Battling professional self-sabotage: Embracing standard of care as the future of pharmacy regulation

Laws and regulations are intended to protect the public; however, overregulation of the profession can block initiatives focused on patient safety and public health. This article discusses the 3 main regulatory approaches to pharmacy practice: standard of care (SOC), bright line, and right touch. An...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Pharmacists Association 2023-11, Vol.63 (6), p.1685-1688.e1
Hauptverfasser: Adams, Jennifer L., O’Connor, Shanna, Seignemartin, Brandy, Shipman, Allie Jo, McConnell, Wendy, Dudman, Ally, Akers, Julie, Vernon, Veronica
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1688.e1
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1685
container_title Journal of the American Pharmacists Association
container_volume 63
creator Adams, Jennifer L.
O’Connor, Shanna
Seignemartin, Brandy
Shipman, Allie Jo
McConnell, Wendy
Dudman, Ally
Akers, Julie
Vernon, Veronica
description Laws and regulations are intended to protect the public; however, overregulation of the profession can block initiatives focused on patient safety and public health. This article discusses the 3 main regulatory approaches to pharmacy practice: standard of care (SOC), bright line, and right touch. An SOC regulatory model supports practitioners delivering patient care within their scope of practice and clinical training. Patient safety is maintained by measuring care against other practitioners within the same practice setting while supporting practitioners practicing at the top of their clinical ability. Compared with bright line and right touch approaches, the SOC regulatory model provides the adaptability needed to respond to different practice scenarios and settings, thus increasing access to health care and opportunities for innovation. To have a lasting impact on the profession and support patients, all pharmacy professionals must be fluent in regulatory approaches and advocate for states to transition to SOC regulatory models.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.japh.2023.08.015
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2857840718</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1544319123002662</els_id><sourcerecordid>2857840718</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-2aae8faa70131c65b084446792977f2053b255a6b51a0fb09b2914e65b97f0de3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhi3UCijtH-ih8pFLgu3YsY16KYgWJKRe2rM1cca7WeVjsR0k_n29WuDY03zomVeah5CvnNWc8fZqV-9gv60FE03NTM24OiHnXElZNVKxD289t_yMfEppx5jQrTWn5KzRLbdG2nPS30DO4zBv6D4uAVMalhlGmnAMVYJuybDBa3o3dRH8gUoZ5h5iT5dAPUSkkGjeIg1rXstUtvstxAn8C424WUfIJfAz-RhgTPjltV6Qvz_v_tzeV4-_fz3c_nisfKPaXAkANAFAM95w36qOGSllq62wWgfBVNMJpaDtFAcWOmY7YbnEAlodWI_NBbk85pZfnlZM2U1D8jiOMOOyJieM0kYyzU1BxRH1cUkpYnD7OEwQXxxn7mDX7dzBrjvYdcy4YrccfXvNX7sJ-_eTN50F-H4EsHz5PGB0yQ84e-yHiD67fhn-l_8Ps_-Lwg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2857840718</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Battling professional self-sabotage: Embracing standard of care as the future of pharmacy regulation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Adams, Jennifer L. ; O’Connor, Shanna ; Seignemartin, Brandy ; Shipman, Allie Jo ; McConnell, Wendy ; Dudman, Ally ; Akers, Julie ; Vernon, Veronica</creator><creatorcontrib>Adams, Jennifer L. ; O’Connor, Shanna ; Seignemartin, Brandy ; Shipman, Allie Jo ; McConnell, Wendy ; Dudman, Ally ; Akers, Julie ; Vernon, Veronica</creatorcontrib><description>Laws and regulations are intended to protect the public; however, overregulation of the profession can block initiatives focused on patient safety and public health. This article discusses the 3 main regulatory approaches to pharmacy practice: standard of care (SOC), bright line, and right touch. An SOC regulatory model supports practitioners delivering patient care within their scope of practice and clinical training. Patient safety is maintained by measuring care against other practitioners within the same practice setting while supporting practitioners practicing at the top of their clinical ability. Compared with bright line and right touch approaches, the SOC regulatory model provides the adaptability needed to respond to different practice scenarios and settings, thus increasing access to health care and opportunities for innovation. To have a lasting impact on the profession and support patients, all pharmacy professionals must be fluent in regulatory approaches and advocate for states to transition to SOC regulatory models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1544-3191</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1544-3450</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2023.08.015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37619849</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Delivery of Health Care ; Humans ; Pharmaceutical Services ; Pharmacies ; Pharmacy ; Standard of Care</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, 2023-11, Vol.63 (6), p.1685-1688.e1</ispartof><rights>2023 American Pharmacists Association</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 American Pharmacists Association®. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-2aae8faa70131c65b084446792977f2053b255a6b51a0fb09b2914e65b97f0de3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-2aae8faa70131c65b084446792977f2053b255a6b51a0fb09b2914e65b97f0de3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5638-3851 ; 0009-0008-9530-618X ; 0000-0002-7690-7106 ; 0000-0003-3681-1721 ; 0000-0002-5766-5033 ; 0009-0003-6651-8945</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37619849$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adams, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Connor, Shanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seignemartin, Brandy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shipman, Allie Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McConnell, Wendy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dudman, Ally</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akers, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vernon, Veronica</creatorcontrib><title>Battling professional self-sabotage: Embracing standard of care as the future of pharmacy regulation</title><title>Journal of the American Pharmacists Association</title><addtitle>J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)</addtitle><description>Laws and regulations are intended to protect the public; however, overregulation of the profession can block initiatives focused on patient safety and public health. This article discusses the 3 main regulatory approaches to pharmacy practice: standard of care (SOC), bright line, and right touch. An SOC regulatory model supports practitioners delivering patient care within their scope of practice and clinical training. Patient safety is maintained by measuring care against other practitioners within the same practice setting while supporting practitioners practicing at the top of their clinical ability. Compared with bright line and right touch approaches, the SOC regulatory model provides the adaptability needed to respond to different practice scenarios and settings, thus increasing access to health care and opportunities for innovation. To have a lasting impact on the profession and support patients, all pharmacy professionals must be fluent in regulatory approaches and advocate for states to transition to SOC regulatory models.</description><subject>Delivery of Health Care</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Services</subject><subject>Pharmacies</subject><subject>Pharmacy</subject><subject>Standard of Care</subject><issn>1544-3191</issn><issn>1544-3450</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhi3UCijtH-ih8pFLgu3YsY16KYgWJKRe2rM1cca7WeVjsR0k_n29WuDY03zomVeah5CvnNWc8fZqV-9gv60FE03NTM24OiHnXElZNVKxD289t_yMfEppx5jQrTWn5KzRLbdG2nPS30DO4zBv6D4uAVMalhlGmnAMVYJuybDBa3o3dRH8gUoZ5h5iT5dAPUSkkGjeIg1rXstUtvstxAn8C424WUfIJfAz-RhgTPjltV6Qvz_v_tzeV4-_fz3c_nisfKPaXAkANAFAM95w36qOGSllq62wWgfBVNMJpaDtFAcWOmY7YbnEAlodWI_NBbk85pZfnlZM2U1D8jiOMOOyJieM0kYyzU1BxRH1cUkpYnD7OEwQXxxn7mDX7dzBrjvYdcy4YrccfXvNX7sJ-_eTN50F-H4EsHz5PGB0yQ84e-yHiD67fhn-l_8Ps_-Lwg</recordid><startdate>202311</startdate><enddate>202311</enddate><creator>Adams, Jennifer L.</creator><creator>O’Connor, Shanna</creator><creator>Seignemartin, Brandy</creator><creator>Shipman, Allie Jo</creator><creator>McConnell, Wendy</creator><creator>Dudman, Ally</creator><creator>Akers, Julie</creator><creator>Vernon, Veronica</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5638-3851</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9530-618X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7690-7106</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3681-1721</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5766-5033</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6651-8945</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202311</creationdate><title>Battling professional self-sabotage: Embracing standard of care as the future of pharmacy regulation</title><author>Adams, Jennifer L. ; O’Connor, Shanna ; Seignemartin, Brandy ; Shipman, Allie Jo ; McConnell, Wendy ; Dudman, Ally ; Akers, Julie ; Vernon, Veronica</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-2aae8faa70131c65b084446792977f2053b255a6b51a0fb09b2914e65b97f0de3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Delivery of Health Care</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Services</topic><topic>Pharmacies</topic><topic>Pharmacy</topic><topic>Standard of Care</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adams, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Connor, Shanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seignemartin, Brandy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shipman, Allie Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McConnell, Wendy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dudman, Ally</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akers, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vernon, Veronica</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Pharmacists Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adams, Jennifer L.</au><au>O’Connor, Shanna</au><au>Seignemartin, Brandy</au><au>Shipman, Allie Jo</au><au>McConnell, Wendy</au><au>Dudman, Ally</au><au>Akers, Julie</au><au>Vernon, Veronica</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Battling professional self-sabotage: Embracing standard of care as the future of pharmacy regulation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Pharmacists Association</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)</addtitle><date>2023-11</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1685</spage><epage>1688.e1</epage><pages>1685-1688.e1</pages><issn>1544-3191</issn><eissn>1544-3450</eissn><abstract>Laws and regulations are intended to protect the public; however, overregulation of the profession can block initiatives focused on patient safety and public health. This article discusses the 3 main regulatory approaches to pharmacy practice: standard of care (SOC), bright line, and right touch. An SOC regulatory model supports practitioners delivering patient care within their scope of practice and clinical training. Patient safety is maintained by measuring care against other practitioners within the same practice setting while supporting practitioners practicing at the top of their clinical ability. Compared with bright line and right touch approaches, the SOC regulatory model provides the adaptability needed to respond to different practice scenarios and settings, thus increasing access to health care and opportunities for innovation. To have a lasting impact on the profession and support patients, all pharmacy professionals must be fluent in regulatory approaches and advocate for states to transition to SOC regulatory models.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>37619849</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.japh.2023.08.015</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5638-3851</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9530-618X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7690-7106</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3681-1721</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5766-5033</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6651-8945</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1544-3191
ispartof Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, 2023-11, Vol.63 (6), p.1685-1688.e1
issn 1544-3191
1544-3450
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2857840718
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Delivery of Health Care
Humans
Pharmaceutical Services
Pharmacies
Pharmacy
Standard of Care
title Battling professional self-sabotage: Embracing standard of care as the future of pharmacy regulation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T13%3A37%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Battling%20professional%20self-sabotage:%20Embracing%20standard%20of%20care%20as%20the%20future%20of%20pharmacy%20regulation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Pharmacists%20Association&rft.au=Adams,%20Jennifer%20L.&rft.date=2023-11&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1685&rft.epage=1688.e1&rft.pages=1685-1688.e1&rft.issn=1544-3191&rft.eissn=1544-3450&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.japh.2023.08.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2857840718%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2857840718&rft_id=info:pmid/37619849&rft_els_id=S1544319123002662&rfr_iscdi=true