Outcome comparison between primary and revisional bariatric surgery: A propensity-matched analysis

Revisional bariatric procedures for weight recurrence are rising but are considered higher risk and less effective than primary bariatric procedures. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes between primary and revisional bariatric surgery for weight recurrence. Prospectively collected data fro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgery 2024-03, Vol.175 (3), p.592-598
Hauptverfasser: Giannopoulos, Spyridon, Li, Wendy S., Kalantar Motamedi, Seyed Mohammad, Embry, Marisa, Stefanidis, Dimitrios
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 598
container_issue 3
container_start_page 592
container_title Surgery
container_volume 175
creator Giannopoulos, Spyridon
Li, Wendy S.
Kalantar Motamedi, Seyed Mohammad
Embry, Marisa
Stefanidis, Dimitrios
description Revisional bariatric procedures for weight recurrence are rising but are considered higher risk and less effective than primary bariatric procedures. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes between primary and revisional bariatric surgery for weight recurrence. Prospectively collected data from adult patients who underwent revisional or primary bariatric surgery from 2016 to 2020 in an academic institution were reviewed. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy were performed primarily or as conversion procedures after laparoscopic adjustable gastric band, vertical banded gastroplasty, and sleeve gastrectomy. 1:1 propensity score matching was performed between revisional bariatric surgery and primary bariatric surgery, and logistic regression analysis was used to compare up to 2-year weight loss and comorbidity resolution outcomes. A total of172 cases (86 revisional bariatric surgery versus 86 primary bariatric surgery) were included. Groups were matched for age, sex, preoperative body mass index, bariatric procedure, diabetes, hypertension, and obstructive sleep apnea. Procedure duration (203 ± 78 vs 154 ± 69 minutes; P < .001) and length of stay (2.3 ± 2.1 vs 1.7 ± 1 days; P = .02) were longer for revisional bariatric surgery versus primary bariatric surgery, respectively. Total weight loss was less in revisional bariatric surgery compared with primary bariatric surgery at 1 year (23 ± 10% vs 32 ± 9%; P < .001) and 2 years (21 ± 12.% vs 32 ± 10%; P < .001) of follow-up; however, no differences were detected in postoperative occurrences, emergency department visits, readmissions, reintervention and reoperation rates, and comorbidity resolution. Although revisional bariatric surgery was associated with longer operation times, prolonged hospitalization, and lower weight loss than primary bariatric surgery, it was accomplished safely and led to substantial weight loss and comorbidity resolution. This information can guide patient counseling before revisional surgery for weight recurrence.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.surg.2023.07.027
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2867150900</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0039606023005056</els_id><sourcerecordid>2867150900</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-e4669eb660f558b3015456c94aab894a2a1215f4650405d717140c55e332e2583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EglL4AxxQjlwS1nZsJ4hLhXhJSFzgbDnOFlzlUeykKP8eVy0cuexeZmZ3PkIuKGQUqLxeZWH0HxkDxjNQGTB1QGZUcJYqLukhmQHwMpUg4YSchrACgDKnxTE54UpxEDSfkep1HGzfYhLH2ngX-i6pcPhG7JK1d63xU2K6OvG4ccH1nWmSKsrM4J1NtufRTzfJImr7NXbBDVPamsF-Yh1tppmCC2fkaGmagOf7PSfvD_dvd0_py-vj893iJbVcyCHFXMoSKylhKURRcaAiF9KWuTFVESczlFGxzKWAHEStqKI5WCGQc4ZMFHxOrna58ZevEcOgWxcsNo3psB-DZoVUVEAZqcwJ20mt70PwuNT7rpqC3rLVK70tp7dsNSgd2UbT5T5_rFqs_yy_MKPgdifA2HLj0OtgHXYWa-fRDrru3X_5PwOaizA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2867150900</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Outcome comparison between primary and revisional bariatric surgery: A propensity-matched analysis</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Giannopoulos, Spyridon ; Li, Wendy S. ; Kalantar Motamedi, Seyed Mohammad ; Embry, Marisa ; Stefanidis, Dimitrios</creator><creatorcontrib>Giannopoulos, Spyridon ; Li, Wendy S. ; Kalantar Motamedi, Seyed Mohammad ; Embry, Marisa ; Stefanidis, Dimitrios</creatorcontrib><description>Revisional bariatric procedures for weight recurrence are rising but are considered higher risk and less effective than primary bariatric procedures. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes between primary and revisional bariatric surgery for weight recurrence. Prospectively collected data from adult patients who underwent revisional or primary bariatric surgery from 2016 to 2020 in an academic institution were reviewed. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy were performed primarily or as conversion procedures after laparoscopic adjustable gastric band, vertical banded gastroplasty, and sleeve gastrectomy. 1:1 propensity score matching was performed between revisional bariatric surgery and primary bariatric surgery, and logistic regression analysis was used to compare up to 2-year weight loss and comorbidity resolution outcomes. A total of172 cases (86 revisional bariatric surgery versus 86 primary bariatric surgery) were included. Groups were matched for age, sex, preoperative body mass index, bariatric procedure, diabetes, hypertension, and obstructive sleep apnea. Procedure duration (203 ± 78 vs 154 ± 69 minutes; P &lt; .001) and length of stay (2.3 ± 2.1 vs 1.7 ± 1 days; P = .02) were longer for revisional bariatric surgery versus primary bariatric surgery, respectively. Total weight loss was less in revisional bariatric surgery compared with primary bariatric surgery at 1 year (23 ± 10% vs 32 ± 9%; P &lt; .001) and 2 years (21 ± 12.% vs 32 ± 10%; P &lt; .001) of follow-up; however, no differences were detected in postoperative occurrences, emergency department visits, readmissions, reintervention and reoperation rates, and comorbidity resolution. Although revisional bariatric surgery was associated with longer operation times, prolonged hospitalization, and lower weight loss than primary bariatric surgery, it was accomplished safely and led to substantial weight loss and comorbidity resolution. This information can guide patient counseling before revisional surgery for weight recurrence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-6060</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7361</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.07.027</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37730514</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>Surgery, 2024-03, Vol.175 (3), p.592-598</ispartof><rights>2023</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-e4669eb660f558b3015456c94aab894a2a1215f4650405d717140c55e332e2583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-e4669eb660f558b3015456c94aab894a2a1215f4650405d717140c55e332e2583</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5144-0274 ; 0000-0002-2177-0763</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039606023005056$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37730514$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Giannopoulos, Spyridon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Wendy S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalantar Motamedi, Seyed Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Embry, Marisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stefanidis, Dimitrios</creatorcontrib><title>Outcome comparison between primary and revisional bariatric surgery: A propensity-matched analysis</title><title>Surgery</title><addtitle>Surgery</addtitle><description>Revisional bariatric procedures for weight recurrence are rising but are considered higher risk and less effective than primary bariatric procedures. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes between primary and revisional bariatric surgery for weight recurrence. Prospectively collected data from adult patients who underwent revisional or primary bariatric surgery from 2016 to 2020 in an academic institution were reviewed. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy were performed primarily or as conversion procedures after laparoscopic adjustable gastric band, vertical banded gastroplasty, and sleeve gastrectomy. 1:1 propensity score matching was performed between revisional bariatric surgery and primary bariatric surgery, and logistic regression analysis was used to compare up to 2-year weight loss and comorbidity resolution outcomes. A total of172 cases (86 revisional bariatric surgery versus 86 primary bariatric surgery) were included. Groups were matched for age, sex, preoperative body mass index, bariatric procedure, diabetes, hypertension, and obstructive sleep apnea. Procedure duration (203 ± 78 vs 154 ± 69 minutes; P &lt; .001) and length of stay (2.3 ± 2.1 vs 1.7 ± 1 days; P = .02) were longer for revisional bariatric surgery versus primary bariatric surgery, respectively. Total weight loss was less in revisional bariatric surgery compared with primary bariatric surgery at 1 year (23 ± 10% vs 32 ± 9%; P &lt; .001) and 2 years (21 ± 12.% vs 32 ± 10%; P &lt; .001) of follow-up; however, no differences were detected in postoperative occurrences, emergency department visits, readmissions, reintervention and reoperation rates, and comorbidity resolution. Although revisional bariatric surgery was associated with longer operation times, prolonged hospitalization, and lower weight loss than primary bariatric surgery, it was accomplished safely and led to substantial weight loss and comorbidity resolution. This information can guide patient counseling before revisional surgery for weight recurrence.</description><issn>0039-6060</issn><issn>1532-7361</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EglL4AxxQjlwS1nZsJ4hLhXhJSFzgbDnOFlzlUeykKP8eVy0cuexeZmZ3PkIuKGQUqLxeZWH0HxkDxjNQGTB1QGZUcJYqLukhmQHwMpUg4YSchrACgDKnxTE54UpxEDSfkep1HGzfYhLH2ngX-i6pcPhG7JK1d63xU2K6OvG4ccH1nWmSKsrM4J1NtufRTzfJImr7NXbBDVPamsF-Yh1tppmCC2fkaGmagOf7PSfvD_dvd0_py-vj893iJbVcyCHFXMoSKylhKURRcaAiF9KWuTFVESczlFGxzKWAHEStqKI5WCGQc4ZMFHxOrna58ZevEcOgWxcsNo3psB-DZoVUVEAZqcwJ20mt70PwuNT7rpqC3rLVK70tp7dsNSgd2UbT5T5_rFqs_yy_MKPgdifA2HLj0OtgHXYWa-fRDrru3X_5PwOaizA</recordid><startdate>202403</startdate><enddate>202403</enddate><creator>Giannopoulos, Spyridon</creator><creator>Li, Wendy S.</creator><creator>Kalantar Motamedi, Seyed Mohammad</creator><creator>Embry, Marisa</creator><creator>Stefanidis, Dimitrios</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5144-0274</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2177-0763</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202403</creationdate><title>Outcome comparison between primary and revisional bariatric surgery: A propensity-matched analysis</title><author>Giannopoulos, Spyridon ; Li, Wendy S. ; Kalantar Motamedi, Seyed Mohammad ; Embry, Marisa ; Stefanidis, Dimitrios</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-e4669eb660f558b3015456c94aab894a2a1215f4650405d717140c55e332e2583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Giannopoulos, Spyridon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Wendy S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalantar Motamedi, Seyed Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Embry, Marisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stefanidis, Dimitrios</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Giannopoulos, Spyridon</au><au>Li, Wendy S.</au><au>Kalantar Motamedi, Seyed Mohammad</au><au>Embry, Marisa</au><au>Stefanidis, Dimitrios</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Outcome comparison between primary and revisional bariatric surgery: A propensity-matched analysis</atitle><jtitle>Surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Surgery</addtitle><date>2024-03</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>175</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>592</spage><epage>598</epage><pages>592-598</pages><issn>0039-6060</issn><eissn>1532-7361</eissn><abstract>Revisional bariatric procedures for weight recurrence are rising but are considered higher risk and less effective than primary bariatric procedures. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes between primary and revisional bariatric surgery for weight recurrence. Prospectively collected data from adult patients who underwent revisional or primary bariatric surgery from 2016 to 2020 in an academic institution were reviewed. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy were performed primarily or as conversion procedures after laparoscopic adjustable gastric band, vertical banded gastroplasty, and sleeve gastrectomy. 1:1 propensity score matching was performed between revisional bariatric surgery and primary bariatric surgery, and logistic regression analysis was used to compare up to 2-year weight loss and comorbidity resolution outcomes. A total of172 cases (86 revisional bariatric surgery versus 86 primary bariatric surgery) were included. Groups were matched for age, sex, preoperative body mass index, bariatric procedure, diabetes, hypertension, and obstructive sleep apnea. Procedure duration (203 ± 78 vs 154 ± 69 minutes; P &lt; .001) and length of stay (2.3 ± 2.1 vs 1.7 ± 1 days; P = .02) were longer for revisional bariatric surgery versus primary bariatric surgery, respectively. Total weight loss was less in revisional bariatric surgery compared with primary bariatric surgery at 1 year (23 ± 10% vs 32 ± 9%; P &lt; .001) and 2 years (21 ± 12.% vs 32 ± 10%; P &lt; .001) of follow-up; however, no differences were detected in postoperative occurrences, emergency department visits, readmissions, reintervention and reoperation rates, and comorbidity resolution. Although revisional bariatric surgery was associated with longer operation times, prolonged hospitalization, and lower weight loss than primary bariatric surgery, it was accomplished safely and led to substantial weight loss and comorbidity resolution. This information can guide patient counseling before revisional surgery for weight recurrence.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>37730514</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.surg.2023.07.027</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5144-0274</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2177-0763</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0039-6060
ispartof Surgery, 2024-03, Vol.175 (3), p.592-598
issn 0039-6060
1532-7361
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2867150900
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
title Outcome comparison between primary and revisional bariatric surgery: A propensity-matched analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T16%3A01%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Outcome%20comparison%20between%20primary%20and%20revisional%20bariatric%20surgery:%20A%20propensity-matched%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Surgery&rft.au=Giannopoulos,%20Spyridon&rft.date=2024-03&rft.volume=175&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=592&rft.epage=598&rft.pages=592-598&rft.issn=0039-6060&rft.eissn=1532-7361&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.surg.2023.07.027&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2867150900%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2867150900&rft_id=info:pmid/37730514&rft_els_id=S0039606023005056&rfr_iscdi=true