The relationship between mental health and public attention to the Brett Kavanaugh hearings and confirmation

Researchers have rarely considered how public attention surrounding political events influences mental health. Specifically, in a politically polarized nation like the United States, it is possible that these events have a public mental health effect. This study examines the mental health effects as...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Social science & medicine (1982) 2023-10, Vol.335, p.116131-116131, Article 116131
Hauptverfasser: Sleeper, Colin, Cartwright, Kate, van der Goes, David N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 116131
container_issue
container_start_page 116131
container_title Social science & medicine (1982)
container_volume 335
creator Sleeper, Colin
Cartwright, Kate
van der Goes, David N.
description Researchers have rarely considered how public attention surrounding political events influences mental health. Specifically, in a politically polarized nation like the United States, it is possible that these events have a public mental health effect. This study examines the mental health effects associated with the 2018 U.S. Senate hearing and confirmation of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh using public survey data. We use the interview date included in CDC data from the 2014–2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) to identify the effects of increased public attention on the Kavanaugh hearings and confirmation on the mental health of individuals who identify as female. We employ a triple difference model to control for possible confounding effects and target causality. We find meaningful increases in both the number of “not good” mental health days reported and the probability of reporting any “not good” mental health days. On average, females reported 0.24 more poor mental health days during the one-month period surrounding the Kavanaugh confirmation and hearings than women did in the same 1-month period in 2014. This change represents a nearly 10% increase in mental health burden. The results are robust to the inclusion of a range of covariates as well as alternate specifications. In addition, we derive estimates of the societal costs associated with the increased mental health burden linked to Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation. This study demonstrates that the Kavanaugh confirmation and hearings were associated with a notable rise in mental health challenges, especially among women. These results extend beyond personal experience and illustrate the societal costs linked to the resulting increased mental health burden. Further research on similar events is warranted. •Public attention to upsetting issues can cause changes in Health Related Quality of Life Measures.•Females reported more poor mental health days during the Brett Kavanaugh hearings and confirmation.•Triple Difference specifications found the increase in poor mental health days to be significant.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116131
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2870995684</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0277953623004884</els_id><sourcerecordid>2870995684</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c294t-4f2c87cd6c04a9165ebd35ee083a1fe9d3da3d2d4e71dec254cd816428ca321d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwDXjJJsWPPJel4iUqsSlry7UnjSvHCbZTxN-TNogtq1nMPVczB6FbShaU0Px-vwidCsq0oBeMML6gNKecnqEZLQueZDwtztGMsKJIqoznl-gqhD0hhJKSz5DdNIA9WBlN50JjeryF-AXgcAsuSosbkDY2WDqN-2FrjcIyxnE1xnHscBzxBw8x4jd5kE4Ou-aIeON24QSpztXGt6f-a3RRSxvg5nfO0cfT42b1kqzfn19Xy3WiWJXGJK2ZKgulc0VSWdE8g63mGcB4sKQ1VJpryTXTKRRUg2JZqnRJ85SVSnJGNZ-ju6m3993nACGK1gQF1koH3RAEKwtSVVlepmO0mKLKdyF4qEXvTSv9t6BEHP2KvfjzK45-xeR3JJcTCeMnBwNejCFwCrTxoKLQnfm34weIIoqh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2870995684</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The relationship between mental health and public attention to the Brett Kavanaugh hearings and confirmation</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Sleeper, Colin ; Cartwright, Kate ; van der Goes, David N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sleeper, Colin ; Cartwright, Kate ; van der Goes, David N.</creatorcontrib><description>Researchers have rarely considered how public attention surrounding political events influences mental health. Specifically, in a politically polarized nation like the United States, it is possible that these events have a public mental health effect. This study examines the mental health effects associated with the 2018 U.S. Senate hearing and confirmation of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh using public survey data. We use the interview date included in CDC data from the 2014–2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) to identify the effects of increased public attention on the Kavanaugh hearings and confirmation on the mental health of individuals who identify as female. We employ a triple difference model to control for possible confounding effects and target causality. We find meaningful increases in both the number of “not good” mental health days reported and the probability of reporting any “not good” mental health days. On average, females reported 0.24 more poor mental health days during the one-month period surrounding the Kavanaugh confirmation and hearings than women did in the same 1-month period in 2014. This change represents a nearly 10% increase in mental health burden. The results are robust to the inclusion of a range of covariates as well as alternate specifications. In addition, we derive estimates of the societal costs associated with the increased mental health burden linked to Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation. This study demonstrates that the Kavanaugh confirmation and hearings were associated with a notable rise in mental health challenges, especially among women. These results extend beyond personal experience and illustrate the societal costs linked to the resulting increased mental health burden. Further research on similar events is warranted. •Public attention to upsetting issues can cause changes in Health Related Quality of Life Measures.•Females reported more poor mental health days during the Brett Kavanaugh hearings and confirmation.•Triple Difference specifications found the increase in poor mental health days to be significant.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-9536</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5347</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116131</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Mental health ; Political news ; Population health ; Sexual assault ; Supreme court</subject><ispartof>Social science &amp; medicine (1982), 2023-10, Vol.335, p.116131-116131, Article 116131</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c294t-4f2c87cd6c04a9165ebd35ee083a1fe9d3da3d2d4e71dec254cd816428ca321d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3397-8633 ; 0000-0002-3374-663X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953623004884$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sleeper, Colin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cartwright, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Goes, David N.</creatorcontrib><title>The relationship between mental health and public attention to the Brett Kavanaugh hearings and confirmation</title><title>Social science &amp; medicine (1982)</title><description>Researchers have rarely considered how public attention surrounding political events influences mental health. Specifically, in a politically polarized nation like the United States, it is possible that these events have a public mental health effect. This study examines the mental health effects associated with the 2018 U.S. Senate hearing and confirmation of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh using public survey data. We use the interview date included in CDC data from the 2014–2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) to identify the effects of increased public attention on the Kavanaugh hearings and confirmation on the mental health of individuals who identify as female. We employ a triple difference model to control for possible confounding effects and target causality. We find meaningful increases in both the number of “not good” mental health days reported and the probability of reporting any “not good” mental health days. On average, females reported 0.24 more poor mental health days during the one-month period surrounding the Kavanaugh confirmation and hearings than women did in the same 1-month period in 2014. This change represents a nearly 10% increase in mental health burden. The results are robust to the inclusion of a range of covariates as well as alternate specifications. In addition, we derive estimates of the societal costs associated with the increased mental health burden linked to Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation. This study demonstrates that the Kavanaugh confirmation and hearings were associated with a notable rise in mental health challenges, especially among women. These results extend beyond personal experience and illustrate the societal costs linked to the resulting increased mental health burden. Further research on similar events is warranted. •Public attention to upsetting issues can cause changes in Health Related Quality of Life Measures.•Females reported more poor mental health days during the Brett Kavanaugh hearings and confirmation.•Triple Difference specifications found the increase in poor mental health days to be significant.</description><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Political news</subject><subject>Population health</subject><subject>Sexual assault</subject><subject>Supreme court</subject><issn>0277-9536</issn><issn>1873-5347</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwDXjJJsWPPJel4iUqsSlry7UnjSvHCbZTxN-TNogtq1nMPVczB6FbShaU0Px-vwidCsq0oBeMML6gNKecnqEZLQueZDwtztGMsKJIqoznl-gqhD0hhJKSz5DdNIA9WBlN50JjeryF-AXgcAsuSosbkDY2WDqN-2FrjcIyxnE1xnHscBzxBw8x4jd5kE4Ou-aIeON24QSpztXGt6f-a3RRSxvg5nfO0cfT42b1kqzfn19Xy3WiWJXGJK2ZKgulc0VSWdE8g63mGcB4sKQ1VJpryTXTKRRUg2JZqnRJ85SVSnJGNZ-ju6m3993nACGK1gQF1koH3RAEKwtSVVlepmO0mKLKdyF4qEXvTSv9t6BEHP2KvfjzK45-xeR3JJcTCeMnBwNejCFwCrTxoKLQnfm34weIIoqh</recordid><startdate>202310</startdate><enddate>202310</enddate><creator>Sleeper, Colin</creator><creator>Cartwright, Kate</creator><creator>van der Goes, David N.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3397-8633</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3374-663X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202310</creationdate><title>The relationship between mental health and public attention to the Brett Kavanaugh hearings and confirmation</title><author>Sleeper, Colin ; Cartwright, Kate ; van der Goes, David N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c294t-4f2c87cd6c04a9165ebd35ee083a1fe9d3da3d2d4e71dec254cd816428ca321d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Political news</topic><topic>Population health</topic><topic>Sexual assault</topic><topic>Supreme court</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sleeper, Colin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cartwright, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Goes, David N.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Social science &amp; medicine (1982)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sleeper, Colin</au><au>Cartwright, Kate</au><au>van der Goes, David N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The relationship between mental health and public attention to the Brett Kavanaugh hearings and confirmation</atitle><jtitle>Social science &amp; medicine (1982)</jtitle><date>2023-10</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>335</volume><spage>116131</spage><epage>116131</epage><pages>116131-116131</pages><artnum>116131</artnum><issn>0277-9536</issn><eissn>1873-5347</eissn><abstract>Researchers have rarely considered how public attention surrounding political events influences mental health. Specifically, in a politically polarized nation like the United States, it is possible that these events have a public mental health effect. This study examines the mental health effects associated with the 2018 U.S. Senate hearing and confirmation of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh using public survey data. We use the interview date included in CDC data from the 2014–2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) to identify the effects of increased public attention on the Kavanaugh hearings and confirmation on the mental health of individuals who identify as female. We employ a triple difference model to control for possible confounding effects and target causality. We find meaningful increases in both the number of “not good” mental health days reported and the probability of reporting any “not good” mental health days. On average, females reported 0.24 more poor mental health days during the one-month period surrounding the Kavanaugh confirmation and hearings than women did in the same 1-month period in 2014. This change represents a nearly 10% increase in mental health burden. The results are robust to the inclusion of a range of covariates as well as alternate specifications. In addition, we derive estimates of the societal costs associated with the increased mental health burden linked to Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation. This study demonstrates that the Kavanaugh confirmation and hearings were associated with a notable rise in mental health challenges, especially among women. These results extend beyond personal experience and illustrate the societal costs linked to the resulting increased mental health burden. Further research on similar events is warranted. •Public attention to upsetting issues can cause changes in Health Related Quality of Life Measures.•Females reported more poor mental health days during the Brett Kavanaugh hearings and confirmation.•Triple Difference specifications found the increase in poor mental health days to be significant.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116131</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3397-8633</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3374-663X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0277-9536
ispartof Social science & medicine (1982), 2023-10, Vol.335, p.116131-116131, Article 116131
issn 0277-9536
1873-5347
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2870995684
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Mental health
Political news
Population health
Sexual assault
Supreme court
title The relationship between mental health and public attention to the Brett Kavanaugh hearings and confirmation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T09%3A12%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20relationship%20between%20mental%20health%20and%20public%20attention%20to%20the%20Brett%20Kavanaugh%20hearings%20and%20confirmation&rft.jtitle=Social%20science%20&%20medicine%20(1982)&rft.au=Sleeper,%20Colin&rft.date=2023-10&rft.volume=335&rft.spage=116131&rft.epage=116131&rft.pages=116131-116131&rft.artnum=116131&rft.issn=0277-9536&rft.eissn=1873-5347&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116131&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2870995684%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2870995684&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0277953623004884&rfr_iscdi=true