Comment on: "Variability in humpback whale songs reveals how individuals can be distinctive when sharing a complex vocal display" J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 153, 2238-2250 (2023)

Lamoni, Garland, Allen, Coxon, Noad, and Rendell [(2023). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 153, 2238-2250] analyzed variations in humpback whale song structure to assess how individual singers can produce distinctive patterns that communicate desirable individual qualities to potential mates. Their analyses reve...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2023-09, Vol.154 (3), p.1596
Hauptverfasser: Mercado, Eduardo, Perazio, Christina E, Franklin, Mark F, Franklin, Wally
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1596
container_title The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
container_volume 154
creator Mercado, Eduardo
Perazio, Christina E
Franklin, Mark F
Franklin, Wally
description Lamoni, Garland, Allen, Coxon, Noad, and Rendell [(2023). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 153, 2238-2250] analyzed variations in humpback whale song structure to assess how individual singers can produce distinctive patterns that communicate desirable individual qualities to potential mates. Their analyses revealed that singers rarely produced individually specific sound patterns and that singers varied subjectively distinctive structural features of songs differently across years. These findings provide the strongest evidence to date that singing humpback whales are not varying song structure in ways that reliably reveal individual singers' physical or cognitive characteristics. Surprisingly, the authors appear to reach the opposite conclusion. Objective strategies for quantitatively comparing song properties are crucial for evaluating competing hypotheses regarding the nature and function of humpback whale songs, but the value of such strategies is reduced when the objectivity of the analyses is suspect and when negative evidence is framed as supporting prior beliefs.Lamoni, Garland, Allen, Coxon, Noad, and Rendell [(2023). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 153, 2238-2250] analyzed variations in humpback whale song structure to assess how individual singers can produce distinctive patterns that communicate desirable individual qualities to potential mates. Their analyses revealed that singers rarely produced individually specific sound patterns and that singers varied subjectively distinctive structural features of songs differently across years. These findings provide the strongest evidence to date that singing humpback whales are not varying song structure in ways that reliably reveal individual singers' physical or cognitive characteristics. Surprisingly, the authors appear to reach the opposite conclusion. Objective strategies for quantitatively comparing song properties are crucial for evaluating competing hypotheses regarding the nature and function of humpback whale songs, but the value of such strategies is reduced when the objectivity of the analyses is suspect and when negative evidence is framed as supporting prior beliefs.
doi_str_mv 10.1121/10.0020913
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2864158442</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2864158442</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_28641584423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjctOwzAURC0EEuWx4QuuuioSCfZ1jFJ2qAIhtiC2leOYxuBHiJ2UfhM_iSuxYMtqZqQzM4RcMFoyhuw6K6VIl4wfkBkTSItaYHX4xx-TkxjfKaWi5ssZ-V4F57RPEPwtzF_lYGRjrEk7MB660fWNVB-w7aTVEIPfRBj0pKWN0IVtZlozmXbcZyU9NBpaE5PxKplJ55r2ELs86jcgQQXXW_0FU1DS7sHeyt0cnkq4U2GMqYTnoHJwJTDBrwCR1wWioLBAivzyjBy95Sd9_qunZPFw_7J6LPohfI46prUzUWlrpdd5b431TcVEXVXI_4H-AI2WY-4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2864158442</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comment on: "Variability in humpback whale songs reveals how individuals can be distinctive when sharing a complex vocal display" J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 153, 2238-2250 (2023)</title><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>AIP Acoustical Society of America</source><creator>Mercado, Eduardo ; Perazio, Christina E ; Franklin, Mark F ; Franklin, Wally</creator><creatorcontrib>Mercado, Eduardo ; Perazio, Christina E ; Franklin, Mark F ; Franklin, Wally</creatorcontrib><description>Lamoni, Garland, Allen, Coxon, Noad, and Rendell [(2023). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 153, 2238-2250] analyzed variations in humpback whale song structure to assess how individual singers can produce distinctive patterns that communicate desirable individual qualities to potential mates. Their analyses revealed that singers rarely produced individually specific sound patterns and that singers varied subjectively distinctive structural features of songs differently across years. These findings provide the strongest evidence to date that singing humpback whales are not varying song structure in ways that reliably reveal individual singers' physical or cognitive characteristics. Surprisingly, the authors appear to reach the opposite conclusion. Objective strategies for quantitatively comparing song properties are crucial for evaluating competing hypotheses regarding the nature and function of humpback whale songs, but the value of such strategies is reduced when the objectivity of the analyses is suspect and when negative evidence is framed as supporting prior beliefs.Lamoni, Garland, Allen, Coxon, Noad, and Rendell [(2023). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 153, 2238-2250] analyzed variations in humpback whale song structure to assess how individual singers can produce distinctive patterns that communicate desirable individual qualities to potential mates. Their analyses revealed that singers rarely produced individually specific sound patterns and that singers varied subjectively distinctive structural features of songs differently across years. These findings provide the strongest evidence to date that singing humpback whales are not varying song structure in ways that reliably reveal individual singers' physical or cognitive characteristics. Surprisingly, the authors appear to reach the opposite conclusion. Objective strategies for quantitatively comparing song properties are crucial for evaluating competing hypotheses regarding the nature and function of humpback whale songs, but the value of such strategies is reduced when the objectivity of the analyses is suspect and when negative evidence is framed as supporting prior beliefs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/10.0020913</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2023-09, Vol.154 (3), p.1596</ispartof><rights>2023 Acoustical Society of America.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>207,208,314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mercado, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perazio, Christina E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franklin, Mark F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franklin, Wally</creatorcontrib><title>Comment on: "Variability in humpback whale songs reveals how individuals can be distinctive when sharing a complex vocal display" J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 153, 2238-2250 (2023)</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><description>Lamoni, Garland, Allen, Coxon, Noad, and Rendell [(2023). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 153, 2238-2250] analyzed variations in humpback whale song structure to assess how individual singers can produce distinctive patterns that communicate desirable individual qualities to potential mates. Their analyses revealed that singers rarely produced individually specific sound patterns and that singers varied subjectively distinctive structural features of songs differently across years. These findings provide the strongest evidence to date that singing humpback whales are not varying song structure in ways that reliably reveal individual singers' physical or cognitive characteristics. Surprisingly, the authors appear to reach the opposite conclusion. Objective strategies for quantitatively comparing song properties are crucial for evaluating competing hypotheses regarding the nature and function of humpback whale songs, but the value of such strategies is reduced when the objectivity of the analyses is suspect and when negative evidence is framed as supporting prior beliefs.Lamoni, Garland, Allen, Coxon, Noad, and Rendell [(2023). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 153, 2238-2250] analyzed variations in humpback whale song structure to assess how individual singers can produce distinctive patterns that communicate desirable individual qualities to potential mates. Their analyses revealed that singers rarely produced individually specific sound patterns and that singers varied subjectively distinctive structural features of songs differently across years. These findings provide the strongest evidence to date that singing humpback whales are not varying song structure in ways that reliably reveal individual singers' physical or cognitive characteristics. Surprisingly, the authors appear to reach the opposite conclusion. Objective strategies for quantitatively comparing song properties are crucial for evaluating competing hypotheses regarding the nature and function of humpback whale songs, but the value of such strategies is reduced when the objectivity of the analyses is suspect and when negative evidence is framed as supporting prior beliefs.</description><issn>1520-8524</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVjctOwzAURC0EEuWx4QuuuioSCfZ1jFJ2qAIhtiC2leOYxuBHiJ2UfhM_iSuxYMtqZqQzM4RcMFoyhuw6K6VIl4wfkBkTSItaYHX4xx-TkxjfKaWi5ssZ-V4F57RPEPwtzF_lYGRjrEk7MB660fWNVB-w7aTVEIPfRBj0pKWN0IVtZlozmXbcZyU9NBpaE5PxKplJ55r2ELs86jcgQQXXW_0FU1DS7sHeyt0cnkq4U2GMqYTnoHJwJTDBrwCR1wWioLBAivzyjBy95Sd9_qunZPFw_7J6LPohfI46prUzUWlrpdd5b431TcVEXVXI_4H-AI2WY-4</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Mercado, Eduardo</creator><creator>Perazio, Christina E</creator><creator>Franklin, Mark F</creator><creator>Franklin, Wally</creator><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>Comment on: "Variability in humpback whale songs reveals how individuals can be distinctive when sharing a complex vocal display" J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 153, 2238-2250 (2023)</title><author>Mercado, Eduardo ; Perazio, Christina E ; Franklin, Mark F ; Franklin, Wally</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_28641584423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mercado, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perazio, Christina E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franklin, Mark F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franklin, Wally</creatorcontrib><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mercado, Eduardo</au><au>Perazio, Christina E</au><au>Franklin, Mark F</au><au>Franklin, Wally</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comment on: "Variability in humpback whale songs reveals how individuals can be distinctive when sharing a complex vocal display" J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 153, 2238-2250 (2023)</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>154</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1596</spage><pages>1596-</pages><issn>1520-8524</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><abstract>Lamoni, Garland, Allen, Coxon, Noad, and Rendell [(2023). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 153, 2238-2250] analyzed variations in humpback whale song structure to assess how individual singers can produce distinctive patterns that communicate desirable individual qualities to potential mates. Their analyses revealed that singers rarely produced individually specific sound patterns and that singers varied subjectively distinctive structural features of songs differently across years. These findings provide the strongest evidence to date that singing humpback whales are not varying song structure in ways that reliably reveal individual singers' physical or cognitive characteristics. Surprisingly, the authors appear to reach the opposite conclusion. Objective strategies for quantitatively comparing song properties are crucial for evaluating competing hypotheses regarding the nature and function of humpback whale songs, but the value of such strategies is reduced when the objectivity of the analyses is suspect and when negative evidence is framed as supporting prior beliefs.Lamoni, Garland, Allen, Coxon, Noad, and Rendell [(2023). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 153, 2238-2250] analyzed variations in humpback whale song structure to assess how individual singers can produce distinctive patterns that communicate desirable individual qualities to potential mates. Their analyses revealed that singers rarely produced individually specific sound patterns and that singers varied subjectively distinctive structural features of songs differently across years. These findings provide the strongest evidence to date that singing humpback whales are not varying song structure in ways that reliably reveal individual singers' physical or cognitive characteristics. Surprisingly, the authors appear to reach the opposite conclusion. Objective strategies for quantitatively comparing song properties are crucial for evaluating competing hypotheses regarding the nature and function of humpback whale songs, but the value of such strategies is reduced when the objectivity of the analyses is suspect and when negative evidence is framed as supporting prior beliefs.</abstract><doi>10.1121/10.0020913</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1520-8524
ispartof The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2023-09, Vol.154 (3), p.1596
issn 1520-8524
1520-8524
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2864158442
source AIP Journals Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection; AIP Acoustical Society of America
title Comment on: "Variability in humpback whale songs reveals how individuals can be distinctive when sharing a complex vocal display" J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 153, 2238-2250 (2023)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T00%3A05%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comment%20on:%20%22Variability%20in%20humpback%20whale%20songs%20reveals%20how%20individuals%20can%20be%20distinctive%20when%20sharing%20a%20complex%20vocal%20display%22%20J.%20Acoust.%20Soc.%20Am.%20153,%202238-2250%20(2023)&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=Mercado,%20Eduardo&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=154&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1596&rft.pages=1596-&rft.issn=1520-8524&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/10.0020913&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2864158442%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2864158442&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true