Sex and Racial and Ethnic Diversity Among Ophthalmology Subspecialty Fellowship Applicants
IMPORTANCE: Physician-patient concordance in sex and race is associated with improved patient outcomes. Studies have explored diversity among ophthalmology residents and faculty, but to our knowledge, not among ophthalmology fellows. OBJECTIVE: To assess diversity by sex and race and ethnicity among...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of ophthalmology (1960) 2023-10, Vol.141 (10), p.948 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 948 |
container_title | Archives of ophthalmology (1960) |
container_volume | 141 |
creator | Ali, Muhammad Menard, Maylander Zafar, Sidra Williams, Basil K Knight, O’Rese J Woreta, Fasika A |
description | IMPORTANCE: Physician-patient concordance in sex and race is associated with improved patient outcomes. Studies have explored diversity among ophthalmology residents and faculty, but to our knowledge, not among ophthalmology fellows. OBJECTIVE: To assess diversity by sex and race and ethnicity among fellowship applicants in ophthalmology subspecialties and compare match rates by applicants’ sex and underrepresented in medicine (URiM) status. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study examined ophthalmology subspecialty fellowship data from the 2021 San Francisco Match. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Applicant characteristics were stratified by sex and URiM status and compared using χ2, Mann-Whitney U, and median tests. For applicants who matched, the percentages of female and URiM applicants were compared among the ophthalmic subspecialties. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to assess the association of applicant characteristics with their match outcomes. RESULTS: Included in the sample were 537 candidates who applied for an ophthalmology fellowship using the 2021 San Francisco Match; 224 applicants (42.6%) were female, and 60 applicants (12.9%) had URiM status. Females and males had similar match rates (70.5% [n = 158] and 69.2% [n = 209], respectively; P = .74), but females had a higher median (IQR) US Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) score (248 [240-258] vs 245 [234-254]; P = .01). The pediatric ophthalmology subspecialty had the highest percentage of female matched applicants (67.5%; 27 of 40 matched applicants), while the retina subspecialty had the highest percentage of males (68.9%; 84 of 122 matched applicants). URiM applicants had lower match rates (55.0%, n = 33) than non-URiM applicants (72.2%, n = 293; P = .007). The URiM applicants had lower median (IQR) scores on the USMLE Step 1 (238 [227-247]) compared with Asian applicants (246 [235-254]) and White applicants (243 [231-252]; P = .04). Additionally, URIM applicants submitted fewer median (IQR) applications (10 [1-23]) than Asian (21 [8-37]) and White (17 [8-32]; P = .001) applicants and completed fewer interviews (median [IQR], 2 [0-11]) than Asian (median [IQR], 12 [3-18]) and White applicants (median [IQR], 8 [1-14]; P = .001). Among matched fellows in each subspecialty, URiM applicants comprised 13.9% (n = 11) in glaucoma, 10% (n = 4) in pediatric ophthalmology, 7.3% (n = 6) in cornea, and 6.6% (n = 8) in retina. CONCLUSIONS AND |
doi_str_mv | 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2023.3853 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2859602044</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ama_id>2809093</ama_id><sourcerecordid>2859602044</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a362t-e8adbc2c98250b81e34d77041f94d22dac53c407d7b436ee20768ddb2c9694ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU9Lw0AQxRdRbKn9Ah4k4MVL6-yfbDbHUlsVCoLVi5ew2d22KUk2ZhO1396NrQWdywzs780b9iEUYBhjAHy7lYW01abZyLyw-ZgAoWMqQnqC-gRzMeI4oqfHmYc9NHRuC74EAKPhOerRiIcYY-ijt6X5CmSpg2epMpn_jLNmU2YquMs-TO2yZhdMCluug6ejp13vgmWbusp0Gg_MTZ7bT7fJqmBSVXmmZNm4C3S2krkzw0MfoNf57GX6MFo83T9OJ4uRpJw0IyOkThVRsSAhpAIbynQUAcOrmGlCtFQhVQwiHaWMcmMIRFxonXoFj5kxdIBu9nur2r63xjVJkTnlL5Klsa1LiAhjDgQY8-j1P3Rr27r013nK-0eEC-wpsadUbZ2rzSqp6qyQ9S7BkHQRJH8jSLoIki4CL706GLRpYfRR-PvhHrjcA37D8ZUIiCGm9BtE347t</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2882572681</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sex and Racial and Ethnic Diversity Among Ophthalmology Subspecialty Fellowship Applicants</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Medical Association Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ali, Muhammad ; Menard, Maylander ; Zafar, Sidra ; Williams, Basil K ; Knight, O’Rese J ; Woreta, Fasika A</creator><creatorcontrib>Ali, Muhammad ; Menard, Maylander ; Zafar, Sidra ; Williams, Basil K ; Knight, O’Rese J ; Woreta, Fasika A</creatorcontrib><description>IMPORTANCE: Physician-patient concordance in sex and race is associated with improved patient outcomes. Studies have explored diversity among ophthalmology residents and faculty, but to our knowledge, not among ophthalmology fellows. OBJECTIVE: To assess diversity by sex and race and ethnicity among fellowship applicants in ophthalmology subspecialties and compare match rates by applicants’ sex and underrepresented in medicine (URiM) status. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study examined ophthalmology subspecialty fellowship data from the 2021 San Francisco Match. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Applicant characteristics were stratified by sex and URiM status and compared using χ2, Mann-Whitney U, and median tests. For applicants who matched, the percentages of female and URiM applicants were compared among the ophthalmic subspecialties. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to assess the association of applicant characteristics with their match outcomes. RESULTS: Included in the sample were 537 candidates who applied for an ophthalmology fellowship using the 2021 San Francisco Match; 224 applicants (42.6%) were female, and 60 applicants (12.9%) had URiM status. Females and males had similar match rates (70.5% [n = 158] and 69.2% [n = 209], respectively; P = .74), but females had a higher median (IQR) US Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) score (248 [240-258] vs 245 [234-254]; P = .01). The pediatric ophthalmology subspecialty had the highest percentage of female matched applicants (67.5%; 27 of 40 matched applicants), while the retina subspecialty had the highest percentage of males (68.9%; 84 of 122 matched applicants). URiM applicants had lower match rates (55.0%, n = 33) than non-URiM applicants (72.2%, n = 293; P = .007). The URiM applicants had lower median (IQR) scores on the USMLE Step 1 (238 [227-247]) compared with Asian applicants (246 [235-254]) and White applicants (243 [231-252]; P = .04). Additionally, URIM applicants submitted fewer median (IQR) applications (10 [1-23]) than Asian (21 [8-37]) and White (17 [8-32]; P = .001) applicants and completed fewer interviews (median [IQR], 2 [0-11]) than Asian (median [IQR], 12 [3-18]) and White applicants (median [IQR], 8 [1-14]; P = .001). Among matched fellows in each subspecialty, URiM applicants comprised 13.9% (n = 11) in glaucoma, 10% (n = 4) in pediatric ophthalmology, 7.3% (n = 6) in cornea, and 6.6% (n = 8) in retina. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Ophthalmology subspecialty fellowship match rates were lower for URiM vs non-URiM applicants in 2021. Underrepresentation of females exists in the retina subspecialty, while racial and ethnic differences exist in all ophthalmology subspecialty fellowships examined. Monitoring trends in fellowship diversity over time should help inform where targeted efforts could improve diversity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-6165</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2168-6173</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-6173</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2023.3853</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37651110</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Child ; Cohort Studies ; Cornea ; Fellowships and Scholarships ; Female ; Females ; Glaucoma ; Humans ; Internship and Residency ; Licensing examinations ; Male ; Multiculturalism & pluralism ; Ophthalmology ; Ophthalmology - education ; Patients ; Pediatrics ; Race ; Retina ; Scholarships & fellowships ; Sex ; Swimming</subject><ispartof>Archives of ophthalmology (1960), 2023-10, Vol.141 (10), p.948</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Medical Association Oct 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a362t-e8adbc2c98250b81e34d77041f94d22dac53c407d7b436ee20768ddb2c9694ee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a362t-e8adbc2c98250b81e34d77041f94d22dac53c407d7b436ee20768ddb2c9694ee3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaophthalmology/articlepdf/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2023.3853$$EPDF$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaophthalmology/fullarticle/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2023.3853$$EHTML$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>64,315,782,786,3342,27931,27932,76497,76500</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37651110$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ali, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menard, Maylander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zafar, Sidra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Basil K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knight, O’Rese J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woreta, Fasika A</creatorcontrib><title>Sex and Racial and Ethnic Diversity Among Ophthalmology Subspecialty Fellowship Applicants</title><title>Archives of ophthalmology (1960)</title><addtitle>JAMA Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>IMPORTANCE: Physician-patient concordance in sex and race is associated with improved patient outcomes. Studies have explored diversity among ophthalmology residents and faculty, but to our knowledge, not among ophthalmology fellows. OBJECTIVE: To assess diversity by sex and race and ethnicity among fellowship applicants in ophthalmology subspecialties and compare match rates by applicants’ sex and underrepresented in medicine (URiM) status. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study examined ophthalmology subspecialty fellowship data from the 2021 San Francisco Match. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Applicant characteristics were stratified by sex and URiM status and compared using χ2, Mann-Whitney U, and median tests. For applicants who matched, the percentages of female and URiM applicants were compared among the ophthalmic subspecialties. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to assess the association of applicant characteristics with their match outcomes. RESULTS: Included in the sample were 537 candidates who applied for an ophthalmology fellowship using the 2021 San Francisco Match; 224 applicants (42.6%) were female, and 60 applicants (12.9%) had URiM status. Females and males had similar match rates (70.5% [n = 158] and 69.2% [n = 209], respectively; P = .74), but females had a higher median (IQR) US Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) score (248 [240-258] vs 245 [234-254]; P = .01). The pediatric ophthalmology subspecialty had the highest percentage of female matched applicants (67.5%; 27 of 40 matched applicants), while the retina subspecialty had the highest percentage of males (68.9%; 84 of 122 matched applicants). URiM applicants had lower match rates (55.0%, n = 33) than non-URiM applicants (72.2%, n = 293; P = .007). The URiM applicants had lower median (IQR) scores on the USMLE Step 1 (238 [227-247]) compared with Asian applicants (246 [235-254]) and White applicants (243 [231-252]; P = .04). Additionally, URIM applicants submitted fewer median (IQR) applications (10 [1-23]) than Asian (21 [8-37]) and White (17 [8-32]; P = .001) applicants and completed fewer interviews (median [IQR], 2 [0-11]) than Asian (median [IQR], 12 [3-18]) and White applicants (median [IQR], 8 [1-14]; P = .001). Among matched fellows in each subspecialty, URiM applicants comprised 13.9% (n = 11) in glaucoma, 10% (n = 4) in pediatric ophthalmology, 7.3% (n = 6) in cornea, and 6.6% (n = 8) in retina. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Ophthalmology subspecialty fellowship match rates were lower for URiM vs non-URiM applicants in 2021. Underrepresentation of females exists in the retina subspecialty, while racial and ethnic differences exist in all ophthalmology subspecialty fellowships examined. Monitoring trends in fellowship diversity over time should help inform where targeted efforts could improve diversity.</description><subject>Child</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Cornea</subject><subject>Fellowships and Scholarships</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Glaucoma</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internship and Residency</subject><subject>Licensing examinations</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Multiculturalism & pluralism</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Ophthalmology - education</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>Retina</subject><subject>Scholarships & fellowships</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Swimming</subject><issn>2168-6165</issn><issn>2168-6173</issn><issn>2168-6173</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU9Lw0AQxRdRbKn9Ah4k4MVL6-yfbDbHUlsVCoLVi5ew2d22KUk2ZhO1396NrQWdywzs780b9iEUYBhjAHy7lYW01abZyLyw-ZgAoWMqQnqC-gRzMeI4oqfHmYc9NHRuC74EAKPhOerRiIcYY-ijt6X5CmSpg2epMpn_jLNmU2YquMs-TO2yZhdMCluug6ejp13vgmWbusp0Gg_MTZ7bT7fJqmBSVXmmZNm4C3S2krkzw0MfoNf57GX6MFo83T9OJ4uRpJw0IyOkThVRsSAhpAIbynQUAcOrmGlCtFQhVQwiHaWMcmMIRFxonXoFj5kxdIBu9nur2r63xjVJkTnlL5Klsa1LiAhjDgQY8-j1P3Rr27r013nK-0eEC-wpsadUbZ2rzSqp6qyQ9S7BkHQRJH8jSLoIki4CL706GLRpYfRR-PvhHrjcA37D8ZUIiCGm9BtE347t</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Ali, Muhammad</creator><creator>Menard, Maylander</creator><creator>Zafar, Sidra</creator><creator>Williams, Basil K</creator><creator>Knight, O’Rese J</creator><creator>Woreta, Fasika A</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>Sex and Racial and Ethnic Diversity Among Ophthalmology Subspecialty Fellowship Applicants</title><author>Ali, Muhammad ; Menard, Maylander ; Zafar, Sidra ; Williams, Basil K ; Knight, O’Rese J ; Woreta, Fasika A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a362t-e8adbc2c98250b81e34d77041f94d22dac53c407d7b436ee20768ddb2c9694ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Child</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Cornea</topic><topic>Fellowships and Scholarships</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Glaucoma</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internship and Residency</topic><topic>Licensing examinations</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Multiculturalism & pluralism</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Ophthalmology - education</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>Retina</topic><topic>Scholarships & fellowships</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Swimming</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ali, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menard, Maylander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zafar, Sidra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Basil K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knight, O’Rese J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woreta, Fasika A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of ophthalmology (1960)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ali, Muhammad</au><au>Menard, Maylander</au><au>Zafar, Sidra</au><au>Williams, Basil K</au><au>Knight, O’Rese J</au><au>Woreta, Fasika A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sex and Racial and Ethnic Diversity Among Ophthalmology Subspecialty Fellowship Applicants</atitle><jtitle>Archives of ophthalmology (1960)</jtitle><addtitle>JAMA Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>141</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>948</spage><pages>948-</pages><issn>2168-6165</issn><issn>2168-6173</issn><eissn>2168-6173</eissn><abstract>IMPORTANCE: Physician-patient concordance in sex and race is associated with improved patient outcomes. Studies have explored diversity among ophthalmology residents and faculty, but to our knowledge, not among ophthalmology fellows. OBJECTIVE: To assess diversity by sex and race and ethnicity among fellowship applicants in ophthalmology subspecialties and compare match rates by applicants’ sex and underrepresented in medicine (URiM) status. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study examined ophthalmology subspecialty fellowship data from the 2021 San Francisco Match. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Applicant characteristics were stratified by sex and URiM status and compared using χ2, Mann-Whitney U, and median tests. For applicants who matched, the percentages of female and URiM applicants were compared among the ophthalmic subspecialties. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to assess the association of applicant characteristics with their match outcomes. RESULTS: Included in the sample were 537 candidates who applied for an ophthalmology fellowship using the 2021 San Francisco Match; 224 applicants (42.6%) were female, and 60 applicants (12.9%) had URiM status. Females and males had similar match rates (70.5% [n = 158] and 69.2% [n = 209], respectively; P = .74), but females had a higher median (IQR) US Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) score (248 [240-258] vs 245 [234-254]; P = .01). The pediatric ophthalmology subspecialty had the highest percentage of female matched applicants (67.5%; 27 of 40 matched applicants), while the retina subspecialty had the highest percentage of males (68.9%; 84 of 122 matched applicants). URiM applicants had lower match rates (55.0%, n = 33) than non-URiM applicants (72.2%, n = 293; P = .007). The URiM applicants had lower median (IQR) scores on the USMLE Step 1 (238 [227-247]) compared with Asian applicants (246 [235-254]) and White applicants (243 [231-252]; P = .04). Additionally, URIM applicants submitted fewer median (IQR) applications (10 [1-23]) than Asian (21 [8-37]) and White (17 [8-32]; P = .001) applicants and completed fewer interviews (median [IQR], 2 [0-11]) than Asian (median [IQR], 12 [3-18]) and White applicants (median [IQR], 8 [1-14]; P = .001). Among matched fellows in each subspecialty, URiM applicants comprised 13.9% (n = 11) in glaucoma, 10% (n = 4) in pediatric ophthalmology, 7.3% (n = 6) in cornea, and 6.6% (n = 8) in retina. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Ophthalmology subspecialty fellowship match rates were lower for URiM vs non-URiM applicants in 2021. Underrepresentation of females exists in the retina subspecialty, while racial and ethnic differences exist in all ophthalmology subspecialty fellowships examined. Monitoring trends in fellowship diversity over time should help inform where targeted efforts could improve diversity.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>37651110</pmid><doi>10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2023.3853</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2168-6165 |
ispartof | Archives of ophthalmology (1960), 2023-10, Vol.141 (10), p.948 |
issn | 2168-6165 2168-6173 2168-6173 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2859602044 |
source | MEDLINE; American Medical Association Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Child Cohort Studies Cornea Fellowships and Scholarships Female Females Glaucoma Humans Internship and Residency Licensing examinations Male Multiculturalism & pluralism Ophthalmology Ophthalmology - education Patients Pediatrics Race Retina Scholarships & fellowships Sex Swimming |
title | Sex and Racial and Ethnic Diversity Among Ophthalmology Subspecialty Fellowship Applicants |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-05T00%3A19%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sex%20and%20Racial%20and%20Ethnic%20Diversity%20Among%20Ophthalmology%20Subspecialty%20Fellowship%20Applicants&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20ophthalmology%20(1960)&rft.au=Ali,%20Muhammad&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=141&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=948&rft.pages=948-&rft.issn=2168-6165&rft.eissn=2168-6173&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2023.3853&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2859602044%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2882572681&rft_id=info:pmid/37651110&rft_ama_id=2809093&rfr_iscdi=true |