Lei, K.J. ; Zhou, L.</creatorcontrib><description>To conduct a direct comparison regarding the non-coplanar positioning accuracy between the optical surface imaging system Catalyst HDTM and non-coplanar cone-beam computed tomography (NC-CBCT) in intracranial single-isocentre non-coplanar stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT). Twenty patients with between one and five brain metastases who underwent single-isocentre non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (NC-VMAT) SRS or HSRT were enrolled in this study. For each non-zero couch angle, both Catalyst HDTM and NC-CBCT were used for set-up verification prior to beam delivery. The set-up error reported by Catalyst HDTM was compared with the set-up error derived from NC-CBCT, which was defined as the gold standard. Additionally, the dose delivery accuracy of each non-coplanar field after using Catalyst HDTM and NC-CBCT for set-up correction was measured with SRS MapCHECKTM. The median set-up error differences (absolute values) between the two positioning methods were 0.30 mm, 0.40 mm, 0.50 mm, 0.15°, 0.10° and 0.10° in the vertical, longitudinal, lateral, yaw, pitch and roll directions, respectively. The largest absolute set-up error differences regarding translation and rotation were 1.5 mm and 1.1°, which occurred in the longitudinal and yaw directions, respectively. Only 35.71% of the pairs of measurements were within the tolerance of 0.5 mm and 0.5° simultaneously. In addition, the non-coplanar field with NC-CBCT correction yielded a higher gamma passing rate than that with Catalyst HDTM correction (P &lt; 0.05), especially for evaluation criteria of 1%/1 mm with a median increase of 12.8%. Catalyst HDTM may not replace NC-CBCT for non-coplanar set-up corrections in single-isocentre NC-VMAT SRS and HSRT for single and multiple brain metastases. The potential role of Catalyst HDTM in intracranial SRS/HSRT needs to be further studied in the future. •Focusing on non-coplanar set-up correction in single-isocentre non-coplanar SRS/HSRT.•Direct non-coplanar positioning accuracy comparison between Catalyst HDTM and non-coplanar CBCT.•Only 35.71% of the absolute set-up error difference between Catalyst HDTM and non-coplanar CBCT was within 0.5 mm/0.5°.•Non-coplanar VMAT using non-coplanar CBCT yields higher delivery accuracy than non-coplanar VMAT using Catalyst HDTM.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0936-6555</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-2981</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.09.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37778972</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Brain metastases ; Brain Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Brain Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Brain Neoplasms - surgery ; Carmustine ; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography ; Etoposide ; Humans ; hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy ; non-coplanar cone-beam computed tomography ; non-coplanar positioning accuracy ; optical surface imaging ; Radiosurgery - methods ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods ; stereotactic radiosurgery</subject><ispartof>Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)), 2023-12, Vol.35 (12), p.e657-e665</ispartof><rights>2023</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-8c200b1d23bfb710d3978cc8d603b9698bd225020c334f0d25dfc76b9f8f2ae3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6428-7392 ; 0000-0001-5940-1763</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37778972$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lai, J.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, S.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, X.X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, X.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ye, X.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lei, K.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, L.</creatorcontrib><title>Can Optical Surface Imaging Replace Non-coplanar Cone-beam Computed Tomography for Non-coplanar Set-up Verification in Single-isocentre Non-coplanar Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Single and Multiple Brain Metastases?</title><title>Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))</title><addtitle>Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)</addtitle><description>To conduct a direct comparison regarding the non-coplanar positioning accuracy between the optical surface imaging system Catalyst HDTM and non-coplanar cone-beam computed tomography (NC-CBCT) in intracranial single-isocentre non-coplanar stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT). Twenty patients with between one and five brain metastases who underwent single-isocentre non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (NC-VMAT) SRS or HSRT were enrolled in this study. For each non-zero couch angle, both Catalyst HDTM and NC-CBCT were used for set-up verification prior to beam delivery. The set-up error reported by Catalyst HDTM was compared with the set-up error derived from NC-CBCT, which was defined as the gold standard. Additionally, the dose delivery accuracy of each non-coplanar field after using Catalyst HDTM and NC-CBCT for set-up correction was measured with SRS MapCHECKTM. The median set-up error differences (absolute values) between the two positioning methods were 0.30 mm, 0.40 mm, 0.50 mm, 0.15°, 0.10° and 0.10° in the vertical, longitudinal, lateral, yaw, pitch and roll directions, respectively. The largest absolute set-up error differences regarding translation and rotation were 1.5 mm and 1.1°, which occurred in the longitudinal and yaw directions, respectively. Only 35.71% of the pairs of measurements were within the tolerance of 0.5 mm and 0.5° simultaneously. In addition, the non-coplanar field with NC-CBCT correction yielded a higher gamma passing rate than that with Catalyst HDTM correction (P &lt; 0.05), especially for evaluation criteria of 1%/1 mm with a median increase of 12.8%. Catalyst HDTM may not replace NC-CBCT for non-coplanar set-up corrections in single-isocentre NC-VMAT SRS and HSRT for single and multiple brain metastases. The potential role of Catalyst HDTM in intracranial SRS/HSRT needs to be further studied in the future. •Focusing on non-coplanar set-up correction in single-isocentre non-coplanar SRS/HSRT.•Direct non-coplanar positioning accuracy comparison between Catalyst HDTM and non-coplanar CBCT.•Only 35.71% of the absolute set-up error difference between Catalyst HDTM and non-coplanar CBCT was within 0.5 mm/0.5°.•Non-coplanar VMAT using non-coplanar CBCT yields higher delivery accuracy than non-coplanar VMAT using Catalyst HDTM.</description><subject>Brain metastases</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Carmustine</subject><subject>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</subject><subject>Etoposide</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy</subject><subject>non-coplanar cone-beam computed tomography</subject><subject>non-coplanar positioning accuracy</subject><subject>optical surface imaging</subject><subject>Radiosurgery - methods</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>stereotactic radiosurgery</subject><issn>0936-6555</issn><issn>1433-2981</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UV1rFDEUHUVp1-of8EHy6MuM-eh8BATRpbWF1kJ38TVkkpttlplkTDLC_nszbhVUEAK5l3vuOedyiuI1wRXBpHm3r9TgXUUxZRXmFcbt02JFzhkrKe_Is2KFOWvKpq7r0-JFjHuMMe06flKcsrZtO97S1ZOTtXTobkpWyQFt5mCkAnQ9yp11O3QP07D0X7wrlc-1kwGtvYOyBznmapzmBBpt_eh3QU4PB2R8-BO-gVTOE_oKwZoskqx3yDq0yfwDlDZ6BS6FvzQ2CQL4JFX2he6ltj7OYQfhgKTT6OoweROWoXdy0f8Xnh4g-znaOUr93Lydh2Sn3HwKMpu4hSRjfhA_vCyeGzlEePX4nxXby4vt-qq8uft8vf54UypWk1R2imLcE01Zb_qWYM142ynV6Qaznje86zWlNaZYMXZusKa1Nqptem46QyWws-LtkXYK_tsMMYnRRgVDPhv8HAXtWpIDo5hkKD1CVfAxBjBiCnaU4SAIFkv-Yi-W_MWSv8Bc5Pzz0ptH_rkfQf9e-RV4Brw_AiAf-d1CEFFZcAq0DaCS0N7-j_8Hc6vIGw</recordid><startdate>202312</startdate><enddate>202312</enddate><creator>Lai, J.L.</creator><creator>Liu, S.P.</creator><creator>Jiang, X.X.</creator><creator>Liu, J.</creator><creator>Li, A.</creator><creator>Li, B.</creator><creator>Li, X.K.</creator><creator>Ye, X.J.</creator><creator>Lei, K.J.</creator><creator>Zhou, L.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6428-7392</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5940-1763</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202312</creationdate><title>Can Optical Surface Imaging Replace Non-coplanar Cone-beam Computed Tomography for Non-coplanar Set-up Verification in Single-isocentre Non-coplanar Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Single and Multiple Brain Metastases?</title><author>Lai, J.L. ; Liu, S.P. ; Jiang, X.X. ; Liu, J. ; Li, A. ; Li, B. ; Li, X.K. ; Ye, X.J. ; Lei, K.J. ; Zhou, L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-8c200b1d23bfb710d3978cc8d603b9698bd225020c334f0d25dfc76b9f8f2ae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Brain metastases</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Carmustine</topic><topic>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</topic><topic>Etoposide</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy</topic><topic>non-coplanar cone-beam computed tomography</topic><topic>non-coplanar positioning accuracy</topic><topic>optical surface imaging</topic><topic>Radiosurgery - methods</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>stereotactic radiosurgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lai, J.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, S.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, X.X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, X.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ye, X.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lei, K.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lai, J.L.</au><au>Liu, S.P.</au><au>Jiang, X.X.</au><au>Liu, J.</au><au>Li, A.</au><au>Li, B.</au><au>Li, X.K.</au><au>Ye, X.J.</au><au>Lei, K.J.</au><au>Zhou, L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can Optical Surface Imaging Replace Non-coplanar Cone-beam Computed Tomography for Non-coplanar Set-up Verification in Single-isocentre Non-coplanar Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Single and Multiple Brain Metastases?</atitle><jtitle>Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)</addtitle><date>2023-12</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e657</spage><epage>e665</epage><pages>e657-e665</pages><issn>0936-6555</issn><eissn>1433-2981</eissn><abstract>To conduct a direct comparison regarding the non-coplanar positioning accuracy between the optical surface imaging system Catalyst HDTM and non-coplanar cone-beam computed tomography (NC-CBCT) in intracranial single-isocentre non-coplanar stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT). Twenty patients with between one and five brain metastases who underwent single-isocentre non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (NC-VMAT) SRS or HSRT were enrolled in this study. For each non-zero couch angle, both Catalyst HDTM and NC-CBCT were used for set-up verification prior to beam delivery. The set-up error reported by Catalyst HDTM was compared with the set-up error derived from NC-CBCT, which was defined as the gold standard. Additionally, the dose delivery accuracy of each non-coplanar field after using Catalyst HDTM and NC-CBCT for set-up correction was measured with SRS MapCHECKTM. The median set-up error differences (absolute values) between the two positioning methods were 0.30 mm, 0.40 mm, 0.50 mm, 0.15°, 0.10° and 0.10° in the vertical, longitudinal, lateral, yaw, pitch and roll directions, respectively. The largest absolute set-up error differences regarding translation and rotation were 1.5 mm and 1.1°, which occurred in the longitudinal and yaw directions, respectively. Only 35.71% of the pairs of measurements were within the tolerance of 0.5 mm and 0.5° simultaneously. In addition, the non-coplanar field with NC-CBCT correction yielded a higher gamma passing rate than that with Catalyst HDTM correction (P &lt; 0.05), especially for evaluation criteria of 1%/1 mm with a median increase of 12.8%. Catalyst HDTM may not replace NC-CBCT for non-coplanar set-up corrections in single-isocentre NC-VMAT SRS and HSRT for single and multiple brain metastases. The potential role of Catalyst HDTM in intracranial SRS/HSRT needs to be further studied in the future. •Focusing on non-coplanar set-up correction in single-isocentre non-coplanar SRS/HSRT.•Direct non-coplanar positioning accuracy comparison between Catalyst HDTM and non-coplanar CBCT.•Only 35.71% of the absolute set-up error difference between Catalyst HDTM and non-coplanar CBCT was within 0.5 mm/0.5°.•Non-coplanar VMAT using non-coplanar CBCT yields higher delivery accuracy than non-coplanar VMAT using Catalyst HDTM.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>37778972</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clon.2023.09.007</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6428-7392</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5940-1763</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0936-6555
ispartof Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)), 2023-12, Vol.35 (12), p.e657-e665
issn 0936-6555
1433-2981
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2871655201
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Brain metastases
Brain Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Brain Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Brain Neoplasms - surgery
Carmustine
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Etoposide
Humans
hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy
non-coplanar cone-beam computed tomography
non-coplanar positioning accuracy
optical surface imaging
Radiosurgery - methods
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods
stereotactic radiosurgery
title Can Optical Surface Imaging Replace Non-coplanar Cone-beam Computed Tomography for Non-coplanar Set-up Verification in Single-isocentre Non-coplanar Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Single and Multiple Brain Metastases?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T03%3A13%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20Optical%20Surface%20Imaging%20Replace%20Non-coplanar%20Cone-beam%20Computed%20Tomography%20for%20Non-coplanar%20Set-up%20Verification%20in%20Single-isocentre%20Non-coplanar%20Stereotactic%20Radiosurgery%20and%20Hypofractionated%20Stereotactic%20Radiotherapy%20for%20Single%20and%20Multiple%20Brain%20Metastases?&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20oncology%20(Royal%20College%20of%20Radiologists%20(Great%20Britain))&rft.au=Lai,%20J.L.&rft.date=2023-12&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e657&rft.epage=e665&rft.pages=e657-e665&rft.issn=0936-6555&rft.eissn=1433-2981&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clon.2023.09.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2871655201%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2871655201&rft_id=info:pmid/37778972&rft_els_id=S0936655523003278&rfr_iscdi=true