Joint kinematic and kinetic responses to added mass on the lower extremities during running

We analyzed the biomechanical response (joint angles, moments, and powers) to running with added leg mass. These data may help guide the design of wearable locomotor assistive devices (i.e., exoskeletons), which are becoming more prevalent. 15 participants (7 females, 8 males) completed treadmill ru...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied ergonomics 2024-01, Vol.114, p.104050-104050, Article 104050
Hauptverfasser: Coifman, Itay, Kram, Rodger, Riemer, Raziel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 104050
container_issue
container_start_page 104050
container_title Applied ergonomics
container_volume 114
creator Coifman, Itay
Kram, Rodger
Riemer, Raziel
description We analyzed the biomechanical response (joint angles, moments, and powers) to running with added leg mass. These data may help guide the design of wearable locomotor assistive devices (i.e., exoskeletons), which are becoming more prevalent. 15 participants (7 females, 8 males) completed treadmill running trials (3m•s−1) normally and with lead mass (300–1350 g) attached to the thigh, shank, or foot, bilaterally. We quantified the lower limb biomechanics combining motion capture and ground reaction force data using standard inverse dynamics analysis. Only moderate kinematic changes occurred in response to the distal added limb mass. Maximum hip flexion and maximum knee flexion angles during swing phase increased by approximately 9% and 6% respectively for each 1 kg added to each foot. However, adding even small masses made dramatic changes to the joint moments and powers, mostly during the swing phase. For example, adding 1 kg to each foot increased maximum joint moments by as much as 40% (knee extension in late swing) and maximum joint power by as much as 50% (hip generation in late swing). Leg joint kinematics were largely conserved in response to adding mass to the legs. Adding mass to the leg distally increased joint power mainly at the knee and hip joints during the swing phase, whereas adding mass proximally mainly affected the ankle joint mechanics during the stance phase. These changes have implications for shoe designs, people who run with added mass on their legs for sport/strength training and for the design of wearable devices. •The study examined the influence of added leg mass on running biomechanics.•Added leg mass had only small effects on stride and joint kinematics.•Added mass greatly increased knee and hip moments and powers during swing phase.•More distal added mass elicited greater knee and hip joint moments and powers.•Surprisingly, energy harvesting exoskeletons might benefit from distal loading.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104050
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2857849234</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0003687023000881</els_id><sourcerecordid>2857849234</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-fc86cc47c656f5e0b90b5077e72c126d4586c2abecb1098ab711703bd37cfb503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ULlOxDAUtBBILAt_QOGSJovtHE4aJLTiFBINVBSWY78sXhI72A7H3-Ml1FTzjpnRe4PQKSUrSmh1vl3JEfzGrRhheRoVpCR7aEFrzrKGsmofLQgheVbVnByioxC2qa0LWi7Qy70zNuI3Y2GQ0Sgsrf7tdrWHMDobIODosNQaNB5kCNhZHF8B9-4TPIav6GEw0SSanryxG-wnaxMeo4NO9gFO_nCJnq-vnta32cPjzd368iFTeV3GrFN1pVTBVVVWXQmkbUhbEs6BM5WO10WZ9ky2oFpKmlq2nFJO8lbnXHWJmS_R2ew7evc-QYhiMEFB30sLbgqC1SWvi4blRaIWM1V5F4KHTozeDNJ_C0rELkuxFXOWYpelmLNMsotZBumNDwNeBGXAKtDGg4pCO_O_wQ9tv3_q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2857849234</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Joint kinematic and kinetic responses to added mass on the lower extremities during running</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Coifman, Itay ; Kram, Rodger ; Riemer, Raziel</creator><creatorcontrib>Coifman, Itay ; Kram, Rodger ; Riemer, Raziel</creatorcontrib><description>We analyzed the biomechanical response (joint angles, moments, and powers) to running with added leg mass. These data may help guide the design of wearable locomotor assistive devices (i.e., exoskeletons), which are becoming more prevalent. 15 participants (7 females, 8 males) completed treadmill running trials (3m•s−1) normally and with lead mass (300–1350 g) attached to the thigh, shank, or foot, bilaterally. We quantified the lower limb biomechanics combining motion capture and ground reaction force data using standard inverse dynamics analysis. Only moderate kinematic changes occurred in response to the distal added limb mass. Maximum hip flexion and maximum knee flexion angles during swing phase increased by approximately 9% and 6% respectively for each 1 kg added to each foot. However, adding even small masses made dramatic changes to the joint moments and powers, mostly during the swing phase. For example, adding 1 kg to each foot increased maximum joint moments by as much as 40% (knee extension in late swing) and maximum joint power by as much as 50% (hip generation in late swing). Leg joint kinematics were largely conserved in response to adding mass to the legs. Adding mass to the leg distally increased joint power mainly at the knee and hip joints during the swing phase, whereas adding mass proximally mainly affected the ankle joint mechanics during the stance phase. These changes have implications for shoe designs, people who run with added mass on their legs for sport/strength training and for the design of wearable devices. •The study examined the influence of added leg mass on running biomechanics.•Added leg mass had only small effects on stride and joint kinematics.•Added mass greatly increased knee and hip moments and powers during swing phase.•More distal added mass elicited greater knee and hip joint moments and powers.•Surprisingly, energy harvesting exoskeletons might benefit from distal loading.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-6870</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9126</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104050</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Exoskeletons ; Joint moments ; Leg loads ; Load carrying ; Wearables</subject><ispartof>Applied ergonomics, 2024-01, Vol.114, p.104050-104050, Article 104050</ispartof><rights>2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-fc86cc47c656f5e0b90b5077e72c126d4586c2abecb1098ab711703bd37cfb503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-fc86cc47c656f5e0b90b5077e72c126d4586c2abecb1098ab711703bd37cfb503</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9358-6287 ; 0000-0002-2526-1608</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Coifman, Itay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kram, Rodger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riemer, Raziel</creatorcontrib><title>Joint kinematic and kinetic responses to added mass on the lower extremities during running</title><title>Applied ergonomics</title><description>We analyzed the biomechanical response (joint angles, moments, and powers) to running with added leg mass. These data may help guide the design of wearable locomotor assistive devices (i.e., exoskeletons), which are becoming more prevalent. 15 participants (7 females, 8 males) completed treadmill running trials (3m•s−1) normally and with lead mass (300–1350 g) attached to the thigh, shank, or foot, bilaterally. We quantified the lower limb biomechanics combining motion capture and ground reaction force data using standard inverse dynamics analysis. Only moderate kinematic changes occurred in response to the distal added limb mass. Maximum hip flexion and maximum knee flexion angles during swing phase increased by approximately 9% and 6% respectively for each 1 kg added to each foot. However, adding even small masses made dramatic changes to the joint moments and powers, mostly during the swing phase. For example, adding 1 kg to each foot increased maximum joint moments by as much as 40% (knee extension in late swing) and maximum joint power by as much as 50% (hip generation in late swing). Leg joint kinematics were largely conserved in response to adding mass to the legs. Adding mass to the leg distally increased joint power mainly at the knee and hip joints during the swing phase, whereas adding mass proximally mainly affected the ankle joint mechanics during the stance phase. These changes have implications for shoe designs, people who run with added mass on their legs for sport/strength training and for the design of wearable devices. •The study examined the influence of added leg mass on running biomechanics.•Added leg mass had only small effects on stride and joint kinematics.•Added mass greatly increased knee and hip moments and powers during swing phase.•More distal added mass elicited greater knee and hip joint moments and powers.•Surprisingly, energy harvesting exoskeletons might benefit from distal loading.</description><subject>Exoskeletons</subject><subject>Joint moments</subject><subject>Leg loads</subject><subject>Load carrying</subject><subject>Wearables</subject><issn>0003-6870</issn><issn>1872-9126</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9ULlOxDAUtBBILAt_QOGSJovtHE4aJLTiFBINVBSWY78sXhI72A7H3-Ml1FTzjpnRe4PQKSUrSmh1vl3JEfzGrRhheRoVpCR7aEFrzrKGsmofLQgheVbVnByioxC2qa0LWi7Qy70zNuI3Y2GQ0Sgsrf7tdrWHMDobIODosNQaNB5kCNhZHF8B9-4TPIav6GEw0SSanryxG-wnaxMeo4NO9gFO_nCJnq-vnta32cPjzd368iFTeV3GrFN1pVTBVVVWXQmkbUhbEs6BM5WO10WZ9ky2oFpKmlq2nFJO8lbnXHWJmS_R2ew7evc-QYhiMEFB30sLbgqC1SWvi4blRaIWM1V5F4KHTozeDNJ_C0rELkuxFXOWYpelmLNMsotZBumNDwNeBGXAKtDGg4pCO_O_wQ9tv3_q</recordid><startdate>202401</startdate><enddate>202401</enddate><creator>Coifman, Itay</creator><creator>Kram, Rodger</creator><creator>Riemer, Raziel</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9358-6287</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2526-1608</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202401</creationdate><title>Joint kinematic and kinetic responses to added mass on the lower extremities during running</title><author>Coifman, Itay ; Kram, Rodger ; Riemer, Raziel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-fc86cc47c656f5e0b90b5077e72c126d4586c2abecb1098ab711703bd37cfb503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Exoskeletons</topic><topic>Joint moments</topic><topic>Leg loads</topic><topic>Load carrying</topic><topic>Wearables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Coifman, Itay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kram, Rodger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riemer, Raziel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Applied ergonomics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Coifman, Itay</au><au>Kram, Rodger</au><au>Riemer, Raziel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Joint kinematic and kinetic responses to added mass on the lower extremities during running</atitle><jtitle>Applied ergonomics</jtitle><date>2024-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>114</volume><spage>104050</spage><epage>104050</epage><pages>104050-104050</pages><artnum>104050</artnum><issn>0003-6870</issn><eissn>1872-9126</eissn><abstract>We analyzed the biomechanical response (joint angles, moments, and powers) to running with added leg mass. These data may help guide the design of wearable locomotor assistive devices (i.e., exoskeletons), which are becoming more prevalent. 15 participants (7 females, 8 males) completed treadmill running trials (3m•s−1) normally and with lead mass (300–1350 g) attached to the thigh, shank, or foot, bilaterally. We quantified the lower limb biomechanics combining motion capture and ground reaction force data using standard inverse dynamics analysis. Only moderate kinematic changes occurred in response to the distal added limb mass. Maximum hip flexion and maximum knee flexion angles during swing phase increased by approximately 9% and 6% respectively for each 1 kg added to each foot. However, adding even small masses made dramatic changes to the joint moments and powers, mostly during the swing phase. For example, adding 1 kg to each foot increased maximum joint moments by as much as 40% (knee extension in late swing) and maximum joint power by as much as 50% (hip generation in late swing). Leg joint kinematics were largely conserved in response to adding mass to the legs. Adding mass to the leg distally increased joint power mainly at the knee and hip joints during the swing phase, whereas adding mass proximally mainly affected the ankle joint mechanics during the stance phase. These changes have implications for shoe designs, people who run with added mass on their legs for sport/strength training and for the design of wearable devices. •The study examined the influence of added leg mass on running biomechanics.•Added leg mass had only small effects on stride and joint kinematics.•Added mass greatly increased knee and hip moments and powers during swing phase.•More distal added mass elicited greater knee and hip joint moments and powers.•Surprisingly, energy harvesting exoskeletons might benefit from distal loading.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104050</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9358-6287</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2526-1608</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-6870
ispartof Applied ergonomics, 2024-01, Vol.114, p.104050-104050, Article 104050
issn 0003-6870
1872-9126
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2857849234
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Exoskeletons
Joint moments
Leg loads
Load carrying
Wearables
title Joint kinematic and kinetic responses to added mass on the lower extremities during running
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T01%3A59%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Joint%20kinematic%20and%20kinetic%20responses%20to%20added%20mass%20on%20the%20lower%20extremities%20during%20running&rft.jtitle=Applied%20ergonomics&rft.au=Coifman,%20Itay&rft.date=2024-01&rft.volume=114&rft.spage=104050&rft.epage=104050&rft.pages=104050-104050&rft.artnum=104050&rft.issn=0003-6870&rft.eissn=1872-9126&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104050&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2857849234%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2857849234&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0003687023000881&rfr_iscdi=true