Differentiation of Active Ulcerative Colitis vs Noninflammatory Bowel Disease Proctitis by Transperineal Superb Microvascular Imaging
Abstract Background Transabdominal ultrasonography and transperineal ultrasonography (TPUS) appear correspond to colonoscopy (CS) for evaluating ulcerative colitis (UC) activity, but their utility in UC diagnosis remains unclear. This research compared the accuracy of TPUS and CS for assessing recta...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Inflammatory bowel diseases 2024-07, Vol.30 (7), p.1103-1111 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1111 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1103 |
container_title | Inflammatory bowel diseases |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Tokushima, Kaori Jimbo, Keisuke Suzuki, Mitsuyoshi Endo, Yoshiko Hibio, Musashi Maruyama, Kimiko Kashiwagi, Kosuke Arai, Nobuyasu Sato, Masamichi Kudo, Takahiro Hoshino, Eri Ohtsuka, Yoshikazu Shimizu, Toshiaki |
description | Abstract
Background
Transabdominal ultrasonography and transperineal ultrasonography (TPUS) appear correspond to colonoscopy (CS) for evaluating ulcerative colitis (UC) activity, but their utility in UC diagnosis remains unclear. This research compared the accuracy of TPUS and CS for assessing rectal activity and differentiating noninflammatory bowel disease proctitis from UC in pediatric cases.
Methods
The study is a blinded, prospective, and controlled trial. Prospectively, values of fecal calprotectin (FCP) and findings of the TPUS and CS were compared between child cases of UC and non-IBD proctitis. Findings of rectal wall thickening (RWT), rectal wall flow (RWF) on power Doppler, and microvascular signal at wall circumference (MSWC) on monochrome superb microvascular imaging assessed using TPUS were compared with the CS.
Results
Thirty patients with Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) 0 to 1 UC, 57 with MES 2 to 3 UC, and 44 with proctitis were registered. Fecal calprotectin, RWF, and MSWC indicated significant differences among the groups (P < .05). Rectal wall thickening showed no significant difference between MES 0–1 and proctitis (P = .76). Rectal wall thickening and MSWC were independent predictors of endoscopic activity of UC, resulting in a sensitivity and specificity of 100% for RWT ≥4.5 mm and positive MSWC. Fecal calprotectin and RWF were independent predictors for differentiating MES 0 to 1 and proctitis, and FCP and RWT were independent predictors for differentiating MES 2 to 3 and proctitis. Sensitivity and specificity were 77.2% and 80.9%, respectively, for FCP >242.5 μg/g and RWF negative; and they were both 100% for RWT >4.1 mm and MSWC positive.
Conclusions
Transperineal ultrasonography with mSMI may enable the evaluation of rectal activity and differentiation of UC from non-IBD proctitis with accuracy comparable to endoscopy.
Lay Summary
Transperineal ultrasonography with superb microvascular imaging can differentiate ulcerative colitis from noninflammatory bowel disease proctitis and is therefore useful in distinguishing whether diarrhea and bloody stool during the treatments of ulcerative colitis are due to recurrence or infection. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/ibd/izad186 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2858987186</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/ibd/izad186</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2858987186</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-a741100917a1dbdcfeb4e99d4554cdef001bbbb0e25be3cb4ae44b36021ddc5f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1L5DAYh4O4-H3yLjmJIF2TNp22R53xC1wV1HN5k7yRSNqMSTsye9__e6Mz63ETQn6H5_3x8hByyNlPzprizEp9Zn-D5vVkg-zwsphkohZiM2VW1Rlrmnqb7Mb4xliebrNFtotqItIrd8ifmTUGA_aDhcH6nnpDz9VgF0hfnMIAX3HqnR1spItI731ve-Og62DwYUkv_Ac6OrMRISJ9DD4Nf6JySZ8D9HGOwfYIjj6NKUr6y6rgFxDV6CDQ2w5ebf-6T34YcBEP1v8eebm6fJ7eZHcP17fT87tM5SUbMqgE54w1vAKupVYGpcCm0aIshdJoGOMyHYZ5KbFQUgAKIYsJy7nWqjTFHjlZ9c6Dfx8xDm1no0LnoEc_xjavy7qpq2QyoacrNK0bY0DTzoPtICxbztpP723y3q69J_poXTzKDvU3-090Ao5XgB_n_236CzWDkI4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2858987186</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differentiation of Active Ulcerative Colitis vs Noninflammatory Bowel Disease Proctitis by Transperineal Superb Microvascular Imaging</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Tokushima, Kaori ; Jimbo, Keisuke ; Suzuki, Mitsuyoshi ; Endo, Yoshiko ; Hibio, Musashi ; Maruyama, Kimiko ; Kashiwagi, Kosuke ; Arai, Nobuyasu ; Sato, Masamichi ; Kudo, Takahiro ; Hoshino, Eri ; Ohtsuka, Yoshikazu ; Shimizu, Toshiaki</creator><creatorcontrib>Tokushima, Kaori ; Jimbo, Keisuke ; Suzuki, Mitsuyoshi ; Endo, Yoshiko ; Hibio, Musashi ; Maruyama, Kimiko ; Kashiwagi, Kosuke ; Arai, Nobuyasu ; Sato, Masamichi ; Kudo, Takahiro ; Hoshino, Eri ; Ohtsuka, Yoshikazu ; Shimizu, Toshiaki</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Background
Transabdominal ultrasonography and transperineal ultrasonography (TPUS) appear correspond to colonoscopy (CS) for evaluating ulcerative colitis (UC) activity, but their utility in UC diagnosis remains unclear. This research compared the accuracy of TPUS and CS for assessing rectal activity and differentiating noninflammatory bowel disease proctitis from UC in pediatric cases.
Methods
The study is a blinded, prospective, and controlled trial. Prospectively, values of fecal calprotectin (FCP) and findings of the TPUS and CS were compared between child cases of UC and non-IBD proctitis. Findings of rectal wall thickening (RWT), rectal wall flow (RWF) on power Doppler, and microvascular signal at wall circumference (MSWC) on monochrome superb microvascular imaging assessed using TPUS were compared with the CS.
Results
Thirty patients with Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) 0 to 1 UC, 57 with MES 2 to 3 UC, and 44 with proctitis were registered. Fecal calprotectin, RWF, and MSWC indicated significant differences among the groups (P < .05). Rectal wall thickening showed no significant difference between MES 0–1 and proctitis (P = .76). Rectal wall thickening and MSWC were independent predictors of endoscopic activity of UC, resulting in a sensitivity and specificity of 100% for RWT ≥4.5 mm and positive MSWC. Fecal calprotectin and RWF were independent predictors for differentiating MES 0 to 1 and proctitis, and FCP and RWT were independent predictors for differentiating MES 2 to 3 and proctitis. Sensitivity and specificity were 77.2% and 80.9%, respectively, for FCP >242.5 μg/g and RWF negative; and they were both 100% for RWT >4.1 mm and MSWC positive.
Conclusions
Transperineal ultrasonography with mSMI may enable the evaluation of rectal activity and differentiation of UC from non-IBD proctitis with accuracy comparable to endoscopy.
Lay Summary
Transperineal ultrasonography with superb microvascular imaging can differentiate ulcerative colitis from noninflammatory bowel disease proctitis and is therefore useful in distinguishing whether diarrhea and bloody stool during the treatments of ulcerative colitis are due to recurrence or infection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-0998</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1536-4844</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-4844</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izad186</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37643765</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Child ; Colitis, Ulcerative - complications ; Colitis, Ulcerative - diagnostic imaging ; Colonoscopy - methods ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Feces - chemistry ; Female ; Humans ; Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex - analysis ; Male ; Microvessels - diagnostic imaging ; Microvessels - pathology ; Proctitis - diagnostic imaging ; Proctitis - etiology ; Prospective Studies ; Rectum - blood supply ; Rectum - diagnostic imaging ; Rectum - pathology ; Ultrasonography - methods</subject><ispartof>Inflammatory bowel diseases, 2024-07, Vol.30 (7), p.1103-1111</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com. 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-a741100917a1dbdcfeb4e99d4554cdef001bbbb0e25be3cb4ae44b36021ddc5f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-a741100917a1dbdcfeb4e99d4554cdef001bbbb0e25be3cb4ae44b36021ddc5f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7276-8201 ; 0000-0001-6317-4305 ; 0000-0003-4708-8049 ; 0000-0002-9969-3454</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37643765$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tokushima, Kaori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jimbo, Keisuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Mitsuyoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Endo, Yoshiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hibio, Musashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maruyama, Kimiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kashiwagi, Kosuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arai, Nobuyasu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Masamichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kudo, Takahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoshino, Eri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohtsuka, Yoshikazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimizu, Toshiaki</creatorcontrib><title>Differentiation of Active Ulcerative Colitis vs Noninflammatory Bowel Disease Proctitis by Transperineal Superb Microvascular Imaging</title><title>Inflammatory bowel diseases</title><addtitle>Inflamm Bowel Dis</addtitle><description>Abstract
Background
Transabdominal ultrasonography and transperineal ultrasonography (TPUS) appear correspond to colonoscopy (CS) for evaluating ulcerative colitis (UC) activity, but their utility in UC diagnosis remains unclear. This research compared the accuracy of TPUS and CS for assessing rectal activity and differentiating noninflammatory bowel disease proctitis from UC in pediatric cases.
Methods
The study is a blinded, prospective, and controlled trial. Prospectively, values of fecal calprotectin (FCP) and findings of the TPUS and CS were compared between child cases of UC and non-IBD proctitis. Findings of rectal wall thickening (RWT), rectal wall flow (RWF) on power Doppler, and microvascular signal at wall circumference (MSWC) on monochrome superb microvascular imaging assessed using TPUS were compared with the CS.
Results
Thirty patients with Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) 0 to 1 UC, 57 with MES 2 to 3 UC, and 44 with proctitis were registered. Fecal calprotectin, RWF, and MSWC indicated significant differences among the groups (P < .05). Rectal wall thickening showed no significant difference between MES 0–1 and proctitis (P = .76). Rectal wall thickening and MSWC were independent predictors of endoscopic activity of UC, resulting in a sensitivity and specificity of 100% for RWT ≥4.5 mm and positive MSWC. Fecal calprotectin and RWF were independent predictors for differentiating MES 0 to 1 and proctitis, and FCP and RWT were independent predictors for differentiating MES 2 to 3 and proctitis. Sensitivity and specificity were 77.2% and 80.9%, respectively, for FCP >242.5 μg/g and RWF negative; and they were both 100% for RWT >4.1 mm and MSWC positive.
Conclusions
Transperineal ultrasonography with mSMI may enable the evaluation of rectal activity and differentiation of UC from non-IBD proctitis with accuracy comparable to endoscopy.
Lay Summary
Transperineal ultrasonography with superb microvascular imaging can differentiate ulcerative colitis from noninflammatory bowel disease proctitis and is therefore useful in distinguishing whether diarrhea and bloody stool during the treatments of ulcerative colitis are due to recurrence or infection.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Colitis, Ulcerative - complications</subject><subject>Colitis, Ulcerative - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Colonoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Differential</subject><subject>Feces - chemistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex - analysis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Microvessels - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Microvessels - pathology</subject><subject>Proctitis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Proctitis - etiology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Rectum - blood supply</subject><subject>Rectum - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Rectum - pathology</subject><subject>Ultrasonography - methods</subject><issn>1078-0998</issn><issn>1536-4844</issn><issn>1536-4844</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1L5DAYh4O4-H3yLjmJIF2TNp22R53xC1wV1HN5k7yRSNqMSTsye9__e6Mz63ETQn6H5_3x8hByyNlPzprizEp9Zn-D5vVkg-zwsphkohZiM2VW1Rlrmnqb7Mb4xliebrNFtotqItIrd8ifmTUGA_aDhcH6nnpDz9VgF0hfnMIAX3HqnR1spItI731ve-Og62DwYUkv_Ac6OrMRISJ9DD4Nf6JySZ8D9HGOwfYIjj6NKUr6y6rgFxDV6CDQ2w5ebf-6T34YcBEP1v8eebm6fJ7eZHcP17fT87tM5SUbMqgE54w1vAKupVYGpcCm0aIshdJoGOMyHYZ5KbFQUgAKIYsJy7nWqjTFHjlZ9c6Dfx8xDm1no0LnoEc_xjavy7qpq2QyoacrNK0bY0DTzoPtICxbztpP723y3q69J_poXTzKDvU3-090Ao5XgB_n_236CzWDkI4</recordid><startdate>20240703</startdate><enddate>20240703</enddate><creator>Tokushima, Kaori</creator><creator>Jimbo, Keisuke</creator><creator>Suzuki, Mitsuyoshi</creator><creator>Endo, Yoshiko</creator><creator>Hibio, Musashi</creator><creator>Maruyama, Kimiko</creator><creator>Kashiwagi, Kosuke</creator><creator>Arai, Nobuyasu</creator><creator>Sato, Masamichi</creator><creator>Kudo, Takahiro</creator><creator>Hoshino, Eri</creator><creator>Ohtsuka, Yoshikazu</creator><creator>Shimizu, Toshiaki</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7276-8201</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6317-4305</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4708-8049</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9969-3454</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240703</creationdate><title>Differentiation of Active Ulcerative Colitis vs Noninflammatory Bowel Disease Proctitis by Transperineal Superb Microvascular Imaging</title><author>Tokushima, Kaori ; Jimbo, Keisuke ; Suzuki, Mitsuyoshi ; Endo, Yoshiko ; Hibio, Musashi ; Maruyama, Kimiko ; Kashiwagi, Kosuke ; Arai, Nobuyasu ; Sato, Masamichi ; Kudo, Takahiro ; Hoshino, Eri ; Ohtsuka, Yoshikazu ; Shimizu, Toshiaki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-a741100917a1dbdcfeb4e99d4554cdef001bbbb0e25be3cb4ae44b36021ddc5f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Colitis, Ulcerative - complications</topic><topic>Colitis, Ulcerative - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Colonoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Differential</topic><topic>Feces - chemistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex - analysis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Microvessels - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Microvessels - pathology</topic><topic>Proctitis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Proctitis - etiology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Rectum - blood supply</topic><topic>Rectum - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Rectum - pathology</topic><topic>Ultrasonography - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tokushima, Kaori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jimbo, Keisuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Mitsuyoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Endo, Yoshiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hibio, Musashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maruyama, Kimiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kashiwagi, Kosuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arai, Nobuyasu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Masamichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kudo, Takahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoshino, Eri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohtsuka, Yoshikazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimizu, Toshiaki</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Inflammatory bowel diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tokushima, Kaori</au><au>Jimbo, Keisuke</au><au>Suzuki, Mitsuyoshi</au><au>Endo, Yoshiko</au><au>Hibio, Musashi</au><au>Maruyama, Kimiko</au><au>Kashiwagi, Kosuke</au><au>Arai, Nobuyasu</au><au>Sato, Masamichi</au><au>Kudo, Takahiro</au><au>Hoshino, Eri</au><au>Ohtsuka, Yoshikazu</au><au>Shimizu, Toshiaki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differentiation of Active Ulcerative Colitis vs Noninflammatory Bowel Disease Proctitis by Transperineal Superb Microvascular Imaging</atitle><jtitle>Inflammatory bowel diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Inflamm Bowel Dis</addtitle><date>2024-07-03</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1103</spage><epage>1111</epage><pages>1103-1111</pages><issn>1078-0998</issn><issn>1536-4844</issn><eissn>1536-4844</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Background
Transabdominal ultrasonography and transperineal ultrasonography (TPUS) appear correspond to colonoscopy (CS) for evaluating ulcerative colitis (UC) activity, but their utility in UC diagnosis remains unclear. This research compared the accuracy of TPUS and CS for assessing rectal activity and differentiating noninflammatory bowel disease proctitis from UC in pediatric cases.
Methods
The study is a blinded, prospective, and controlled trial. Prospectively, values of fecal calprotectin (FCP) and findings of the TPUS and CS were compared between child cases of UC and non-IBD proctitis. Findings of rectal wall thickening (RWT), rectal wall flow (RWF) on power Doppler, and microvascular signal at wall circumference (MSWC) on monochrome superb microvascular imaging assessed using TPUS were compared with the CS.
Results
Thirty patients with Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) 0 to 1 UC, 57 with MES 2 to 3 UC, and 44 with proctitis were registered. Fecal calprotectin, RWF, and MSWC indicated significant differences among the groups (P < .05). Rectal wall thickening showed no significant difference between MES 0–1 and proctitis (P = .76). Rectal wall thickening and MSWC were independent predictors of endoscopic activity of UC, resulting in a sensitivity and specificity of 100% for RWT ≥4.5 mm and positive MSWC. Fecal calprotectin and RWF were independent predictors for differentiating MES 0 to 1 and proctitis, and FCP and RWT were independent predictors for differentiating MES 2 to 3 and proctitis. Sensitivity and specificity were 77.2% and 80.9%, respectively, for FCP >242.5 μg/g and RWF negative; and they were both 100% for RWT >4.1 mm and MSWC positive.
Conclusions
Transperineal ultrasonography with mSMI may enable the evaluation of rectal activity and differentiation of UC from non-IBD proctitis with accuracy comparable to endoscopy.
Lay Summary
Transperineal ultrasonography with superb microvascular imaging can differentiate ulcerative colitis from noninflammatory bowel disease proctitis and is therefore useful in distinguishing whether diarrhea and bloody stool during the treatments of ulcerative colitis are due to recurrence or infection.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>37643765</pmid><doi>10.1093/ibd/izad186</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7276-8201</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6317-4305</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4708-8049</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9969-3454</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1078-0998 |
ispartof | Inflammatory bowel diseases, 2024-07, Vol.30 (7), p.1103-1111 |
issn | 1078-0998 1536-4844 1536-4844 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2858987186 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE |
subjects | Adolescent Child Colitis, Ulcerative - complications Colitis, Ulcerative - diagnostic imaging Colonoscopy - methods Diagnosis, Differential Feces - chemistry Female Humans Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex - analysis Male Microvessels - diagnostic imaging Microvessels - pathology Proctitis - diagnostic imaging Proctitis - etiology Prospective Studies Rectum - blood supply Rectum - diagnostic imaging Rectum - pathology Ultrasonography - methods |
title | Differentiation of Active Ulcerative Colitis vs Noninflammatory Bowel Disease Proctitis by Transperineal Superb Microvascular Imaging |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T09%3A58%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differentiation%20of%20Active%20Ulcerative%20Colitis%20vs%20Noninflammatory%20Bowel%20Disease%20Proctitis%20by%20Transperineal%20Superb%20Microvascular%20Imaging&rft.jtitle=Inflammatory%20bowel%20diseases&rft.au=Tokushima,%20Kaori&rft.date=2024-07-03&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1103&rft.epage=1111&rft.pages=1103-1111&rft.issn=1078-0998&rft.eissn=1536-4844&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ibd/izad186&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2858987186%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2858987186&rft_id=info:pmid/37643765&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ibd/izad186&rfr_iscdi=true |