Pipeline agglomerator design as a model test case

Design of a pipeline agglomerator to facilitate collection of submicron flame-synthesized aerosol powder post-quench must consider simultaneous aggregation and breakup to arrive at the appropriate pipe diameter to achieve desired cyclone efficiency under pressure drop constraints. The authors have u...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Powder technology 2005-08, Vol.156 (2), p.129-145
Hauptverfasser: Diemer, R. Bertrum, Ehrman, Sheryl H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 145
container_issue 2
container_start_page 129
container_title Powder technology
container_volume 156
creator Diemer, R. Bertrum
Ehrman, Sheryl H.
description Design of a pipeline agglomerator to facilitate collection of submicron flame-synthesized aerosol powder post-quench must consider simultaneous aggregation and breakup to arrive at the appropriate pipe diameter to achieve desired cyclone efficiency under pressure drop constraints. The authors have used this problem in teaching population balances to classes in particle technology. The class solved the problem using a sectional method. Here, alternative moment solutions are discussed, including reconstruction of the distribution for comparison with the sectional result. The power of using both types of methods is illustrated in the additional insight available. The solution to the problem can be anticipated from the equilibrium solution for the zeroth moment alone. Insight into what is happening along the system trajectory can be seen more clearly in the moments but is reflected in the trajectory of sectionally obtained distributions. The moment model for this problem is an open set of equations requiring closure. Two different approaches, polynomial interpolative closure (MOMIC) and closure by quadrature (QMOM), are illustrated and the sensitivity of distribution reconstruction to the number of moments included in each type of model is probed. For both approaches, a model based on 10 moment equations resulted in a reconstructed distribution in reasonable agreement with the distribution computed directly from a 25-bin sectional model. Comparing on the same platform, solution time was the shortest for the MOMIC approach. The sectional method took 2–3 times longer than MOMIC while the QMOM method took 35% longer.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.powtec.2005.04.016
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28609416</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0032591005001312</els_id><sourcerecordid>28609416</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-e96700a9b449f90bf1a45257f76b8d61e5c16f6de7d114eecbaafde6bf4218933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-Axfd6K713jZN240ggy8QdKHgLqTJzZChL5OO4r-3Ywfcubpw-M453MPYOUKCgOJqkwz910g6SQHyBHgyiQdsgWWRxVlavh-yBUCWxnmFcMxOQtgAgMgQFgxf3ECN6yhS63XTt-TV2PvIUHDrLlIhUlHbG2qikcIYaRXolB1Z1QQ6298le7u7fV09xE_P94-rm6dYc-BjTJUoAFRVc17ZCmqLiudpXthC1KURSLlGYYWhwiByIl0rZQ2J2vIUyyrLluxyzh18_7Gd2mXrgqamUR312yDTUkDFUUwgn0Ht-xA8WTl41yr_LRHkbh-5kfM-crePBC7h13axz1dBq8Z61WkX_rwF5jwTMHHXM0fTs5-OvAzaUafJOE96lKZ3_xf9AATmfPY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>28609416</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pipeline agglomerator design as a model test case</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Diemer, R. Bertrum ; Ehrman, Sheryl H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Diemer, R. Bertrum ; Ehrman, Sheryl H.</creatorcontrib><description>Design of a pipeline agglomerator to facilitate collection of submicron flame-synthesized aerosol powder post-quench must consider simultaneous aggregation and breakup to arrive at the appropriate pipe diameter to achieve desired cyclone efficiency under pressure drop constraints. The authors have used this problem in teaching population balances to classes in particle technology. The class solved the problem using a sectional method. Here, alternative moment solutions are discussed, including reconstruction of the distribution for comparison with the sectional result. The power of using both types of methods is illustrated in the additional insight available. The solution to the problem can be anticipated from the equilibrium solution for the zeroth moment alone. Insight into what is happening along the system trajectory can be seen more clearly in the moments but is reflected in the trajectory of sectionally obtained distributions. The moment model for this problem is an open set of equations requiring closure. Two different approaches, polynomial interpolative closure (MOMIC) and closure by quadrature (QMOM), are illustrated and the sensitivity of distribution reconstruction to the number of moments included in each type of model is probed. For both approaches, a model based on 10 moment equations resulted in a reconstructed distribution in reasonable agreement with the distribution computed directly from a 25-bin sectional model. Comparing on the same platform, solution time was the shortest for the MOMIC approach. The sectional method took 2–3 times longer than MOMIC while the QMOM method took 35% longer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-5910</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-328X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2005.04.016</identifier><identifier>CODEN: POTEBX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lausanne: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Agglomeration ; Applied sciences ; Breakage ; Centrifugation, cyclones ; Chemical engineering ; Distribution reconstruction ; Exact sciences and technology ; Handling and storage of chemicals. Piping ; Hydrodynamics of contact apparatus ; Liquid-liquid and fluid-solid mechanical separations ; Miscellaneous ; Moments ; MOMIC ; Population balance ; QMOM ; Sectional method ; Solid-solid systems</subject><ispartof>Powder technology, 2005-08, Vol.156 (2), p.129-145</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-e96700a9b449f90bf1a45257f76b8d61e5c16f6de7d114eecbaafde6bf4218933</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-e96700a9b449f90bf1a45257f76b8d61e5c16f6de7d114eecbaafde6bf4218933</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032591005001312$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,3537,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17154360$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Diemer, R. Bertrum</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehrman, Sheryl H.</creatorcontrib><title>Pipeline agglomerator design as a model test case</title><title>Powder technology</title><description>Design of a pipeline agglomerator to facilitate collection of submicron flame-synthesized aerosol powder post-quench must consider simultaneous aggregation and breakup to arrive at the appropriate pipe diameter to achieve desired cyclone efficiency under pressure drop constraints. The authors have used this problem in teaching population balances to classes in particle technology. The class solved the problem using a sectional method. Here, alternative moment solutions are discussed, including reconstruction of the distribution for comparison with the sectional result. The power of using both types of methods is illustrated in the additional insight available. The solution to the problem can be anticipated from the equilibrium solution for the zeroth moment alone. Insight into what is happening along the system trajectory can be seen more clearly in the moments but is reflected in the trajectory of sectionally obtained distributions. The moment model for this problem is an open set of equations requiring closure. Two different approaches, polynomial interpolative closure (MOMIC) and closure by quadrature (QMOM), are illustrated and the sensitivity of distribution reconstruction to the number of moments included in each type of model is probed. For both approaches, a model based on 10 moment equations resulted in a reconstructed distribution in reasonable agreement with the distribution computed directly from a 25-bin sectional model. Comparing on the same platform, solution time was the shortest for the MOMIC approach. The sectional method took 2–3 times longer than MOMIC while the QMOM method took 35% longer.</description><subject>Agglomeration</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Breakage</subject><subject>Centrifugation, cyclones</subject><subject>Chemical engineering</subject><subject>Distribution reconstruction</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Handling and storage of chemicals. Piping</subject><subject>Hydrodynamics of contact apparatus</subject><subject>Liquid-liquid and fluid-solid mechanical separations</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Moments</subject><subject>MOMIC</subject><subject>Population balance</subject><subject>QMOM</subject><subject>Sectional method</subject><subject>Solid-solid systems</subject><issn>0032-5910</issn><issn>1873-328X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-Axfd6K713jZN240ggy8QdKHgLqTJzZChL5OO4r-3Ywfcubpw-M453MPYOUKCgOJqkwz910g6SQHyBHgyiQdsgWWRxVlavh-yBUCWxnmFcMxOQtgAgMgQFgxf3ECN6yhS63XTt-TV2PvIUHDrLlIhUlHbG2qikcIYaRXolB1Z1QQ6298le7u7fV09xE_P94-rm6dYc-BjTJUoAFRVc17ZCmqLiudpXthC1KURSLlGYYWhwiByIl0rZQ2J2vIUyyrLluxyzh18_7Gd2mXrgqamUR312yDTUkDFUUwgn0Ht-xA8WTl41yr_LRHkbh-5kfM-crePBC7h13axz1dBq8Z61WkX_rwF5jwTMHHXM0fTs5-OvAzaUafJOE96lKZ3_xf9AATmfPY</recordid><startdate>20050823</startdate><enddate>20050823</enddate><creator>Diemer, R. Bertrum</creator><creator>Ehrman, Sheryl H.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050823</creationdate><title>Pipeline agglomerator design as a model test case</title><author>Diemer, R. Bertrum ; Ehrman, Sheryl H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-e96700a9b449f90bf1a45257f76b8d61e5c16f6de7d114eecbaafde6bf4218933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Agglomeration</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Breakage</topic><topic>Centrifugation, cyclones</topic><topic>Chemical engineering</topic><topic>Distribution reconstruction</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Handling and storage of chemicals. Piping</topic><topic>Hydrodynamics of contact apparatus</topic><topic>Liquid-liquid and fluid-solid mechanical separations</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Moments</topic><topic>MOMIC</topic><topic>Population balance</topic><topic>QMOM</topic><topic>Sectional method</topic><topic>Solid-solid systems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Diemer, R. Bertrum</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehrman, Sheryl H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Powder technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Diemer, R. Bertrum</au><au>Ehrman, Sheryl H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pipeline agglomerator design as a model test case</atitle><jtitle>Powder technology</jtitle><date>2005-08-23</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>156</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>129</spage><epage>145</epage><pages>129-145</pages><issn>0032-5910</issn><eissn>1873-328X</eissn><coden>POTEBX</coden><abstract>Design of a pipeline agglomerator to facilitate collection of submicron flame-synthesized aerosol powder post-quench must consider simultaneous aggregation and breakup to arrive at the appropriate pipe diameter to achieve desired cyclone efficiency under pressure drop constraints. The authors have used this problem in teaching population balances to classes in particle technology. The class solved the problem using a sectional method. Here, alternative moment solutions are discussed, including reconstruction of the distribution for comparison with the sectional result. The power of using both types of methods is illustrated in the additional insight available. The solution to the problem can be anticipated from the equilibrium solution for the zeroth moment alone. Insight into what is happening along the system trajectory can be seen more clearly in the moments but is reflected in the trajectory of sectionally obtained distributions. The moment model for this problem is an open set of equations requiring closure. Two different approaches, polynomial interpolative closure (MOMIC) and closure by quadrature (QMOM), are illustrated and the sensitivity of distribution reconstruction to the number of moments included in each type of model is probed. For both approaches, a model based on 10 moment equations resulted in a reconstructed distribution in reasonable agreement with the distribution computed directly from a 25-bin sectional model. Comparing on the same platform, solution time was the shortest for the MOMIC approach. The sectional method took 2–3 times longer than MOMIC while the QMOM method took 35% longer.</abstract><cop>Lausanne</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.powtec.2005.04.016</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-5910
ispartof Powder technology, 2005-08, Vol.156 (2), p.129-145
issn 0032-5910
1873-328X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28609416
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Agglomeration
Applied sciences
Breakage
Centrifugation, cyclones
Chemical engineering
Distribution reconstruction
Exact sciences and technology
Handling and storage of chemicals. Piping
Hydrodynamics of contact apparatus
Liquid-liquid and fluid-solid mechanical separations
Miscellaneous
Moments
MOMIC
Population balance
QMOM
Sectional method
Solid-solid systems
title Pipeline agglomerator design as a model test case
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T15%3A01%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pipeline%20agglomerator%20design%20as%20a%20model%20test%20case&rft.jtitle=Powder%20technology&rft.au=Diemer,%20R.%20Bertrum&rft.date=2005-08-23&rft.volume=156&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=129&rft.epage=145&rft.pages=129-145&rft.issn=0032-5910&rft.eissn=1873-328X&rft.coden=POTEBX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.powtec.2005.04.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E28609416%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=28609416&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0032591005001312&rfr_iscdi=true