Battling professional self-sabotage: Embracing standard of care as the future of pharmacy regulation
Laws and regulations are intended to protect the public; however, overregulation of the profession can block initiatives focused on patient safety and public health. This article discusses the 3 main regulatory approaches to pharmacy practice: standard of care (SOC), bright line, and right touch. An...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American Pharmacists Association 2023-11, Vol.63 (6), p.1685-1688.e1 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1688.e1 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1685 |
container_title | Journal of the American Pharmacists Association |
container_volume | 63 |
creator | Adams, Jennifer L. O’Connor, Shanna Seignemartin, Brandy Shipman, Allie Jo McConnell, Wendy Dudman, Ally Akers, Julie Vernon, Veronica |
description | Laws and regulations are intended to protect the public; however, overregulation of the profession can block initiatives focused on patient safety and public health. This article discusses the 3 main regulatory approaches to pharmacy practice: standard of care (SOC), bright line, and right touch. An SOC regulatory model supports practitioners delivering patient care within their scope of practice and clinical training. Patient safety is maintained by measuring care against other practitioners within the same practice setting while supporting practitioners practicing at the top of their clinical ability. Compared with bright line and right touch approaches, the SOC regulatory model provides the adaptability needed to respond to different practice scenarios and settings, thus increasing access to health care and opportunities for innovation. To have a lasting impact on the profession and support patients, all pharmacy professionals must be fluent in regulatory approaches and advocate for states to transition to SOC regulatory models. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.japh.2023.08.015 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2857840718</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1544319123002662</els_id><sourcerecordid>2857840718</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-2aae8faa70131c65b084446792977f2053b255a6b51a0fb09b2914e65b97f0de3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhi3UCijtH-ih8pFLgu3YsY16KYgWJKRe2rM1cca7WeVjsR0k_n29WuDY03zomVeah5CvnNWc8fZqV-9gv60FE03NTM24OiHnXElZNVKxD289t_yMfEppx5jQrTWn5KzRLbdG2nPS30DO4zBv6D4uAVMalhlGmnAMVYJuybDBa3o3dRH8gUoZ5h5iT5dAPUSkkGjeIg1rXstUtvstxAn8C424WUfIJfAz-RhgTPjltV6Qvz_v_tzeV4-_fz3c_nisfKPaXAkANAFAM95w36qOGSllq62wWgfBVNMJpaDtFAcWOmY7YbnEAlodWI_NBbk85pZfnlZM2U1D8jiOMOOyJieM0kYyzU1BxRH1cUkpYnD7OEwQXxxn7mDX7dzBrjvYdcy4YrccfXvNX7sJ-_eTN50F-H4EsHz5PGB0yQ84e-yHiD67fhn-l_8Ps_-Lwg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2857840718</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Battling professional self-sabotage: Embracing standard of care as the future of pharmacy regulation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Adams, Jennifer L. ; O’Connor, Shanna ; Seignemartin, Brandy ; Shipman, Allie Jo ; McConnell, Wendy ; Dudman, Ally ; Akers, Julie ; Vernon, Veronica</creator><creatorcontrib>Adams, Jennifer L. ; O’Connor, Shanna ; Seignemartin, Brandy ; Shipman, Allie Jo ; McConnell, Wendy ; Dudman, Ally ; Akers, Julie ; Vernon, Veronica</creatorcontrib><description>Laws and regulations are intended to protect the public; however, overregulation of the profession can block initiatives focused on patient safety and public health. This article discusses the 3 main regulatory approaches to pharmacy practice: standard of care (SOC), bright line, and right touch. An SOC regulatory model supports practitioners delivering patient care within their scope of practice and clinical training. Patient safety is maintained by measuring care against other practitioners within the same practice setting while supporting practitioners practicing at the top of their clinical ability. Compared with bright line and right touch approaches, the SOC regulatory model provides the adaptability needed to respond to different practice scenarios and settings, thus increasing access to health care and opportunities for innovation. To have a lasting impact on the profession and support patients, all pharmacy professionals must be fluent in regulatory approaches and advocate for states to transition to SOC regulatory models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1544-3191</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1544-3450</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2023.08.015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37619849</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Delivery of Health Care ; Humans ; Pharmaceutical Services ; Pharmacies ; Pharmacy ; Standard of Care</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, 2023-11, Vol.63 (6), p.1685-1688.e1</ispartof><rights>2023 American Pharmacists Association</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 American Pharmacists Association®. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-2aae8faa70131c65b084446792977f2053b255a6b51a0fb09b2914e65b97f0de3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-2aae8faa70131c65b084446792977f2053b255a6b51a0fb09b2914e65b97f0de3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5638-3851 ; 0009-0008-9530-618X ; 0000-0002-7690-7106 ; 0000-0003-3681-1721 ; 0000-0002-5766-5033 ; 0009-0003-6651-8945</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37619849$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adams, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Connor, Shanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seignemartin, Brandy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shipman, Allie Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McConnell, Wendy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dudman, Ally</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akers, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vernon, Veronica</creatorcontrib><title>Battling professional self-sabotage: Embracing standard of care as the future of pharmacy regulation</title><title>Journal of the American Pharmacists Association</title><addtitle>J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)</addtitle><description>Laws and regulations are intended to protect the public; however, overregulation of the profession can block initiatives focused on patient safety and public health. This article discusses the 3 main regulatory approaches to pharmacy practice: standard of care (SOC), bright line, and right touch. An SOC regulatory model supports practitioners delivering patient care within their scope of practice and clinical training. Patient safety is maintained by measuring care against other practitioners within the same practice setting while supporting practitioners practicing at the top of their clinical ability. Compared with bright line and right touch approaches, the SOC regulatory model provides the adaptability needed to respond to different practice scenarios and settings, thus increasing access to health care and opportunities for innovation. To have a lasting impact on the profession and support patients, all pharmacy professionals must be fluent in regulatory approaches and advocate for states to transition to SOC regulatory models.</description><subject>Delivery of Health Care</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Services</subject><subject>Pharmacies</subject><subject>Pharmacy</subject><subject>Standard of Care</subject><issn>1544-3191</issn><issn>1544-3450</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhi3UCijtH-ih8pFLgu3YsY16KYgWJKRe2rM1cca7WeVjsR0k_n29WuDY03zomVeah5CvnNWc8fZqV-9gv60FE03NTM24OiHnXElZNVKxD289t_yMfEppx5jQrTWn5KzRLbdG2nPS30DO4zBv6D4uAVMalhlGmnAMVYJuybDBa3o3dRH8gUoZ5h5iT5dAPUSkkGjeIg1rXstUtvstxAn8C424WUfIJfAz-RhgTPjltV6Qvz_v_tzeV4-_fz3c_nisfKPaXAkANAFAM95w36qOGSllq62wWgfBVNMJpaDtFAcWOmY7YbnEAlodWI_NBbk85pZfnlZM2U1D8jiOMOOyJieM0kYyzU1BxRH1cUkpYnD7OEwQXxxn7mDX7dzBrjvYdcy4YrccfXvNX7sJ-_eTN50F-H4EsHz5PGB0yQ84e-yHiD67fhn-l_8Ps_-Lwg</recordid><startdate>202311</startdate><enddate>202311</enddate><creator>Adams, Jennifer L.</creator><creator>O’Connor, Shanna</creator><creator>Seignemartin, Brandy</creator><creator>Shipman, Allie Jo</creator><creator>McConnell, Wendy</creator><creator>Dudman, Ally</creator><creator>Akers, Julie</creator><creator>Vernon, Veronica</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5638-3851</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9530-618X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7690-7106</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3681-1721</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5766-5033</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6651-8945</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202311</creationdate><title>Battling professional self-sabotage: Embracing standard of care as the future of pharmacy regulation</title><author>Adams, Jennifer L. ; O’Connor, Shanna ; Seignemartin, Brandy ; Shipman, Allie Jo ; McConnell, Wendy ; Dudman, Ally ; Akers, Julie ; Vernon, Veronica</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-2aae8faa70131c65b084446792977f2053b255a6b51a0fb09b2914e65b97f0de3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Delivery of Health Care</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Services</topic><topic>Pharmacies</topic><topic>Pharmacy</topic><topic>Standard of Care</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adams, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Connor, Shanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seignemartin, Brandy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shipman, Allie Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McConnell, Wendy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dudman, Ally</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akers, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vernon, Veronica</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Pharmacists Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adams, Jennifer L.</au><au>O’Connor, Shanna</au><au>Seignemartin, Brandy</au><au>Shipman, Allie Jo</au><au>McConnell, Wendy</au><au>Dudman, Ally</au><au>Akers, Julie</au><au>Vernon, Veronica</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Battling professional self-sabotage: Embracing standard of care as the future of pharmacy regulation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Pharmacists Association</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)</addtitle><date>2023-11</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1685</spage><epage>1688.e1</epage><pages>1685-1688.e1</pages><issn>1544-3191</issn><eissn>1544-3450</eissn><abstract>Laws and regulations are intended to protect the public; however, overregulation of the profession can block initiatives focused on patient safety and public health. This article discusses the 3 main regulatory approaches to pharmacy practice: standard of care (SOC), bright line, and right touch. An SOC regulatory model supports practitioners delivering patient care within their scope of practice and clinical training. Patient safety is maintained by measuring care against other practitioners within the same practice setting while supporting practitioners practicing at the top of their clinical ability. Compared with bright line and right touch approaches, the SOC regulatory model provides the adaptability needed to respond to different practice scenarios and settings, thus increasing access to health care and opportunities for innovation. To have a lasting impact on the profession and support patients, all pharmacy professionals must be fluent in regulatory approaches and advocate for states to transition to SOC regulatory models.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>37619849</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.japh.2023.08.015</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5638-3851</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9530-618X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7690-7106</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3681-1721</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5766-5033</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6651-8945</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1544-3191 |
ispartof | Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, 2023-11, Vol.63 (6), p.1685-1688.e1 |
issn | 1544-3191 1544-3450 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2857840718 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Delivery of Health Care Humans Pharmaceutical Services Pharmacies Pharmacy Standard of Care |
title | Battling professional self-sabotage: Embracing standard of care as the future of pharmacy regulation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T13%3A37%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Battling%20professional%20self-sabotage:%20Embracing%20standard%20of%20care%20as%20the%20future%20of%20pharmacy%20regulation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Pharmacists%20Association&rft.au=Adams,%20Jennifer%20L.&rft.date=2023-11&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1685&rft.epage=1688.e1&rft.pages=1685-1688.e1&rft.issn=1544-3191&rft.eissn=1544-3450&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.japh.2023.08.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2857840718%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2857840718&rft_id=info:pmid/37619849&rft_els_id=S1544319123002662&rfr_iscdi=true |