Assessment of routine same-day discharge surgery for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
Introduction It is important for robotic surgery to be cost-effective, especially by reducing the length of stay (LOS). Therefore, we developed a protocol for day-case robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). This study aimed to validate this as a safe practice of care and to assess the potentia...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | World journal of urology 2023-10, Vol.41 (10), p.2679-2684 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2684 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 2679 |
container_title | World journal of urology |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Broe, Mark Carbin Joseph, Danny Darlington Casson, Helen Innes, Maria Adamou, Constantinos Fragkoulis, Gerasimos Moschonas, Dimitrios Kusuma, Venkata Ramana Murthy Hicks, James Patil, Krishna Perry, Matthew James Alexander Abou Chedid, Wissam |
description | Introduction
It is important for robotic surgery to be cost-effective, especially by reducing the length of stay (LOS). Therefore, we developed a protocol for day-case robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). This study aimed to validate this as a safe practice of care and to assess the potential benefits to the hospital and patient.
Methods
In this single-centre study, all patients booked for RARP between April 2022 and October 2022 were screened for suitability for day case. All tumour types were included. Exclusion criteria were a history of complex abdominal surgeries, salvage prostatectomy, body mass index (BMI) > 35 and patient living alone or > 150 km away from the hospital. All day-case RARPs were performed as a morning case with a protocol for review throughout the day with evening discharge if mobilising independently and eating/drinking well. The primary outcome of the study was success rate of discharge home on day of surgery (DOS) with secondary outcomes of readmissions and complications. A patient questionnaire was completed at home including both visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and satisfaction rating.
Results
Forty-five patients underwent day-case RARP over a 6-month period with minimum of 30 days of follow-up. 41/45 (91%) had successful DOS discharge home. The four admissions overnight were due to dizziness, low oxygen saturation, intraoperative complications and a diagnosis of COVID-19. There were no readmissions and no 30-day complications. The most common issues at home were catheter discomfort and constipation with low mean VAS pain score and low nausea reported. The overall patient satisfaction rating was very high at 4.8/5, and 97% said they would recommend to a family member. The cost saving for the hospital was 400 pounds per patient.
Conclusion
Day-case procedure is a viable, safe and efficient pathway for appropriately selected and counselled patients undergoing RARP. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00345-023-04566-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2861305131</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2861305131</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-b0e052c8a0fd79df0a8d0ebb03ab74224f0eb1c70bdb8a238ddcaae8cf04dcc73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOxCAUQInRODr6Ay5MEzdu0Au0hVka4yuZxI0uXBEKVDuZtiOXJvbvRWd8xIUb4MK5Dw4hRwzOGIA8RwCRFxS4oJAXZUnftsgey4WgSvJy-9d5QvYRFwBMllDskomQZakkm-2RpwtEj9j6LmZ9nYV-iE3nMzStp86MmWvQvpjwnK6GtIYxq_uQsKqP1CA2GL3LgnGNNctsFXqMJnob-3Y8IDu1WaI_3OxT8nh99XB5S-f3N3eXF3NqhSwircBDwa0yUDs5czUY5cBXFQhTyZzzvE4RsxIqVynDhXLOGuOVrSF31koxJafruqn76-Ax6jbN7JdL0_l-QM1VyQQUTLCEnvxBF_0QujRdoqRiBVMlTxRfUzZ9B4Ov9So0rQmjZqA_xOu1eJ3E60_x-i0lHW9KD1Xr3XfKl-kEiDWA6alLJn96_1P2HZ8WkSI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2878151862</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of routine same-day discharge surgery for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Broe, Mark ; Carbin Joseph, Danny Darlington ; Casson, Helen ; Innes, Maria ; Adamou, Constantinos ; Fragkoulis, Gerasimos ; Moschonas, Dimitrios ; Kusuma, Venkata Ramana Murthy ; Hicks, James ; Patil, Krishna ; Perry, Matthew James Alexander ; Abou Chedid, Wissam</creator><creatorcontrib>Broe, Mark ; Carbin Joseph, Danny Darlington ; Casson, Helen ; Innes, Maria ; Adamou, Constantinos ; Fragkoulis, Gerasimos ; Moschonas, Dimitrios ; Kusuma, Venkata Ramana Murthy ; Hicks, James ; Patil, Krishna ; Perry, Matthew James Alexander ; Abou Chedid, Wissam</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
It is important for robotic surgery to be cost-effective, especially by reducing the length of stay (LOS). Therefore, we developed a protocol for day-case robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). This study aimed to validate this as a safe practice of care and to assess the potential benefits to the hospital and patient.
Methods
In this single-centre study, all patients booked for RARP between April 2022 and October 2022 were screened for suitability for day case. All tumour types were included. Exclusion criteria were a history of complex abdominal surgeries, salvage prostatectomy, body mass index (BMI) > 35 and patient living alone or > 150 km away from the hospital. All day-case RARPs were performed as a morning case with a protocol for review throughout the day with evening discharge if mobilising independently and eating/drinking well. The primary outcome of the study was success rate of discharge home on day of surgery (DOS) with secondary outcomes of readmissions and complications. A patient questionnaire was completed at home including both visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and satisfaction rating.
Results
Forty-five patients underwent day-case RARP over a 6-month period with minimum of 30 days of follow-up. 41/45 (91%) had successful DOS discharge home. The four admissions overnight were due to dizziness, low oxygen saturation, intraoperative complications and a diagnosis of COVID-19. There were no readmissions and no 30-day complications. The most common issues at home were catheter discomfort and constipation with low mean VAS pain score and low nausea reported. The overall patient satisfaction rating was very high at 4.8/5, and 97% said they would recommend to a family member. The cost saving for the hospital was 400 pounds per patient.
Conclusion
Day-case procedure is a viable, safe and efficient pathway for appropriately selected and counselled patients undergoing RARP.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1433-8726</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0724-4983</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-8726</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04566-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37668719</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Body mass index ; Constipation ; COVID-19 ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Nephrology ; Oncology ; Original Article ; Pain ; Patient Discharge ; Patient satisfaction ; Patients ; Prostatectomy ; Prostatectomy - methods ; Robotic surgery ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods ; Robotics ; Surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Urological surgery ; Urology</subject><ispartof>World journal of urology, 2023-10, Vol.41 (10), p.2679-2684</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-b0e052c8a0fd79df0a8d0ebb03ab74224f0eb1c70bdb8a238ddcaae8cf04dcc73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-b0e052c8a0fd79df0a8d0ebb03ab74224f0eb1c70bdb8a238ddcaae8cf04dcc73</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8841-0992</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00345-023-04566-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00345-023-04566-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37668719$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Broe, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carbin Joseph, Danny Darlington</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casson, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Innes, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adamou, Constantinos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fragkoulis, Gerasimos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moschonas, Dimitrios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kusuma, Venkata Ramana Murthy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hicks, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patil, Krishna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perry, Matthew James Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abou Chedid, Wissam</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of routine same-day discharge surgery for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy</title><title>World journal of urology</title><addtitle>World J Urol</addtitle><addtitle>World J Urol</addtitle><description>Introduction
It is important for robotic surgery to be cost-effective, especially by reducing the length of stay (LOS). Therefore, we developed a protocol for day-case robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). This study aimed to validate this as a safe practice of care and to assess the potential benefits to the hospital and patient.
Methods
In this single-centre study, all patients booked for RARP between April 2022 and October 2022 were screened for suitability for day case. All tumour types were included. Exclusion criteria were a history of complex abdominal surgeries, salvage prostatectomy, body mass index (BMI) > 35 and patient living alone or > 150 km away from the hospital. All day-case RARPs were performed as a morning case with a protocol for review throughout the day with evening discharge if mobilising independently and eating/drinking well. The primary outcome of the study was success rate of discharge home on day of surgery (DOS) with secondary outcomes of readmissions and complications. A patient questionnaire was completed at home including both visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and satisfaction rating.
Results
Forty-five patients underwent day-case RARP over a 6-month period with minimum of 30 days of follow-up. 41/45 (91%) had successful DOS discharge home. The four admissions overnight were due to dizziness, low oxygen saturation, intraoperative complications and a diagnosis of COVID-19. There were no readmissions and no 30-day complications. The most common issues at home were catheter discomfort and constipation with low mean VAS pain score and low nausea reported. The overall patient satisfaction rating was very high at 4.8/5, and 97% said they would recommend to a family member. The cost saving for the hospital was 400 pounds per patient.
Conclusion
Day-case procedure is a viable, safe and efficient pathway for appropriately selected and counselled patients undergoing RARP.</description><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Constipation</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Nephrology</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patient Discharge</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prostatectomy</subject><subject>Prostatectomy - methods</subject><subject>Robotic surgery</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Urological surgery</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>1433-8726</issn><issn>0724-4983</issn><issn>1433-8726</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOxCAUQInRODr6Ay5MEzdu0Au0hVka4yuZxI0uXBEKVDuZtiOXJvbvRWd8xIUb4MK5Dw4hRwzOGIA8RwCRFxS4oJAXZUnftsgey4WgSvJy-9d5QvYRFwBMllDskomQZakkm-2RpwtEj9j6LmZ9nYV-iE3nMzStp86MmWvQvpjwnK6GtIYxq_uQsKqP1CA2GL3LgnGNNctsFXqMJnob-3Y8IDu1WaI_3OxT8nh99XB5S-f3N3eXF3NqhSwircBDwa0yUDs5czUY5cBXFQhTyZzzvE4RsxIqVynDhXLOGuOVrSF31koxJafruqn76-Ax6jbN7JdL0_l-QM1VyQQUTLCEnvxBF_0QujRdoqRiBVMlTxRfUzZ9B4Ov9So0rQmjZqA_xOu1eJ3E60_x-i0lHW9KD1Xr3XfKl-kEiDWA6alLJn96_1P2HZ8WkSI</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Broe, Mark</creator><creator>Carbin Joseph, Danny Darlington</creator><creator>Casson, Helen</creator><creator>Innes, Maria</creator><creator>Adamou, Constantinos</creator><creator>Fragkoulis, Gerasimos</creator><creator>Moschonas, Dimitrios</creator><creator>Kusuma, Venkata Ramana Murthy</creator><creator>Hicks, James</creator><creator>Patil, Krishna</creator><creator>Perry, Matthew James Alexander</creator><creator>Abou Chedid, Wissam</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8841-0992</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>Assessment of routine same-day discharge surgery for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy</title><author>Broe, Mark ; Carbin Joseph, Danny Darlington ; Casson, Helen ; Innes, Maria ; Adamou, Constantinos ; Fragkoulis, Gerasimos ; Moschonas, Dimitrios ; Kusuma, Venkata Ramana Murthy ; Hicks, James ; Patil, Krishna ; Perry, Matthew James Alexander ; Abou Chedid, Wissam</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-b0e052c8a0fd79df0a8d0ebb03ab74224f0eb1c70bdb8a238ddcaae8cf04dcc73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Constipation</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Nephrology</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patient Discharge</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prostatectomy</topic><topic>Prostatectomy - methods</topic><topic>Robotic surgery</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Urological surgery</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Broe, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carbin Joseph, Danny Darlington</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casson, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Innes, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adamou, Constantinos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fragkoulis, Gerasimos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moschonas, Dimitrios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kusuma, Venkata Ramana Murthy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hicks, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patil, Krishna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perry, Matthew James Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abou Chedid, Wissam</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>World journal of urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Broe, Mark</au><au>Carbin Joseph, Danny Darlington</au><au>Casson, Helen</au><au>Innes, Maria</au><au>Adamou, Constantinos</au><au>Fragkoulis, Gerasimos</au><au>Moschonas, Dimitrios</au><au>Kusuma, Venkata Ramana Murthy</au><au>Hicks, James</au><au>Patil, Krishna</au><au>Perry, Matthew James Alexander</au><au>Abou Chedid, Wissam</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of routine same-day discharge surgery for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy</atitle><jtitle>World journal of urology</jtitle><stitle>World J Urol</stitle><addtitle>World J Urol</addtitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2679</spage><epage>2684</epage><pages>2679-2684</pages><issn>1433-8726</issn><issn>0724-4983</issn><eissn>1433-8726</eissn><abstract>Introduction
It is important for robotic surgery to be cost-effective, especially by reducing the length of stay (LOS). Therefore, we developed a protocol for day-case robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). This study aimed to validate this as a safe practice of care and to assess the potential benefits to the hospital and patient.
Methods
In this single-centre study, all patients booked for RARP between April 2022 and October 2022 were screened for suitability for day case. All tumour types were included. Exclusion criteria were a history of complex abdominal surgeries, salvage prostatectomy, body mass index (BMI) > 35 and patient living alone or > 150 km away from the hospital. All day-case RARPs were performed as a morning case with a protocol for review throughout the day with evening discharge if mobilising independently and eating/drinking well. The primary outcome of the study was success rate of discharge home on day of surgery (DOS) with secondary outcomes of readmissions and complications. A patient questionnaire was completed at home including both visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and satisfaction rating.
Results
Forty-five patients underwent day-case RARP over a 6-month period with minimum of 30 days of follow-up. 41/45 (91%) had successful DOS discharge home. The four admissions overnight were due to dizziness, low oxygen saturation, intraoperative complications and a diagnosis of COVID-19. There were no readmissions and no 30-day complications. The most common issues at home were catheter discomfort and constipation with low mean VAS pain score and low nausea reported. The overall patient satisfaction rating was very high at 4.8/5, and 97% said they would recommend to a family member. The cost saving for the hospital was 400 pounds per patient.
Conclusion
Day-case procedure is a viable, safe and efficient pathway for appropriately selected and counselled patients undergoing RARP.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>37668719</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00345-023-04566-x</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8841-0992</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1433-8726 |
ispartof | World journal of urology, 2023-10, Vol.41 (10), p.2679-2684 |
issn | 1433-8726 0724-4983 1433-8726 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2861305131 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Body mass index Constipation COVID-19 Humans Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Nephrology Oncology Original Article Pain Patient Discharge Patient satisfaction Patients Prostatectomy Prostatectomy - methods Robotic surgery Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods Robotics Surgery Treatment Outcome Urological surgery Urology |
title | Assessment of routine same-day discharge surgery for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T05%3A48%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20routine%20same-day%20discharge%20surgery%20for%20robot-assisted%20radical%20prostatectomy&rft.jtitle=World%20journal%20of%20urology&rft.au=Broe,%20Mark&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2679&rft.epage=2684&rft.pages=2679-2684&rft.issn=1433-8726&rft.eissn=1433-8726&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00345-023-04566-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2861305131%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2878151862&rft_id=info:pmid/37668719&rfr_iscdi=true |