Comment on: "Variability in humpback whale songs reveals how individuals can be distinctive when sharing a complex vocal display" J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 153, 2238-2250 (2023)
Lamoni, Garland, Allen, Coxon, Noad, and Rendell [(2023). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 153, 2238-2250] analyzed variations in humpback whale song structure to assess how individual singers can produce distinctive patterns that communicate desirable individual qualities to potential mates. Their analyses reve...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2023-09, Vol.154 (3), p.1596 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1596 |
container_title | The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America |
container_volume | 154 |
creator | Mercado, Eduardo Perazio, Christina E Franklin, Mark F Franklin, Wally |
description | Lamoni, Garland, Allen, Coxon, Noad, and Rendell [(2023). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 153, 2238-2250] analyzed variations in humpback whale song structure to assess how individual singers can produce distinctive patterns that communicate desirable individual qualities to potential mates. Their analyses revealed that singers rarely produced individually specific sound patterns and that singers varied subjectively distinctive structural features of songs differently across years. These findings provide the strongest evidence to date that singing humpback whales are not varying song structure in ways that reliably reveal individual singers' physical or cognitive characteristics. Surprisingly, the authors appear to reach the opposite conclusion. Objective strategies for quantitatively comparing song properties are crucial for evaluating competing hypotheses regarding the nature and function of humpback whale songs, but the value of such strategies is reduced when the objectivity of the analyses is suspect and when negative evidence is framed as supporting prior beliefs.Lamoni, Garland, Allen, Coxon, Noad, and Rendell [(2023). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 153, 2238-2250] analyzed variations in humpback whale song structure to assess how individual singers can produce distinctive patterns that communicate desirable individual qualities to potential mates. Their analyses revealed that singers rarely produced individually specific sound patterns and that singers varied subjectively distinctive structural features of songs differently across years. These findings provide the strongest evidence to date that singing humpback whales are not varying song structure in ways that reliably reveal individual singers' physical or cognitive characteristics. Surprisingly, the authors appear to reach the opposite conclusion. Objective strategies for quantitatively comparing song properties are crucial for evaluating competing hypotheses regarding the nature and function of humpback whale songs, but the value of such strategies is reduced when the objectivity of the analyses is suspect and when negative evidence is framed as supporting prior beliefs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1121/10.0020913 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2864158442</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2864158442</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_28641584423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjctOwzAURC0EEuWx4QuuuioSCfZ1jFJ2qAIhtiC2leOYxuBHiJ2UfhM_iSuxYMtqZqQzM4RcMFoyhuw6K6VIl4wfkBkTSItaYHX4xx-TkxjfKaWi5ssZ-V4F57RPEPwtzF_lYGRjrEk7MB660fWNVB-w7aTVEIPfRBj0pKWN0IVtZlozmXbcZyU9NBpaE5PxKplJ55r2ELs86jcgQQXXW_0FU1DS7sHeyt0cnkq4U2GMqYTnoHJwJTDBrwCR1wWioLBAivzyjBy95Sd9_qunZPFw_7J6LPohfI46prUzUWlrpdd5b431TcVEXVXI_4H-AI2WY-4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2864158442</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comment on: "Variability in humpback whale songs reveals how individuals can be distinctive when sharing a complex vocal display" J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 153, 2238-2250 (2023)</title><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>AIP Acoustical Society of America</source><creator>Mercado, Eduardo ; Perazio, Christina E ; Franklin, Mark F ; Franklin, Wally</creator><creatorcontrib>Mercado, Eduardo ; Perazio, Christina E ; Franklin, Mark F ; Franklin, Wally</creatorcontrib><description>Lamoni, Garland, Allen, Coxon, Noad, and Rendell [(2023). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 153, 2238-2250] analyzed variations in humpback whale song structure to assess how individual singers can produce distinctive patterns that communicate desirable individual qualities to potential mates. Their analyses revealed that singers rarely produced individually specific sound patterns and that singers varied subjectively distinctive structural features of songs differently across years. These findings provide the strongest evidence to date that singing humpback whales are not varying song structure in ways that reliably reveal individual singers' physical or cognitive characteristics. Surprisingly, the authors appear to reach the opposite conclusion. Objective strategies for quantitatively comparing song properties are crucial for evaluating competing hypotheses regarding the nature and function of humpback whale songs, but the value of such strategies is reduced when the objectivity of the analyses is suspect and when negative evidence is framed as supporting prior beliefs.Lamoni, Garland, Allen, Coxon, Noad, and Rendell [(2023). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 153, 2238-2250] analyzed variations in humpback whale song structure to assess how individual singers can produce distinctive patterns that communicate desirable individual qualities to potential mates. Their analyses revealed that singers rarely produced individually specific sound patterns and that singers varied subjectively distinctive structural features of songs differently across years. These findings provide the strongest evidence to date that singing humpback whales are not varying song structure in ways that reliably reveal individual singers' physical or cognitive characteristics. Surprisingly, the authors appear to reach the opposite conclusion. Objective strategies for quantitatively comparing song properties are crucial for evaluating competing hypotheses regarding the nature and function of humpback whale songs, but the value of such strategies is reduced when the objectivity of the analyses is suspect and when negative evidence is framed as supporting prior beliefs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/10.0020913</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2023-09, Vol.154 (3), p.1596</ispartof><rights>2023 Acoustical Society of America.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>207,208,314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mercado, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perazio, Christina E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franklin, Mark F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franklin, Wally</creatorcontrib><title>Comment on: "Variability in humpback whale songs reveals how individuals can be distinctive when sharing a complex vocal display" J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 153, 2238-2250 (2023)</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><description>Lamoni, Garland, Allen, Coxon, Noad, and Rendell [(2023). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 153, 2238-2250] analyzed variations in humpback whale song structure to assess how individual singers can produce distinctive patterns that communicate desirable individual qualities to potential mates. Their analyses revealed that singers rarely produced individually specific sound patterns and that singers varied subjectively distinctive structural features of songs differently across years. These findings provide the strongest evidence to date that singing humpback whales are not varying song structure in ways that reliably reveal individual singers' physical or cognitive characteristics. Surprisingly, the authors appear to reach the opposite conclusion. Objective strategies for quantitatively comparing song properties are crucial for evaluating competing hypotheses regarding the nature and function of humpback whale songs, but the value of such strategies is reduced when the objectivity of the analyses is suspect and when negative evidence is framed as supporting prior beliefs.Lamoni, Garland, Allen, Coxon, Noad, and Rendell [(2023). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 153, 2238-2250] analyzed variations in humpback whale song structure to assess how individual singers can produce distinctive patterns that communicate desirable individual qualities to potential mates. Their analyses revealed that singers rarely produced individually specific sound patterns and that singers varied subjectively distinctive structural features of songs differently across years. These findings provide the strongest evidence to date that singing humpback whales are not varying song structure in ways that reliably reveal individual singers' physical or cognitive characteristics. Surprisingly, the authors appear to reach the opposite conclusion. Objective strategies for quantitatively comparing song properties are crucial for evaluating competing hypotheses regarding the nature and function of humpback whale songs, but the value of such strategies is reduced when the objectivity of the analyses is suspect and when negative evidence is framed as supporting prior beliefs.</description><issn>1520-8524</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVjctOwzAURC0EEuWx4QuuuioSCfZ1jFJ2qAIhtiC2leOYxuBHiJ2UfhM_iSuxYMtqZqQzM4RcMFoyhuw6K6VIl4wfkBkTSItaYHX4xx-TkxjfKaWi5ssZ-V4F57RPEPwtzF_lYGRjrEk7MB660fWNVB-w7aTVEIPfRBj0pKWN0IVtZlozmXbcZyU9NBpaE5PxKplJ55r2ELs86jcgQQXXW_0FU1DS7sHeyt0cnkq4U2GMqYTnoHJwJTDBrwCR1wWioLBAivzyjBy95Sd9_qunZPFw_7J6LPohfI46prUzUWlrpdd5b431TcVEXVXI_4H-AI2WY-4</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Mercado, Eduardo</creator><creator>Perazio, Christina E</creator><creator>Franklin, Mark F</creator><creator>Franklin, Wally</creator><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>Comment on: "Variability in humpback whale songs reveals how individuals can be distinctive when sharing a complex vocal display" J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 153, 2238-2250 (2023)</title><author>Mercado, Eduardo ; Perazio, Christina E ; Franklin, Mark F ; Franklin, Wally</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_28641584423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mercado, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perazio, Christina E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franklin, Mark F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franklin, Wally</creatorcontrib><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mercado, Eduardo</au><au>Perazio, Christina E</au><au>Franklin, Mark F</au><au>Franklin, Wally</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comment on: "Variability in humpback whale songs reveals how individuals can be distinctive when sharing a complex vocal display" J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 153, 2238-2250 (2023)</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>154</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1596</spage><pages>1596-</pages><issn>1520-8524</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><abstract>Lamoni, Garland, Allen, Coxon, Noad, and Rendell [(2023). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 153, 2238-2250] analyzed variations in humpback whale song structure to assess how individual singers can produce distinctive patterns that communicate desirable individual qualities to potential mates. Their analyses revealed that singers rarely produced individually specific sound patterns and that singers varied subjectively distinctive structural features of songs differently across years. These findings provide the strongest evidence to date that singing humpback whales are not varying song structure in ways that reliably reveal individual singers' physical or cognitive characteristics. Surprisingly, the authors appear to reach the opposite conclusion. Objective strategies for quantitatively comparing song properties are crucial for evaluating competing hypotheses regarding the nature and function of humpback whale songs, but the value of such strategies is reduced when the objectivity of the analyses is suspect and when negative evidence is framed as supporting prior beliefs.Lamoni, Garland, Allen, Coxon, Noad, and Rendell [(2023). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 153, 2238-2250] analyzed variations in humpback whale song structure to assess how individual singers can produce distinctive patterns that communicate desirable individual qualities to potential mates. Their analyses revealed that singers rarely produced individually specific sound patterns and that singers varied subjectively distinctive structural features of songs differently across years. These findings provide the strongest evidence to date that singing humpback whales are not varying song structure in ways that reliably reveal individual singers' physical or cognitive characteristics. Surprisingly, the authors appear to reach the opposite conclusion. Objective strategies for quantitatively comparing song properties are crucial for evaluating competing hypotheses regarding the nature and function of humpback whale songs, but the value of such strategies is reduced when the objectivity of the analyses is suspect and when negative evidence is framed as supporting prior beliefs.</abstract><doi>10.1121/10.0020913</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1520-8524 |
ispartof | The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2023-09, Vol.154 (3), p.1596 |
issn | 1520-8524 1520-8524 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2864158442 |
source | AIP Journals Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection; AIP Acoustical Society of America |
title | Comment on: "Variability in humpback whale songs reveals how individuals can be distinctive when sharing a complex vocal display" J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 153, 2238-2250 (2023) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T00%3A05%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comment%20on:%20%22Variability%20in%20humpback%20whale%20songs%20reveals%20how%20individuals%20can%20be%20distinctive%20when%20sharing%20a%20complex%20vocal%20display%22%20J.%20Acoust.%20Soc.%20Am.%20153,%202238-2250%20(2023)&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=Mercado,%20Eduardo&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=154&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1596&rft.pages=1596-&rft.issn=1520-8524&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/10.0020913&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2864158442%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2864158442&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |