Scoping review of outcome measures in cleft care used in research and reports
Treatment outcome measures are critical in the decision making of best practices in the OFC field. OFC consortium working groups provided standardization of outcome measures based on previous treatment outcome studies. However, the implementation of such standardization in OFC centres worldwide is u...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Orthodontics & craniofacial research 2024-06, Vol.27 (S1), p.42-48 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 48 |
---|---|
container_issue | S1 |
container_start_page | 42 |
container_title | Orthodontics & craniofacial research |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Sarilita, Erli Sjamsudin, Endang Mossey, Peter A. |
description | Treatment outcome measures are critical in the decision making of best practices in the OFC field. OFC consortium working groups provided standardization of outcome measures based on previous treatment outcome studies. However, the implementation of such standardization in OFC centres worldwide is unknown. This study presented mapped outcome measures in cleft care using a structured review method complemented by quantitative overview of the relevant published research to provide initial guidelines for the implementation of treatment outcome standardization. A scoping review of the literature of treatment outcomes in cleft care following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta‐Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines was performed. The selected indexed paper in outcome measures mapped following the international consortium in standard set of outcome measures in cleft care. Three hundred and sixty‐five articles were filtered. The most discussed domains of cleft care were dental and oral health, appearance and speech/communication. Overall, the majority of publications were produced in high‐income countries. The current review indicates that there are inequalities of treatment outcome studies among the domain of cleft care. In addition, there are also inequalities of published articles from HIC versus LMIC in treatment outcomes. This information can be used to develop targeted interventions aimed at encouraging cleft centres worldwide to adapt standardized outcome measures. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ocr.12711 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2870142726</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3053800595</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3481-9ac5851cac0bfa84ae596c0700440cd81d6b394f4e0da3e181f040d16a0d61fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoVqsH_4AEvOihdmaTze4epfgFSsGPc0izs7qyu6lJ19J_b7Tag2Auk5l5eBhexo4QzjG-sbP-HJMMcYvtoQIcKSHF9uYv0gHbD-ENIIEkUbtsILJMZTkWe-z-0bp53b1wTx81LbmruOsX1rXEWzKh9xR43XHbULXg1njifaDyaxQ3ZLx95aYrYzN3fhEO2E5lmkCHP3XInq8unyY3o7vp9e3k4m5khcxxVBib5ilaY2FWmVwaSgtlIQOQEmyZY6lmopCVJCiNIMyxAgklKgOlwsqIITtde-fevfcUFrqtg6WmMR25PugkzwBlkiUqoid_0DfX-y5epwWkIgdIizRSZ2vKeheCp0rPfd0av9II-itjHTPW3xlH9vjH2M9aKjfkb6gRGK-BZd3Q6n-Tnk4e1spPkhOEeQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3053800595</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Scoping review of outcome measures in cleft care used in research and reports</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Sarilita, Erli ; Sjamsudin, Endang ; Mossey, Peter A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sarilita, Erli ; Sjamsudin, Endang ; Mossey, Peter A.</creatorcontrib><description>Treatment outcome measures are critical in the decision making of best practices in the OFC field. OFC consortium working groups provided standardization of outcome measures based on previous treatment outcome studies. However, the implementation of such standardization in OFC centres worldwide is unknown. This study presented mapped outcome measures in cleft care using a structured review method complemented by quantitative overview of the relevant published research to provide initial guidelines for the implementation of treatment outcome standardization. A scoping review of the literature of treatment outcomes in cleft care following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta‐Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines was performed. The selected indexed paper in outcome measures mapped following the international consortium in standard set of outcome measures in cleft care. Three hundred and sixty‐five articles were filtered. The most discussed domains of cleft care were dental and oral health, appearance and speech/communication. Overall, the majority of publications were produced in high‐income countries. The current review indicates that there are inequalities of treatment outcome studies among the domain of cleft care. In addition, there are also inequalities of published articles from HIC versus LMIC in treatment outcomes. This information can be used to develop targeted interventions aimed at encouraging cleft centres worldwide to adapt standardized outcome measures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1601-6335</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1601-6343</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12711</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37767819</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Cleft Lip - therapy ; Cleft Palate - therapy ; Clinical outcomes ; Consortia ; Decision making ; Humans ; Literature reviews ; Meta-analysis ; orofacial cleft ; Outcome Assessment, Health Care ; review ; Standardization ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Orthodontics & craniofacial research, 2024-06, Vol.27 (S1), p.42-48</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3481-9ac5851cac0bfa84ae596c0700440cd81d6b394f4e0da3e181f040d16a0d61fa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4678-2744 ; 0000-0002-9914-6901</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Focr.12711$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Focr.12711$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37767819$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sarilita, Erli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sjamsudin, Endang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mossey, Peter A.</creatorcontrib><title>Scoping review of outcome measures in cleft care used in research and reports</title><title>Orthodontics & craniofacial research</title><addtitle>Orthod Craniofac Res</addtitle><description>Treatment outcome measures are critical in the decision making of best practices in the OFC field. OFC consortium working groups provided standardization of outcome measures based on previous treatment outcome studies. However, the implementation of such standardization in OFC centres worldwide is unknown. This study presented mapped outcome measures in cleft care using a structured review method complemented by quantitative overview of the relevant published research to provide initial guidelines for the implementation of treatment outcome standardization. A scoping review of the literature of treatment outcomes in cleft care following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta‐Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines was performed. The selected indexed paper in outcome measures mapped following the international consortium in standard set of outcome measures in cleft care. Three hundred and sixty‐five articles were filtered. The most discussed domains of cleft care were dental and oral health, appearance and speech/communication. Overall, the majority of publications were produced in high‐income countries. The current review indicates that there are inequalities of treatment outcome studies among the domain of cleft care. In addition, there are also inequalities of published articles from HIC versus LMIC in treatment outcomes. This information can be used to develop targeted interventions aimed at encouraging cleft centres worldwide to adapt standardized outcome measures.</description><subject>Cleft Lip - therapy</subject><subject>Cleft Palate - therapy</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Consortia</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>orofacial cleft</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment, Health Care</subject><subject>review</subject><subject>Standardization</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1601-6335</issn><issn>1601-6343</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoVqsH_4AEvOihdmaTze4epfgFSsGPc0izs7qyu6lJ19J_b7Tag2Auk5l5eBhexo4QzjG-sbP-HJMMcYvtoQIcKSHF9uYv0gHbD-ENIIEkUbtsILJMZTkWe-z-0bp53b1wTx81LbmruOsX1rXEWzKh9xR43XHbULXg1njifaDyaxQ3ZLx95aYrYzN3fhEO2E5lmkCHP3XInq8unyY3o7vp9e3k4m5khcxxVBib5ilaY2FWmVwaSgtlIQOQEmyZY6lmopCVJCiNIMyxAgklKgOlwsqIITtde-fevfcUFrqtg6WmMR25PugkzwBlkiUqoid_0DfX-y5epwWkIgdIizRSZ2vKeheCp0rPfd0av9II-itjHTPW3xlH9vjH2M9aKjfkb6gRGK-BZd3Q6n-Tnk4e1spPkhOEeQ</recordid><startdate>202406</startdate><enddate>202406</enddate><creator>Sarilita, Erli</creator><creator>Sjamsudin, Endang</creator><creator>Mossey, Peter A.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4678-2744</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9914-6901</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202406</creationdate><title>Scoping review of outcome measures in cleft care used in research and reports</title><author>Sarilita, Erli ; Sjamsudin, Endang ; Mossey, Peter A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3481-9ac5851cac0bfa84ae596c0700440cd81d6b394f4e0da3e181f040d16a0d61fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Cleft Lip - therapy</topic><topic>Cleft Palate - therapy</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Consortia</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>orofacial cleft</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment, Health Care</topic><topic>review</topic><topic>Standardization</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sarilita, Erli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sjamsudin, Endang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mossey, Peter A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Orthodontics & craniofacial research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sarilita, Erli</au><au>Sjamsudin, Endang</au><au>Mossey, Peter A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Scoping review of outcome measures in cleft care used in research and reports</atitle><jtitle>Orthodontics & craniofacial research</jtitle><addtitle>Orthod Craniofac Res</addtitle><date>2024-06</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>42</spage><epage>48</epage><pages>42-48</pages><issn>1601-6335</issn><eissn>1601-6343</eissn><abstract>Treatment outcome measures are critical in the decision making of best practices in the OFC field. OFC consortium working groups provided standardization of outcome measures based on previous treatment outcome studies. However, the implementation of such standardization in OFC centres worldwide is unknown. This study presented mapped outcome measures in cleft care using a structured review method complemented by quantitative overview of the relevant published research to provide initial guidelines for the implementation of treatment outcome standardization. A scoping review of the literature of treatment outcomes in cleft care following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta‐Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines was performed. The selected indexed paper in outcome measures mapped following the international consortium in standard set of outcome measures in cleft care. Three hundred and sixty‐five articles were filtered. The most discussed domains of cleft care were dental and oral health, appearance and speech/communication. Overall, the majority of publications were produced in high‐income countries. The current review indicates that there are inequalities of treatment outcome studies among the domain of cleft care. In addition, there are also inequalities of published articles from HIC versus LMIC in treatment outcomes. This information can be used to develop targeted interventions aimed at encouraging cleft centres worldwide to adapt standardized outcome measures.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>37767819</pmid><doi>10.1111/ocr.12711</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4678-2744</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9914-6901</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1601-6335 |
ispartof | Orthodontics & craniofacial research, 2024-06, Vol.27 (S1), p.42-48 |
issn | 1601-6335 1601-6343 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2870142726 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals |
subjects | Cleft Lip - therapy Cleft Palate - therapy Clinical outcomes Consortia Decision making Humans Literature reviews Meta-analysis orofacial cleft Outcome Assessment, Health Care review Standardization Treatment Outcome |
title | Scoping review of outcome measures in cleft care used in research and reports |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T08%3A14%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Scoping%20review%20of%20outcome%20measures%20in%20cleft%20care%20used%20in%20research%20and%20reports&rft.jtitle=Orthodontics%20&%20craniofacial%20research&rft.au=Sarilita,%20Erli&rft.date=2024-06&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=42&rft.epage=48&rft.pages=42-48&rft.issn=1601-6335&rft.eissn=1601-6343&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ocr.12711&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3053800595%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3053800595&rft_id=info:pmid/37767819&rfr_iscdi=true |