Evaluation of enamel wear by 3 occlusal splint materials: An in vitro study

Occlusal devices used to manage bruxism have been commonly fabricated from polymethyl methacrylate with the powder-liquid technique. More recently, Vertex ThermoSens (VTS) and the biocompatible high-performance polymer (BioHPP), an optimized material having polyetheretherketone (PEEK) as its basis,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 2023-11, Vol.130 (5), p.743-743.e6
Hauptverfasser: Borg, Hisham, Azer, Shereen S., El Hadary, Amany, Helaly, Osama, Shoeib, Ahmad, Hassan, Mohammed
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 743.e6
container_issue 5
container_start_page 743
container_title The Journal of prosthetic dentistry
container_volume 130
creator Borg, Hisham
Azer, Shereen S.
El Hadary, Amany
Helaly, Osama
Shoeib, Ahmad
Hassan, Mohammed
description Occlusal devices used to manage bruxism have been commonly fabricated from polymethyl methacrylate with the powder-liquid technique. More recently, Vertex ThermoSens (VTS) and the biocompatible high-performance polymer (BioHPP), an optimized material having polyetheretherketone (PEEK) as its basis, have been used, but little is known about the wear of these materials on human enamel. The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess via a mastication simulation test how 3 occlusal device materials affected the wear and roughness of enamel antagonists. A noncontact 3D optical profilometer was used to measure the enamel surface roughness (Ra) against 3 occlusal device materials: vertex regular, VTS, and PEEK high-performance polymer (BioHPP). A dual-axis mastication simulator was used to perform a 2-body wear test on specimens from each group. The test consisted of 10 000 cycles with a 70-N force and 5 to 55 °C thermocycling. Following simulated mastication, the weight of each specimen and the Ra change were compared with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, paired specimens t test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and 1-way analysis of variance (α=.05). The polyamide group caused the lowest amount of enamel wear (P
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.08.034
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2868670217</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022391323005747</els_id><sourcerecordid>2868670217</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-25810d09579895d31c73eee721c9445d05630ae251810198f836a9eda923602f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAURS0EEqXwF5BHloRnO3FsJqqqfIhKLDBbxnmRXLlJsZ2i_nuCCjPTG965V7qHkGsGJQMmbzflLg6pxT6XHLgoQZUgqhMyY6CbQqqKnZIZAOeF0Eyck4uUNgCg6obNyMtqb8Nosx96OnQUe7vFQL_QRvpxoIIOzoUx2UDTLvg-063NGL0N6Y4ueup7uvc5DjTlsT1ckrNu-uDV752T94fV2_KpWL8-Pi8X68JxzXPBa8WgBV03Wum6Fcw1AhEbzpyuqrqFWgqwyGs2cUyrTglpNbZWcyGBd2JObo690-7PEVM2W58chmB7HMZkuJJKNsBZM6HyiLpJUYrYmV30WxsPhoH5sWc25s-e-bFnQJnJ3hS8PwZxGrL3GE1yHnuHrY_osmkH_1_FN4rNepQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2868670217</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of enamel wear by 3 occlusal splint materials: An in vitro study</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Borg, Hisham ; Azer, Shereen S. ; El Hadary, Amany ; Helaly, Osama ; Shoeib, Ahmad ; Hassan, Mohammed</creator><creatorcontrib>Borg, Hisham ; Azer, Shereen S. ; El Hadary, Amany ; Helaly, Osama ; Shoeib, Ahmad ; Hassan, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><description>Occlusal devices used to manage bruxism have been commonly fabricated from polymethyl methacrylate with the powder-liquid technique. More recently, Vertex ThermoSens (VTS) and the biocompatible high-performance polymer (BioHPP), an optimized material having polyetheretherketone (PEEK) as its basis, have been used, but little is known about the wear of these materials on human enamel. The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess via a mastication simulation test how 3 occlusal device materials affected the wear and roughness of enamel antagonists. A noncontact 3D optical profilometer was used to measure the enamel surface roughness (Ra) against 3 occlusal device materials: vertex regular, VTS, and PEEK high-performance polymer (BioHPP). A dual-axis mastication simulator was used to perform a 2-body wear test on specimens from each group. The test consisted of 10 000 cycles with a 70-N force and 5 to 55 °C thermocycling. Following simulated mastication, the weight of each specimen and the Ra change were compared with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, paired specimens t test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and 1-way analysis of variance (α=.05). The polyamide group caused the lowest amount of enamel wear (P&lt;.05), while the heat-polymerized acrylic resin group induced the largest amount of enamel wear (P&lt;.05). For polyamide and PEEK, the change in enamel surface roughness exhibited a smooth texture, whereas it found a rougher surface for the heat-polymerized acrylic resin. According to this study, surface roughness and wear on human enamel were not correlated. PEEK is a promising material for the fabrication of occlusal devices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3913</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6841</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.08.034</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 2023-11, Vol.130 (5), p.743-743.e6</ispartof><rights>2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-25810d09579895d31c73eee721c9445d05630ae251810198f836a9eda923602f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0657-2870 ; 0000-0002-7262-378X ; 0000-0002-8722-4845</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Borg, Hisham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azer, Shereen S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El Hadary, Amany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helaly, Osama</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shoeib, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassan, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of enamel wear by 3 occlusal splint materials: An in vitro study</title><title>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</title><description>Occlusal devices used to manage bruxism have been commonly fabricated from polymethyl methacrylate with the powder-liquid technique. More recently, Vertex ThermoSens (VTS) and the biocompatible high-performance polymer (BioHPP), an optimized material having polyetheretherketone (PEEK) as its basis, have been used, but little is known about the wear of these materials on human enamel. The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess via a mastication simulation test how 3 occlusal device materials affected the wear and roughness of enamel antagonists. A noncontact 3D optical profilometer was used to measure the enamel surface roughness (Ra) against 3 occlusal device materials: vertex regular, VTS, and PEEK high-performance polymer (BioHPP). A dual-axis mastication simulator was used to perform a 2-body wear test on specimens from each group. The test consisted of 10 000 cycles with a 70-N force and 5 to 55 °C thermocycling. Following simulated mastication, the weight of each specimen and the Ra change were compared with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, paired specimens t test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and 1-way analysis of variance (α=.05). The polyamide group caused the lowest amount of enamel wear (P&lt;.05), while the heat-polymerized acrylic resin group induced the largest amount of enamel wear (P&lt;.05). For polyamide and PEEK, the change in enamel surface roughness exhibited a smooth texture, whereas it found a rougher surface for the heat-polymerized acrylic resin. According to this study, surface roughness and wear on human enamel were not correlated. PEEK is a promising material for the fabrication of occlusal devices.</description><issn>0022-3913</issn><issn>1097-6841</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAURS0EEqXwF5BHloRnO3FsJqqqfIhKLDBbxnmRXLlJsZ2i_nuCCjPTG965V7qHkGsGJQMmbzflLg6pxT6XHLgoQZUgqhMyY6CbQqqKnZIZAOeF0Eyck4uUNgCg6obNyMtqb8Nosx96OnQUe7vFQL_QRvpxoIIOzoUx2UDTLvg-063NGL0N6Y4ueup7uvc5DjTlsT1ckrNu-uDV752T94fV2_KpWL8-Pi8X68JxzXPBa8WgBV03Wum6Fcw1AhEbzpyuqrqFWgqwyGs2cUyrTglpNbZWcyGBd2JObo690-7PEVM2W58chmB7HMZkuJJKNsBZM6HyiLpJUYrYmV30WxsPhoH5sWc25s-e-bFnQJnJ3hS8PwZxGrL3GE1yHnuHrY_osmkH_1_FN4rNepQ</recordid><startdate>202311</startdate><enddate>202311</enddate><creator>Borg, Hisham</creator><creator>Azer, Shereen S.</creator><creator>El Hadary, Amany</creator><creator>Helaly, Osama</creator><creator>Shoeib, Ahmad</creator><creator>Hassan, Mohammed</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0657-2870</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7262-378X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8722-4845</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202311</creationdate><title>Evaluation of enamel wear by 3 occlusal splint materials: An in vitro study</title><author>Borg, Hisham ; Azer, Shereen S. ; El Hadary, Amany ; Helaly, Osama ; Shoeib, Ahmad ; Hassan, Mohammed</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-25810d09579895d31c73eee721c9445d05630ae251810198f836a9eda923602f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Borg, Hisham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azer, Shereen S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El Hadary, Amany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helaly, Osama</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shoeib, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassan, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Borg, Hisham</au><au>Azer, Shereen S.</au><au>El Hadary, Amany</au><au>Helaly, Osama</au><au>Shoeib, Ahmad</au><au>Hassan, Mohammed</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of enamel wear by 3 occlusal splint materials: An in vitro study</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</jtitle><date>2023-11</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>130</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>743</spage><epage>743.e6</epage><pages>743-743.e6</pages><issn>0022-3913</issn><eissn>1097-6841</eissn><abstract>Occlusal devices used to manage bruxism have been commonly fabricated from polymethyl methacrylate with the powder-liquid technique. More recently, Vertex ThermoSens (VTS) and the biocompatible high-performance polymer (BioHPP), an optimized material having polyetheretherketone (PEEK) as its basis, have been used, but little is known about the wear of these materials on human enamel. The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess via a mastication simulation test how 3 occlusal device materials affected the wear and roughness of enamel antagonists. A noncontact 3D optical profilometer was used to measure the enamel surface roughness (Ra) against 3 occlusal device materials: vertex regular, VTS, and PEEK high-performance polymer (BioHPP). A dual-axis mastication simulator was used to perform a 2-body wear test on specimens from each group. The test consisted of 10 000 cycles with a 70-N force and 5 to 55 °C thermocycling. Following simulated mastication, the weight of each specimen and the Ra change were compared with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, paired specimens t test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and 1-way analysis of variance (α=.05). The polyamide group caused the lowest amount of enamel wear (P&lt;.05), while the heat-polymerized acrylic resin group induced the largest amount of enamel wear (P&lt;.05). For polyamide and PEEK, the change in enamel surface roughness exhibited a smooth texture, whereas it found a rougher surface for the heat-polymerized acrylic resin. According to this study, surface roughness and wear on human enamel were not correlated. PEEK is a promising material for the fabrication of occlusal devices.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.08.034</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0657-2870</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7262-378X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8722-4845</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3913
ispartof The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 2023-11, Vol.130 (5), p.743-743.e6
issn 0022-3913
1097-6841
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2868670217
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
title Evaluation of enamel wear by 3 occlusal splint materials: An in vitro study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T20%3A04%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20enamel%20wear%20by%203%20occlusal%20splint%20materials:%20An%20in%20vitro%20study&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20prosthetic%20dentistry&rft.au=Borg,%20Hisham&rft.date=2023-11&rft.volume=130&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=743&rft.epage=743.e6&rft.pages=743-743.e6&rft.issn=0022-3913&rft.eissn=1097-6841&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.08.034&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2868670217%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2868670217&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0022391323005747&rfr_iscdi=true