The efficacy of the combination of topical minoxidil and oral spironolactone compared with the combination of topical minoxidil and oral finasteride in women with androgenic alopecia, female and male hair loss patterns: A blinded randomized clinical trial
Introduction Androgenic alopecia (AGA) is the most common cause of hair loss in women, affecting their quality of life. The present study was conducted with the aim of comparing the combined effect of topical minoxidil and oral spironolactone with the combined effect of topical minoxidil and oral fi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cosmetic dermatology 2024-02, Vol.23 (2), p.543-551 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 551 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 543 |
container_title | Journal of cosmetic dermatology |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Sadeghzadeh Bazargan, Afsaneh Tavana, Zeynab Dehghani, Abbas Jafarzadeh, Alireza Tabavar, Anahita Alavi Rad, Ehsan Goodarzi, Azadeh |
description | Introduction
Androgenic alopecia (AGA) is the most common cause of hair loss in women, affecting their quality of life. The present study was conducted with the aim of comparing the combined effect of topical minoxidil and oral spironolactone with the combined effect of topical minoxidil and oral finasteride in women with AGA, female and male hair loss patterns.
Method
This clinical study was performed on 60 women suffering from AGA. The patients were divided into two groups receiving spironolactone 100 mg/day and finasteride 5 mg/day. In addition, a 2% minoxidil solution was used in all patients in addition to treatment with finasteride or spironolactone. At 2 months after initiation and at the end of treatment, patients were evaluated using the Ludwig/Norwood–Hamilton scale and the degree of physician and patient satisfaction.
Results
After 2 months, hair density, hair thickness, and hair loss had improved in both groups; however, statistically, there was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to these parameters (p > 0.05). After 4 months, a significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of treatment response (physician satisfaction), hair density, and hair loss severity. So that, the drugs used were ineffective in 6.7% of cases in the minoxidil‐spironolactone group and in 16.7% of cases in the minoxidil‐finasteride group. In addition, 43.3% of cases in the minoxidil‐spironolactone group and 53% in the minoxidil‐finasteride group responded well to treatment. The treatment effect was excellent in 56.7% and 0% of the mentioned groups, respectively, and the mentioned difference was statistically significant (p: 0.01). The response to treatment in female pattern hair loss (FPHL) was not statistically significant (p: 0.52), but there was a significant difference in the response to both treatments in male pattern hair loss (MPHL; p: 0.007). In terms of patient satisfaction, minoxidil‐spironolactone treatment was significantly better than minoxidil‐finasteride regarding hair density and severity of hair loss (p: 0.01). Finally, in terms of treatment complications, the patients in two groups did not have any serious adverse effects.
Conclusion
The combination of minoxidil and spironolactone could be considered a more effective treatment than the combination of minoxidil and finasteride in women with AGA, FPHL, and MPHL. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jocd.15979 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2859602608</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2859602608</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4479-bc972a6704e5d38cfe6cd513d3162f213d4ede74fe172d19f6f88db298c0c6d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkktv1DAUhSMEog_Y8AOQJTaoYoodJ07cXTW8Vambso4c-5q5I8cOdkbD8OfBk5QuWCDhja-Pv3t0bZ2ieMHoJcvr7TZoc8lq2chHxSmrGr4qmagfP9ScnhRnKW0pZY1k9dPihDeipjXnp8Wvuw0QsBa10gcSLJnyWYehR68mDH6WwpivHRnQhx9o0BHlDQkxS2nEGHxwSk_Bz42jimDIHqfNf1rZjKUJIhog6Mk-DOAXn4zE8A08aqJcGEGjekMsDMrB3D4XG4WRuJASGdWUbXy6Itekd-hNnidmLgz4M5c6S_MMU0TlnhVPrHIJnt_v58XXD-_v1p9WN7cfP6-vb1a6qhq56rVsSiUaWkFteKstCG1qxg1norT5i00FBprKAmtKw6QVtm1NX8pWUy1My8-L14vvGMP3HaSpGzBpcE55CLvUlW0tBS0FPaKv_kK3YRd9nq7jVFLBuKjLTF0slI750RFsN0YcVDx0jHbHWHTHWHRzLDL88t5y1w9gHtA_OcgAW4A9Ojj8w6r7crt-t5j-BlFMySc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3090613652</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The efficacy of the combination of topical minoxidil and oral spironolactone compared with the combination of topical minoxidil and oral finasteride in women with androgenic alopecia, female and male hair loss patterns: A blinded randomized clinical trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Sadeghzadeh Bazargan, Afsaneh ; Tavana, Zeynab ; Dehghani, Abbas ; Jafarzadeh, Alireza ; Tabavar, Anahita ; Alavi Rad, Ehsan ; Goodarzi, Azadeh</creator><creatorcontrib>Sadeghzadeh Bazargan, Afsaneh ; Tavana, Zeynab ; Dehghani, Abbas ; Jafarzadeh, Alireza ; Tabavar, Anahita ; Alavi Rad, Ehsan ; Goodarzi, Azadeh</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
Androgenic alopecia (AGA) is the most common cause of hair loss in women, affecting their quality of life. The present study was conducted with the aim of comparing the combined effect of topical minoxidil and oral spironolactone with the combined effect of topical minoxidil and oral finasteride in women with AGA, female and male hair loss patterns.
Method
This clinical study was performed on 60 women suffering from AGA. The patients were divided into two groups receiving spironolactone 100 mg/day and finasteride 5 mg/day. In addition, a 2% minoxidil solution was used in all patients in addition to treatment with finasteride or spironolactone. At 2 months after initiation and at the end of treatment, patients were evaluated using the Ludwig/Norwood–Hamilton scale and the degree of physician and patient satisfaction.
Results
After 2 months, hair density, hair thickness, and hair loss had improved in both groups; however, statistically, there was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to these parameters (p > 0.05). After 4 months, a significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of treatment response (physician satisfaction), hair density, and hair loss severity. So that, the drugs used were ineffective in 6.7% of cases in the minoxidil‐spironolactone group and in 16.7% of cases in the minoxidil‐finasteride group. In addition, 43.3% of cases in the minoxidil‐spironolactone group and 53% in the minoxidil‐finasteride group responded well to treatment. The treatment effect was excellent in 56.7% and 0% of the mentioned groups, respectively, and the mentioned difference was statistically significant (p: 0.01). The response to treatment in female pattern hair loss (FPHL) was not statistically significant (p: 0.52), but there was a significant difference in the response to both treatments in male pattern hair loss (MPHL; p: 0.007). In terms of patient satisfaction, minoxidil‐spironolactone treatment was significantly better than minoxidil‐finasteride regarding hair density and severity of hair loss (p: 0.01). Finally, in terms of treatment complications, the patients in two groups did not have any serious adverse effects.
Conclusion
The combination of minoxidil and spironolactone could be considered a more effective treatment than the combination of minoxidil and finasteride in women with AGA, FPHL, and MPHL.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1473-2130</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-2165</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jocd.15979</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37650533</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Alopecia ; Alopecia - therapy ; androgenic alopecia ; Androgens ; Baldness ; Clinical trials ; Female ; female pattern hair loss ; Females ; Finasteride - adverse effects ; Hair loss ; Humans ; Male ; Minoxidil - adverse effects ; Normal distribution ; oral finasteride ; oral spironolactone ; Patient satisfaction ; Quality of Life ; Spironolactone - adverse effects ; Statistical analysis ; topical minoxidil ; Treatment Outcome ; Variables ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2024-02, Vol.23 (2), p.543-551</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the "License"). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4479-bc972a6704e5d38cfe6cd513d3162f213d4ede74fe172d19f6f88db298c0c6d83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4479-bc972a6704e5d38cfe6cd513d3162f213d4ede74fe172d19f6f88db298c0c6d83</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8556-9893 ; 0000-0001-5878-9778 ; 0000-0003-1056-5913 ; 0000-0003-0999-9992 ; 0000-0001-9277-3606 ; 0000-0002-1249-4429 ; 0000-0003-1102-6241</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjocd.15979$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjocd.15979$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,11562,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37650533$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sadeghzadeh Bazargan, Afsaneh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tavana, Zeynab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dehghani, Abbas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jafarzadeh, Alireza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tabavar, Anahita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alavi Rad, Ehsan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodarzi, Azadeh</creatorcontrib><title>The efficacy of the combination of topical minoxidil and oral spironolactone compared with the combination of topical minoxidil and oral finasteride in women with androgenic alopecia, female and male hair loss patterns: A blinded randomized clinical trial</title><title>Journal of cosmetic dermatology</title><addtitle>J Cosmet Dermatol</addtitle><description>Introduction
Androgenic alopecia (AGA) is the most common cause of hair loss in women, affecting their quality of life. The present study was conducted with the aim of comparing the combined effect of topical minoxidil and oral spironolactone with the combined effect of topical minoxidil and oral finasteride in women with AGA, female and male hair loss patterns.
Method
This clinical study was performed on 60 women suffering from AGA. The patients were divided into two groups receiving spironolactone 100 mg/day and finasteride 5 mg/day. In addition, a 2% minoxidil solution was used in all patients in addition to treatment with finasteride or spironolactone. At 2 months after initiation and at the end of treatment, patients were evaluated using the Ludwig/Norwood–Hamilton scale and the degree of physician and patient satisfaction.
Results
After 2 months, hair density, hair thickness, and hair loss had improved in both groups; however, statistically, there was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to these parameters (p > 0.05). After 4 months, a significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of treatment response (physician satisfaction), hair density, and hair loss severity. So that, the drugs used were ineffective in 6.7% of cases in the minoxidil‐spironolactone group and in 16.7% of cases in the minoxidil‐finasteride group. In addition, 43.3% of cases in the minoxidil‐spironolactone group and 53% in the minoxidil‐finasteride group responded well to treatment. The treatment effect was excellent in 56.7% and 0% of the mentioned groups, respectively, and the mentioned difference was statistically significant (p: 0.01). The response to treatment in female pattern hair loss (FPHL) was not statistically significant (p: 0.52), but there was a significant difference in the response to both treatments in male pattern hair loss (MPHL; p: 0.007). In terms of patient satisfaction, minoxidil‐spironolactone treatment was significantly better than minoxidil‐finasteride regarding hair density and severity of hair loss (p: 0.01). Finally, in terms of treatment complications, the patients in two groups did not have any serious adverse effects.
Conclusion
The combination of minoxidil and spironolactone could be considered a more effective treatment than the combination of minoxidil and finasteride in women with AGA, FPHL, and MPHL.</description><subject>Alopecia</subject><subject>Alopecia - therapy</subject><subject>androgenic alopecia</subject><subject>Androgens</subject><subject>Baldness</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>female pattern hair loss</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Finasteride - adverse effects</subject><subject>Hair loss</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Minoxidil - adverse effects</subject><subject>Normal distribution</subject><subject>oral finasteride</subject><subject>oral spironolactone</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Spironolactone - adverse effects</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>topical minoxidil</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Variables</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1473-2130</issn><issn>1473-2165</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkktv1DAUhSMEog_Y8AOQJTaoYoodJ07cXTW8Vambso4c-5q5I8cOdkbD8OfBk5QuWCDhja-Pv3t0bZ2ieMHoJcvr7TZoc8lq2chHxSmrGr4qmagfP9ScnhRnKW0pZY1k9dPihDeipjXnp8Wvuw0QsBa10gcSLJnyWYehR68mDH6WwpivHRnQhx9o0BHlDQkxS2nEGHxwSk_Bz42jimDIHqfNf1rZjKUJIhog6Mk-DOAXn4zE8A08aqJcGEGjekMsDMrB3D4XG4WRuJASGdWUbXy6Itekd-hNnidmLgz4M5c6S_MMU0TlnhVPrHIJnt_v58XXD-_v1p9WN7cfP6-vb1a6qhq56rVsSiUaWkFteKstCG1qxg1norT5i00FBprKAmtKw6QVtm1NX8pWUy1My8-L14vvGMP3HaSpGzBpcE55CLvUlW0tBS0FPaKv_kK3YRd9nq7jVFLBuKjLTF0slI750RFsN0YcVDx0jHbHWHTHWHRzLDL88t5y1w9gHtA_OcgAW4A9Ojj8w6r7crt-t5j-BlFMySc</recordid><startdate>202402</startdate><enddate>202402</enddate><creator>Sadeghzadeh Bazargan, Afsaneh</creator><creator>Tavana, Zeynab</creator><creator>Dehghani, Abbas</creator><creator>Jafarzadeh, Alireza</creator><creator>Tabavar, Anahita</creator><creator>Alavi Rad, Ehsan</creator><creator>Goodarzi, Azadeh</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8556-9893</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5878-9778</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1056-5913</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0999-9992</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9277-3606</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1249-4429</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1102-6241</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202402</creationdate><title>The efficacy of the combination of topical minoxidil and oral spironolactone compared with the combination of topical minoxidil and oral finasteride in women with androgenic alopecia, female and male hair loss patterns: A blinded randomized clinical trial</title><author>Sadeghzadeh Bazargan, Afsaneh ; Tavana, Zeynab ; Dehghani, Abbas ; Jafarzadeh, Alireza ; Tabavar, Anahita ; Alavi Rad, Ehsan ; Goodarzi, Azadeh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4479-bc972a6704e5d38cfe6cd513d3162f213d4ede74fe172d19f6f88db298c0c6d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Alopecia</topic><topic>Alopecia - therapy</topic><topic>androgenic alopecia</topic><topic>Androgens</topic><topic>Baldness</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>female pattern hair loss</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Finasteride - adverse effects</topic><topic>Hair loss</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Minoxidil - adverse effects</topic><topic>Normal distribution</topic><topic>oral finasteride</topic><topic>oral spironolactone</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Spironolactone - adverse effects</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>topical minoxidil</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Variables</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sadeghzadeh Bazargan, Afsaneh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tavana, Zeynab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dehghani, Abbas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jafarzadeh, Alireza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tabavar, Anahita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alavi Rad, Ehsan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodarzi, Azadeh</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cosmetic dermatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sadeghzadeh Bazargan, Afsaneh</au><au>Tavana, Zeynab</au><au>Dehghani, Abbas</au><au>Jafarzadeh, Alireza</au><au>Tabavar, Anahita</au><au>Alavi Rad, Ehsan</au><au>Goodarzi, Azadeh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The efficacy of the combination of topical minoxidil and oral spironolactone compared with the combination of topical minoxidil and oral finasteride in women with androgenic alopecia, female and male hair loss patterns: A blinded randomized clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cosmetic dermatology</jtitle><addtitle>J Cosmet Dermatol</addtitle><date>2024-02</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>543</spage><epage>551</epage><pages>543-551</pages><issn>1473-2130</issn><eissn>1473-2165</eissn><abstract>Introduction
Androgenic alopecia (AGA) is the most common cause of hair loss in women, affecting their quality of life. The present study was conducted with the aim of comparing the combined effect of topical minoxidil and oral spironolactone with the combined effect of topical minoxidil and oral finasteride in women with AGA, female and male hair loss patterns.
Method
This clinical study was performed on 60 women suffering from AGA. The patients were divided into two groups receiving spironolactone 100 mg/day and finasteride 5 mg/day. In addition, a 2% minoxidil solution was used in all patients in addition to treatment with finasteride or spironolactone. At 2 months after initiation and at the end of treatment, patients were evaluated using the Ludwig/Norwood–Hamilton scale and the degree of physician and patient satisfaction.
Results
After 2 months, hair density, hair thickness, and hair loss had improved in both groups; however, statistically, there was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to these parameters (p > 0.05). After 4 months, a significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of treatment response (physician satisfaction), hair density, and hair loss severity. So that, the drugs used were ineffective in 6.7% of cases in the minoxidil‐spironolactone group and in 16.7% of cases in the minoxidil‐finasteride group. In addition, 43.3% of cases in the minoxidil‐spironolactone group and 53% in the minoxidil‐finasteride group responded well to treatment. The treatment effect was excellent in 56.7% and 0% of the mentioned groups, respectively, and the mentioned difference was statistically significant (p: 0.01). The response to treatment in female pattern hair loss (FPHL) was not statistically significant (p: 0.52), but there was a significant difference in the response to both treatments in male pattern hair loss (MPHL; p: 0.007). In terms of patient satisfaction, minoxidil‐spironolactone treatment was significantly better than minoxidil‐finasteride regarding hair density and severity of hair loss (p: 0.01). Finally, in terms of treatment complications, the patients in two groups did not have any serious adverse effects.
Conclusion
The combination of minoxidil and spironolactone could be considered a more effective treatment than the combination of minoxidil and finasteride in women with AGA, FPHL, and MPHL.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>37650533</pmid><doi>10.1111/jocd.15979</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8556-9893</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5878-9778</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1056-5913</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0999-9992</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9277-3606</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1249-4429</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1102-6241</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1473-2130 |
ispartof | Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2024-02, Vol.23 (2), p.543-551 |
issn | 1473-2130 1473-2165 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2859602608 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Open Access; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Alopecia Alopecia - therapy androgenic alopecia Androgens Baldness Clinical trials Female female pattern hair loss Females Finasteride - adverse effects Hair loss Humans Male Minoxidil - adverse effects Normal distribution oral finasteride oral spironolactone Patient satisfaction Quality of Life Spironolactone - adverse effects Statistical analysis topical minoxidil Treatment Outcome Variables Womens health |
title | The efficacy of the combination of topical minoxidil and oral spironolactone compared with the combination of topical minoxidil and oral finasteride in women with androgenic alopecia, female and male hair loss patterns: A blinded randomized clinical trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T10%3A20%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20efficacy%20of%20the%20combination%20of%20topical%20minoxidil%20and%20oral%20spironolactone%20compared%20with%20the%20combination%20of%20topical%20minoxidil%20and%20oral%20finasteride%20in%20women%20with%20androgenic%20alopecia,%20female%20and%20male%20hair%20loss%20patterns:%20A%20blinded%20randomized%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cosmetic%20dermatology&rft.au=Sadeghzadeh%C2%A0Bazargan,%20Afsaneh&rft.date=2024-02&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=543&rft.epage=551&rft.pages=543-551&rft.issn=1473-2130&rft.eissn=1473-2165&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jocd.15979&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2859602608%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3090613652&rft_id=info:pmid/37650533&rfr_iscdi=true |