“More effective” is not necessarily “better”: Some ethical considerations when influencing individual behaviour
Chater & Loewenstein make a persuasive case for focusing behavioural research and policy making on s- rather than i-interventions. This commentary highlights some conceptual and ethical issues that need to be addressed before such reform can be embraced. These include the need to adjudicate betw...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Behavioral and brain sciences 2023-08, Vol.46, p.e151-e151, Article e151 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e151 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | e151 |
| container_title | The Behavioral and brain sciences |
| container_volume | 46 |
| creator | Brown, Rebecca C. H. |
| description | Chater & Loewenstein make a persuasive case for focusing behavioural research and policy making on s- rather than i-interventions. This commentary highlights some conceptual and ethical issues that need to be addressed before such reform can be embraced. These include the need to adjudicate between different conceptions of “effectiveness,” and accounting for reasonable differences between how people weight different values. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0140525X23001127 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2858993543</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0140525X23001127</cupid><sourcerecordid>2858648973</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-4a8a29465387ec4250e425c0731093d9df7209ca9f69df191a9bb2d78aee96683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1Kw0AUhQdRsFYfwN2AGzfR-ckkGXdS_IOKiyq4C5PJTTslndSZpKW7Poi-XJ_EqRUExc29B853LgcuQqeUXFBC08sRoTERTLwyTgilLN1DPRonMqIZE_uot7WjrX-IjryfEkJELGQPLTfr98fGAYaqAt2aBWzWH9h4bJsWW9DgvXKmXuHAFdC24IJ_hUfNLETaidGqxrqx3pTgVGuCwssJWGxsVXdgtbHjoEuzMGUX0AImamGazh2jg0rVHk6-dx-93N48D-6j4dPdw-B6GGlOWBvFKlNMxongWQo6ZoJAGJqknBLJS1lWKSNSK1klQVNJlSwKVqaZApBJkvE-Ot_dnbvmrQPf5jPjNdS1stB0PmeZyKTkIuYBPfuFTkNRG9p9UUmcyXRL0R2lXeO9gyqfOzNTbpVTkm9fkf95Rcjw74yaFc6UY_g5_X_qEx-jj_M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2858648973</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>“More effective” is not necessarily “better”: Some ethical considerations when influencing individual behaviour</title><source>Cambridge Journals</source><creator>Brown, Rebecca C. H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brown, Rebecca C. H.</creatorcontrib><description>Chater & Loewenstein make a persuasive case for focusing behavioural research and policy making on s- rather than i-interventions. This commentary highlights some conceptual and ethical issues that need to be addressed before such reform can be embraced. These include the need to adjudicate between different conceptions of “effectiveness,” and accounting for reasonable differences between how people weight different values.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-525X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-1825</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X23001127</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Ethics ; Intervention ; Open Peer Commentary ; Public health ; Skiing</subject><ispartof>The Behavioral and brain sciences, 2023-08, Vol.46, p.e151-e151, Article e151</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-4a8a29465387ec4250e425c0731093d9df7209ca9f69df191a9bb2d78aee96683</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8023-1092</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0140525X23001127/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brown, Rebecca C. H.</creatorcontrib><title>“More effective” is not necessarily “better”: Some ethical considerations when influencing individual behaviour</title><title>The Behavioral and brain sciences</title><addtitle>Behav Brain Sci</addtitle><description>Chater & Loewenstein make a persuasive case for focusing behavioural research and policy making on s- rather than i-interventions. This commentary highlights some conceptual and ethical issues that need to be addressed before such reform can be embraced. These include the need to adjudicate between different conceptions of “effectiveness,” and accounting for reasonable differences between how people weight different values.</description><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Open Peer Commentary</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Skiing</subject><issn>0140-525X</issn><issn>1469-1825</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1Kw0AUhQdRsFYfwN2AGzfR-ckkGXdS_IOKiyq4C5PJTTslndSZpKW7Poi-XJ_EqRUExc29B853LgcuQqeUXFBC08sRoTERTLwyTgilLN1DPRonMqIZE_uot7WjrX-IjryfEkJELGQPLTfr98fGAYaqAt2aBWzWH9h4bJsWW9DgvXKmXuHAFdC24IJ_hUfNLETaidGqxrqx3pTgVGuCwssJWGxsVXdgtbHjoEuzMGUX0AImamGazh2jg0rVHk6-dx-93N48D-6j4dPdw-B6GGlOWBvFKlNMxongWQo6ZoJAGJqknBLJS1lWKSNSK1klQVNJlSwKVqaZApBJkvE-Ot_dnbvmrQPf5jPjNdS1stB0PmeZyKTkIuYBPfuFTkNRG9p9UUmcyXRL0R2lXeO9gyqfOzNTbpVTkm9fkf95Rcjw74yaFc6UY_g5_X_qEx-jj_M</recordid><startdate>20230830</startdate><enddate>20230830</enddate><creator>Brown, Rebecca C. H.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8023-1092</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230830</creationdate><title>“More effective” is not necessarily “better”: Some ethical considerations when influencing individual behaviour</title><author>Brown, Rebecca C. H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-4a8a29465387ec4250e425c0731093d9df7209ca9f69df191a9bb2d78aee96683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Open Peer Commentary</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Skiing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brown, Rebecca C. H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Behavioral and brain sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brown, Rebecca C. H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>“More effective” is not necessarily “better”: Some ethical considerations when influencing individual behaviour</atitle><jtitle>The Behavioral and brain sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Behav Brain Sci</addtitle><date>2023-08-30</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>46</volume><spage>e151</spage><epage>e151</epage><pages>e151-e151</pages><artnum>e151</artnum><issn>0140-525X</issn><eissn>1469-1825</eissn><abstract>Chater & Loewenstein make a persuasive case for focusing behavioural research and policy making on s- rather than i-interventions. This commentary highlights some conceptual and ethical issues that need to be addressed before such reform can be embraced. These include the need to adjudicate between different conceptions of “effectiveness,” and accounting for reasonable differences between how people weight different values.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0140525X23001127</doi><tpages>2</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8023-1092</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0140-525X |
| ispartof | The Behavioral and brain sciences, 2023-08, Vol.46, p.e151-e151, Article e151 |
| issn | 0140-525X 1469-1825 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2858993543 |
| source | Cambridge Journals |
| subjects | Ethics Intervention Open Peer Commentary Public health Skiing |
| title | “More effective” is not necessarily “better”: Some ethical considerations when influencing individual behaviour |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T06%3A00%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%9CMore%20effective%E2%80%9D%20is%20not%20necessarily%20%E2%80%9Cbetter%E2%80%9D:%20Some%20ethical%20considerations%20when%20influencing%20individual%20behaviour&rft.jtitle=The%20Behavioral%20and%20brain%20sciences&rft.au=Brown,%20Rebecca%20C.%20H.&rft.date=2023-08-30&rft.volume=46&rft.spage=e151&rft.epage=e151&rft.pages=e151-e151&rft.artnum=e151&rft.issn=0140-525X&rft.eissn=1469-1825&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0140525X23001127&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2858648973%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2858648973&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0140525X23001127&rfr_iscdi=true |