Clinical Outcomes of De Novo Versus Relapsed Early Metastatic Testicular Seminoma Treated With Contemporary Radiation Therapy
Chemotherapy (CHT) or radiation therapy (RT) are first-line treatments for clinical stage II (CS-II) testicular seminoma. Historically, clinical stage I (CS-I) seminoma was also treated with CHT or RT, but in the past 2 decades practice has shifted toward active surveillance for CS-I with RT or CHT...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics biology, physics, 2024-03, Vol.118 (3), p.706-711 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 711 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 706 |
container_title | International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics |
container_volume | 118 |
creator | Rosen, Daniel B. Ghosh, Anushka Niemierko, Andrzej Beard, Clair J. Ravi, Praful Tewari, Alok Sweeney, Christopher Lee, Richard J. Saylor, Philip Martin, Neil Efstathiou, Jason A. Mouw, Kent Kamran, Sophia C. |
description | Chemotherapy (CHT) or radiation therapy (RT) are first-line treatments for clinical stage II (CS-II) testicular seminoma. Historically, clinical stage I (CS-I) seminoma was also treated with CHT or RT, but in the past 2 decades practice has shifted toward active surveillance for CS-I with RT or CHT reserved for patients with progression to CS-II. Limited data exist on contemporary RT techniques and patient stratification (ie, de novo [CS-II at orchiectomy] vs relapsed [CS-II diagnosed during surveillance after orchiectomy for CS-I]). We investigated outcomes in CS-II patients treated with RT in the modern era across 2 institutions.
A retrospective review identified 73 patients treated with RT for CS-II A or B seminoma between 2001 and 2022. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and univariate analyses were performed with log-rank or Cox proportional hazard regression. Recurrence was defined as biopsy-proven metastatic seminoma after RT completion. Second malignancies were defined as a biopsy-proven malignancy originating in the prior RT field.
Thirty-eight (52%) patients presented with de novo CS-II and 35 (48%) patients had relapsed CS-II. Median follow-up was 4.8 years (IQR: 2.3-8.1). Five-year RFS was 82% overall (92% in relapsed patients and 73% in de novo patients). Relapsed CS-II disease had lower recurrence rates after RT compared with de novo CS-II disease. All recurrences occurred outside the prior RT field and were salvaged. Disease-specific survival was 100%. Two second malignancies occurred (prostate, colorectal cancer at 67 months and 119 months post-RT, respectively).
In patients with CS-II seminoma treated with modern RT, there were no in-field recurrences. Presentation with de novo CS-II is associated with out-of-field recurrence. Subject to further larger-scale validation, our results suggest that compared with CS-II at time of relapse, de novo CS-II may portend more aggressive or micrometastatic disease beyond the retroperitoneum, raising the possibility of benefit from CHT after radiation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.09.010 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2866113423</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0360301623079233</els_id><sourcerecordid>2866113423</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-46e278e4600729bbb03379e4584925afe25c55dad39c67d4b0295363bd86a5c03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhi0EokvhHyDkI5eEsR3byQUJLeVDKlQqy8fNcpxZ1askTm2n0h7477jawpHTXJ533pmHkJcMagZMvTnU_hBDv9QcuKihq4HBI7Jhre4qIeWvx2QDQkElCnxGnqV0AADGdPOUnAmtmdat2JDf29HP3tmRXq3ZhQkTDXv6HunXcBfoD4xpTfQaR7skHOiFjeORfsFsU7bZO7rDVMY62ki_4eTnMFm6i2hzgX_6fEO3Yc44LSHaeKTXdvAlFma6u8Fol-Nz8mRvx4QvHuY5-f7hYrf9VF1effy8fXdZOaF4rhqFXLfYKADNu77vQQjdYSPbpuPS7pFLJ-VgB9E5pYemB95JoUQ_tMpKB-KcvD7tXWK4XcvNZvLJ4TjaGcOaDG-VYkw0XBS0OaEuhpQi7s0S_VSuNwzMvXhzMCfx5l68gc4U8SX26qFh7Scc_oX-mi7A2xOA5c87j9Ek53F2OPiILpsh-P83_AGrlJdP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2866113423</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical Outcomes of De Novo Versus Relapsed Early Metastatic Testicular Seminoma Treated With Contemporary Radiation Therapy</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Rosen, Daniel B. ; Ghosh, Anushka ; Niemierko, Andrzej ; Beard, Clair J. ; Ravi, Praful ; Tewari, Alok ; Sweeney, Christopher ; Lee, Richard J. ; Saylor, Philip ; Martin, Neil ; Efstathiou, Jason A. ; Mouw, Kent ; Kamran, Sophia C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Daniel B. ; Ghosh, Anushka ; Niemierko, Andrzej ; Beard, Clair J. ; Ravi, Praful ; Tewari, Alok ; Sweeney, Christopher ; Lee, Richard J. ; Saylor, Philip ; Martin, Neil ; Efstathiou, Jason A. ; Mouw, Kent ; Kamran, Sophia C.</creatorcontrib><description>Chemotherapy (CHT) or radiation therapy (RT) are first-line treatments for clinical stage II (CS-II) testicular seminoma. Historically, clinical stage I (CS-I) seminoma was also treated with CHT or RT, but in the past 2 decades practice has shifted toward active surveillance for CS-I with RT or CHT reserved for patients with progression to CS-II. Limited data exist on contemporary RT techniques and patient stratification (ie, de novo [CS-II at orchiectomy] vs relapsed [CS-II diagnosed during surveillance after orchiectomy for CS-I]). We investigated outcomes in CS-II patients treated with RT in the modern era across 2 institutions.
A retrospective review identified 73 patients treated with RT for CS-II A or B seminoma between 2001 and 2022. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and univariate analyses were performed with log-rank or Cox proportional hazard regression. Recurrence was defined as biopsy-proven metastatic seminoma after RT completion. Second malignancies were defined as a biopsy-proven malignancy originating in the prior RT field.
Thirty-eight (52%) patients presented with de novo CS-II and 35 (48%) patients had relapsed CS-II. Median follow-up was 4.8 years (IQR: 2.3-8.1). Five-year RFS was 82% overall (92% in relapsed patients and 73% in de novo patients). Relapsed CS-II disease had lower recurrence rates after RT compared with de novo CS-II disease. All recurrences occurred outside the prior RT field and were salvaged. Disease-specific survival was 100%. Two second malignancies occurred (prostate, colorectal cancer at 67 months and 119 months post-RT, respectively).
In patients with CS-II seminoma treated with modern RT, there were no in-field recurrences. Presentation with de novo CS-II is associated with out-of-field recurrence. Subject to further larger-scale validation, our results suggest that compared with CS-II at time of relapse, de novo CS-II may portend more aggressive or micrometastatic disease beyond the retroperitoneum, raising the possibility of benefit from CHT after radiation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-3016</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-355X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.09.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37717783</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2024-03, Vol.118 (3), p.706-711</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-46e278e4600729bbb03379e4584925afe25c55dad39c67d4b0295363bd86a5c03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-46e278e4600729bbb03379e4584925afe25c55dad39c67d4b0295363bd86a5c03</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9283-6515 ; 0000-0002-0412-6239</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.09.010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37717783$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Daniel B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghosh, Anushka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niemierko, Andrzej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beard, Clair J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravi, Praful</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tewari, Alok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sweeney, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saylor, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Efstathiou, Jason A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mouw, Kent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamran, Sophia C.</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical Outcomes of De Novo Versus Relapsed Early Metastatic Testicular Seminoma Treated With Contemporary Radiation Therapy</title><title>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</title><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><description>Chemotherapy (CHT) or radiation therapy (RT) are first-line treatments for clinical stage II (CS-II) testicular seminoma. Historically, clinical stage I (CS-I) seminoma was also treated with CHT or RT, but in the past 2 decades practice has shifted toward active surveillance for CS-I with RT or CHT reserved for patients with progression to CS-II. Limited data exist on contemporary RT techniques and patient stratification (ie, de novo [CS-II at orchiectomy] vs relapsed [CS-II diagnosed during surveillance after orchiectomy for CS-I]). We investigated outcomes in CS-II patients treated with RT in the modern era across 2 institutions.
A retrospective review identified 73 patients treated with RT for CS-II A or B seminoma between 2001 and 2022. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and univariate analyses were performed with log-rank or Cox proportional hazard regression. Recurrence was defined as biopsy-proven metastatic seminoma after RT completion. Second malignancies were defined as a biopsy-proven malignancy originating in the prior RT field.
Thirty-eight (52%) patients presented with de novo CS-II and 35 (48%) patients had relapsed CS-II. Median follow-up was 4.8 years (IQR: 2.3-8.1). Five-year RFS was 82% overall (92% in relapsed patients and 73% in de novo patients). Relapsed CS-II disease had lower recurrence rates after RT compared with de novo CS-II disease. All recurrences occurred outside the prior RT field and were salvaged. Disease-specific survival was 100%. Two second malignancies occurred (prostate, colorectal cancer at 67 months and 119 months post-RT, respectively).
In patients with CS-II seminoma treated with modern RT, there were no in-field recurrences. Presentation with de novo CS-II is associated with out-of-field recurrence. Subject to further larger-scale validation, our results suggest that compared with CS-II at time of relapse, de novo CS-II may portend more aggressive or micrometastatic disease beyond the retroperitoneum, raising the possibility of benefit from CHT after radiation.</description><issn>0360-3016</issn><issn>1879-355X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhi0EokvhHyDkI5eEsR3byQUJLeVDKlQqy8fNcpxZ1askTm2n0h7477jawpHTXJ533pmHkJcMagZMvTnU_hBDv9QcuKihq4HBI7Jhre4qIeWvx2QDQkElCnxGnqV0AADGdPOUnAmtmdat2JDf29HP3tmRXq3ZhQkTDXv6HunXcBfoD4xpTfQaR7skHOiFjeORfsFsU7bZO7rDVMY62ki_4eTnMFm6i2hzgX_6fEO3Yc44LSHaeKTXdvAlFma6u8Fol-Nz8mRvx4QvHuY5-f7hYrf9VF1effy8fXdZOaF4rhqFXLfYKADNu77vQQjdYSPbpuPS7pFLJ-VgB9E5pYemB95JoUQ_tMpKB-KcvD7tXWK4XcvNZvLJ4TjaGcOaDG-VYkw0XBS0OaEuhpQi7s0S_VSuNwzMvXhzMCfx5l68gc4U8SX26qFh7Scc_oX-mi7A2xOA5c87j9Ek53F2OPiILpsh-P83_AGrlJdP</recordid><startdate>20240301</startdate><enddate>20240301</enddate><creator>Rosen, Daniel B.</creator><creator>Ghosh, Anushka</creator><creator>Niemierko, Andrzej</creator><creator>Beard, Clair J.</creator><creator>Ravi, Praful</creator><creator>Tewari, Alok</creator><creator>Sweeney, Christopher</creator><creator>Lee, Richard J.</creator><creator>Saylor, Philip</creator><creator>Martin, Neil</creator><creator>Efstathiou, Jason A.</creator><creator>Mouw, Kent</creator><creator>Kamran, Sophia C.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9283-6515</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0412-6239</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240301</creationdate><title>Clinical Outcomes of De Novo Versus Relapsed Early Metastatic Testicular Seminoma Treated With Contemporary Radiation Therapy</title><author>Rosen, Daniel B. ; Ghosh, Anushka ; Niemierko, Andrzej ; Beard, Clair J. ; Ravi, Praful ; Tewari, Alok ; Sweeney, Christopher ; Lee, Richard J. ; Saylor, Philip ; Martin, Neil ; Efstathiou, Jason A. ; Mouw, Kent ; Kamran, Sophia C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-46e278e4600729bbb03379e4584925afe25c55dad39c67d4b0295363bd86a5c03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Daniel B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghosh, Anushka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niemierko, Andrzej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beard, Clair J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravi, Praful</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tewari, Alok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sweeney, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saylor, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Efstathiou, Jason A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mouw, Kent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamran, Sophia C.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rosen, Daniel B.</au><au>Ghosh, Anushka</au><au>Niemierko, Andrzej</au><au>Beard, Clair J.</au><au>Ravi, Praful</au><au>Tewari, Alok</au><au>Sweeney, Christopher</au><au>Lee, Richard J.</au><au>Saylor, Philip</au><au>Martin, Neil</au><au>Efstathiou, Jason A.</au><au>Mouw, Kent</au><au>Kamran, Sophia C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical Outcomes of De Novo Versus Relapsed Early Metastatic Testicular Seminoma Treated With Contemporary Radiation Therapy</atitle><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><date>2024-03-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>118</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>706</spage><epage>711</epage><pages>706-711</pages><issn>0360-3016</issn><eissn>1879-355X</eissn><abstract>Chemotherapy (CHT) or radiation therapy (RT) are first-line treatments for clinical stage II (CS-II) testicular seminoma. Historically, clinical stage I (CS-I) seminoma was also treated with CHT or RT, but in the past 2 decades practice has shifted toward active surveillance for CS-I with RT or CHT reserved for patients with progression to CS-II. Limited data exist on contemporary RT techniques and patient stratification (ie, de novo [CS-II at orchiectomy] vs relapsed [CS-II diagnosed during surveillance after orchiectomy for CS-I]). We investigated outcomes in CS-II patients treated with RT in the modern era across 2 institutions.
A retrospective review identified 73 patients treated with RT for CS-II A or B seminoma between 2001 and 2022. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and univariate analyses were performed with log-rank or Cox proportional hazard regression. Recurrence was defined as biopsy-proven metastatic seminoma after RT completion. Second malignancies were defined as a biopsy-proven malignancy originating in the prior RT field.
Thirty-eight (52%) patients presented with de novo CS-II and 35 (48%) patients had relapsed CS-II. Median follow-up was 4.8 years (IQR: 2.3-8.1). Five-year RFS was 82% overall (92% in relapsed patients and 73% in de novo patients). Relapsed CS-II disease had lower recurrence rates after RT compared with de novo CS-II disease. All recurrences occurred outside the prior RT field and were salvaged. Disease-specific survival was 100%. Two second malignancies occurred (prostate, colorectal cancer at 67 months and 119 months post-RT, respectively).
In patients with CS-II seminoma treated with modern RT, there were no in-field recurrences. Presentation with de novo CS-II is associated with out-of-field recurrence. Subject to further larger-scale validation, our results suggest that compared with CS-II at time of relapse, de novo CS-II may portend more aggressive or micrometastatic disease beyond the retroperitoneum, raising the possibility of benefit from CHT after radiation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>37717783</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.09.010</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9283-6515</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0412-6239</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0360-3016 |
ispartof | International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2024-03, Vol.118 (3), p.706-711 |
issn | 0360-3016 1879-355X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2866113423 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
title | Clinical Outcomes of De Novo Versus Relapsed Early Metastatic Testicular Seminoma Treated With Contemporary Radiation Therapy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T10%3A37%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20Outcomes%20of%20De%20Novo%20Versus%20Relapsed%20Early%20Metastatic%20Testicular%20Seminoma%20Treated%20With%20Contemporary%20Radiation%20Therapy&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20radiation%20oncology,%20biology,%20physics&rft.au=Rosen,%20Daniel%20B.&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.volume=118&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=706&rft.epage=711&rft.pages=706-711&rft.issn=0360-3016&rft.eissn=1879-355X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.09.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2866113423%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2866113423&rft_id=info:pmid/37717783&rft_els_id=S0360301623079233&rfr_iscdi=true |