Outcome comparison between primary and revisional bariatric surgery: A propensity-matched analysis
Revisional bariatric procedures for weight recurrence are rising but are considered higher risk and less effective than primary bariatric procedures. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes between primary and revisional bariatric surgery for weight recurrence. Prospectively collected data fro...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Surgery 2024-03, Vol.175 (3), p.592-598 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 598 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 592 |
container_title | Surgery |
container_volume | 175 |
creator | Giannopoulos, Spyridon Li, Wendy S. Kalantar Motamedi, Seyed Mohammad Embry, Marisa Stefanidis, Dimitrios |
description | Revisional bariatric procedures for weight recurrence are rising but are considered higher risk and less effective than primary bariatric procedures. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes between primary and revisional bariatric surgery for weight recurrence.
Prospectively collected data from adult patients who underwent revisional or primary bariatric surgery from 2016 to 2020 in an academic institution were reviewed. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy were performed primarily or as conversion procedures after laparoscopic adjustable gastric band, vertical banded gastroplasty, and sleeve gastrectomy. 1:1 propensity score matching was performed between revisional bariatric surgery and primary bariatric surgery, and logistic regression analysis was used to compare up to 2-year weight loss and comorbidity resolution outcomes.
A total of172 cases (86 revisional bariatric surgery versus 86 primary bariatric surgery) were included. Groups were matched for age, sex, preoperative body mass index, bariatric procedure, diabetes, hypertension, and obstructive sleep apnea. Procedure duration (203 ± 78 vs 154 ± 69 minutes; P < .001) and length of stay (2.3 ± 2.1 vs 1.7 ± 1 days; P = .02) were longer for revisional bariatric surgery versus primary bariatric surgery, respectively. Total weight loss was less in revisional bariatric surgery compared with primary bariatric surgery at 1 year (23 ± 10% vs 32 ± 9%; P < .001) and 2 years (21 ± 12.% vs 32 ± 10%; P < .001) of follow-up; however, no differences were detected in postoperative occurrences, emergency department visits, readmissions, reintervention and reoperation rates, and comorbidity resolution.
Although revisional bariatric surgery was associated with longer operation times, prolonged hospitalization, and lower weight loss than primary bariatric surgery, it was accomplished safely and led to substantial weight loss and comorbidity resolution. This information can guide patient counseling before revisional surgery for weight recurrence. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.surg.2023.07.027 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2867150900</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0039606023005056</els_id><sourcerecordid>2867150900</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-e4669eb660f558b3015456c94aab894a2a1215f4650405d717140c55e332e2583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EglL4AxxQjlwS1nZsJ4hLhXhJSFzgbDnOFlzlUeykKP8eVy0cuexeZmZ3PkIuKGQUqLxeZWH0HxkDxjNQGTB1QGZUcJYqLukhmQHwMpUg4YSchrACgDKnxTE54UpxEDSfkep1HGzfYhLH2ngX-i6pcPhG7JK1d63xU2K6OvG4ccH1nWmSKsrM4J1NtufRTzfJImr7NXbBDVPamsF-Yh1tppmCC2fkaGmagOf7PSfvD_dvd0_py-vj893iJbVcyCHFXMoSKylhKURRcaAiF9KWuTFVESczlFGxzKWAHEStqKI5WCGQc4ZMFHxOrna58ZevEcOgWxcsNo3psB-DZoVUVEAZqcwJ20mt70PwuNT7rpqC3rLVK70tp7dsNSgd2UbT5T5_rFqs_yy_MKPgdifA2HLj0OtgHXYWa-fRDrru3X_5PwOaizA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2867150900</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Outcome comparison between primary and revisional bariatric surgery: A propensity-matched analysis</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Giannopoulos, Spyridon ; Li, Wendy S. ; Kalantar Motamedi, Seyed Mohammad ; Embry, Marisa ; Stefanidis, Dimitrios</creator><creatorcontrib>Giannopoulos, Spyridon ; Li, Wendy S. ; Kalantar Motamedi, Seyed Mohammad ; Embry, Marisa ; Stefanidis, Dimitrios</creatorcontrib><description>Revisional bariatric procedures for weight recurrence are rising but are considered higher risk and less effective than primary bariatric procedures. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes between primary and revisional bariatric surgery for weight recurrence.
Prospectively collected data from adult patients who underwent revisional or primary bariatric surgery from 2016 to 2020 in an academic institution were reviewed. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy were performed primarily or as conversion procedures after laparoscopic adjustable gastric band, vertical banded gastroplasty, and sleeve gastrectomy. 1:1 propensity score matching was performed between revisional bariatric surgery and primary bariatric surgery, and logistic regression analysis was used to compare up to 2-year weight loss and comorbidity resolution outcomes.
A total of172 cases (86 revisional bariatric surgery versus 86 primary bariatric surgery) were included. Groups were matched for age, sex, preoperative body mass index, bariatric procedure, diabetes, hypertension, and obstructive sleep apnea. Procedure duration (203 ± 78 vs 154 ± 69 minutes; P < .001) and length of stay (2.3 ± 2.1 vs 1.7 ± 1 days; P = .02) were longer for revisional bariatric surgery versus primary bariatric surgery, respectively. Total weight loss was less in revisional bariatric surgery compared with primary bariatric surgery at 1 year (23 ± 10% vs 32 ± 9%; P < .001) and 2 years (21 ± 12.% vs 32 ± 10%; P < .001) of follow-up; however, no differences were detected in postoperative occurrences, emergency department visits, readmissions, reintervention and reoperation rates, and comorbidity resolution.
Although revisional bariatric surgery was associated with longer operation times, prolonged hospitalization, and lower weight loss than primary bariatric surgery, it was accomplished safely and led to substantial weight loss and comorbidity resolution. This information can guide patient counseling before revisional surgery for weight recurrence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-6060</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7361</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.07.027</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37730514</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>Surgery, 2024-03, Vol.175 (3), p.592-598</ispartof><rights>2023</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-e4669eb660f558b3015456c94aab894a2a1215f4650405d717140c55e332e2583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-e4669eb660f558b3015456c94aab894a2a1215f4650405d717140c55e332e2583</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5144-0274 ; 0000-0002-2177-0763</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039606023005056$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37730514$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Giannopoulos, Spyridon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Wendy S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalantar Motamedi, Seyed Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Embry, Marisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stefanidis, Dimitrios</creatorcontrib><title>Outcome comparison between primary and revisional bariatric surgery: A propensity-matched analysis</title><title>Surgery</title><addtitle>Surgery</addtitle><description>Revisional bariatric procedures for weight recurrence are rising but are considered higher risk and less effective than primary bariatric procedures. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes between primary and revisional bariatric surgery for weight recurrence.
Prospectively collected data from adult patients who underwent revisional or primary bariatric surgery from 2016 to 2020 in an academic institution were reviewed. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy were performed primarily or as conversion procedures after laparoscopic adjustable gastric band, vertical banded gastroplasty, and sleeve gastrectomy. 1:1 propensity score matching was performed between revisional bariatric surgery and primary bariatric surgery, and logistic regression analysis was used to compare up to 2-year weight loss and comorbidity resolution outcomes.
A total of172 cases (86 revisional bariatric surgery versus 86 primary bariatric surgery) were included. Groups were matched for age, sex, preoperative body mass index, bariatric procedure, diabetes, hypertension, and obstructive sleep apnea. Procedure duration (203 ± 78 vs 154 ± 69 minutes; P < .001) and length of stay (2.3 ± 2.1 vs 1.7 ± 1 days; P = .02) were longer for revisional bariatric surgery versus primary bariatric surgery, respectively. Total weight loss was less in revisional bariatric surgery compared with primary bariatric surgery at 1 year (23 ± 10% vs 32 ± 9%; P < .001) and 2 years (21 ± 12.% vs 32 ± 10%; P < .001) of follow-up; however, no differences were detected in postoperative occurrences, emergency department visits, readmissions, reintervention and reoperation rates, and comorbidity resolution.
Although revisional bariatric surgery was associated with longer operation times, prolonged hospitalization, and lower weight loss than primary bariatric surgery, it was accomplished safely and led to substantial weight loss and comorbidity resolution. This information can guide patient counseling before revisional surgery for weight recurrence.</description><issn>0039-6060</issn><issn>1532-7361</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EglL4AxxQjlwS1nZsJ4hLhXhJSFzgbDnOFlzlUeykKP8eVy0cuexeZmZ3PkIuKGQUqLxeZWH0HxkDxjNQGTB1QGZUcJYqLukhmQHwMpUg4YSchrACgDKnxTE54UpxEDSfkep1HGzfYhLH2ngX-i6pcPhG7JK1d63xU2K6OvG4ccH1nWmSKsrM4J1NtufRTzfJImr7NXbBDVPamsF-Yh1tppmCC2fkaGmagOf7PSfvD_dvd0_py-vj893iJbVcyCHFXMoSKylhKURRcaAiF9KWuTFVESczlFGxzKWAHEStqKI5WCGQc4ZMFHxOrna58ZevEcOgWxcsNo3psB-DZoVUVEAZqcwJ20mt70PwuNT7rpqC3rLVK70tp7dsNSgd2UbT5T5_rFqs_yy_MKPgdifA2HLj0OtgHXYWa-fRDrru3X_5PwOaizA</recordid><startdate>202403</startdate><enddate>202403</enddate><creator>Giannopoulos, Spyridon</creator><creator>Li, Wendy S.</creator><creator>Kalantar Motamedi, Seyed Mohammad</creator><creator>Embry, Marisa</creator><creator>Stefanidis, Dimitrios</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5144-0274</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2177-0763</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202403</creationdate><title>Outcome comparison between primary and revisional bariatric surgery: A propensity-matched analysis</title><author>Giannopoulos, Spyridon ; Li, Wendy S. ; Kalantar Motamedi, Seyed Mohammad ; Embry, Marisa ; Stefanidis, Dimitrios</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-e4669eb660f558b3015456c94aab894a2a1215f4650405d717140c55e332e2583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Giannopoulos, Spyridon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Wendy S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalantar Motamedi, Seyed Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Embry, Marisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stefanidis, Dimitrios</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Giannopoulos, Spyridon</au><au>Li, Wendy S.</au><au>Kalantar Motamedi, Seyed Mohammad</au><au>Embry, Marisa</au><au>Stefanidis, Dimitrios</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Outcome comparison between primary and revisional bariatric surgery: A propensity-matched analysis</atitle><jtitle>Surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Surgery</addtitle><date>2024-03</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>175</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>592</spage><epage>598</epage><pages>592-598</pages><issn>0039-6060</issn><eissn>1532-7361</eissn><abstract>Revisional bariatric procedures for weight recurrence are rising but are considered higher risk and less effective than primary bariatric procedures. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes between primary and revisional bariatric surgery for weight recurrence.
Prospectively collected data from adult patients who underwent revisional or primary bariatric surgery from 2016 to 2020 in an academic institution were reviewed. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy were performed primarily or as conversion procedures after laparoscopic adjustable gastric band, vertical banded gastroplasty, and sleeve gastrectomy. 1:1 propensity score matching was performed between revisional bariatric surgery and primary bariatric surgery, and logistic regression analysis was used to compare up to 2-year weight loss and comorbidity resolution outcomes.
A total of172 cases (86 revisional bariatric surgery versus 86 primary bariatric surgery) were included. Groups were matched for age, sex, preoperative body mass index, bariatric procedure, diabetes, hypertension, and obstructive sleep apnea. Procedure duration (203 ± 78 vs 154 ± 69 minutes; P < .001) and length of stay (2.3 ± 2.1 vs 1.7 ± 1 days; P = .02) were longer for revisional bariatric surgery versus primary bariatric surgery, respectively. Total weight loss was less in revisional bariatric surgery compared with primary bariatric surgery at 1 year (23 ± 10% vs 32 ± 9%; P < .001) and 2 years (21 ± 12.% vs 32 ± 10%; P < .001) of follow-up; however, no differences were detected in postoperative occurrences, emergency department visits, readmissions, reintervention and reoperation rates, and comorbidity resolution.
Although revisional bariatric surgery was associated with longer operation times, prolonged hospitalization, and lower weight loss than primary bariatric surgery, it was accomplished safely and led to substantial weight loss and comorbidity resolution. This information can guide patient counseling before revisional surgery for weight recurrence.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>37730514</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.surg.2023.07.027</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5144-0274</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2177-0763</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0039-6060 |
ispartof | Surgery, 2024-03, Vol.175 (3), p.592-598 |
issn | 0039-6060 1532-7361 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2867150900 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
title | Outcome comparison between primary and revisional bariatric surgery: A propensity-matched analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T16%3A01%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Outcome%20comparison%20between%20primary%20and%20revisional%20bariatric%20surgery:%20A%20propensity-matched%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Surgery&rft.au=Giannopoulos,%20Spyridon&rft.date=2024-03&rft.volume=175&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=592&rft.epage=598&rft.pages=592-598&rft.issn=0039-6060&rft.eissn=1532-7361&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.surg.2023.07.027&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2867150900%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2867150900&rft_id=info:pmid/37730514&rft_els_id=S0039606023005056&rfr_iscdi=true |