Analysis of craniectomy bone flaps stored in a neurosurgical cryopreservation freezer: microorganism culture results and reimplantation rates

Background Cryopreservation of bone flaps after decompressive craniectomies is a common practice. A frequent complication after bone flap reimplantation is postoperative infection, so culturing of frozen craniectomy bone flaps is a crucial practice that can prevent patient morbidity and mortality. Although many studies report on infection rates after cranioplasty, no study reports on the results of bone flaps stored in a cryopreservation freezer, reimplanted or otherwise. We sought to analyze the flaps in our medical center’s bone bank freezer, including microorganism culture results and reimplantation rates of cryopreserved bone flaps. Methods Patients who underwent craniectomy and had bone flaps cryopreserved between January 1, 2016, and July 1, 2022, were included in this retrospective study. Information about bone flap cultures and reimplantation or discard was obtained from a prospectively maintained cryopreservation database. Information including infection rates and mortality was acquired from a retrospective review of patient records. Culture results were obtained for all flaps immediately before cryopreservation and again at the time of reimplantation at the operator’s discretion. Results There were 148 bone flaps obtained from 145 patients (3 craniectomies were bilateral) stored in our center’s freezer. Positive culture results were seen in 79 (53.4%) flaps. The most common microorganism genus was Propionibacterium with 47 positive flaps, 46 (97.9%) of which were P. acnes . Staphylococcus was the second most common with 23 positive flaps, of which 8 (34.8%) tested positive for S. epidermidis . Of the 148 flaps, 25 (16.9%) were reimplanted, 116 (78.4%) were discarded, and 7 (4.7%) are still being stored in the freezer. Postcranioplasty infections were seen in 3 (12%) patients who had flap reimplantation. Conclusions Considering the substantial number of positive cultures and limited reimplantation rate, we have reservations about the logistical efficiency of cryopreservation for flap storage. Future multicenter studies analyzing reimplantation predictors could help to reduce unnecessary freezing and culturing.