Validation and use of the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool questionnaire: a scoping review

Patient safety incidents can impact not only patients and families but also healthcare providers, who may experience negative emotions and symptoms, such as anxiety, guilt, stress, and loss of confidence. To identify and support these “second victims,” a screening tool called the Second Victim Exper...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Public health (London) 2023-10, Vol.223, p.183-192
Hauptverfasser: Dato Md Yusof, Y.J., Ng, Q.X., Teoh, S.E., Loh, C.Y.L., Xin, X., Thumboo, J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 192
container_issue
container_start_page 183
container_title Public health (London)
container_volume 223
creator Dato Md Yusof, Y.J.
Ng, Q.X.
Teoh, S.E.
Loh, C.Y.L.
Xin, X.
Thumboo, J.
description Patient safety incidents can impact not only patients and families but also healthcare providers, who may experience negative emotions and symptoms, such as anxiety, guilt, stress, and loss of confidence. To identify and support these “second victims,” a screening tool called the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool (SVEST) has been developed. This scoping review aims to map our current knowledge of the SVEST in terms of its scope of use, validation and limitations. Scoping review. In accordance with the framework outlined by Arksey and O'Malley and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews, we conducted a literature search in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, Embase and PsycINFO databases from database inception up till 1 March 2023. A total of 31 studies were reviewed. The SVEST has been cross-culturally adapted from English into other languages. The SVEST has been successfully used in different contexts and with various healthcare professionals, including doctors, nurses, allied health professionals, midwives and pharmacists. The tool has been used to assess the impact of second victim experiences and the effectiveness of support interventions in addressing the phenomenon. Validity assessment of translated versions of SVEST in the reviewed studies revealed good content validity in most cases, although some studies did not report clear values for scale-level Content Validity Index. On the whole, SVEST is generally a reliable and valid tool, although further refinements and modifications may improve its validity and reliability. The review highlights the significance of SVEST as a crucial resource for healthcare providers and organisations that prioritise well-being and safety in health care. It also underscores the importance of recognising the needs of second victims and offering them appropriate interventions to manage the aftermath of adverse events.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.puhe.2023.08.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2862202195</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S003335062300286X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2862202195</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-b956c3858a06dc604ac02cf277587b9db6b03236568ebb3311b12853df7002f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAURC0EEqXwA6y8ZJPgR-04iA2qykOqxKKlW8txbqirNA52wuPvSVrWrK40mhndOQhdU5JSQuXtLm37LaSMMJ4SlRLCT9CEzjKZCEnlKZoMCk-4IPIcXcS4I4SwjIsJshtTu9J0zjfYNCXuI2Bf4W4LeAXWD8rG2c7t8eK7heCgsXDwrfq29aHDa-9r_NFDHBsa4wLcYYOj9a1r3nGATwdfl-isMnWEq787RW-Pi_X8OVm-Pr3MH5aJ5Zx3SZELabkSyhBZWklmxhJmK5ZlQmVFXhayIJxxKaSCouCc0oIyJXhZZcOaKudTdHPsbYM_vKT3Llqoa9OA76NmSrKBEM3FYGVHqw0-xgCVboPbm_CjKdEjUb3TI1E9EtVE6ZHfFN0fQzCMGIYFHe2BSDnMtp0uvfsv_gsTEH8j</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2862202195</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation and use of the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool questionnaire: a scoping review</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Dato Md Yusof, Y.J. ; Ng, Q.X. ; Teoh, S.E. ; Loh, C.Y.L. ; Xin, X. ; Thumboo, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dato Md Yusof, Y.J. ; Ng, Q.X. ; Teoh, S.E. ; Loh, C.Y.L. ; Xin, X. ; Thumboo, J.</creatorcontrib><description>Patient safety incidents can impact not only patients and families but also healthcare providers, who may experience negative emotions and symptoms, such as anxiety, guilt, stress, and loss of confidence. To identify and support these “second victims,” a screening tool called the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool (SVEST) has been developed. This scoping review aims to map our current knowledge of the SVEST in terms of its scope of use, validation and limitations. Scoping review. In accordance with the framework outlined by Arksey and O'Malley and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews, we conducted a literature search in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, Embase and PsycINFO databases from database inception up till 1 March 2023. A total of 31 studies were reviewed. The SVEST has been cross-culturally adapted from English into other languages. The SVEST has been successfully used in different contexts and with various healthcare professionals, including doctors, nurses, allied health professionals, midwives and pharmacists. The tool has been used to assess the impact of second victim experiences and the effectiveness of support interventions in addressing the phenomenon. Validity assessment of translated versions of SVEST in the reviewed studies revealed good content validity in most cases, although some studies did not report clear values for scale-level Content Validity Index. On the whole, SVEST is generally a reliable and valid tool, although further refinements and modifications may improve its validity and reliability. The review highlights the significance of SVEST as a crucial resource for healthcare providers and organisations that prioritise well-being and safety in health care. It also underscores the importance of recognising the needs of second victims and offering them appropriate interventions to manage the aftermath of adverse events.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-3506</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5616</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2023.08.003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Medical errors ; Scoping review ; Second victim ; Second Victim Experience and Support Tool ; SVEST</subject><ispartof>Public health (London), 2023-10, Vol.223, p.183-192</ispartof><rights>2023 The Royal Society for Public Health</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-b956c3858a06dc604ac02cf277587b9db6b03236568ebb3311b12853df7002f93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-b956c3858a06dc604ac02cf277587b9db6b03236568ebb3311b12853df7002f93</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8561-2513 ; 0000-0001-9526-7960</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2023.08.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dato Md Yusof, Y.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Q.X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teoh, S.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loh, C.Y.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xin, X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thumboo, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Validation and use of the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool questionnaire: a scoping review</title><title>Public health (London)</title><description>Patient safety incidents can impact not only patients and families but also healthcare providers, who may experience negative emotions and symptoms, such as anxiety, guilt, stress, and loss of confidence. To identify and support these “second victims,” a screening tool called the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool (SVEST) has been developed. This scoping review aims to map our current knowledge of the SVEST in terms of its scope of use, validation and limitations. Scoping review. In accordance with the framework outlined by Arksey and O'Malley and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews, we conducted a literature search in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, Embase and PsycINFO databases from database inception up till 1 March 2023. A total of 31 studies were reviewed. The SVEST has been cross-culturally adapted from English into other languages. The SVEST has been successfully used in different contexts and with various healthcare professionals, including doctors, nurses, allied health professionals, midwives and pharmacists. The tool has been used to assess the impact of second victim experiences and the effectiveness of support interventions in addressing the phenomenon. Validity assessment of translated versions of SVEST in the reviewed studies revealed good content validity in most cases, although some studies did not report clear values for scale-level Content Validity Index. On the whole, SVEST is generally a reliable and valid tool, although further refinements and modifications may improve its validity and reliability. The review highlights the significance of SVEST as a crucial resource for healthcare providers and organisations that prioritise well-being and safety in health care. It also underscores the importance of recognising the needs of second victims and offering them appropriate interventions to manage the aftermath of adverse events.</description><subject>Medical errors</subject><subject>Scoping review</subject><subject>Second victim</subject><subject>Second Victim Experience and Support Tool</subject><subject>SVEST</subject><issn>0033-3506</issn><issn>1476-5616</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAURC0EEqXwA6y8ZJPgR-04iA2qykOqxKKlW8txbqirNA52wuPvSVrWrK40mhndOQhdU5JSQuXtLm37LaSMMJ4SlRLCT9CEzjKZCEnlKZoMCk-4IPIcXcS4I4SwjIsJshtTu9J0zjfYNCXuI2Bf4W4LeAXWD8rG2c7t8eK7heCgsXDwrfq29aHDa-9r_NFDHBsa4wLcYYOj9a1r3nGATwdfl-isMnWEq787RW-Pi_X8OVm-Pr3MH5aJ5Zx3SZELabkSyhBZWklmxhJmK5ZlQmVFXhayIJxxKaSCouCc0oIyJXhZZcOaKudTdHPsbYM_vKT3Llqoa9OA76NmSrKBEM3FYGVHqw0-xgCVboPbm_CjKdEjUb3TI1E9EtVE6ZHfFN0fQzCMGIYFHe2BSDnMtp0uvfsv_gsTEH8j</recordid><startdate>202310</startdate><enddate>202310</enddate><creator>Dato Md Yusof, Y.J.</creator><creator>Ng, Q.X.</creator><creator>Teoh, S.E.</creator><creator>Loh, C.Y.L.</creator><creator>Xin, X.</creator><creator>Thumboo, J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8561-2513</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9526-7960</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202310</creationdate><title>Validation and use of the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool questionnaire: a scoping review</title><author>Dato Md Yusof, Y.J. ; Ng, Q.X. ; Teoh, S.E. ; Loh, C.Y.L. ; Xin, X. ; Thumboo, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-b956c3858a06dc604ac02cf277587b9db6b03236568ebb3311b12853df7002f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Medical errors</topic><topic>Scoping review</topic><topic>Second victim</topic><topic>Second Victim Experience and Support Tool</topic><topic>SVEST</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dato Md Yusof, Y.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Q.X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teoh, S.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loh, C.Y.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xin, X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thumboo, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Public health (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dato Md Yusof, Y.J.</au><au>Ng, Q.X.</au><au>Teoh, S.E.</au><au>Loh, C.Y.L.</au><au>Xin, X.</au><au>Thumboo, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation and use of the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool questionnaire: a scoping review</atitle><jtitle>Public health (London)</jtitle><date>2023-10</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>223</volume><spage>183</spage><epage>192</epage><pages>183-192</pages><issn>0033-3506</issn><eissn>1476-5616</eissn><abstract>Patient safety incidents can impact not only patients and families but also healthcare providers, who may experience negative emotions and symptoms, such as anxiety, guilt, stress, and loss of confidence. To identify and support these “second victims,” a screening tool called the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool (SVEST) has been developed. This scoping review aims to map our current knowledge of the SVEST in terms of its scope of use, validation and limitations. Scoping review. In accordance with the framework outlined by Arksey and O'Malley and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews, we conducted a literature search in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, Embase and PsycINFO databases from database inception up till 1 March 2023. A total of 31 studies were reviewed. The SVEST has been cross-culturally adapted from English into other languages. The SVEST has been successfully used in different contexts and with various healthcare professionals, including doctors, nurses, allied health professionals, midwives and pharmacists. The tool has been used to assess the impact of second victim experiences and the effectiveness of support interventions in addressing the phenomenon. Validity assessment of translated versions of SVEST in the reviewed studies revealed good content validity in most cases, although some studies did not report clear values for scale-level Content Validity Index. On the whole, SVEST is generally a reliable and valid tool, although further refinements and modifications may improve its validity and reliability. The review highlights the significance of SVEST as a crucial resource for healthcare providers and organisations that prioritise well-being and safety in health care. It also underscores the importance of recognising the needs of second victims and offering them appropriate interventions to manage the aftermath of adverse events.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.puhe.2023.08.003</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8561-2513</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9526-7960</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-3506
ispartof Public health (London), 2023-10, Vol.223, p.183-192
issn 0033-3506
1476-5616
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2862202195
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Medical errors
Scoping review
Second victim
Second Victim Experience and Support Tool
SVEST
title Validation and use of the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool questionnaire: a scoping review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T03%3A03%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20and%20use%20of%20the%20Second%20Victim%20Experience%20and%20Support%20Tool%20questionnaire:%20a%20scoping%20review&rft.jtitle=Public%20health%20(London)&rft.au=Dato%20Md%20Yusof,%20Y.J.&rft.date=2023-10&rft.volume=223&rft.spage=183&rft.epage=192&rft.pages=183-192&rft.issn=0033-3506&rft.eissn=1476-5616&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.puhe.2023.08.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2862202195%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2862202195&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S003335062300286X&rfr_iscdi=true