Clinical Outcomes of De Novo Versus Relapsed Early Metastatic Testicular Seminoma Treated With Contemporary Radiation Therapy

Chemotherapy (CHT) or radiation therapy (RT) are first-line treatments for clinical stage II (CS-II) testicular seminoma. Historically, clinical stage I (CS-I) seminoma was also treated with CHT or RT, but in the past 2 decades practice has shifted toward active surveillance for CS-I with RT or CHT...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics biology, physics, 2024-03, Vol.118 (3), p.706-711
Hauptverfasser: Rosen, Daniel B., Ghosh, Anushka, Niemierko, Andrzej, Beard, Clair J., Ravi, Praful, Tewari, Alok, Sweeney, Christopher, Lee, Richard J., Saylor, Philip, Martin, Neil, Efstathiou, Jason A., Mouw, Kent, Kamran, Sophia C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 711
container_issue 3
container_start_page 706
container_title International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
container_volume 118
creator Rosen, Daniel B.
Ghosh, Anushka
Niemierko, Andrzej
Beard, Clair J.
Ravi, Praful
Tewari, Alok
Sweeney, Christopher
Lee, Richard J.
Saylor, Philip
Martin, Neil
Efstathiou, Jason A.
Mouw, Kent
Kamran, Sophia C.
description Chemotherapy (CHT) or radiation therapy (RT) are first-line treatments for clinical stage II (CS-II) testicular seminoma. Historically, clinical stage I (CS-I) seminoma was also treated with CHT or RT, but in the past 2 decades practice has shifted toward active surveillance for CS-I with RT or CHT reserved for patients with progression to CS-II. Limited data exist on contemporary RT techniques and patient stratification (ie, de novo [CS-II at orchiectomy] vs relapsed [CS-II diagnosed during surveillance after orchiectomy for CS-I]). We investigated outcomes in CS-II patients treated with RT in the modern era across 2 institutions. A retrospective review identified 73 patients treated with RT for CS-II A or B seminoma between 2001 and 2022. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and univariate analyses were performed with log-rank or Cox proportional hazard regression. Recurrence was defined as biopsy-proven metastatic seminoma after RT completion. Second malignancies were defined as a biopsy-proven malignancy originating in the prior RT field. Thirty-eight (52%) patients presented with de novo CS-II and 35 (48%) patients had relapsed CS-II. Median follow-up was 4.8 years (IQR: 2.3-8.1). Five-year RFS was 82% overall (92% in relapsed patients and 73% in de novo patients). Relapsed CS-II disease had lower recurrence rates after RT compared with de novo CS-II disease. All recurrences occurred outside the prior RT field and were salvaged. Disease-specific survival was 100%. Two second malignancies occurred (prostate, colorectal cancer at 67 months and 119 months post-RT, respectively). In patients with CS-II seminoma treated with modern RT, there were no in-field recurrences. Presentation with de novo CS-II is associated with out-of-field recurrence. Subject to further larger-scale validation, our results suggest that compared with CS-II at time of relapse, de novo CS-II may portend more aggressive or micrometastatic disease beyond the retroperitoneum, raising the possibility of benefit from CHT after radiation.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.09.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2866113423</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0360301623079233</els_id><sourcerecordid>2866113423</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-46e278e4600729bbb03379e4584925afe25c55dad39c67d4b0295363bd86a5c03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhi0EokvhHyDkI5eEsR3byQUJLeVDKlQqy8fNcpxZ1askTm2n0h7477jawpHTXJ533pmHkJcMagZMvTnU_hBDv9QcuKihq4HBI7Jhre4qIeWvx2QDQkElCnxGnqV0AADGdPOUnAmtmdat2JDf29HP3tmRXq3ZhQkTDXv6HunXcBfoD4xpTfQaR7skHOiFjeORfsFsU7bZO7rDVMY62ki_4eTnMFm6i2hzgX_6fEO3Yc44LSHaeKTXdvAlFma6u8Fol-Nz8mRvx4QvHuY5-f7hYrf9VF1effy8fXdZOaF4rhqFXLfYKADNu77vQQjdYSPbpuPS7pFLJ-VgB9E5pYemB95JoUQ_tMpKB-KcvD7tXWK4XcvNZvLJ4TjaGcOaDG-VYkw0XBS0OaEuhpQi7s0S_VSuNwzMvXhzMCfx5l68gc4U8SX26qFh7Scc_oX-mi7A2xOA5c87j9Ek53F2OPiILpsh-P83_AGrlJdP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2866113423</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical Outcomes of De Novo Versus Relapsed Early Metastatic Testicular Seminoma Treated With Contemporary Radiation Therapy</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Rosen, Daniel B. ; Ghosh, Anushka ; Niemierko, Andrzej ; Beard, Clair J. ; Ravi, Praful ; Tewari, Alok ; Sweeney, Christopher ; Lee, Richard J. ; Saylor, Philip ; Martin, Neil ; Efstathiou, Jason A. ; Mouw, Kent ; Kamran, Sophia C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Daniel B. ; Ghosh, Anushka ; Niemierko, Andrzej ; Beard, Clair J. ; Ravi, Praful ; Tewari, Alok ; Sweeney, Christopher ; Lee, Richard J. ; Saylor, Philip ; Martin, Neil ; Efstathiou, Jason A. ; Mouw, Kent ; Kamran, Sophia C.</creatorcontrib><description>Chemotherapy (CHT) or radiation therapy (RT) are first-line treatments for clinical stage II (CS-II) testicular seminoma. Historically, clinical stage I (CS-I) seminoma was also treated with CHT or RT, but in the past 2 decades practice has shifted toward active surveillance for CS-I with RT or CHT reserved for patients with progression to CS-II. Limited data exist on contemporary RT techniques and patient stratification (ie, de novo [CS-II at orchiectomy] vs relapsed [CS-II diagnosed during surveillance after orchiectomy for CS-I]). We investigated outcomes in CS-II patients treated with RT in the modern era across 2 institutions. A retrospective review identified 73 patients treated with RT for CS-II A or B seminoma between 2001 and 2022. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and univariate analyses were performed with log-rank or Cox proportional hazard regression. Recurrence was defined as biopsy-proven metastatic seminoma after RT completion. Second malignancies were defined as a biopsy-proven malignancy originating in the prior RT field. Thirty-eight (52%) patients presented with de novo CS-II and 35 (48%) patients had relapsed CS-II. Median follow-up was 4.8 years (IQR: 2.3-8.1). Five-year RFS was 82% overall (92% in relapsed patients and 73% in de novo patients). Relapsed CS-II disease had lower recurrence rates after RT compared with de novo CS-II disease. All recurrences occurred outside the prior RT field and were salvaged. Disease-specific survival was 100%. Two second malignancies occurred (prostate, colorectal cancer at 67 months and 119 months post-RT, respectively). In patients with CS-II seminoma treated with modern RT, there were no in-field recurrences. Presentation with de novo CS-II is associated with out-of-field recurrence. Subject to further larger-scale validation, our results suggest that compared with CS-II at time of relapse, de novo CS-II may portend more aggressive or micrometastatic disease beyond the retroperitoneum, raising the possibility of benefit from CHT after radiation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-3016</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-355X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.09.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37717783</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2024-03, Vol.118 (3), p.706-711</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-46e278e4600729bbb03379e4584925afe25c55dad39c67d4b0295363bd86a5c03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-46e278e4600729bbb03379e4584925afe25c55dad39c67d4b0295363bd86a5c03</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9283-6515 ; 0000-0002-0412-6239</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.09.010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37717783$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Daniel B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghosh, Anushka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niemierko, Andrzej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beard, Clair J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravi, Praful</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tewari, Alok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sweeney, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saylor, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Efstathiou, Jason A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mouw, Kent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamran, Sophia C.</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical Outcomes of De Novo Versus Relapsed Early Metastatic Testicular Seminoma Treated With Contemporary Radiation Therapy</title><title>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</title><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><description>Chemotherapy (CHT) or radiation therapy (RT) are first-line treatments for clinical stage II (CS-II) testicular seminoma. Historically, clinical stage I (CS-I) seminoma was also treated with CHT or RT, but in the past 2 decades practice has shifted toward active surveillance for CS-I with RT or CHT reserved for patients with progression to CS-II. Limited data exist on contemporary RT techniques and patient stratification (ie, de novo [CS-II at orchiectomy] vs relapsed [CS-II diagnosed during surveillance after orchiectomy for CS-I]). We investigated outcomes in CS-II patients treated with RT in the modern era across 2 institutions. A retrospective review identified 73 patients treated with RT for CS-II A or B seminoma between 2001 and 2022. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and univariate analyses were performed with log-rank or Cox proportional hazard regression. Recurrence was defined as biopsy-proven metastatic seminoma after RT completion. Second malignancies were defined as a biopsy-proven malignancy originating in the prior RT field. Thirty-eight (52%) patients presented with de novo CS-II and 35 (48%) patients had relapsed CS-II. Median follow-up was 4.8 years (IQR: 2.3-8.1). Five-year RFS was 82% overall (92% in relapsed patients and 73% in de novo patients). Relapsed CS-II disease had lower recurrence rates after RT compared with de novo CS-II disease. All recurrences occurred outside the prior RT field and were salvaged. Disease-specific survival was 100%. Two second malignancies occurred (prostate, colorectal cancer at 67 months and 119 months post-RT, respectively). In patients with CS-II seminoma treated with modern RT, there were no in-field recurrences. Presentation with de novo CS-II is associated with out-of-field recurrence. Subject to further larger-scale validation, our results suggest that compared with CS-II at time of relapse, de novo CS-II may portend more aggressive or micrometastatic disease beyond the retroperitoneum, raising the possibility of benefit from CHT after radiation.</description><issn>0360-3016</issn><issn>1879-355X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhi0EokvhHyDkI5eEsR3byQUJLeVDKlQqy8fNcpxZ1askTm2n0h7477jawpHTXJ533pmHkJcMagZMvTnU_hBDv9QcuKihq4HBI7Jhre4qIeWvx2QDQkElCnxGnqV0AADGdPOUnAmtmdat2JDf29HP3tmRXq3ZhQkTDXv6HunXcBfoD4xpTfQaR7skHOiFjeORfsFsU7bZO7rDVMY62ki_4eTnMFm6i2hzgX_6fEO3Yc44LSHaeKTXdvAlFma6u8Fol-Nz8mRvx4QvHuY5-f7hYrf9VF1effy8fXdZOaF4rhqFXLfYKADNu77vQQjdYSPbpuPS7pFLJ-VgB9E5pYemB95JoUQ_tMpKB-KcvD7tXWK4XcvNZvLJ4TjaGcOaDG-VYkw0XBS0OaEuhpQi7s0S_VSuNwzMvXhzMCfx5l68gc4U8SX26qFh7Scc_oX-mi7A2xOA5c87j9Ek53F2OPiILpsh-P83_AGrlJdP</recordid><startdate>20240301</startdate><enddate>20240301</enddate><creator>Rosen, Daniel B.</creator><creator>Ghosh, Anushka</creator><creator>Niemierko, Andrzej</creator><creator>Beard, Clair J.</creator><creator>Ravi, Praful</creator><creator>Tewari, Alok</creator><creator>Sweeney, Christopher</creator><creator>Lee, Richard J.</creator><creator>Saylor, Philip</creator><creator>Martin, Neil</creator><creator>Efstathiou, Jason A.</creator><creator>Mouw, Kent</creator><creator>Kamran, Sophia C.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9283-6515</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0412-6239</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240301</creationdate><title>Clinical Outcomes of De Novo Versus Relapsed Early Metastatic Testicular Seminoma Treated With Contemporary Radiation Therapy</title><author>Rosen, Daniel B. ; Ghosh, Anushka ; Niemierko, Andrzej ; Beard, Clair J. ; Ravi, Praful ; Tewari, Alok ; Sweeney, Christopher ; Lee, Richard J. ; Saylor, Philip ; Martin, Neil ; Efstathiou, Jason A. ; Mouw, Kent ; Kamran, Sophia C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-46e278e4600729bbb03379e4584925afe25c55dad39c67d4b0295363bd86a5c03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Daniel B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghosh, Anushka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niemierko, Andrzej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beard, Clair J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravi, Praful</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tewari, Alok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sweeney, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saylor, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Efstathiou, Jason A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mouw, Kent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamran, Sophia C.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rosen, Daniel B.</au><au>Ghosh, Anushka</au><au>Niemierko, Andrzej</au><au>Beard, Clair J.</au><au>Ravi, Praful</au><au>Tewari, Alok</au><au>Sweeney, Christopher</au><au>Lee, Richard J.</au><au>Saylor, Philip</au><au>Martin, Neil</au><au>Efstathiou, Jason A.</au><au>Mouw, Kent</au><au>Kamran, Sophia C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical Outcomes of De Novo Versus Relapsed Early Metastatic Testicular Seminoma Treated With Contemporary Radiation Therapy</atitle><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><date>2024-03-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>118</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>706</spage><epage>711</epage><pages>706-711</pages><issn>0360-3016</issn><eissn>1879-355X</eissn><abstract>Chemotherapy (CHT) or radiation therapy (RT) are first-line treatments for clinical stage II (CS-II) testicular seminoma. Historically, clinical stage I (CS-I) seminoma was also treated with CHT or RT, but in the past 2 decades practice has shifted toward active surveillance for CS-I with RT or CHT reserved for patients with progression to CS-II. Limited data exist on contemporary RT techniques and patient stratification (ie, de novo [CS-II at orchiectomy] vs relapsed [CS-II diagnosed during surveillance after orchiectomy for CS-I]). We investigated outcomes in CS-II patients treated with RT in the modern era across 2 institutions. A retrospective review identified 73 patients treated with RT for CS-II A or B seminoma between 2001 and 2022. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and univariate analyses were performed with log-rank or Cox proportional hazard regression. Recurrence was defined as biopsy-proven metastatic seminoma after RT completion. Second malignancies were defined as a biopsy-proven malignancy originating in the prior RT field. Thirty-eight (52%) patients presented with de novo CS-II and 35 (48%) patients had relapsed CS-II. Median follow-up was 4.8 years (IQR: 2.3-8.1). Five-year RFS was 82% overall (92% in relapsed patients and 73% in de novo patients). Relapsed CS-II disease had lower recurrence rates after RT compared with de novo CS-II disease. All recurrences occurred outside the prior RT field and were salvaged. Disease-specific survival was 100%. Two second malignancies occurred (prostate, colorectal cancer at 67 months and 119 months post-RT, respectively). In patients with CS-II seminoma treated with modern RT, there were no in-field recurrences. Presentation with de novo CS-II is associated with out-of-field recurrence. Subject to further larger-scale validation, our results suggest that compared with CS-II at time of relapse, de novo CS-II may portend more aggressive or micrometastatic disease beyond the retroperitoneum, raising the possibility of benefit from CHT after radiation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>37717783</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.09.010</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9283-6515</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0412-6239</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0360-3016
ispartof International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2024-03, Vol.118 (3), p.706-711
issn 0360-3016
1879-355X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2866113423
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
title Clinical Outcomes of De Novo Versus Relapsed Early Metastatic Testicular Seminoma Treated With Contemporary Radiation Therapy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T10%3A37%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20Outcomes%20of%20De%20Novo%20Versus%20Relapsed%20Early%20Metastatic%20Testicular%20Seminoma%20Treated%20With%20Contemporary%20Radiation%20Therapy&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20radiation%20oncology,%20biology,%20physics&rft.au=Rosen,%20Daniel%20B.&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.volume=118&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=706&rft.epage=711&rft.pages=706-711&rft.issn=0360-3016&rft.eissn=1879-355X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.09.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2866113423%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2866113423&rft_id=info:pmid/37717783&rft_els_id=S0360301623079233&rfr_iscdi=true