Postanesthesia Care Unit Recovery Time According to Volatile Anesthetic Used in Clinical Practice

BACKGROUNDWhether volatile anesthetic solubility affects postanesthesia recovery time in clinical practice is unclear. We investigated the association among 3 volatile agents and 2 clinically relevant outcomes-postanesthesia care unit (PACU) recovery time (time from PACU admission to fulfillment of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anesthesia and analgesia 2023-11, Vol.137 (5), p.1066-1074
Hauptverfasser: Sprung, Juraj, Deljou, Atousa, Warner, David O., Schroeder, Darrell R., Weingarten, Toby N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1074
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1066
container_title Anesthesia and analgesia
container_volume 137
creator Sprung, Juraj
Deljou, Atousa
Warner, David O.
Schroeder, Darrell R.
Weingarten, Toby N.
description BACKGROUNDWhether volatile anesthetic solubility affects postanesthesia recovery time in clinical practice is unclear. We investigated the association among 3 volatile agents and 2 clinically relevant outcomes-postanesthesia care unit (PACU) recovery time (time from PACU admission to fulfillment of discharge criteria) and oversedation (Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale score ≤-3)-as a potential contributor to delaying PACU discharge. The volatile agents studied were isoflurane, desflurane, and sevoflurane. We hypothesized that increased solubility of the volatile agent (isoflurane versus desflurane or sevoflurane) would be associated with longer PACU recovery time and higher rates of oversedation. METHODSThis retrospective observational study included adults (≥18 years) who underwent surgical procedures under general anesthesia with a volatile agent and were admitted to the PACU from May 5, 2018, to December 31, 2020. The primary outcome was PACU recovery time, and the secondary outcome was oversedation. PACU recovery time was log-transformed and analyzed with linear regression. Oversedation was analyzed by using logistic regression. To account for potential confounding, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used. Pairwise comparisons of the 3 agents were performed, with P < .017 (Bonferroni-adjusted) considered significant. RESULTSOf 47,847 patients included, 11,817 (24.7%) received isoflurane, 11,286 (23.6%) received desflurane, and 24,744 (51.7%) received sevoflurane. Sevoflurane had an estimated 4% shorter PACU recovery time (IPTW-adjusted median [interquartile range {IQR}], 61 [42-89] minutes) than isoflurane (64 [44-92] minutes) (ratio of geometric means [98.3% confidence interval {CI}], 0.96 [0.95-0.98]; P < .001). Differences in PACU recovery time between desflurane and the other agents were not significant. The IPTW-adjusted frequency of oversedation was 8.8% for desflurane, 12.2% for sevoflurane, and 16.7% for isoflurane; all pairwise comparisons were observed to be significant (odds ratio [98.3% CI], 0.70 [0.62-0.79] for desflurane versus sevoflurane, 0.48 [0.42-0.55] for desflurane vs isoflurane, and 0.69 [0.63-0.76] for sevoflurane versus isoflurane; all P < .001). Although oversedated patients had longer PACU recovery time, differences in the oversedation rate across agents did not result in meaningful differences in time to PACU recovery. CONCLUSIONSIn clinical practice, only small, clinically unimportant differences in PACU
doi_str_mv 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006647
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2865782450</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2865782450</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-7d8e55dbf13f89b2a65f9fb3f5c4a5360f08a8450a9f48e63cc56534ea3cd7973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUE1LAzEQDaJgrf4DDzl62bpJNtnkWJb6AUWLdL0u02yike2mJqnQf2-kHsS5DPPmzePNQ-ialDNCCbudPy1m5Z8SoqpP0IRwKoqaK3mKJhllBVVKnaOLGD_ySEopJghWPiYYTUzvJjrADQSD29El_GK0_zLhgNdua_Bcax96N77h5PGrHyC5IaPHw-Q0bqPpsRtxM7jRaRjwKoDOC3OJziwM0Vz99ilq7xbr5qFYPt8_NvNloamsUlH30nDebyxhVqoNBcGtshtmua6AM1HaUoKseAnKVtIIpjUXnFUGmO5rVbMpujnq7oL_3Gdf3dZFbYYhf-f3saNS8FrSrJCp1ZGqg48xGNvtgttCOHSk7H4S7XKi3f9E2TfclGlw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2865782450</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Postanesthesia Care Unit Recovery Time According to Volatile Anesthetic Used in Clinical Practice</title><source>Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Sprung, Juraj ; Deljou, Atousa ; Warner, David O. ; Schroeder, Darrell R. ; Weingarten, Toby N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sprung, Juraj ; Deljou, Atousa ; Warner, David O. ; Schroeder, Darrell R. ; Weingarten, Toby N.</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUNDWhether volatile anesthetic solubility affects postanesthesia recovery time in clinical practice is unclear. We investigated the association among 3 volatile agents and 2 clinically relevant outcomes-postanesthesia care unit (PACU) recovery time (time from PACU admission to fulfillment of discharge criteria) and oversedation (Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale score ≤-3)-as a potential contributor to delaying PACU discharge. The volatile agents studied were isoflurane, desflurane, and sevoflurane. We hypothesized that increased solubility of the volatile agent (isoflurane versus desflurane or sevoflurane) would be associated with longer PACU recovery time and higher rates of oversedation. METHODSThis retrospective observational study included adults (≥18 years) who underwent surgical procedures under general anesthesia with a volatile agent and were admitted to the PACU from May 5, 2018, to December 31, 2020. The primary outcome was PACU recovery time, and the secondary outcome was oversedation. PACU recovery time was log-transformed and analyzed with linear regression. Oversedation was analyzed by using logistic regression. To account for potential confounding, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used. Pairwise comparisons of the 3 agents were performed, with P &lt; .017 (Bonferroni-adjusted) considered significant. RESULTSOf 47,847 patients included, 11,817 (24.7%) received isoflurane, 11,286 (23.6%) received desflurane, and 24,744 (51.7%) received sevoflurane. Sevoflurane had an estimated 4% shorter PACU recovery time (IPTW-adjusted median [interquartile range {IQR}], 61 [42-89] minutes) than isoflurane (64 [44-92] minutes) (ratio of geometric means [98.3% confidence interval {CI}], 0.96 [0.95-0.98]; P &lt; .001). Differences in PACU recovery time between desflurane and the other agents were not significant. The IPTW-adjusted frequency of oversedation was 8.8% for desflurane, 12.2% for sevoflurane, and 16.7% for isoflurane; all pairwise comparisons were observed to be significant (odds ratio [98.3% CI], 0.70 [0.62-0.79] for desflurane versus sevoflurane, 0.48 [0.42-0.55] for desflurane vs isoflurane, and 0.69 [0.63-0.76] for sevoflurane versus isoflurane; all P &lt; .001). Although oversedated patients had longer PACU recovery time, differences in the oversedation rate across agents did not result in meaningful differences in time to PACU recovery. CONCLUSIONSIn clinical practice, only small, clinically unimportant differences in PACU recovery time were observed between the volatile anesthetics. Although oversedation was associated with increased PACU recovery time, differences in the rate of oversedation among agents were insufficient to produce meaningful differences in overall PACU recovery time across the 3 volatile agents. Practical attempts to decrease PACU recovery time should address factors other than volatile agent selection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2999</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-7598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006647</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Anesthesia and analgesia, 2023-11, Vol.137 (5), p.1066-1074</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-7d8e55dbf13f89b2a65f9fb3f5c4a5360f08a8450a9f48e63cc56534ea3cd7973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-7d8e55dbf13f89b2a65f9fb3f5c4a5360f08a8450a9f48e63cc56534ea3cd7973</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27931,27932</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sprung, Juraj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deljou, Atousa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warner, David O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroeder, Darrell R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weingarten, Toby N.</creatorcontrib><title>Postanesthesia Care Unit Recovery Time According to Volatile Anesthetic Used in Clinical Practice</title><title>Anesthesia and analgesia</title><description>BACKGROUNDWhether volatile anesthetic solubility affects postanesthesia recovery time in clinical practice is unclear. We investigated the association among 3 volatile agents and 2 clinically relevant outcomes-postanesthesia care unit (PACU) recovery time (time from PACU admission to fulfillment of discharge criteria) and oversedation (Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale score ≤-3)-as a potential contributor to delaying PACU discharge. The volatile agents studied were isoflurane, desflurane, and sevoflurane. We hypothesized that increased solubility of the volatile agent (isoflurane versus desflurane or sevoflurane) would be associated with longer PACU recovery time and higher rates of oversedation. METHODSThis retrospective observational study included adults (≥18 years) who underwent surgical procedures under general anesthesia with a volatile agent and were admitted to the PACU from May 5, 2018, to December 31, 2020. The primary outcome was PACU recovery time, and the secondary outcome was oversedation. PACU recovery time was log-transformed and analyzed with linear regression. Oversedation was analyzed by using logistic regression. To account for potential confounding, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used. Pairwise comparisons of the 3 agents were performed, with P &lt; .017 (Bonferroni-adjusted) considered significant. RESULTSOf 47,847 patients included, 11,817 (24.7%) received isoflurane, 11,286 (23.6%) received desflurane, and 24,744 (51.7%) received sevoflurane. Sevoflurane had an estimated 4% shorter PACU recovery time (IPTW-adjusted median [interquartile range {IQR}], 61 [42-89] minutes) than isoflurane (64 [44-92] minutes) (ratio of geometric means [98.3% confidence interval {CI}], 0.96 [0.95-0.98]; P &lt; .001). Differences in PACU recovery time between desflurane and the other agents were not significant. The IPTW-adjusted frequency of oversedation was 8.8% for desflurane, 12.2% for sevoflurane, and 16.7% for isoflurane; all pairwise comparisons were observed to be significant (odds ratio [98.3% CI], 0.70 [0.62-0.79] for desflurane versus sevoflurane, 0.48 [0.42-0.55] for desflurane vs isoflurane, and 0.69 [0.63-0.76] for sevoflurane versus isoflurane; all P &lt; .001). Although oversedated patients had longer PACU recovery time, differences in the oversedation rate across agents did not result in meaningful differences in time to PACU recovery. CONCLUSIONSIn clinical practice, only small, clinically unimportant differences in PACU recovery time were observed between the volatile anesthetics. Although oversedation was associated with increased PACU recovery time, differences in the rate of oversedation among agents were insufficient to produce meaningful differences in overall PACU recovery time across the 3 volatile agents. Practical attempts to decrease PACU recovery time should address factors other than volatile agent selection.</description><issn>0003-2999</issn><issn>1526-7598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdUE1LAzEQDaJgrf4DDzl62bpJNtnkWJb6AUWLdL0u02yike2mJqnQf2-kHsS5DPPmzePNQ-ialDNCCbudPy1m5Z8SoqpP0IRwKoqaK3mKJhllBVVKnaOLGD_ySEopJghWPiYYTUzvJjrADQSD29El_GK0_zLhgNdua_Bcax96N77h5PGrHyC5IaPHw-Q0bqPpsRtxM7jRaRjwKoDOC3OJziwM0Vz99ilq7xbr5qFYPt8_NvNloamsUlH30nDebyxhVqoNBcGtshtmua6AM1HaUoKseAnKVtIIpjUXnFUGmO5rVbMpujnq7oL_3Gdf3dZFbYYhf-f3saNS8FrSrJCp1ZGqg48xGNvtgttCOHSk7H4S7XKi3f9E2TfclGlw</recordid><startdate>20231101</startdate><enddate>20231101</enddate><creator>Sprung, Juraj</creator><creator>Deljou, Atousa</creator><creator>Warner, David O.</creator><creator>Schroeder, Darrell R.</creator><creator>Weingarten, Toby N.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231101</creationdate><title>Postanesthesia Care Unit Recovery Time According to Volatile Anesthetic Used in Clinical Practice</title><author>Sprung, Juraj ; Deljou, Atousa ; Warner, David O. ; Schroeder, Darrell R. ; Weingarten, Toby N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-7d8e55dbf13f89b2a65f9fb3f5c4a5360f08a8450a9f48e63cc56534ea3cd7973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sprung, Juraj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deljou, Atousa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warner, David O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroeder, Darrell R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weingarten, Toby N.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sprung, Juraj</au><au>Deljou, Atousa</au><au>Warner, David O.</au><au>Schroeder, Darrell R.</au><au>Weingarten, Toby N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Postanesthesia Care Unit Recovery Time According to Volatile Anesthetic Used in Clinical Practice</atitle><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle><date>2023-11-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>137</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1066</spage><epage>1074</epage><pages>1066-1074</pages><issn>0003-2999</issn><eissn>1526-7598</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUNDWhether volatile anesthetic solubility affects postanesthesia recovery time in clinical practice is unclear. We investigated the association among 3 volatile agents and 2 clinically relevant outcomes-postanesthesia care unit (PACU) recovery time (time from PACU admission to fulfillment of discharge criteria) and oversedation (Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale score ≤-3)-as a potential contributor to delaying PACU discharge. The volatile agents studied were isoflurane, desflurane, and sevoflurane. We hypothesized that increased solubility of the volatile agent (isoflurane versus desflurane or sevoflurane) would be associated with longer PACU recovery time and higher rates of oversedation. METHODSThis retrospective observational study included adults (≥18 years) who underwent surgical procedures under general anesthesia with a volatile agent and were admitted to the PACU from May 5, 2018, to December 31, 2020. The primary outcome was PACU recovery time, and the secondary outcome was oversedation. PACU recovery time was log-transformed and analyzed with linear regression. Oversedation was analyzed by using logistic regression. To account for potential confounding, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used. Pairwise comparisons of the 3 agents were performed, with P &lt; .017 (Bonferroni-adjusted) considered significant. RESULTSOf 47,847 patients included, 11,817 (24.7%) received isoflurane, 11,286 (23.6%) received desflurane, and 24,744 (51.7%) received sevoflurane. Sevoflurane had an estimated 4% shorter PACU recovery time (IPTW-adjusted median [interquartile range {IQR}], 61 [42-89] minutes) than isoflurane (64 [44-92] minutes) (ratio of geometric means [98.3% confidence interval {CI}], 0.96 [0.95-0.98]; P &lt; .001). Differences in PACU recovery time between desflurane and the other agents were not significant. The IPTW-adjusted frequency of oversedation was 8.8% for desflurane, 12.2% for sevoflurane, and 16.7% for isoflurane; all pairwise comparisons were observed to be significant (odds ratio [98.3% CI], 0.70 [0.62-0.79] for desflurane versus sevoflurane, 0.48 [0.42-0.55] for desflurane vs isoflurane, and 0.69 [0.63-0.76] for sevoflurane versus isoflurane; all P &lt; .001). Although oversedated patients had longer PACU recovery time, differences in the oversedation rate across agents did not result in meaningful differences in time to PACU recovery. CONCLUSIONSIn clinical practice, only small, clinically unimportant differences in PACU recovery time were observed between the volatile anesthetics. Although oversedation was associated with increased PACU recovery time, differences in the rate of oversedation among agents were insufficient to produce meaningful differences in overall PACU recovery time across the 3 volatile agents. Practical attempts to decrease PACU recovery time should address factors other than volatile agent selection.</abstract><doi>10.1213/ANE.0000000000006647</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-2999
ispartof Anesthesia and analgesia, 2023-11, Vol.137 (5), p.1066-1074
issn 0003-2999
1526-7598
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2865782450
source Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
title Postanesthesia Care Unit Recovery Time According to Volatile Anesthetic Used in Clinical Practice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T12%3A51%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Postanesthesia%20Care%20Unit%20Recovery%20Time%20According%20to%20Volatile%20Anesthetic%20Used%20in%20Clinical%20Practice&rft.jtitle=Anesthesia%20and%20analgesia&rft.au=Sprung,%20Juraj&rft.date=2023-11-01&rft.volume=137&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1066&rft.epage=1074&rft.pages=1066-1074&rft.issn=0003-2999&rft.eissn=1526-7598&rft_id=info:doi/10.1213/ANE.0000000000006647&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2865782450%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2865782450&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true