Differentiation of Active Ulcerative Colitis vs Noninflammatory Bowel Disease Proctitis by Transperineal Superb Microvascular Imaging

Abstract Background Transabdominal ultrasonography and transperineal ultrasonography (TPUS) appear correspond to colonoscopy (CS) for evaluating ulcerative colitis (UC) activity, but their utility in UC diagnosis remains unclear. This research compared the accuracy of TPUS and CS for assessing recta...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Inflammatory bowel diseases 2024-07, Vol.30 (7), p.1103-1111
Hauptverfasser: Tokushima, Kaori, Jimbo, Keisuke, Suzuki, Mitsuyoshi, Endo, Yoshiko, Hibio, Musashi, Maruyama, Kimiko, Kashiwagi, Kosuke, Arai, Nobuyasu, Sato, Masamichi, Kudo, Takahiro, Hoshino, Eri, Ohtsuka, Yoshikazu, Shimizu, Toshiaki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1111
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1103
container_title Inflammatory bowel diseases
container_volume 30
creator Tokushima, Kaori
Jimbo, Keisuke
Suzuki, Mitsuyoshi
Endo, Yoshiko
Hibio, Musashi
Maruyama, Kimiko
Kashiwagi, Kosuke
Arai, Nobuyasu
Sato, Masamichi
Kudo, Takahiro
Hoshino, Eri
Ohtsuka, Yoshikazu
Shimizu, Toshiaki
description Abstract Background Transabdominal ultrasonography and transperineal ultrasonography (TPUS) appear correspond to colonoscopy (CS) for evaluating ulcerative colitis (UC) activity, but their utility in UC diagnosis remains unclear. This research compared the accuracy of TPUS and CS for assessing rectal activity and differentiating noninflammatory bowel disease proctitis from UC in pediatric cases. Methods The study is a blinded, prospective, and controlled trial. Prospectively, values of fecal calprotectin (FCP) and findings of the TPUS and CS were compared between child cases of UC and non-IBD proctitis. Findings of rectal wall thickening (RWT), rectal wall flow (RWF) on power Doppler, and microvascular signal at wall circumference (MSWC) on monochrome superb microvascular imaging assessed using TPUS were compared with the CS. Results Thirty patients with Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) 0 to 1 UC, 57 with MES 2 to 3 UC, and 44 with proctitis were registered. Fecal calprotectin, RWF, and MSWC indicated significant differences among the groups (P < .05). Rectal wall thickening showed no significant difference between MES 0–1 and proctitis (P = .76). Rectal wall thickening and MSWC were independent predictors of endoscopic activity of UC, resulting in a sensitivity and specificity of 100% for RWT ≥4.5 mm and positive MSWC. Fecal calprotectin and RWF were independent predictors for differentiating MES 0 to 1 and proctitis, and FCP and RWT were independent predictors for differentiating MES 2 to 3 and proctitis. Sensitivity and specificity were 77.2% and 80.9%, respectively, for FCP >242.5 μg/g and RWF negative; and they were both 100% for RWT >4.1 mm and MSWC positive. Conclusions Transperineal ultrasonography with mSMI may enable the evaluation of rectal activity and differentiation of UC from non-IBD proctitis with accuracy comparable to endoscopy. Lay Summary Transperineal ultrasonography with superb microvascular imaging can differentiate ulcerative colitis from noninflammatory bowel disease proctitis and is therefore useful in distinguishing whether diarrhea and bloody stool during the treatments of ulcerative colitis are due to recurrence or infection.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ibd/izad186
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2858987186</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/ibd/izad186</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2858987186</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-a741100917a1dbdcfeb4e99d4554cdef001bbbb0e25be3cb4ae44b36021ddc5f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1L5DAYh4O4-H3yLjmJIF2TNp22R53xC1wV1HN5k7yRSNqMSTsye9__e6Mz63ETQn6H5_3x8hByyNlPzprizEp9Zn-D5vVkg-zwsphkohZiM2VW1Rlrmnqb7Mb4xliebrNFtotqItIrd8ifmTUGA_aDhcH6nnpDz9VgF0hfnMIAX3HqnR1spItI731ve-Og62DwYUkv_Ac6OrMRISJ9DD4Nf6JySZ8D9HGOwfYIjj6NKUr6y6rgFxDV6CDQ2w5ebf-6T34YcBEP1v8eebm6fJ7eZHcP17fT87tM5SUbMqgE54w1vAKupVYGpcCm0aIshdJoGOMyHYZ5KbFQUgAKIYsJy7nWqjTFHjlZ9c6Dfx8xDm1no0LnoEc_xjavy7qpq2QyoacrNK0bY0DTzoPtICxbztpP723y3q69J_poXTzKDvU3-090Ao5XgB_n_236CzWDkI4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2858987186</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differentiation of Active Ulcerative Colitis vs Noninflammatory Bowel Disease Proctitis by Transperineal Superb Microvascular Imaging</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Tokushima, Kaori ; Jimbo, Keisuke ; Suzuki, Mitsuyoshi ; Endo, Yoshiko ; Hibio, Musashi ; Maruyama, Kimiko ; Kashiwagi, Kosuke ; Arai, Nobuyasu ; Sato, Masamichi ; Kudo, Takahiro ; Hoshino, Eri ; Ohtsuka, Yoshikazu ; Shimizu, Toshiaki</creator><creatorcontrib>Tokushima, Kaori ; Jimbo, Keisuke ; Suzuki, Mitsuyoshi ; Endo, Yoshiko ; Hibio, Musashi ; Maruyama, Kimiko ; Kashiwagi, Kosuke ; Arai, Nobuyasu ; Sato, Masamichi ; Kudo, Takahiro ; Hoshino, Eri ; Ohtsuka, Yoshikazu ; Shimizu, Toshiaki</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Transabdominal ultrasonography and transperineal ultrasonography (TPUS) appear correspond to colonoscopy (CS) for evaluating ulcerative colitis (UC) activity, but their utility in UC diagnosis remains unclear. This research compared the accuracy of TPUS and CS for assessing rectal activity and differentiating noninflammatory bowel disease proctitis from UC in pediatric cases. Methods The study is a blinded, prospective, and controlled trial. Prospectively, values of fecal calprotectin (FCP) and findings of the TPUS and CS were compared between child cases of UC and non-IBD proctitis. Findings of rectal wall thickening (RWT), rectal wall flow (RWF) on power Doppler, and microvascular signal at wall circumference (MSWC) on monochrome superb microvascular imaging assessed using TPUS were compared with the CS. Results Thirty patients with Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) 0 to 1 UC, 57 with MES 2 to 3 UC, and 44 with proctitis were registered. Fecal calprotectin, RWF, and MSWC indicated significant differences among the groups (P &lt; .05). Rectal wall thickening showed no significant difference between MES 0–1 and proctitis (P = .76). Rectal wall thickening and MSWC were independent predictors of endoscopic activity of UC, resulting in a sensitivity and specificity of 100% for RWT ≥4.5 mm and positive MSWC. Fecal calprotectin and RWF were independent predictors for differentiating MES 0 to 1 and proctitis, and FCP and RWT were independent predictors for differentiating MES 2 to 3 and proctitis. Sensitivity and specificity were 77.2% and 80.9%, respectively, for FCP &gt;242.5 μg/g and RWF negative; and they were both 100% for RWT &gt;4.1 mm and MSWC positive. Conclusions Transperineal ultrasonography with mSMI may enable the evaluation of rectal activity and differentiation of UC from non-IBD proctitis with accuracy comparable to endoscopy. Lay Summary Transperineal ultrasonography with superb microvascular imaging can differentiate ulcerative colitis from noninflammatory bowel disease proctitis and is therefore useful in distinguishing whether diarrhea and bloody stool during the treatments of ulcerative colitis are due to recurrence or infection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-0998</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1536-4844</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-4844</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izad186</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37643765</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Child ; Colitis, Ulcerative - complications ; Colitis, Ulcerative - diagnostic imaging ; Colonoscopy - methods ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Feces - chemistry ; Female ; Humans ; Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex - analysis ; Male ; Microvessels - diagnostic imaging ; Microvessels - pathology ; Proctitis - diagnostic imaging ; Proctitis - etiology ; Prospective Studies ; Rectum - blood supply ; Rectum - diagnostic imaging ; Rectum - pathology ; Ultrasonography - methods</subject><ispartof>Inflammatory bowel diseases, 2024-07, Vol.30 (7), p.1103-1111</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn’s &amp; Colitis Foundation. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com. 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn’s &amp; Colitis Foundation. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-a741100917a1dbdcfeb4e99d4554cdef001bbbb0e25be3cb4ae44b36021ddc5f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-a741100917a1dbdcfeb4e99d4554cdef001bbbb0e25be3cb4ae44b36021ddc5f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7276-8201 ; 0000-0001-6317-4305 ; 0000-0003-4708-8049 ; 0000-0002-9969-3454</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37643765$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tokushima, Kaori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jimbo, Keisuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Mitsuyoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Endo, Yoshiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hibio, Musashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maruyama, Kimiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kashiwagi, Kosuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arai, Nobuyasu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Masamichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kudo, Takahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoshino, Eri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohtsuka, Yoshikazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimizu, Toshiaki</creatorcontrib><title>Differentiation of Active Ulcerative Colitis vs Noninflammatory Bowel Disease Proctitis by Transperineal Superb Microvascular Imaging</title><title>Inflammatory bowel diseases</title><addtitle>Inflamm Bowel Dis</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Transabdominal ultrasonography and transperineal ultrasonography (TPUS) appear correspond to colonoscopy (CS) for evaluating ulcerative colitis (UC) activity, but their utility in UC diagnosis remains unclear. This research compared the accuracy of TPUS and CS for assessing rectal activity and differentiating noninflammatory bowel disease proctitis from UC in pediatric cases. Methods The study is a blinded, prospective, and controlled trial. Prospectively, values of fecal calprotectin (FCP) and findings of the TPUS and CS were compared between child cases of UC and non-IBD proctitis. Findings of rectal wall thickening (RWT), rectal wall flow (RWF) on power Doppler, and microvascular signal at wall circumference (MSWC) on monochrome superb microvascular imaging assessed using TPUS were compared with the CS. Results Thirty patients with Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) 0 to 1 UC, 57 with MES 2 to 3 UC, and 44 with proctitis were registered. Fecal calprotectin, RWF, and MSWC indicated significant differences among the groups (P &lt; .05). Rectal wall thickening showed no significant difference between MES 0–1 and proctitis (P = .76). Rectal wall thickening and MSWC were independent predictors of endoscopic activity of UC, resulting in a sensitivity and specificity of 100% for RWT ≥4.5 mm and positive MSWC. Fecal calprotectin and RWF were independent predictors for differentiating MES 0 to 1 and proctitis, and FCP and RWT were independent predictors for differentiating MES 2 to 3 and proctitis. Sensitivity and specificity were 77.2% and 80.9%, respectively, for FCP &gt;242.5 μg/g and RWF negative; and they were both 100% for RWT &gt;4.1 mm and MSWC positive. Conclusions Transperineal ultrasonography with mSMI may enable the evaluation of rectal activity and differentiation of UC from non-IBD proctitis with accuracy comparable to endoscopy. Lay Summary Transperineal ultrasonography with superb microvascular imaging can differentiate ulcerative colitis from noninflammatory bowel disease proctitis and is therefore useful in distinguishing whether diarrhea and bloody stool during the treatments of ulcerative colitis are due to recurrence or infection.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Colitis, Ulcerative - complications</subject><subject>Colitis, Ulcerative - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Colonoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Differential</subject><subject>Feces - chemistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex - analysis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Microvessels - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Microvessels - pathology</subject><subject>Proctitis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Proctitis - etiology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Rectum - blood supply</subject><subject>Rectum - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Rectum - pathology</subject><subject>Ultrasonography - methods</subject><issn>1078-0998</issn><issn>1536-4844</issn><issn>1536-4844</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1L5DAYh4O4-H3yLjmJIF2TNp22R53xC1wV1HN5k7yRSNqMSTsye9__e6Mz63ETQn6H5_3x8hByyNlPzprizEp9Zn-D5vVkg-zwsphkohZiM2VW1Rlrmnqb7Mb4xliebrNFtotqItIrd8ifmTUGA_aDhcH6nnpDz9VgF0hfnMIAX3HqnR1spItI731ve-Og62DwYUkv_Ac6OrMRISJ9DD4Nf6JySZ8D9HGOwfYIjj6NKUr6y6rgFxDV6CDQ2w5ebf-6T34YcBEP1v8eebm6fJ7eZHcP17fT87tM5SUbMqgE54w1vAKupVYGpcCm0aIshdJoGOMyHYZ5KbFQUgAKIYsJy7nWqjTFHjlZ9c6Dfx8xDm1no0LnoEc_xjavy7qpq2QyoacrNK0bY0DTzoPtICxbztpP723y3q69J_poXTzKDvU3-090Ao5XgB_n_236CzWDkI4</recordid><startdate>20240703</startdate><enddate>20240703</enddate><creator>Tokushima, Kaori</creator><creator>Jimbo, Keisuke</creator><creator>Suzuki, Mitsuyoshi</creator><creator>Endo, Yoshiko</creator><creator>Hibio, Musashi</creator><creator>Maruyama, Kimiko</creator><creator>Kashiwagi, Kosuke</creator><creator>Arai, Nobuyasu</creator><creator>Sato, Masamichi</creator><creator>Kudo, Takahiro</creator><creator>Hoshino, Eri</creator><creator>Ohtsuka, Yoshikazu</creator><creator>Shimizu, Toshiaki</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7276-8201</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6317-4305</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4708-8049</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9969-3454</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240703</creationdate><title>Differentiation of Active Ulcerative Colitis vs Noninflammatory Bowel Disease Proctitis by Transperineal Superb Microvascular Imaging</title><author>Tokushima, Kaori ; Jimbo, Keisuke ; Suzuki, Mitsuyoshi ; Endo, Yoshiko ; Hibio, Musashi ; Maruyama, Kimiko ; Kashiwagi, Kosuke ; Arai, Nobuyasu ; Sato, Masamichi ; Kudo, Takahiro ; Hoshino, Eri ; Ohtsuka, Yoshikazu ; Shimizu, Toshiaki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-a741100917a1dbdcfeb4e99d4554cdef001bbbb0e25be3cb4ae44b36021ddc5f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Colitis, Ulcerative - complications</topic><topic>Colitis, Ulcerative - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Colonoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Differential</topic><topic>Feces - chemistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex - analysis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Microvessels - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Microvessels - pathology</topic><topic>Proctitis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Proctitis - etiology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Rectum - blood supply</topic><topic>Rectum - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Rectum - pathology</topic><topic>Ultrasonography - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tokushima, Kaori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jimbo, Keisuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Mitsuyoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Endo, Yoshiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hibio, Musashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maruyama, Kimiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kashiwagi, Kosuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arai, Nobuyasu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Masamichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kudo, Takahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoshino, Eri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohtsuka, Yoshikazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimizu, Toshiaki</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Inflammatory bowel diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tokushima, Kaori</au><au>Jimbo, Keisuke</au><au>Suzuki, Mitsuyoshi</au><au>Endo, Yoshiko</au><au>Hibio, Musashi</au><au>Maruyama, Kimiko</au><au>Kashiwagi, Kosuke</au><au>Arai, Nobuyasu</au><au>Sato, Masamichi</au><au>Kudo, Takahiro</au><au>Hoshino, Eri</au><au>Ohtsuka, Yoshikazu</au><au>Shimizu, Toshiaki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differentiation of Active Ulcerative Colitis vs Noninflammatory Bowel Disease Proctitis by Transperineal Superb Microvascular Imaging</atitle><jtitle>Inflammatory bowel diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Inflamm Bowel Dis</addtitle><date>2024-07-03</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1103</spage><epage>1111</epage><pages>1103-1111</pages><issn>1078-0998</issn><issn>1536-4844</issn><eissn>1536-4844</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Transabdominal ultrasonography and transperineal ultrasonography (TPUS) appear correspond to colonoscopy (CS) for evaluating ulcerative colitis (UC) activity, but their utility in UC diagnosis remains unclear. This research compared the accuracy of TPUS and CS for assessing rectal activity and differentiating noninflammatory bowel disease proctitis from UC in pediatric cases. Methods The study is a blinded, prospective, and controlled trial. Prospectively, values of fecal calprotectin (FCP) and findings of the TPUS and CS were compared between child cases of UC and non-IBD proctitis. Findings of rectal wall thickening (RWT), rectal wall flow (RWF) on power Doppler, and microvascular signal at wall circumference (MSWC) on monochrome superb microvascular imaging assessed using TPUS were compared with the CS. Results Thirty patients with Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) 0 to 1 UC, 57 with MES 2 to 3 UC, and 44 with proctitis were registered. Fecal calprotectin, RWF, and MSWC indicated significant differences among the groups (P &lt; .05). Rectal wall thickening showed no significant difference between MES 0–1 and proctitis (P = .76). Rectal wall thickening and MSWC were independent predictors of endoscopic activity of UC, resulting in a sensitivity and specificity of 100% for RWT ≥4.5 mm and positive MSWC. Fecal calprotectin and RWF were independent predictors for differentiating MES 0 to 1 and proctitis, and FCP and RWT were independent predictors for differentiating MES 2 to 3 and proctitis. Sensitivity and specificity were 77.2% and 80.9%, respectively, for FCP &gt;242.5 μg/g and RWF negative; and they were both 100% for RWT &gt;4.1 mm and MSWC positive. Conclusions Transperineal ultrasonography with mSMI may enable the evaluation of rectal activity and differentiation of UC from non-IBD proctitis with accuracy comparable to endoscopy. Lay Summary Transperineal ultrasonography with superb microvascular imaging can differentiate ulcerative colitis from noninflammatory bowel disease proctitis and is therefore useful in distinguishing whether diarrhea and bloody stool during the treatments of ulcerative colitis are due to recurrence or infection.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>37643765</pmid><doi>10.1093/ibd/izad186</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7276-8201</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6317-4305</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4708-8049</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9969-3454</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1078-0998
ispartof Inflammatory bowel diseases, 2024-07, Vol.30 (7), p.1103-1111
issn 1078-0998
1536-4844
1536-4844
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2858987186
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE
subjects Adolescent
Child
Colitis, Ulcerative - complications
Colitis, Ulcerative - diagnostic imaging
Colonoscopy - methods
Diagnosis, Differential
Feces - chemistry
Female
Humans
Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex - analysis
Male
Microvessels - diagnostic imaging
Microvessels - pathology
Proctitis - diagnostic imaging
Proctitis - etiology
Prospective Studies
Rectum - blood supply
Rectum - diagnostic imaging
Rectum - pathology
Ultrasonography - methods
title Differentiation of Active Ulcerative Colitis vs Noninflammatory Bowel Disease Proctitis by Transperineal Superb Microvascular Imaging
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T09%3A58%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differentiation%20of%20Active%20Ulcerative%20Colitis%20vs%20Noninflammatory%20Bowel%20Disease%20Proctitis%20by%20Transperineal%20Superb%20Microvascular%20Imaging&rft.jtitle=Inflammatory%20bowel%20diseases&rft.au=Tokushima,%20Kaori&rft.date=2024-07-03&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1103&rft.epage=1111&rft.pages=1103-1111&rft.issn=1078-0998&rft.eissn=1536-4844&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ibd/izad186&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2858987186%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2858987186&rft_id=info:pmid/37643765&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ibd/izad186&rfr_iscdi=true